Abstract
Jan. Evangelista Purkyně, the most famous among Czech physiologists, was the first who identified and described the largest nerve cells in the cerebellum. The most distinguished researchers of the nervous system then recommended naming these neurons Purkinje cells in his honor. Through experiments by Purkinje and his followers, the function of the cerebellum was properly attributed to the precision of motor movements and skills. This traditional concept was valid until early 1990s, when it was readjusted and replenished with new and important findings. It was discovered that the cerebellar cortex contains more neurons than the cerebral cortex and shortly thereafter was gradually revealed that such enormous numbers of neural cells are not without impact on brain functions. It was shown that the cerebellum, in addition to its traditional role, also participates in higher nervous activity. These new findings were obtained thanks to the introduction of modern methods of examination into the clinical praxis, and experimental procedures using animal models of cerebellar disorders described in this work.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Druga R. Purkinje cells of the cerebellum. In: Trávníčková E. editor. Jan Evangelista Purkyně, life and work. Prague: Avicenum; 1986. p. 255–61 (in Czech).
y Cajal SR. Histologie du systéme nerveux de l’homme et des vertébrés. Paris, T. II. Ed. A Maloine, 1911. p. 1–993.
Friede RL. The relationship of body size, nerve cell size, axon length, and glial density in the cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1963;49:187–93.
Eccles JC, Ito M, Szenthagothai J. The cerebellum as a neuronal machine. Berlin, Germany: Springer; 1967.
Szentagothai J. Structure-functional considerations of the cerebellar neuron network. Proc IEEE. 1968;56:6960–8.
Ito M. Neurophysiological basis of the cerebellar motor control system. Int J Neurol. 1970;7:162–76.
Ito M. Neural design of the cerebellar motor system. Brain Res. 1972;40:81–4.
Ito M. The cerebellum and neural control. New York, 1984.
Palay SL, Chan-Palay V. Cerebellar cortex: cytology and organization. Springer, 1974.
Glickstein M. The cerebellum and motor learning. Cur Opin Neurobiol. 1992;2:802–6.
Schmahmann JD. From movement to thought: anatomic substrates of the cerebellar contribution to cognitive processing. Hum Brain Mapp. 1996;4:174–98.
Schmahmann JD, Pandya DN. The cerebellar system. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:31–60.
Middleton FA, Strik PL. Cerebellar projections to the prefrontal cortex of the primate. J Neurosci. 2001;21:700–12.
Ito M. Cerebellar circuitry as a neuronal machine. Progress Neurobiol. 2006;78:272–303.
Haines DE, Dietrichs E, Mihailoff GA, McDonald EF. The cerebellar-hypothalamic axis: basic circuits and clinical observations. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:83–107.
Onat F, Cavdar S. Cerebellar connections: hypothalamus. Cerebellum. 2003;2:263–9.
Manto M, Lorivel T. Cognitive repercussions of hereditary cerebellar disorders. Cortex. 2011;47:81–100.
Buckner RL. The cerebellum and cognitive function: 25 years of insight from anatomy and neuroimaging. Neuron. 2013;80:807–15.
Andersen BB, Korbo L, Pakkenberg B. A quantitative study of the human cerebellum with unbiased stereological techniques. J Comp Neurol. 1992;326:549–60.
Herculano-Houzel S, Mota B, Lent R. Cellular scaling rules for rodent brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006;103:12138–43.
Herculano-Houzel S, Collins CE, Wong P, Kaas JH. Cellular scaling rules for primate brains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:3562–7.
Azevedo F, Carvalho L, Grinberg L, Farfel JR, Ferretti R, Leite R, Jacob Filho W, Lent R, Herculano-Houzel S. Equal numbers of neuronal and non-neuronal cells make the human brain a scaled-up primate brain. J Comp Neurol. 2009;513:532–41.
Sarko DK, Catania KC, Leitch DB, Kaas JH, Herculano-Houzel S. Cellular scaling rules of insectivore brains. Front Neuroanat. 2009;3:3–12.
Herculano-Houzel S. Coordinated scaling of cortical and cerebellar numbers of neurons. Front Neuroanat. 2010;4:1–8.
Zhu JN, Wang JJ. The cerebellum in feeding control: possible function and mechanism. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008;28:469–78.
Mordel J, Karnas D, Pévet P, Isope P, Challet E, Meissl H. The output signal of Purkinje cells of the cerebellum and circadian rhythmicity. PLoS One. 2013;8:e58457. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0058457. Epub 2013 Mar 7
Schutter DJL. Human cerebellum in motivation and emotion. In: Manto M, DL G, JD S, Koibuchi N, Rossi F, editors. Handbook of the cerebellum and cerebellar disorders. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2013. p. 1499–52.
van Dun K, De Witte E, Van Daele W, Van Hecke W, Manto M, Mariën P. Atypical cerebral and cerebellar language organisation: a case study. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2015;2:18.
Kandel ER, Schwartz JH, Jessel TM. Principles of neural science. 4th ed. New York: McGraw-Hi; 2000.
Manto M. Mechanisms of human cerebellar dysmetria: experimental evidence and current conceptual bases. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009;6:10. doi:10.1186/1743-0003-6-10.
Manto M, Marmolino D. Cerebellar ataxias. Curr Opin Neurol. 2009;22(4):419–29.
