Abstract
It is necessary to practice efficient irrigation in any agricultural development strategy under the context of climate change and competition from other economic sectors. Irrigation based on the relationship between photosynthetic activity and change of soil moisture could be an effective practice. Herein, we investigated the response of sugarcane photosynthetic parameters on drought stress at yield formation stage. The experiment was carried out by withholding water for 3 weeks from 190 days after transplanting and then re-watering until the end of experimental period. Data were collected for photosynthetic parameters including potential photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance, transpiration rate, internal CO2 concentration, SPAD, and soil physical parameters. The results showed that sugarcane photosynthetic parameters decreased with decreasing soil moisture content to certain extent and the stayed static before dropping off again. Internal CO2 concentration increased when soil moisture reached the most severe, and it caused a standstill in photosynthesis. However, photosynthesis also recovered with soil moisture recovery. Photosynthetic parameters could be used as indicators to evaluate drought stress’s effect as well as to determine the time to re-irrigate to maintain normal growth of the plants. Soil volume moisture content of 15% (recorded by the 5TE sensor) or at pF of 2.8 (recorded by the MPS-6 sensor) seems to be the initial time to start irrigation to keep standard growth. Soil moistures at 10% and 3.8 pF, respectively, could be the critical points beyond which irrigation was found to result in photosynthetic disorders.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- DAR:
-
Days after re-irrigation
- DDP:
-
Days of drought period
- VWC:
-
Volume water content
- A :
-
Potential photosynthetic rate
- C i :
-
Internal CO2 concentration
- E :
-
Transpiration rate
- g s :
-
Stomatal conductance
References
Allison, J.C.S., H.T. Williams, and N.W. Pammenter. 1997. Effect of specific leaf nitrogen content on photosynthesis of sugarcane. Annals of Applied Biology 131: 339–350.
Bahrani, M.J., M. Shomeili, S.H. Zande-Parsa, and A. Kamgar-Haghighi. 2009. Sugarcane responses to irrigation and nitrogen in subtropical Iran. Iran Agricultural Research 27(1–2) & 28(1): 17–26.
Barbosa, A.M., K.A. Guidorizi, T.A. Catuchi, T.A. Marques, R.V. Ribeiro, and G.M. Souza. 2015. Biomass and bioenergy partitioning of sugarcane plants under water deficit. Acta Physiologiae Plantarum 37: 142. https://doi.org/10.1007/211738-015-1887-7.
Basnayake, J., P.A. Jackson, N.G. Inman-Bamber, and P. Lakshmanan. 2012. Sugarcane for water-limited environments. Genetic variation in cane yield and sugar content in response to water stress. Journal of Experimental Botany 63: 6023–6033. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers251.
Boyer, J.S., and Y. Kawamitsu. 2011. Photosynthesis gas exchange system with internal CO2 directly measured. Environment Control Biology 49: 193–207.
Boyer, J.S., S.C. Wong, and G.D. Farquhar. 1997. CO2 and water vapour exchange across leaf cuticle (epidermis) at various water potentials. Plant Physiology 114: 185–191.
Caemmerer, S.V., and G.D. Farquhar. 1981. Some relationships between the biochemistry of photosynthesis and the gas exchange of leaves. Planta 153: 376–387.
Davidson, J.M. 1989. Principles of water and nutrient movement in soil. http://irrec.ifas.ufl.edu/flcitrus/pdfs/short_course_and_workshop/second_international_citrus/Davidson-Principles_of_Water_and_Nutrient_Movement.pdf. Accessed 17 Apr 2018.
Dinh, T.H., H. Takaragawa, and Y. Kawamitsu. 2018. Nitrogen use efficiency and drought tolerant ability of various sugarcane varieties under drought stress at early growth stage. Plant Production Science 22: 250–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2018.1540277.
Dinh, T.H., K. Watanabe, H. Takaragawa, and Y. Kawamitsu. 2017a. Effects of drought stress at early growth stage on response of sugarcane to different nitrogen application. Sugar Tech 20: 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0566-y.
Dinh, T.H., K. Watanabe, H. Takaragawa, M. Nakabaru, and Y. Kawamitsu. 2017b. Photosynthetic response and nitrogen use efficiency of sugarcane under drought stress conditions with different nitrogen application levels. Plant Production Science 20: 412–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/1343943X.2017.1371570.
Du, Y.C., Y. Kawamitsu, A. Nose, S. Hiyane, S. Murayama, K. Wasano, and Y. Uchida. 1996. Effect of water stress on carbon exchange rate and activities of photosynthetic enzymes in leaves of sugarcane (Saccharum sp.). Australian Journal of Plant Physiology 23: 719–726.
FAO-Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Chapter 2: Crop water needs. http://www.fao.org/docrep/s2022e/s2022e02.htm.
Ferreira, T.H.S., M.S. Tsunada, D. Bassi, P. Araújo, L. Mattiello, G.V. Guidelli, G.L. Righetto, V.R. Gonçalvesm, P. Lakshmanan, and M. Menossi. 2017. Sugarcane water stress tolerance mechanisms and its implications on developing biotechnology solutions. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01077.
