Abstract
The aim of this study is to investigate physiological responses and root characteristics of four sugarcane genotypes under drought stress and recovery conditions. The experiment was conducted in rhizoboxes under greenhouse conditions from February to May of 2019. A factorial experiment in completely randomized design with two replications was employed. Factor A contained three water regimes (full irrigation, drought, and recovery) and factor B consisted of the four sugarcane genotypes; Biotec 1, PR3067, UT6, and UT12. Data were recorded on physiological parameters, root characteristics and biomass yield. Early-drought led to a reduction in the relative water content (RWC), SPAD chlorophyll meter reading (SCMR), chlorophyll fluorescence (Fv/Fm), stomatal conductance (gs), transpiration rate (E), net photosynthetic rate (Pn), root length (RL), root surface area (RSA), root diameter (RD), root volume (RV), and biomass. Conversely, water use efficiency (WUE) increased. Biotec 1 showed low reductions on Fv/Fm, SCMR, Pn, gs and E whereas PR3067 and UT 12 showed high reductions for all traits. After rewatering, four parameters (SCMR, Fv/Fm, Pn, and WUE) illustrated how the sugarcane genotypes recovered from drought. We concluded that the ability of sugarcane to recover from drought was genotype dependent. Genotype Biotec 1 and UT 6 had the best drought recovery among the other sugarcane genotypes in each parameter and recover to levels equal to that of full recovery. Genotype Biotec 1 showed good recovery for SCMR, Fv/Fm and RL but Pn and WUE cannot reach to the full irrigation. Interestingly, UT 6 displayed good recovery for SCMR, Fv/Fm, Pn, RL and WUE. Additionally, the Biotec 1 and UT 6 genotypes demonstrated a high recovery efficiency for biomass by 85% and 79%, respectively. Despite rewatering, genotypes PR3067 and UT 12 produced low recovery efficiency at 56% and 49%, respectively. Our study proposes Biotec 1 and UT 6 as drought-tolerant genotypes capable of maintaining satisfactory photosynthetic rates, as well as suitable root systems, leading to high biomass after recovery. Furthermore, breeders can utilize this genotype as a parent in sugarcane breeding for drought resistance, and photosynthetic and root traits could be used as selection criteria for enhancing sugarcane drought resistance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertolino, L.T., R.S. Caine, and J.E. Gray. 2019. Impact of stomatal density and morphology on water-use efficiency in a changing world. Frontiers in Plant Science 10: 225. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.00225.
Chumphu, S., N. Jongrungklang, and P. Songsri. 2019. Association of physiological responses and root distribution patterns of ratooning ability and yield of the second ratoon cane in sugarcane elite clones. Agronomy 9 (4): 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy9040200.
Comas, L.H., S.R. Becker, V.V. Cruz, P.F. Byrne, and D.A. Dierig. 2013. Root traits contributing to plant productivity under drought. Frontiers in Plant Science 4: 442. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00442.
Department of Agriculture (Thailand). 2022. Sugarcane breeding manual. https://www.doa.go.th/fcri/wp-content/uploads/2022/smart-box/sugar-cane2565.pdf. Accessed 18 April 2023.
Devi, K., R. Gomathi, R.A. Kumar, R. Manimekalai, and A. Selvi. 2018. Field tolerance and recovery potential of sugarcane varieties subjected to drought. Indian Journal of Plant Physiology 23 (2): 271–282. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0367-7.
Dinh, H.T., K. Watanable, H. Takaragaw, and Y. Kawamitsu. 2017. Effects of drought stress at early growth stage on response of sugarcane to different nitrogen application. Sugar Tech 20: 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0566-y.
Fang, Y., Y. Du, J. Wang, A. Wu, S. Qiao, B. Xu, S. Zhang, K.H.M. Siddique, Y. Chen, and Y. 2017. Moderate drought stress affected root growth and grain yield in old, modern and newly released cultivars of winter wheat. Frontiers in Plant Science 8: 672–680. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00672.
Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). 2022. Available online: http://www.fao.org (accessed on 18 May 2022).
Gano, B., J.S.B. Dembele, A. Ndour, D. Luquet, G. Beurier, D. Diouf, and A. Audebert. 2021. Using UAV borne, multi-spectral imaging for the field phenotyping of shoot biomass, leaf area index and height of West African sorghum varieties under two contrasted water conditions. Agronomy 11 (5): 850. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11050850.
Graça, J.P., F.A. Rodrigues, J.R.B. Farias, M.C.N. Oliveira, C.B. Hoffmann-Campo, and S.M. Zingaretti. 2010. Physiological parameters in sugarcane cultivars submitted to water deficit. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 22 (3): 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202010000300006.
Hamedani, N.G., M. Gholamhoseini, F. Bazrafshan, B. Amiri, and F. Habibzadeh. 2020. Variability of root traits in sesame genotypes under different irrigation regimes. Rhizosphere 13: 100190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2020.100190.