Bodranghien F, Bastian A, Casali C, Hallett M, Louis ED, Manto M, Mariën P, Nowak DA, Schmahmann JD, Serrao M, Steiner KM, Strupp M, Tilikete C, Timmann D, van Dun K. Consensus paper: revisiting the symptoms and signs of cerebellar syndrome. Cerebellum. 2016;15:369–91.
Schmahmann JD, Sherman JC. Cerebellar cognitive affective syndrome. Int Rev Neurobiol. 1997;41:433–40.
Andreasen NC, Pierson R. The role of the cerebellum in schizophrenia. Biol Psychiatry. 2008;64:81–8.
Fatemi SH, Aldinger KA, Ashwood P, Bauman L, Blaha CD, Blatt GJ. Consensus paper: pathological role of the cerebellum in autism. Cerebellum. 2012;11:777–807.
Záhlava J. The cerebellum. In: Mysliveček J. editor. Pathological Physiology of the nervous system. Charles University Prague 1994; 150–55. (in Czech).
Kishore A, Meunier S, Popa T. Cerebellar influence on motor cortex plasticity: behavioral implications for Parkinson’s disease. Front Neurol. 2014;5:1–8.
Kim SG, Ugurbil K, Strick PL. Activation of a cerebellar output nucleus during cognitive processing. Science. 1994;265:949–51.
Van Mier HI, Tempel LW, Pertmutter JS, et al. Changes in brain activity during motor learning measured with PET: effects of hand of performance and practice. J Neurophysiol. 1998;80:2177–99.
Van Mier HI, Petersen SE. Role of the cerebellum in motor cognition. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002;978:334–53.
Sharma P, Mazumdar B, Chatterjee P. Cerebellar hypermetabolism on 18F-FDG PET/CT with normal MRI in a case of paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration with negative antibodies. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol. 2015;34:79–80.
Akita K, Arai S. The ataxic Syrian hamster: an animal model homologous to the pcd mutant mouse? Cerebellum. 2009;8:202–10.
Manto M, Marmolino D. Animal models of human cerebellar ataxias: a cornerstone for the therapies of the twenty-first century. Cerebellum. 2009;8:137–54.
Ebner TJ, Chen G. Tottering mouse. In: Manto M, DL G, JD S, Koibuchi N, Rossi F, editors. Handbook of the cerebellum and cerebellar disorders. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2013. p. 1521–40.
Bickford P. Motor learning deficits in aged rats are correlated with loss of cerebellar noradrenergic function. Brain Res. 1993;620:133–8.
Lalonde R, Joyal CC, Coté C, Botez MI. Simultaneous visual discrimination learning in Lurcher mutant mice. Brain Res. 1993;618:19–23.
Lalonde R, Joyal CC, Guastavino JM, Botez MI. Hole poking and motor coordination in Lurcher mutant mice. Physiol Behav. 1993;54:41–4.
Lalonde R, Filali M, Bensoula AN, Lestienne F. Sensorimotor learning in three cerebellar mutant mice. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 1996;65:113–20.
Cendelín J, Korelusová I, Vožeh F. The effect of repeated rotarod training on motor skills and spatial learning ability in Lurcher mutant mice. Behav Brain Res. 2008;189:65–74.
Hilber P, Caston J. Motor skills and motor learning in Lurcher mutant mice during aging. Neuroscience. 2001;102:615–23.
Křížková A, Vožeh F. Development of early motor learning and topical motor skills in a model of cerebellar degeneration. Behav Brain Res. 2004;150:65–72.
Thullier F, Lalonde R, Cousin X. Neurobehavioral evaluation of lurcher mutant mice during ontogeny. Dev Brain Res. 1997;100:22–8.
Vožeh F, Caddy KWT, Mysliveček J, et al. Some characteristics of early learning in cerebellar degeneration model. Studia Psychol. 1997;39:279–81.
Vožeh F, Cendelín J, Motáňová A. The development of different types of learning in cerebellar degeneration model. Homestasis. 1999;39:248–50.
Vožeh F, Cendelín J, Štenglová V. The development of spatial learning in a model of olivocerebellar degeneration. Homestasis. 2001;41:64–6.
Cendelín J, Vožeh F. Lurcher mouse. In: Manto M, DL G, JD S, Koibuchi N, Rossi F, editors. Handbook of the cerebellum and cerebellar disorders. New York: Springer Science + Business Media; 2013. p. 1499–520.
Purkartová Z, Vožeh F. Cerebellar degeneration in Lurcher mice under confocal laser scanning microscope. Microsc Res Tech. 2013;76:545–51.
Cendelín J. From mice to men: lessons from mutant ataxic mice. Cerebellum Ataxias. 2014;1:1–21.
Koeppen AH. The pathogenesis of spinocerebellar ataxia. Cerebellum. 2005;4:62–73.
Yamada M, Sato T, Tsuji S, et al. CAG repeat disorder models and human neuropathology: similarities and differences. Acta Neuropathol. 2008;115:71–86.
Fan HC, Ho LI, Chi CS, Chen SJ, Peng GS, Chan TM, Lin SZ, Harn HJ. Polyglutamine (PolyQ) diseases: genetics to treatments. Cell Transplant. 2014;23:441–58.
Acknowledgments
The preparation of this article was supported by the Charles University Research Fund (project number P36), the Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen and by the National Sustainability Program I (NPU I) Nr. LO1503 provided by the Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vožeh, F. Cerebellum—from J. E. Purkyně up to Contemporary Research. Cerebellum 16, 691–694 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-016-0835-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12311-016-0835-4