Ghannoum, O. 2009. C4 photosynthesis and water stress. Annals of Botany 103: 635–644. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn093.
Global Agriculture. Agriculture at a Crossroads. Findings and recommendations for future farming. https://www.globalagriculture.org/report-topics/water.html.
Graça, J.P.D., F.A. Rodrigues, J.R.B. Farias, M.C.N.D. Oliveira, C.B. Hoffmann-Campo, and S.M. Zingaretti. 2010. Physiological parameters in sugarcane cultivars submitted to water deficit. Brazilian Society of Plant Physiology 22: 189–197.
Ibrahim, H.S. 1978. Effects of irrigation sugarcane at different soil moisture deficits in the Sudan. Experimental Agriculture 14: 151–156. http://cambridge.org/core/journals/experimental-agriculture/article/effects-of-irrigating-sugarcane-at-different-soil-moisture-deficits-in-the-sudan/8B8A2BA95F682114EA28A561125B31D1. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Ibrahim, H.S. 2006. Determination of irrigation interval for sugarcane by monitoring changes in soil moisture in the field at the Guneid Scheme. http://agris.fao.org/agrissearch/search.do?recordID=SD2006000030. Accessed 3 May 2018.
Inman-Bamber, N.G. 2004. Sugarcane water stress criteria for irrigation and drying off. Field Crops Research 89: 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.01.018.
Inman-Bamber, N.G., and D. Smith. 2005. Water relations in sugarcane and response to water deficits. Field Crops Research 92: 185–202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.023.
Koonjah, S.S., S. Walker, A. Singel, R.V. Antwerpen, and R. Nayamuth. 2006. A quantitative study of water stress effect on sugarcane photosynthesis. Proceeding of South African Sugar Technologists’ Association 80: 140–158.
Kramer, P.J., and J.S. Boyer. 1995. Water relations of plants and soils. Orlando: Academic Press.
Parry, M.A.J., P.J. Andralojc, S. Khan, P.J. Lea, and A.J. Keys. 2002. Rubisco activity: Effects of drought stress. Annals of Botany 89: 833–839.
Pedrozo, C.A., J. Jifon, M.H.P. Barbosa, J.A.D. Silva, J. Park, and N.S. Gracia. 2015. Differential morphological, physiological, and molecular responses to water deficit stress in sugarcane. Journal of Plant Breeding and Crop Science 7: 226–232. https://doi.org/10.5897/JPBCS2015.0500.
Prieto, I., C. Armas, and F.I. Pugnaire. 2011. Water release through plant roots: New insights into its consequences at the plant and ecosystem level. New Phytologist 193: 830–841.
Radha, J., A. Chandara, K.V. Visha, and S. Solomon. 2015. Physiological changes and expression of SOD and P5CS genes in response to water deficit in sugarcane. Sugar Tech 17: 276–282.
Richards, J.H., and M.M. Caldwell. 1987. Hydraulic lift: Substantial nocturnal water transport between soil layers by Artemisia tridentata roots. Oecologia 73: 486–489.
Rodrigues, F.A., M.L.D. Laia, and S.M. Zingaretti. 2009. Analysis of gene expression profiles under water stress in tolerant and sensitive sugarcane plants. Plant Science 176: 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.11.007.
Singh, P.N., and S.C. Mohan. 1994. Water use and yield response of sugarcane under different irrigation schedules and nitrogen levels in a subtropical region. Agricultural Water Management 26: 253–264.
Tominaga, J., and Y. Kawamitsu. 2015. Cuticle affects calculations of internal CO2 in leaves closing their stomata. Plant and Cell Physiology 56: 1900–1908. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcv109.
Wiedenfeld, B., and J. Enciso. 2008. Sugarcane responses to irrigation and nitrogen in semiarid South Texas. Agronomy Journal 100: 665–671.
Zhao, D., G. Barry, and J.C. Comstock. 2013. Sugarcane leaf photosynthesis and growth characters during development of water deficit stress. Crop Science 52: 1066–1075. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2012.09.0554.
Zingaretti, S.M., F.A. Rodrigues, J.P.D. Graça, L.D.M. Pereira, and M.V. Lourenço. 2012. Sugarcane responses at water deficit conditions. In Water stress, ed. P.M.M. Rahman. Shanghai: InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/30986.
Zotarelli, L., M.D. Dukes, C.C. Romero, K.W. Migliaccio, and K.T. Morgan. 2015. Step by step calculation of the Penman–Monteith evapotranspiration (FAO-56 method). UF/IFAS extension. The University of Florida. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pdffiles/ae/ae45900.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2016.
Zuurbier, P., and J.V.D. Vooren. 2008. Introduction to sugarcane ethanol contributions to climate change mitigation and the environment. In Sugarcane ethanol. Contributions to climate change mitigation and the environment, ed. P. Zubbier and J.V.D. Vooren, 19–27. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dinh, T.H., Takaragawa, H., Watanabe, K. et al. Leaf Photosynthesis Response to Change of Soil Moisture Content in Sugarcane. Sugar Tech 21, 949–958 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00735-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-019-00735-8