Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of head impact attenuation capabilities between a standard American football helmet and novel protective equipment that couples a helmet and shoulder pads

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sports Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Concussive and subconcussive sports-related head impacts are common in the United States, particularly in American football. Football helmets are constantly improving upon their predecessors and are proven to reduce head impact kinematics and the risk of sports-related head injury. All football helmets are required to pass certification testing overseen by the National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) before they are permitted for use. A new advance in protective equipment involves coupling a helmet and shoulder pads as one connected piece of protective equipment. These protective gears cannot be tested using the standard NOCSAE method as they are worn over a user’s head, neck, and upper torso. We aimed to test the effectiveness of a prototype of a coupled, one-piece design, relative to a standard football helmet, using a custom drop tower method of testing. Relative to the standard football helmet, the coupled design reduced measures of peak linear acceleration at front, side, and rear impacts (p < .001) and peak rotational acceleration at all tested head locations (p < .004). The coupled design was also more effective than the standard helmet in attenuating the resultant upper neck force (p < .004) at all tested head impact locations and resultant upper neck moment at rear and side impact locations (p < .048). Future iterations of coupled, one-piece designs should use the results of this study to make improvements to the device, and further investigations on the effectiveness and safety implications of the protective gear are necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Langlois JA, Rutland-Brown W, Wald MM (2006) The epidemiology and impact of traumatic brain injury: a brief overview. J Head Trauma Rehabil 21(5):375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Guskiewicz KM, Weaver NL, Padua DA, Garrett WE (2000) Epidemiology of concussion in collegiate and high school football players. Am J Sports Med 28(5):643–650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kontos AP, Elbin RJ, Fazio-Sumrock VC, Burkhart S, Swindell H, Maroon J, Collins MW (2013) Incidence of sports-related concussion among youth football players aged 8–12 years. J Pediatr 163(3):717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pellman EJ, Powell JW, Viano DC, Casson IR, Tucker AM, Feuer H, Lovell M, Waeckerle JF, Robertson DW (2004) Concussion in professional football: epidemiological features of game injuries and review of the literature—part 3. Neurosurgery 54(1):81–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bazarian JJ, Zhu T, Zhong J, Janigro D, Rozen E, Roberts A, Javien H, Merchant- Borna K, Abar B, Blackman EG (2014) Persistent, long-term cerebral white matter changes after sports-related repetitive head impacts. PLoS ONE 9(4):e94734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Montenigro PH, Alosco ML, Martin BM, Daneshvar DH, Mez J, Chaisson CE, Nowinski CJ, Au R, McKee AC, Cantu RC, McClean MD (2017) Cumulative head impact exposure predicts later-life depression, apathy, executive dysfunction, and cognitive impairment in former high school and college football players. J Neurotrauma 34(2):328–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Talavage TM, Nauman EA, Breedlove EL, Yoruk U, Dye AE, Morigaki KE, Feuer H, Leverenz LJ (2014) Functionally-detected cognitive impairment in high school football players without clinically-diagnosed concussion. J Neurotrauma 31(4):327–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rowson S, Duma SM (2013) Brain injury prediction: assessing the combined probability of concussion using linear and rotational head acceleration. Ann Biomed Eng 41(5):873–882

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Duhaime AC, Beckwith JG, Maerlender AC, McAllister TW, Crisco JJ, Duma SM, Brolinson PG, Rowson S, Flashman LA, Chu JJ, Greenwald RM (2012) Spectrum of acute clinical characteristics of diagnosed concussions in college athletes wearing instrumented helmets. J Neurosurg 117(6):1092–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rowson S, Duma SM, Greenwald RM, Beckwith JG, Chu JJ, Guskiewicz KM, Mihalik JP, Crisco JJ, Wilcox BJ, McAllister TW, Maerlender AC (2014) Can helmet design reduce the risk of concussion in football? Technical note. J Neurosurg 120(4):919–922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. National Operating Committee on Standards for Athletic Equipment (NOCSAE) (2017) Standard performance specification for newly manufactured football helmets. https://nocsae.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/1501096770ND00217m17aMfrdFBHelmetsStandardPerformance.pdf. Accessed 13 Mar 2018

