Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Shear and drape behavior of non-crimp fabrics based on stitching geometry

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-crimp fabrics (NCFs) enable relatively high mechanical properties by keeping the reinforcement tows straight. Handling of those fabrics is improved by stitching the reinforcement tows together. While the stitching has little structural influence on the final part, it highly affects the NCFs capability to shear and drape over a mold during preforming. High tensile strain in the stitching yarn has been correlated to the NCF resistance to shearing and even adverse drape defects such as tow undulations. Furthermore, stitching causes the shear behavior of the fabric to be anisotropic, with different behavior in positive and negative shear. In the current study, a model based on the stitching geometry and reinforcement tow directions has been created to find the tensile strain in the stitching yarn as the NCF is being sheared. It was found that the stitch angle was the main driving stitching parameter, and that this angle could be selected so that shearing in both positive and negative directions produces no tensile strain in the stitching yarn. The model showed good correlation with uniaxial bias-extension and drape tests for NCFs with different stitching parameters. Finally, design charts are displayed which can be used to select the stitching parameters of standard industrial NCF-machines which results in NCFs with near-symmetric shear behavior and thus good shear and draping performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Laessig R, Eisenhut M, Mathias A, Schulte R, Peters F, Kuehnemann T et al (2012) Series production of high-strength composites: Perspectives for the german engineering industry

  2. Middendorf P, Metzner C (2011) Aerospace applications of non-crimp fabric composites. In: Lomov S (ed) Non-crimp fabric composites: Manufacturing, properties and applications. Oxford and Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing

  3. Skoeck-Hartmann B, Gries T (2011) Automotive applications of non-crimp fabric composites. In: Lomov S (ed) Non-crimp fabric composites: Manufacturing, properties and applications. Oxford and Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing

  4. Lomov S, Barburski M, Stoilova T, Verpoest I, Akkerman R, Loendersloot R et al (2005) Carbon composites based on multiaxial multiply stitched preforms. part 3: Biaxial tension, picture frame and compression tests of the preforms. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf 36(9):1188–1206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Spencer DJ (2001) Knitting technology: A comprehensive handbook and practical guide, 3rd edn. Lancaster and Cambridge, Technomic

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Schnabel S, Gries T (2011) Production of non-crimp fabrics for composites. In: Lomov S (ed) Non-crimp fabric composites: Manufacturing, properties and applications. Oxford and Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing

  7. Lomov S (2011) Understanding and modelling the effect of stitching on the geometry of non-crimp fabrics. In: Lomov S (ed) Non-crimp fabric composites: Manufacturing, properties and applications. Oxford and Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing

  8. Lomov SV (2011) Deformability of textile preforms in the manufacture of non-crimp fabric composites. In: Lomov S (ed) Non-crimp fabric composites: Manufacturing, properties and applications. Oxford and Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing

  9. Kong H, Mouritz AP, Paton R (2004) Tensile extension properties and deformation mechanisms of multiaxial non-crimp fabrics. Compos Struct 66(1–4):249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bel S, Boisse P, Dumont F (2012) Analyses of the deformation mechanisms of non-crimp fabric composite reinforcements during preforming. Appl Compos Mater 19:513–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Long A, Souter B, Robitaile F (2000) A fabric mechanics approach to draping of woven and non- crimp reinforcements. 15th Technical Conference American Society for Composites: College Station, Texas

  12. Long A, Souter B, Robitaille F (1999) Effects of fibre architecture on deformation during preform manufacture. ICCM-12, TCA

  13. Yu WR, Harrison P, Long A (2005) Finite element forming simulation for non-crimp fabrics using a non-orthogonal constitutive equation. Compos Part A 36:1079–1093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harrison P, Yu W, Long A (2011) Modelling the deformability of biaxial non-crimp fabric composites. In: Lomov S (ed) Non-crimp fabric composites: Manufacturing, properties and applications. Oxford and Philadelphia: Woodhead Publishing

  15. Harrison P, Wiggers J, Long AC, Rudd CD (2000) Constitutive modelling based on meso and micro kinematics for woven and stitched fabrics. 15th Technical Conference American Society for Composites: College Station, Texas