Jangpromma, N., S. Thammasirirak, P. Jaisil, and P. Songsri. 2012. Effects of drought and recovery from drought stress on above ground and root growth, and water use efficiency in sugarcane Saccharum officinarum L. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6 (8): 1298–1304.
Khonghintaisong, J., P. Songsri, B. Toomsan, and J. Jongrungklang. 2018. Rooting and physiological trait responses to early drought stress of sugarcane cultivars. Sugar Tech 20: 396–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-017-0564-0.
Khonghintaisong, J., P. Songsri, and N. Jongrungklang. 2020. Root characteristics of individual tillers and the relationships with above-ground growth and dry matter accumulation in sugarcane. Pakistan Journal of Botany 52: 101–109.
Laclau, P.B., and J.P. Laclau. 2009. Growth of the whole root system for a plant crop of sugarcane under rainfed and irrigated environments in Brazil. Field Crops Research 114 (3): 351–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.004.
Lavinsky, A.O., P.C. Magalhães, M.M. Diniz, C.C. Gomes-Jr, E.M. Castro, and R. Ávila. 2016. Root system traits and its relationship with photosynthesis and productivity in four maize genotypes under drought. Cereal Research Communications 44 (1): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1556/0806.43.2015.029.
Lawlor, D.W., and W. Tezara. 2009. Causes of decreased photosynthetic rate and metabolic capacity in water-deficient leaf cells: A critical evaluation of mechanisms and integration of processes. Annals of Botany 103 (4): 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcn244.
Lawson, T., and S. Vialet-Chabrand. 2019. Speedy stomata, photosynthesis and plant water use efficiency. New Phytologist 221: 93–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.15330.
Leanasawat, N., M. Kosittrakun, W. Lontom, and P. Songsri. 2022. Physiological and agronomic traits of certain sugarcane genotypes grown under field conditions as influenced by early drought stress. Agronomy 11 (11): 2319. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy11112319.
Li, Y., H. Li, Y. Li, and S. Zhang. 2017. Improving water-use efficiency by decreasing stomatal conductance and transpiration rate to maintain higher ear photosynthetic rate in drought resistant wheat. The Crop Journal 5: 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2017.01.001.
Marcos, F.C., N.M. Silveira, P.E. Marchiori, E.C. Machado, G.M. Souza, M.G.A. Landell, and R.V. Ribeiro. 2018. Drought tolerance of sugarcane propagules is improved when origin material faces water deficit. PLoS ONE 13 (12): e0206716. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206716.
Maxwell, K., and G.N. Johnson. 2000. Chlorophyll fluorescence-a practical guide. Journal of Experimental Botany 51 (345): 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/51.345.659.
Namwongsa, J., N. Jongrungklang, and P. Songsri. 2019. Genotypic variation in root distribution changes and physiological responses of sugarcane induced by drought stress. SABRAO Journal of Breeding and Genetics 51: 470–493. https://doi.org/10.1101/503912.
Nawae, W., J.R. Shearman, S. Tangphatsornruang, P. Punpee, T. Yoocha, D. Sangsrakru, C. Naktang, C. Sonthirod, W. Wirojsirasak, K. Ukoskit, K. Sriroth, P. Klomsa-ard, and W. Pootakham. 2020. Differential expression between drought-tolerant and drought-sensitive sugarcane under mild and moderate water stress as revealed by a comparative analysis of leaf transcriptome. Peer, J 8: e9608. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9608.
Office of the cane and sugar board, (OCSB). 2022. Available online: http://www.ocsb.go.th/ (accessed on 18 May 2022).
Ohashi, A.Y.P., R.C.D.M. Pires, R.V. Ribeiro, and A.L.B.D.O. Silva. 2015. Root growth and distribution in sugarcane cultivars fertigated by a subsurface drip system. Bragantia 74: 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1590/1678-4499.0295.
Paz, H., F. Pineda-García, and L.F. Pinzón-Pérez. 2015. Root depth and morphology in response to soil drought: comparing ecological groups along the secondary succession in a tropical dry forest. Oecologia 179: 551–561. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-015-3359-6.
Pimentel, P., R.D. Almada, A. Salvatierra, G. Toro, M.J. Arismendi, M.T. Pino, B. Sagredoa, and M. Pinto. 2014. Physiological and morphological responses of Prunus species with different degree of tolerance to long-term root hypoxia. Scientia Horticulturae 180: 14–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.09.055.
Pirasteh‐Anosheh, H., A. Saed‐Moucheshi, H. Pakniyat, and M. Pessarakli. (2016). Stomatal responses to drought stress, In Water Stress and Crop Plants: A Sustainable Approach, 1st ed; Ahmad, P., Ed; John Wiley & Sons, New Jersey USA 3: 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119054450.ch3.
Pirnajmedin, F., M.M. Majidi, and M. Gheysari. 2015. Root and physiological characteristics associated with drought tolerance in Iranian tall fescue. Euphytica 202: 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-014-1239-5.
Puangbut, D., S. Jogloy, N. Vorasoot, and K. Craig. 2018. Root distribution pattern and their contribution in photosynthesis and biomass in Jerusalem artichoke under drought conditions. Pakistan Journal of Botany 50: 879–886.
Puangbut, D., S. Jogloy, N. Vorasoot, and P. Songsri. 2022. Photosynthetic and physiological responses to drought of Jerusalem artichoke genotypes differing in drought resistance. Agricultural Water Management 259: 107252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107252.
Robertson, M.J., N.G. Inman-Bamber, R.C. Muchow, and A.W. Wood. 1999. Physiology and productivity of sugarcane with early and mid-season water deficit. Field Crops Research 64: 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(99)00042-8.
Set-Tow, S., P. Songsri, and N. Jongrungklang. 2020. Variations in root distribution patterns and cane yield of 16 elite sugarcane clones grown under varied soil conditions. Sugar Tech 22 (6): 1018–1031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-020-00834-x.
Silva, M.A., J.L. Jifon, J.A.G.D. Silva, and V. Sharma. 2007. Use of physiological parameters as fast tools to screen for drought tolerance in sugarcane. Brazilian Journal of Plant Physiology 19 (3): 193–201. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-04202007000300003.
Silva, M.D.A., J.A.G.D. Silva, J. Enciso, V. Sharma, and J. Jifon. 2008. Yield components as indicators of drought tolerance of sugarcane. Scientia Agricola 65: 620–627. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0103-90162008000600008.
Silva, M.D.A., J.L. Jifon, V. Sharma, J.A.G.D. Silva, M.M. Caputo, M.B. Damaj, E.R. Guimarães, and M.I.T. Ferro. 2011. Use of physiological parameters in screening drought tolerance in sugarcane genotypes. Sugar Tech 13 (3): 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-011-0087-z.
Silva, M.A., J.L. Jifon, C.M. Santos, C.J. Jadoski, and J.A.G.D. Silva. 2013. Photosynthetic capacity and water use efficiency in sugarcane genotypes subject to water deficit during early growth phase. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology 56 (5): 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-89132013000500004.
Singh, S.P., M. Jawaid, M. Chandrasekar, K. Senthilkumar, B. Yadav, N. Saba, and S. Siengchin. 2021. Sugarcane wastes into commercial products: Processing methods production optimization and challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 328: 129453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129453.
Souza, A.P., A. Grandis, D.C.C. Leite, and M.S. Buckeridge. 2014. Sugarcane as a bioenergy source: History performance and perspectives for second-generation bioethanol. BioEnergy Research 7 (1): 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-013-9366-8.
Thangthong, N., S. Jogloy, N. Jongrungklang, C.K. Kvien, V. Pensuk, T. Kesmala, and N. Vorasoot. 2017. Root distribution patterns of peanut genotypes with different drought resistance levels under early-season drought stress. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 204: 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12249.
Verma, K.K., X. Song, Y. Zeng, D. Li, D. Guo, V.D. Rajput, G. Chen, A. Barakhov, T.M. Minkina, and Y. Li. 2020. Characteristics of leaf stomata and their relationship with photosynthesis in Saccharum officinarum under drought and silicon application. ACS Omega 5 (37): 24145–24153. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c03820.
Vilela, R.D., B.K.L. Bezerra, A. Froehlich, and L. Endres. 2017. Antioxidant system is essential to increase drought tolerance of sugarcane. Annals of Applied Biology 171: 451–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12387.
Wu, G., H. Liu, L. Hua, Q. Luo, Y. Lin, P. He, S. Feng, J. Liu, and Q. Ye. 2018. Differential responses of stomata and photosynthesis to elevated temperature in two co-occurring subtropical forest tree species. Frontiers in Plant Science 9: 467. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00467.
Xu, Z., and G. Zhou. 2008. Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. Journal of Experimental Botany 59 (12): 3317–3325. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern185.
Yordanov, I., V. Velikova, and T. Tsonev. 2000. Plant responses to drought acclimation and stress tolerance. Photosynthetica 38 (2): 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007201411474.
Zhang, Z., H. Ding, T. Kang, L. Daia, D. Cia, F. Qina, and W. Song. 2017. Rooting traits of peanut genotypes differing in drought tolerance under drought stress. International Journal of Plant Production 5: 349–360.
Zhou, L., S. Wang, Y. Chi, Q. Li, K. Huang, and Q. Yu. 2015. Responses of photosynthetic parameters to drought in subtropical forest ecosystem of China. Scientific Reports 5 (1): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18254.
Acknowledgements
This research was fund by the Northeast Thailand Cane and Sugar Research Center (NECS), Faculty of Agriculture, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, P.S., D.P. and N.J.; performed the analyses and collected the data, P.C.; writing original draft preparation, P.C. and D.P.; writing review and editing, P.S. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design of the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Chanaphai, P., Jongrungklang, N., Puangbut, D. et al. Response of Photosynthetic and Root Traits of Sugarcane Genotypes Under Drought and Recovery Conditions. Sugar Tech 25, 1102–1114 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-023-01288-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12355-023-01288-7