  12. Cantu RC, Mueller FO (2003) Catastrophic spine injuries in American football, 1977–2001. Neurosurgery 53(2):358–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Levy ML, Ozgur BM, Berry C, Aryan HE, Apuzzo ML (2004) Analysis and evolution of head injury in football. Neurosurgery 55(3):649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Delaney JS, Al-Kashmiri A (2005) Neck injuries presenting to emergency departments in the United States from 1990 to 1999 for ice hockey, soccer, and American football. Br J Sports Med 39(4):e21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Viano DC, Halstead D (2012) Change in size and impact performance of football helmets from the 1970 s to 2010. Ann Biomed Eng 40(1):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Viano DC, Pellman EJ, Withnall C, Shewchenko N (2006) Concussion in professional football: performance of newer helmets in reconstructed game impacts—part 13. Neurosurgery 59(3):591–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Viano DC, Withnall C, Halstead D (2012) Impact performance of modern football helmets. Ann Biomed Eng 40(1):160–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Broglio SP, Sosnoff JJ, Shin S, He X, Alcaraz C, Zimmerman J (2009) Head impacts during high school football: a biomechanical assessment. J Athl Train 44(4):342–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Crisco JJ, Fiore R, Beckwith JG, Chu JJ, Brolinson PG, Duma S, McAllister TW, Duhaime AC, Greenwald RM (2010) Frequency and location of head impact exposures in individual collegiate football players. J Athl Train 45(6):549–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mihalik JP, Bell DR, Marshall SW, Guskiewicz KM (2007) Measurement of head impacts in collegiate football players: an investigation of positional and event-type differences. Neurosurgery 61(6):1229–1235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Namjoshi DR, Cheng WH, McInnes KA, Martens KM, Carr M, Wilkinson A, Fan J, Robert J, Hayat A, Cripton PA, Wellington CL (2014) Merging pathology with biomechanics using CHIMERA (Closed-head impact model of engineered rotational acceleration): a novel, surgery-free model of traumatic brain injury. Mol Neurodegener 9(1):55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kawata K, Rubin LH, Takahagi M, Lee JH, Sim T, Szwanki V, Bellamy A, Tierney R, Langford D (2017) Subconcussive impact-dependent increase in plasma S100β levels in collegiate football players. J Neurotrauma 34(14):2254–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Pellman EJ, Viano DC, Tucker AM, Casson IR, Waeckerle JF (2003) Concussion in professional football: reconstruction of game impacts and injuries. Neurosurgery 53(4):799–814

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bishop PJ, Wells RP (1990) The inappropriateness of helmet drop tests in assessing neck protection in head-first impacts. Am J Sports Med 18(2):201–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rowson S, Duma SM (2011) Development of the STAR evaluation system for football helmets: integrating player head impact exposure and risk of concussion. Ann Biomed Eng 39(8):2130–2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowson B, Terrell EJ, Rowson S (2018) Quantifying the effect of the facemask on helmet performance. Proc Inst Mech Eng P J Sports Eng Technol 232(2):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zanetti K, Post A, Marshall M, Karton C, Hoshizaki B, Gilchrist MD (2013) Identifying injury characteristics for three player positions in American football using physical and finite element modeling reconstructions. In: International research council on the biomechanics of injury (IRCOBI). Gothenburg, Sweden

Download references

Acknowledgments

NJC, TJO, and JJR have a financial interest in Popejoy Sports LLC. Funding for study expenses was provided by the Popejoy Family Trust.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicholas J. Cecchi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cecchi, N.J., Oros, T.J., Ringhofer, J.J. et al. Comparison of head impact attenuation capabilities between a standard American football helmet and novel protective equipment that couples a helmet and shoulder pads. Sports Eng 22, 16 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0311-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12283-019-0311-8

Keywords

Navigation