  16. Wiggers J, Long A, Harrison P, Rudd C (2003) The effects of stitch architecture on the shear compliance of non-crimp fabrics. Proceedings of 6th International ESAFORM Conference on Material Forming, Salerno, Italy, pp 851–4

  17. Lee J, Hong S, Yu W, Kang T (2007) The effect of blank holder force on the stamp forming behavior of non-crimp fabric with a chain stitch. Compos Sci Technol 67:357366

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bel S, Hamila N, Boisse P, Dumont F (2012) Finite element model for ncf composite reinforcement preforming: Importance of inter-ply sliding. Compos Part A 43:22692277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dumont F, Weimer C, Soulat D, Launay J, Chatel S, Maison-Le-Poec S (2008) Composites preforms simulations for helicopters parts. Int J Mater Form 1:847850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chen S, McGregor O, Harper L, Endruweit A, Warrior N (2016) Defect formation during preforming of a bi-axial non-crimp fabric with a pillar stitch pattern. Compos Part A 91:156–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Li L, Zhao Y, Vuong H, Chen Y, Yang J, Duan Y (2014) In-plane shear investigation of biaxial carbon non-crimp fabrics with experimental tests and finite element modeling. Mater Des 63:757–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Samir D, Hamid S (2013) Determination of the in-plane shear rigidity modulus of a carbon non- crimp fabric from bias-extension data test. J Compos Mater 48:2729–2736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. (2013) Handbuch Faserverbundkunststoffe/Composites. Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden

  24. Du G, Ko F (1996) Analysis of multiaxial warp-knit preforms for composite reinforcement. Compos Sci Technol 56(3):253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Robitaille F, Clayton B, Long A, Souter B, Rudd C (2000) Geometric modelling of industrial preforms: Warp-knitted textiles. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part L J Mater Des Appl 214(2):71–90

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ko F, Bruner J, Pastore A, Scardino F (1980) Development of multi-bar weft-insert warp knit glass fabrics for industrial applications. J Eng Ind 102(4):333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Creech G, Pickett A (2006) Meso-modelling of non-crimp fabric composites for coupled drape and failure analysis. J Mater Sci 41(20):6725–6736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sirtautas J, Pickett AK, Lepicier P (2013) A mesoscopic model for coupled drape-infusion simulation of biaxial non-crimp fabric. Compos Part B 47:48–57

  29. Long A (2005) Design and manufacture of textile composites. Woodhead, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Boisse P, Hamila N, Guzman-Maldonado E, Madeo A, Hivet G, Dell’Isola F (2016) The bias- extension test for the analysis of in-plane shear properties of textile composite reinforcements and prepregs: a review. Int J Mater Form. doi:10.1007/s12289-016

  31. Mack C, Taylor H (2006) The fitting of woven cloths to surfaces. J Text Inst 47:477–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Launay J, Hivet G, Duong AV, Boisse P (2008) Experimental analysis of the influence of tensions on in plane shear behaviour of woven composite reinforcements. Compos Sci Technol 68(2):506–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Harrison P, Clifford M, Long A (2004) Shear characterisation of viscous woven textile composites: a comparison between picture frame and bias extension experiments. Compos Sci Technol 64:1453–1465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Krieger H, Schnabel A, Appel L, Gries T (2013) Experimental setup to validate textile material models for drape simulation. Key Eng Mater 554-557:456–464. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.554-557.456

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts Lowell, 1 University Avenue, Lowell, MA, 01854, USA

    Helga Krieger & Scott E. Stapleton

  2. Institut fuer Textiltechnik, RWTH Aachen University, Otto-Blumenthal-Str. 1, 52074, Aachen, Germany

    Thomas Gries

Authors
  1. Helga Krieger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Gries
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Scott E. Stapleton
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helga Krieger.

Ethics declarations

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Krieger, H., Gries, T. & Stapleton, S.E. Shear and drape behavior of non-crimp fabrics based on stitching geometry. Int J Mater Form 11, 593–605 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1368-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-017-1368-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation