Abstract
Purpose of Review
Candida auris, a recently recognized yeast pathogen, has become a major public health threat due to the problems associated with its accurate identification, intrinsic and acquired resistance to antifungal drugs, and its potential to easily contaminate the environment causing clonal outbreaks in healthcare facilities. These outbreaks are associated with high mortality rates particularly among older patients with multiple comorbidities under intensive care settings. The purpose of this review is to highlight strategies that are being adapted to prevent transmission of C. auris in healthcare settings.
Recent Findings
Colonized patients shed C. auris into their environment which contaminates surrounding equipment. It resists elimination even by robust decontamination procedures and is easily transmitted to new patients during close contact resulting in outbreaks. Efforts are being made to rapidly identify C. auris-infected/C. auris-colonized patients, to determine its susceptibility to antifungals, and to perform effective cleaning and decontamination of the environment and isolation of colonized patients to prevent further transmission.
Summary
Rapid and accurate identification of hospitalized patients infected/colonized with C. auris, rapid detection of its susceptibility patterns, and appropriate use of infection control measures can help to contain the spread of this highly pathogenic yeast in healthcare settings and prevent/control outbreaks.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are regarded as the diseases of medical progress, and invasive candidiasis, particularly candidemia, is the most common manifestation of IFIs [1•, 2••]. The incidence of candidemia/invasive candidiasis has been consistently rising globally, and Candida spp. are the causative agent in nearly 25% of all bloodstream infections among hospitalized patients [1•, 2••, 3]. Important risk factors for invasive candidiasis include extremes of age; admission into intensive care units (ICUs); total parenteral nutrition; multiple comorbidities such as diabetes mellitus, chronic pulmonary, cardiovascular, or kidney disease, neutropenia, and malignancy; presence of central venous/urinary catheters; and prior use of broad-spectrum antibiotics/antifungal agents [3,4,5,6]. Invasive Candida infections have an attributable mortality of nearly 30% in adults and nearly 15% in neonates [7, 8]. With rapid changes in clinical practice, the spectrum of Candida and other yeast species capable of causing IFIs is also changing [9•, 10].
Candida albicans is usually the most common cause of invasive candidiasis; however, majority (> 50%) of Candida infections are now caused by non-albicans Candida species (NACS) [10,11,12,13,14]. The NACS usually exhibit reduced susceptibility/resistance to one or more antifungal drugs [10, 15•, 16,17,18]. The incidence of NACS-invasive infections has increased due to their selection as a result of increasing use of fluconazole/other antifungal drugs for prophylaxis or therapy for IFIs [10, 12,13,14, 15•, 16,17,18]. The emerging multidrug-resistant Candida spp. include C. glabrata, C. krusei, C. lusitaniae, C. guilliermondii complex members, C. kefyr, C. haemulonii complex members, and C. auris [10, 12,13,14, 15•, 16,17,18, 19••]. Of these, C. auris is now recognized as a threat to global public health due to its ability to cause outbreaks of invasive infections in healthcare facilities which have been difficult to control and treat [19••, 20•, 21]. In this article, the current epidemiology of C. auris infections, its rapid detection from infected/colonized patients, and strategies to control its spread in healthcare facilities by infection prevention are described.
Global Epidemiology of C. auris Infections
Candida auris, isolated from the external ear canal of a Japanese patient, was first described as a novel Candida species in 2009 [22]. However, a subsequent retrospective study from South Korea revealed that the earliest C. auris, a bloodstream isolate initially misidentified as C. haemulonii, dates back to 1996 [23]. Fifteen other C. auris isolates, misidentified earlier as C. haemulonii, were also identified among archived cultures collected from ear samples during 2004–2006 [24]. Soon afterwards, several invasive isolates were identified in India [25], and the first outbreak was reported from the UK [26•]. The epidemiology of C. auris infections has witnessed dramatic changes over the past 10 years as several thousand sporadic or outbreak isolates have been recovered from blood and other specimens mostly from hospitalized patients in > 50 countries/territories from Asia (Japan, South Korea, India, Kuwait, Israel, Oman, Pakistan, United Arab Emirates, China, Malaysia, Saudi Arabia, Iran, Thailand, Singapore, Bangladesh, Lebanon, Qatar, Taiwan, and Vietnam), Europe (Great Britain, Spain, Norway, France, Belgium, Germany, Russia, Austria, Switzerland, Italy, Greece, Netherlands, Poland, and Denmark), North/South Americas (USA, Venezuela, Canada, Colombia, Panama, Chile, Costa Rica, Brazil, Guatemala, Mexico, and Peru), Africa (South Africa, Kenya, Egypt, Sudan, Algeria, and Nigeria), and the Oceania (Australia) [19••, 20•, 21, 27,28,29].
Whole genome sequencing of clinical C. auris isolates has identified five distinct clades which exhibit large sequence differences (> 200,000 single nucleotide polymorphisms, SNPs) and likely originated simultaneously. C. auris isolates within the same clade usually show minor sequence differences [30••, 31, 32]. The five clades include South Asian Clade (clade I), East Asian Clade (clade II), African Clade (clade III), South American Clade (clade IV), and Iranian Clade (clade V) [30••, 31, 32]. C. auris isolates exhibit clade-specific resistance patterns to antifungal drugs, and invasive infections/outbreaks are mostly caused by clade I, clade III, and clade IV isolates, while clade II and clade V isolates mainly cause ear infections and are usually susceptible to antifungal drugs [30••, 33, 34]. Genomic analyses and in vitro/in vivo evolution of resistance studies have shown that clade I and clade IV isolates develop resistance to fluconazole rather easily which is not lost even after drug removal during growth of C. auris indicating that no fitness cost is associated with resistance [35•]. Resistance development likely occurred due to deletion of multiple genes near subtelomeric regions, and a mutator phenotype was also identified exhibiting elevated mutation rates and high level of resistance during in vitro and in vivo passages [35•]. A fluconazole-resistant C. auris belonging to clade V and isolated from fungal otitis has also been described recently [36].
The impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) epidemic has also been investigated as ICU admissions, a major risk factor for acquiring invasive C. auris infections, dramatically increased at times during this period [37,38,39]. Based on the meta-analysis of 10 studies, Vaseghi et al. [38] reported an overall pooled prevalence of 5.7% for COVID-19-associated C. auris infections, and male gender was a major risk factor for acquiring C. auris infection. The authors concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections decreased during the COVID-19 pandemic. On the contrary, Vinayagamoorthy et al. [39] reported a prevalence of 14% for COVID-19-associated C. auris infections and concluded that the prevalence of C. auris infections remained unchanged during the COVID-19 pandemic. Both studies reported the same common risk factors (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, placement of a central venous catheter, ICU stay, and treatment with broad-spectrum antibiotics) for C. auris infection among COVID-19-infected patients [38, 39].
In recent years, C. auris has caused invasive infections/outbreaks with increasing frequency which have been associated with high mortality rates among hospitalized patients [19••, 20•, 21, 40,41,42,43]. The increasing incidence of C. auris infections has also caused major shift in the epidemiology of invasive Candida infections at many geographical locations with C. auris becoming a major bloodstream pathogen, even surpassing C. glabrata or C. tropicalis in some settings [19••, 44,45,46,47].
Although C. auris isolates described until 2020 were obtained from clinical specimens, environmental isolation of C. auris has also been described recently, first from the tropical marine ecosystems in the Indian Ocean and subsequently from a coastal habitat in Colombia [48•, 49]. These findings have supported climate change as the main driving force for the recent emergence of C. auris as a novel human fungal pathogen. Climate change has likely resulted in stress adaptation (thermotolerance and halotolerance) and biotic predation allowing adaptation to diverse environmental niches [19••, 48•]. Furthermore, C. auris has been isolated from apples previously treated with fungicidal agents, and this practice in food industry may have been responsible for the selection of drug-resistant C. auris [50•, 51].
Identification of C. auris in Yeast Cultures and Clinical Specimens
Until recently, C. auris was usually misidentified as Candida haemulonii/duobushaemulonii, Candida sake, Rhodotorula glutinis, or other Candida species by biochemical substrate utilization-based systems such as VITEK2, API 20C AUX, Phenix YIS, RapID Yeast Plus, or MicroScan [19••, 52]. These automated systems now identify C. auris accurately with updated databases; however, they are time-consuming as they require yeast culture [19••, 52].
Like C. glabrata, C. haemulonii complex members, C. kefyr, Candida guilliermondii, Candida famata, Candida conglobata, and Candida utilis, C. auris also forms pink-colored colonies on CHROMagar Candida [53]. However, on CHROMagar™ Candida Plus, C. auris forms cream-colored colonies with a blue halo which differentiates it from other closely related species [54, 55]. Other low-cost phenotypic methods are not completely specific for C. auris [19••, 52]. Phenotypic methods are slow as they require yeast culture, and to avoid misidentification, clinical isolates are usually subjected to analysis by matrix assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) by using Bruker-Daltonics MALDI Biotyper or VITEK MS with their updated databases which consume additional cost and time [52, 56].
Rapid and definitive identification is usually achieved by PCR amplification and/or PCR sequencing of rDNA-based methods, and both in-house and commercial tests have yielded ≥ 90% clinical sensitivities and specificities with yeast cultures/clinical specimens [19••, 52, 57]. Implementation of C. auris real-time PCR for surveillance in the UK was recently shown to reduce the risk of invasive infections [58]. Since clinical C. auris strains exhibit clade-specific virulence and resistance to antifungal drugs, PCR-based clade-identification methods have also been developed [59].
Susceptibility of C. auris and Molecular Basis of Resistance to Antifungal Drugs
Although there are no established susceptibility breakpoints for C. auris, tentative breakpoints have been suggested by expert opinion and by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) of the USA and are as follows: fluconazole, ≥ 32 µg/mL; amphotericin B, 2 µg/mL; caspofungin, 2 µg/mL; micafungin, 4 µg/mL; and anidulafungin, 4 µg/mL [30••, 60,61,62].
Worldwide, nearly 90% of clinical C. auris isolates are resistant to fluconazole, and susceptibility to voriconazole and other triazoles varies widely even among isolates belonging to the same clade [19••, 21]. Nearly 4% isolates are pan-resistant; however, resistance rates in different countries/healthcare settings vary considerably [19••, 21]. Thus, nearly 90%, 30%, and ~ 5% of C. auris isolates from the USA were resistant to fluconazole, amphotericin B, and echinocandins, respectively, while in the New York-New Jersey area where 55% of all US isolates occur, 99.8% of the isolates were fluconazole-resistant, and 50% isolates were amphotericin B-resistant [63]. The resistance rates of 90–95%, 7–37%, and < 2% and 90%, 5.5%, and 0.25% have been reported for fluconazole, amphotericin B, and echinocandins among C. auris from India and South Africa, respectively [44, 60, 64, 65]. These differences are mainly due to the occurrence of different percentages of C. auris isolates belonging to different clades in different settings [35•, 63,64,65].
The reference broth microdilution-based antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) protocols recommended by the Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) are the methods of choice for C. auris [60,61,62,63]. Other broth microdilution-based methods (Sensititre® YeastOne, MICRONAUT) have also yielded comparable results [40, 43, 66]. Rapid methods such as MALDI TOF MS, Etest, Liofilchem MIC Test Strip, and VITEK2 have also been used; however, VITEK2 results for fluconazole and amphotericin B may not be suitable to guide therapeutic decisions [53, 56, 66,67,68].
The molecular mechanisms of resistance to antifungal drugs in C. auris have been elucidated in the past few years (Table 1). The molecular basis of resistance to different antifungal drugs in C. auris has also been reviewed recently [69]. The ERG11 encoding cytochrome P450-dependent lanosterol demethylase, involved in ergosterol biosynthesis, is the main target conferring resistance to fluconazole, and VF125AL, Y132F, or K143R are the most common genetic alterations [60, 69,70,71,72]. However, these mutations alone are not sufficient to confer high-level fluconazole resistance commonly observed among clinical isolates as replacement of wild-type C. auris allele with mutant alleles increased fluconazole and voriconazole minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) by only 8–16 fold. Similarly, replacement of K143R mutation with wild-type allele led to a 16-fold decrease in fluconazole MIC [72]. Other studies have shown the involvement of an ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter (CDR1) and a major facilitator superfamily (MFS) member (MDR1) in conferring resistance of C. auris to fluconazole (Table 1) [69, 73, 74].
Studies have shown that CDR1 homologs are upregulated in triazole-resistant C. auris and deletion of CDR1 gene in a triazole-resistant strain caused nearly 100-fold decrease in the MIC for fluconazole [73]. Furthermore, fluconazole-resistant C. auris belonging to clades I and IV contain missense mutations in TAC1B transcription factor which caused increased expression of CDR1 [74]. Gene replacement studies involving a common TAC1B mutation (A640V) have confirmed the role of this gene in fluconazole resistance [74]. MDR1 homologs are also upregulated in triazole-resistant C. auris. The MDR1 is upregulated by MRR1, another transcription factor. A gain-of-function mutation (N647T) has been described in MRR1 which causes upregulation of MDR1, and introduction of mutant MRR1 allele in a fluconazole-susceptible C. auris isolate caused significant increase in the MIC for triazoles [69, 75]. Another C. auris gene implicated in fluconazole resistance is YMC1 that encodes transmembrane transporter activities important for mitochondrial function, and few fluconazole-resistant C. auris isolates lacking K143R mutation in ERG11 contain a nonsynonymous (G145D) mutation in YMC1 (Table 1) [64].
Unlike C. glabrata or C. albicans, gene targets conferring amphotericin B resistance in C. auris are poorly defined [18, 19••, 69]. The role of a nonsynonymous (G145D) mutation in ERG2, detected in some amphotericin B-resistant C. auris isolates, is not well established [64]. The first molecular mechanism conferring high level of resistance to amphotericin B (MIC of 32 µg/mL) in C. auris identified a novel deletion (frame shift) mutation in ERG6 which was supported by sterol analyses of mutant cells and by Cas-9-mediated genetic manipulations [76]. Another C. auris isolate carrying a large deletion of 164 amino acids in ERG6 and exhibiting high-level of resistance to amphotericin B has also been described. The mutant allele was confirmed to confer resistance to amphotericin B when it was introduced into a susceptible strain [77]. However, mutations in ERG6 do not appear to be the main mechanism of resistance to amphotericin B in C. auris, particularly for isolates with low level of drug resistance [19••, 69, 76].
Echinocandin resistance in C. auris mainly involves nonsynonymous mutations in the hotspot-1 (HS-1) and HS-2 regions of FKS1 encoding 1,3 β-D-glucan synthase. Most genetic alterations occur at codon 639 in HS-1 of FKS1 gene (Table 1) [43, 60, 71, 78, 79]. Two nonsynonymous mutations (F635L and F635Y) as well as deletion of codon F635 and D642Y mutation within HS-1 of FKS1 have been detected in some echinocandin-resistant C. auris [40, 43, 78, 79]. Two nonsynonymous mutations (R1354S and R1354H) have also been found within HS-2 of FKS1 (Table 1) [43, 79]. Clinical C. auris isolates with identical FKS1 mutations exhibit variable susceptibility to echinocandins (different MIC values) likely due to differences in their genetic background [35•, 43, 78, 79]. Also, patients infected with C. auris strains carrying different FKS1 mutations show variable in vivo response to treatment with antifungal drugs suggesting differences in fitness cost associated with these mutations [43, 78, 80]. This is also supported by the gradual reversal of echinocandin resistance after removal of antifungal pressure [80]. Echinocandin-treated C. auris cells exhibit slower growth, cell–cell adhesion, biofilm formation, elevated chitin content, and cross resistance to fluconazole [80]. These characteristics likely aid in the survival and persistence of C. auris in the environment and promote reservoirs that may subsequently cause outbreaks in healthcare settings.
Strategies to Prevent Transmission of C. auris in Healthcare Settings
There are several reasons why C. auris is able to cause outbreaks of invasive infections in healthcare facilities that have been difficult to treat. These include its overlapping phenotypic characteristics with other closely related species compromising its rapid identification, its ability to resist killing by common disinfectants, persist and remain viable for weeks to months, mostly due to biofilm formation, in the hospital environment, and its intrinsic resistance to some drugs and ability to rapidly acquire resistance to other antifungals, often resulting in a multidrug-/pan-resistant phenotype [19••, 43, 52, 78, 81,82,83]. C. auris frequently colonizes the skin, respiratory tract, and urinary tract and is shed from the skin into the environment contaminating surfaces/equipment. This causes person-to-person transmission of infection through direct/indirect contact in hospital settings [19••, 26•, 64, 84•, 85].
Risk factors for invasive C. auris infections are common with other pathogenic Candida species described above, and nearly 10% of C. auris-colonized patients develop invasive infections, particularly those with mechanical ventilation and placement of invasive devices in ICU settings [26•, 40, 46, 64, 84•, 85,86,87]. Crude mortality rates of 0 to 72% have been reported for C. auris infections [20•, 26•, 40, 44, 88]. Due to these reasons, specific guidelines/recommendations have been published by the CDC and other leading international health agencies for controlling C. auris outbreaks in healthcare facilities [88,89,90,91]. A brief account of the current recommendations is described below, and the main points are summarized in Table 2.
Identification of Cases of C. auris-Invasive Infections and Colonization
Rapid and accurate detection of C. auris in yeast cultures and more importantly in clinical specimens is vital to identify infected/colonized patients. Recommendations from leading experts and international health agencies advocate that detection of even a single case of C. auris should start an epidemiological investigation and implementation of infection control measures and contact precautions to prevent further transmission [19••, 84•, 85, 89,90,91,92]. Research has shown that delayed recognition of infection/colonization and delayed implementation of infection control practices causes rapid transmission of C. auris to other hospitalized patients sharing space and/or common facilities and equipment [26•, 84•, 85, 93, 94]. Although culture is considered the gold standard for definitive diagnosis of Candida infection, it is slow and also lacks sensitivity as nearly 50% cases of candidemia/invasive candidiasis remain culture-negative [95, 96]. Furthermore, species-specific identification of C. auris in all cultures from invasive samples consumes additional time and resources [52, 56, 97].
Recent developments in molecular diagnostic procedures now allow rapid identification of invasive C. auris infections within a few hours with high sensitivity and specificity [52, 57, 97]. Quantitative real-time PCR assays have been developed for cost-effective and rapid detection of live C. auris cells from the hospital environment and from skin and other patient swab samples for the detection of colonized patients [98,99,100]. A portable quantitative real-time PCR-based point-of-care test for C. auris detection in clinical samples, reporting results in ≤ 30 min, has also been developed recently [101].
Once a C. auris-positive case has been identified, the hospital infection control team should be informed immediately to implement transmission-based precautions (TBPs) so that other patients in the facility are not affected [19••, 84•, 85, 89]. The treating clinicians/infectious disease specialists should be alerted for proper patient management and the microbiology laboratory staff for diagnostic capacity building to efficiently and correctly identify C. auris. One study has shown that hospitalized patients on ventilator or those who received systemic fluconazole or carbapenem antibiotics in the prior 90 days or had ≥ 1 visit to the hospital for acute care in the previous 6 months are more likely to be colonized with C. auris [102]. Pre-emptive screening of new patients suspected to be colonized, particularly those with international exposure or history of previous stay in a hospital with C. auris infections or with risk factors listed above, should be carried out for axilla, groin, and other relevant (urine, throat, wounds, catheter) sites [19••, 64, 84•, 85, 89]. Considering the high frequency of skin and rectal colonization and shedding into the environment [19••, 84•, 85, 94, 102, 103], C. auris-positive patients should be placed in single occupancy rooms with attached toilet facilities. If this is not feasible, all C. auris-positive patients should be cohorted and cared for by a dedicated healthcare workers (HCWs) team familiar with the management of patients infected with multidrug-resistant organisms [19••, 84•, 85].
Hand Hygiene and Other Transmission-Based Precautions (TBPs)
Transmission of C. auris to other patients in hospital settings is largely facilitated by its ability to persist in a viable form on various environmental surfaces/equipment within the patient’s room such as walls/floors, mattresses/pillows/bed sheets, bed side trolleys, sinks, door and faucet handles, disposable/reusable equipment (oxygen mask, temperature/blood pressure monitors), and other objects (intravenous pole, personal mobile phones, cloth lanyards, etc.) 19••, 84•, 85, 89, 94, 102. C. auris also survives for weeks on different environmental surfaces due to the formation of biofilms and has also been isolated from the hands/nares/groin of HCWs which could also serve as the source of its transmission to other hospitalized patients [19••, 26•, 64, 83, 84•, 85, 104].
Since new patients are colonized with this yeast with a contact time of just 4 h with C. auris-positive patients and invasive infections have occurred in patients within 48 h of admission in ICU settings [26•, 64], efforts should be made to minimize transmission of C. auris to other patients in hospital settings. All HCWs attending C. auris-infected patients should frequently use alcohol-based hand rubs, and soiled hands should be thoroughly cleaned with soap and water followed by application of alcohol-based hand rub, don personal protective equipment (PPE) while attending the patients and use disposable items/equipment whenever it is feasible to do so [89,90,91, 94, 104,105,106]. Minimum number of HCWs should be designated for the care of C. auris-infected patients. The infection control team of the hospital should ensure strict adherence to hand hygiene and proper use of PPE (gloves and a long-sleeved gown) by HCWs while attending C. auris-infected patients. Wearing of a face mask by HCWs may also be helpful in preventing their own colonization with C. auris [89,90,91, 94, 104,105,106].
Rooms housing C. auris-infected patients should be clearly marked, and limited entry by visitors should be allowed only after adherence to PPE and TBPs. C. auris-positive patients should be moved only when it is absolutely necessary, and they should be placed last on the list for non-emergency imaging, medical procedures, or surgery to avoid contact with other patients and to allow thorough cleaning of the equipment/environment afterwards [19••, 84•, 85, 89]. Colonized patients should be followed until discharge from the facility or when they have turned culture-negative during regular screening, and TBPs should be enforced until C. auris cases are detected in the facility [19••, 84•, 85].
Cleaning and Disinfection of Environment and Reusable Equipment
International health agencies and expert opinion have recommended disinfection of high touch areas and reusable equipment in rooms housing C. auris-infected patients with hospital-grade agents effective against Clostridium difficile spores to minimize cross-transmission of infection to other patients [19••, 84•, 85, 89]. Cleaning surfaces twice or three times daily in rooms with C. auris-positive patients with chlorine-based or other sporicidal disinfectants is highly effective in controlling cross-transmission of infection [19••, 84•, 85]. To avoid laborious cleaning procedures, single-use items (pillows, bedding material, and fiber cloth wipes for cleaning), and equipment (thermometers, blood pressure cuffs, etc.) should be preferred for C. auris-positive patients. Less expensive items which cannot be easily cleaned should be discarded [19••, 84•, 85]. Considering that biocidal agents effective against C. auris should be fast-acting as real-world contact times for disinfectants usually do not exceed 1 to 2 min, commonly used hospital agents (such as chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride) have limited activity against C. auris [107,108,109,110]. The efficacy and minimum contact time for different formulations of disinfectants and antiseptics effective against C. auris planktonic cells and biofilms are listed in Table 3.
Chlorine-based products such as sodium hypochlorite (≥ 1000 parts per million, ppm) are effective against planktonic cells and, at pH of 13.13, against C. auris biofilms during environmental decontamination. However, very high concentrations (≥ 6000 PPM) are irritating to some patients/HCWs and corrosive for medical/dental devices [105, 109,110,111]. Peracetic acid at 2000 ppm and sodium dichloroisocyanurate at 4000 ppm are also effective against planktonic cells of C. auris (Table 3) [104, 109, 111]. For biofilms, peracetic acid (3500 ppm, pH 8.82) and sodium dichloroisocyanurate (1000 ppm, pH 13.13) are also effective as they prevented the transfer and regrowth of C. auris [111]. Chlorhexidine gluconate (2%) in 70% isopropanol and povidone-iodine (10%) are yeasticidal for planktonic cells of C. auris [112].
Hydrogen peroxide (> 1%) or vaporized hydrogen peroxide, ozone, and ultraviolet subtype-C (UV-C) light are also yeasticidal for C. auris [82, 112,113,114,115]. The UV-C light also prevents biofilm formation [116]. The UV-C light was more effective in non-shaded areas than in shaded areas [115]. Flushing of sinks in patient’s room with ozonated water (2.5 ppm) for 30 s every 4 h resulted in complete elimination of C. auris within 2 days [117]. Silver nanoparticles have also been recently recognized as promising antifungal agents against growth and biofilm formation of C. auris on medical and environmental surfaces [118].
Common equipment serves as a source of C. auris spread in healthcare facilities and should be thoroughly disinfected after every use as per the manufacturer’s instructions and its compatibility with the disinfectant [19••, 84•, 85, 119]. Glutaraldehyde and peracetic acid preparations, though expensive and/or corrosive for some metals, have also been used for cleaning of medical/dental devices to prevent cross-transmission of C. auris [108, 113]. Ethanol (70%), isopropyl alcohol (70%), and other products containing ethanol or phenols are suitable for cleaning small spills [105, 108].
Terminal cleaning and disinfection of everything in the patient’s room on discharge are mandatory with agents of certified antifungal activity. In addition to regular cleaning with disinfectants, fogging with hydrogen peroxide vapor, ozone, and UV-C disinfection should also be performed as an additional safety measure [19••, 84•, 85, 94]. Regular sampling for C. auris growth should be done to ensure that the environment and reusable equipment are being disinfected adequately [19••, 84•, 85, 94].
Decolonization of C. auris-Positive Patients
Once C. auris is acquired, patients usually remain colonized with this yeast. One hospitalized patient in Kuwait yielded more than 17 isolates from five (urine, tracheal secretion, vagina, catheter tip) different sites over a span of nearly 10 months [71]. Strict adherence to central and peripheral catheter care bundles, urinary catheter care bundle, and proper care of the tracheostomy site are measures that are more likely to prevent C. auris-invasive infections [89]. Although there are no specific guidelines for the decolonization of C. auris-positive patients from CDC or other international health agencies, some centers have attempted to eliminate this organism from colonized patients. One study reported only partial success, with twice daily skin decontamination with disposable wash cloths (wipes) soaked in 2% chlorhexidine gluconate or 4% chlorhexidine solution, mouth washing of patients on ventilator support with 0.2% chlorhexidine and chlorhexidine-soaked disks for central vascular catheter exit sites to minimize seeding of blood with C. auris, as new cases continued to occur in the hospital [26•]. Isopropanol augments the activity of chlorhexidine for decolonization of C. auris from skin, and both tea tree and lemongrass oil further enhanced the decolonization by chlorhexidine/isopropanol combination [120]. However, even if decolonization is transiently achieved in some patients, recolonization may occur soon afterwards from the bedding material, pillows, or other personal items where C. auris can survive for several days [19••, 26•, 105].
Future Perspectives
New rapid, sensitive, and more specific point-of-care tests are being developed for rapid identification of C. auris in yeast cultures and also directly in clinical specimens [52, 98,99,100,101]. These tests will help in rapid identification of C. auris-infected/C. auris-colonized patients for early implementation of strategies to prevent further transmission of infection to other patients in hospital settings. Advances are also being made in C. auris eradication from patients’ rooms. In addition to silver nanoparticles, silver functionalized nanostructured titanium has recently been recognized as a promising antifungal agent against growth and biofilm formation of C. auris on medical and environmental surfaces [121]. Far ultraviolet subtype C (222 nm) (Far-UVC) has recently been shown to destroy airborne pathogens nearly instantly in room-sized chambers [122]. Other novel antifungal agents and disinfectants are also being discovered with potent activity against C. auris [123, 124].
Major developments are also underway in the discovery of new drugs/drug combinations to improve treatment of C. auris infections [125, 126•]. Emerging antifungal compounds being investigated include natural compounds, antimicrobial peptides, immunotherapy, metals and nano particles, photodynamic and combinational therapy, and repurposed drugs [118, 125, 126•, 127]. Colistin showed synergistic activity with amphotericin B against C. auris [128], while farnesol boosted the antifungal effect of fluconazole [129]. Fluconazole-resistant C. auris isolates have higher levels of chitin in their cell wall and increased susceptibility to a glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase inhibitor [130]. Ibrexafungerp, a member of the triterpenoids, inhibits the production of (1,3)-β-D-glucan and has shown good in vivo activity against fluconazole-resistant C. auris in an experimental mouse model of invasive candidiasis [131]. Combination therapy with a lower dose of amphotericin B with anidulafungin/caspofungin provided greater killing with synergistic and/or fungicidal outcomes against C. auris [132]. Major advances in the above areas will be greatly beneficial in controlling C. auris infections and outbreaks.
Recent description of Candida khanbhai, another novel yeast species [133] closely related to C. haemulonii species complex and its colony characteristics on CHROMagar Candida Plus diagnostic test, similar to C. auris, have compromised the utility of this simple test for specific identification of C. auris among clinical yeast isolates.
Conclusions
C. auris has now become a major threat to global public health as sporadic cases detected in some countries soon after its identification as a human fungal pathogen have given way to major outbreaks in healthcare facilities in many countries with unfavorable outcomes. The patients most commonly affected include elderly subjects with multiple comorbidities, exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics/antifungal drugs, arterial or central venous catheters, major surgery, and prolonged stay in the ICU. Major problems associated with inadequate management of C. auris-infected patients include faulty routine diagnostic methods yielding inaccurate identification in yeast cultures and clinical specimens, its intrinsic or acquired resistance to one or more antifungal drugs limiting treatment options, its resistance to killing by hospital disinfectants, and its rapid transmission to other susceptible patients during routine contact or shared equipment in healthcare facilities. However, recent advances towards rapid, sensitive, and more specific point-of-care tests for identification of C. auris in yeast cultures and clinical specimens, susceptibility testing to guide treatment, and its eradication from the patients’ environment by using novel disinfectants and infection control measures offer hope that C. auris infections/outbreaks can be controlled or even prevented in the near future.
References
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance
Brown GD, Denning DW, Gow NA, Levitz SM, Netea MG, White TC. Hidden killers: human fungal infections. Sci Transl Med. 2012;4:165rv13. This review highlights the contribution of fungal infections towards human morbidity and mortality, particularly among immunocompromised individuals.
Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, et al. update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;2016(62):e1-50. This article has summarized diagnosis, antifungal drugs, antifungal susceptibility testing and clinical practice guidelines for the management of invasive Candida infections affecting different organs in neutropenic/non-neutropenic patients.
Barchiesi F, Orsetti E, Mazzanti S, Trave F, Salvi A, Nitti C, et al. Candidemia in the elderly: what does it change? PLoS One. 2017;12:e0176576.
Falcone M, Tiseo G, Tascini C, Russo A, Sozio E, Raponi G, et al. Assessment of risk factors for candidemia in non-neutropenic patients hospitalized in internal medicine wards: a multicenter study. Eur J Intern Med. 2017;41:33–8.
Chen XC, Xu J, Wu DP. Clinical characteristics and outcomes of breakthrough candidemia in 71 hematologic malignancy patients and/or allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients: a single-center retrospective study from China, 2011–2018. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;71(Suppl 4):S394–9.
Leitheiser S, Harner A, Waller JL, Turrentine J, Baer S, Kheda M, et al. Risk factors associated with invasive fungal infections in kidney transplant patients. Am J Med Sci. 2020;359:108–16.
Gudlaugsson O, Gillespie S, Lee K, Vande Berg J, Hu J, Messer S, et al. Attributable mortality of nosocomial candidemia, revisited. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37:1172–7.
Falagas ME, Apostolou KE, Pappas VD. Attributable mortality of candidemia: a systematic review of matched cohort and case-control studies. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2006;25:419–25.
Sprute R, Cornely OA, Chen SC, Seidel D, Schuetz AN, Zhang SX. All you need to know and more about the diagnosis and management of rare yeast infections. mBio. 2021;12:e0159421. This article describes recent advances in the diagnosis and management of infections caused by rare yeast pathogens.
Wiederhold NP. Emerging fungal infections: new species, new names, and antifungal resistance. Clin Chem. 2021;68:83–90.
Tan BH, Chakrabarti A, Li RY, Patel AK, Watcharananan SP, Liu Z, et al. Incidence and species distribution of candidaemia in Asia: a laboratory-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21:946–53.
Lamoth F, Lockhart SR, Berkow EL, Calandra T. Changes in the epidemiological landscape of invasive candidiasis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73(suppl_1):i4–13.
Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Turnidge JD, Castanheira M, Jones RN. Twenty years of the SENTRY antifungal surveillance program: results for Candida species from 1997–2016. Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(Suppl 1):S79-94.
Khan Z, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Mokaddas E, Al-Banwan K, Alfouzan W, et al. Changing trends in epidemiology and antifungal susceptibility patterns of six bloodstream Candida species isolates over a 12-year period in Kuwait. PLoS One. 2019;14:e0216250.
Colombo AL, Júnior JNA, Guinea J. Emerging multidrug-resistant Candida species. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2017;30:528–38. This review described the epidemiology and clinical management of invasive infections caused by the emerging multidrug-resistant Candida spp. with special emphasis on C. auris and C. glabrata.
Ahmad S, Khan Z, Al-Sweih N, Alfouzan W, Joseph L, Asadzadeh M. Candida kefyr in Kuwait: prevalence, antifungal drug susceptibility and genotypic heterogeneity. PLoS One. 2020;15:e0240426.
Ostrosky-Zeichner L. Candida glabrata and FKS mutations: witnessing the emergence of the true multidrug-resistant Candida. Clin Infect Dis. 2013;56:1733–4.
Ahmad S, Joseph L, Parker JE, Asadzadeh M, Kelly SL, Meis JF, et al. ERG6 and ERG2 are major targets conferring reduced susceptibility to amphotericin B in clinical Candida glabrata isolates in Kuwait. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e01900-e1918.
Ahmad S, Alfouzan W. Candida auris: epidemiology, diagnosis, pathogenesis, antifungal susceptibility and infection control measures to combat the spreading of infections in healthcare facilities. Microorganisms 2021:9:807. This insightful review provided detailed information on the recent emergence of C. auris as a fungal pathogen and developments in rapid diagnosis and drug resistance and virulence mechanisms.
Chen J, Tian S, Han X, Chu Y, Wang Q, Zhou B, Shang H. Is the superbug fungus really so scary? A systematic review and meta-analysis of global epidemiology and mortality of Candida auris. BMC Infect Dis. 2020;20:827. This systematic review showed why Candida auris is now considered a threat to public health as 45% candidemia patients had a fatal outcome.
Garcia-Bustos V, Cabanero-Navalon MD, Ruiz-Saurí A, Ruiz-Gaitán AC, Salavert M, Tormo MÁ, et al. What do we know about Candida auris? State of the art, knowledge gaps, and future directions. Microorganisms. 2021;9:2177.
Satoh K, Makimura K, Hasumi Y, Nishiyama Y, Uchida K, Yamaguchi H. Candida auris sp. Nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol Immunol. 2009;53:41–4.
Lee WG, Shin JH, Uh Y, Kang MG, Kim SH, Park KH, et al. First three reported cases of nosocomial fungemia caused by Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol. 2011;49:3139–42.
Kim MN, Shin JH, Sung H, Lee K, Kim EC, Ryoo N, et al. Candida haemulonii and closely related species at 5 university hospitals in Korea: identification, antifungal susceptibility and clinical features. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;48:e57-61.
Chowdhary A, Sharma C, Duggal S, Agarwal K, Prakash A, Singh PK, et al. New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi. India Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19:1670–3.
Schelenz S, Hagen F, Rhodes JL, Abdolrasouli A, Chowdhary A, Hall A, et al. First hospital outbreak of the globally emerging Candida auris in a European hospital. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2016;5:35. This paper described the first outbreak of invasive C. auris infections and its control in a hospital and the impact of infection control measures adopted at the facility.
Oladele R, Uwanibe JN, Olawoye IB, Ettu AO, Meis JF, Happi CT. Emergence and genomic characterization of multidrug resistant Candida auris in Nigeria. West Africa J Fungi. 2022;8:787.
Tsai YT, Lu PL, Tang HJ, Huang CH, Hung WC, Tseng YT, et al. The first invasive Candida auris infection in Taiwan. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022;11:1867–75.
Theut M, Antsupova V, Andreasen AS, Buhl D, Midttun M, Knudsen JD, et al. The first two cases of Candida auris in Denmark. Ugeskr Laeger. 2022;184:V10210768.
Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017;64:134–40. This study based on whole genome sequence analyses showed that C. auris isolates from different countries belonged to four distinct clades that differed from each other by hundreds of thousands of nucleotides while the isolates from the same clade were closely related.
Chow NA, de Groot T, Badali H, Abastabar M, Chiller TM, Meis JF. Potential fifth clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1780–1.
Safari F, Madani M, Badali H, Kargoshaie AA, Fakhim H, Kheirollahi M, et al. A chronic autochthonous fifth clade case of Candida auris otomycosis in Iran. Mycopathologia. 2022;187:121–7.
Chow NA, Muñoz JF, Gade L, Berkow EL, Li X, Welsh RM, et al. Tracing the evolutionary history and global expansion of Candida auris using population genomic analyses. mBio. 2020;11:e03364–19.
Muñoz JF, Welsh RM, Shea T, Batra D, Gade L, Howard D, et al. Clade-specific chromosomal rearrangements and loss of subtelomeric adhesins in Candida auris. Genetics. 2021;218:iyab029.
Burrack LS, Todd RT, Soisangwan N, Wiederhold NP, Selmecki A. Genomic diversity across Candida auris clinical isolates shapes rapid development of antifungal resistance in vitro and in vivo. mBio. 2022;13:e0084222. This study showed that the genetic background of clinical C. auris isolates has a profound effect on the evolution of drug resistance, no fitness cost was associated with fluconazole resistance development and identified a mutator phenotype capable of rapidly evolving into a pan-resistant isolate even within the same patient.
Taghizadeh Armaki M, Mahdavi Omran S, Kiakojuri K, Khojasteh S, Jafarzadeh J, Tavakoli M, et al. First fluconazole-resistant Candida auris isolated from fungal otitis in Iran. Curr Med Mycol. 2021;7:51–4.
de St MA, Parti U, Anikst VE, Harper T, Mirasol R, Dayo AJ, et al. Clinical, microbiological, and genomic characteristics of clade-III Candida auris colonization and infection in southern California, 2019–2022. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;2:1–9.
Vaseghi N, Sharifisooraki J, Khodadadi H, Nami S, Safari F, Ahangarkani F, et al. Global prevalence and subgroup analyses of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) associated Candida auris infections (CACa): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mycoses. 2022;65:683–703.
Vinayagamoorthy K, Pentapati KC, Prakash H. Prevalence, risk factors, treatment and outcome of multidrug resistance Candida auris infections in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients: a systematic review. Mycoses. 2022;65:613–24.
Alfouzan W, Ahmad S, Dhar R, Asadzadeh M, Almerdasi N, Abdo NM, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Candida auris outbreak in a major secondary-care hospital in Kuwait. J Fungi. 2020;6:307.
Mohsin J, Weerakoon S, Ahmed S, Puts Y, Al Balushi Z, Meis JF, Al-Hatmi AMS. A cluster of Candida auris blood stream infections in a tertiary care hospital in Oman from 2016 to 2019. Antibiotics. 2020;9:E638.
Mulet Bayona JV, Tormo Palop N, Salvador García C, Herrero Rodríguez P, Abril López de Medrano V, Ferrer Gómez C, et al. Characteristics and management of candidaemia episodes in an established Candida auris outbreak. Antibiotics. 2020;9:E558.
Asadzadeh M, Mokaddas E, Ahmad S, Abdullah AA, de Groot T, Meis JF, et al. Molecular characterisation of Candida auris isolates from immunocompromised patients in a tertiary-care hospital in Kuwait reveals a novel mutation in FKS1 conferring reduced susceptibility to echinocandins. Mycoses. 2022;65:331–43.
Mathur P, Hasan F, Singh PK, Malhotra R, Walia K, Chowdhary A. Five-year profile of candidaemia at an Indian trauma centre: high rates of Candida auris blood stream infections. Mycoses. 2018;61:674–80.
van Schalkwyk E, Mpembe RS, Thomas J, Shuping L, Ismail H, Lowman W, et al. Epidemiologic shift in candidemia driven by Candida auris, South Africa, 2016–2017. Emerg Infect Dis. 2019;25:1698–707.
Shastri PS, Shankarnarayan SA, Oberoi J, Rudramurthy SM, Wattal C, Chakrabarti A. Candida auris candidaemia in an intensive care unit - prospective observational study to evaluate epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome. J Crit Care. 2020;57:42–8.
Alobaid K, Ahmad S, Asadzadeh M, Mokaddas E, Al-Sweih N, Albenwan K, et al. Epidemiology of candidemia in Kuwait: a nationwide, population-based study. J Fungi. 2021;7:673.
Arora P, Singh P, Wang Y, Yadav A, Pawar K, Singh A, et al. Environmental isolation of Candida auris from the coastal wetlands of Andaman Islands, India. mBio. 2021;12:e03181–20. This study described the isolation of C. auris from tropical marine ecosystem that supports global warming as the driving force for the emergence of novel human pathogens.
Escandón P. Novel environmental niches for Candida auris: isolation from a coastal habitat in Colombia. J Fungi. 2022;8:748.
Yadav A, Jain K, Wang Y, Pawar K, Kaur H, Sharma KK, et al. Candida auris on apples: diversity and clinical significance. mBio. 2022;13:e0051822. This study described the isolation of C. auris from stored apples previously treated with fungicides, a practice that may have contributed to the development of antifungal drug resistance in this pathogen.
Yadav V, Heitman J. On fruits and fungi: a risk of antifungal usage in food storage and distribution in driving drug resistance in Candida auris. mBio. 2022;13:e0073922.
Lockhart SR, Lyman MM, Sexton DJ. Tools for detecting a “Superbug”: updates on Candida auris testing. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60:e0080821.
Khan ZU, Ahmad S, Al-Sweih N, Joseph L, Alfouzan F, Asadzadeh M. Increasing prevalence, molecular characterization and antifungal drug susceptibility of serial Candida auris isolates in Kuwait. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0195743.
Borman AM, Fraser M, Johnson EM. CHROMagar™ Candida Plus: a novel chromogenic agar that permits the rapid identification of Candida auris. Med Mycol. 2021;59:253–8.
Mulet Bayona JV, Salvador García C, Tormo Palop N, Valentín Martín A, González Padrón C, Colomina Rodríguez J, et al. Novel chromogenic medium CHROMagar™ Candida Plus for detection of Candida auris and other Candida species from surveillance and environmental samples: a multicenter study. J Fungi. 2022;8:281.
Vatanshenassan M, Boekhout T, Meis JF, Berman J, Chowdhary A, Ben-Ami R, et al. Candida auris identification and rapid antifungal susceptibility testing against echinocandins by MALDI-TOF MS. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2019;9:20.
Arastehfar A, Fang W, Daneshnia F, S Al-Hatmi AM, Liao W, Pan W, et al. Novel multiplex real-time quantitative PCR detecting system approach for direct detection of Candida auris and its relatives in spiked serum samples. Future Microbiol. 2019;14:33–45.
Taori SK, Rhodes J, Khonyongwa K, Szendroi A, Smith M, Borman AM, et al. First experience of implementing Candida auris real-time PCR for surveillance in the UK: detection of multiple introductions with two international clades and improved patient outcomes. J Hosp Infect. 2022;127:111–20.
Narayanan A, Selvakumar P, Siddharthan R, Sanyal K. ClaID: a rapid method of clade-level identification of the multidrug resistant human fungal pathogen Candida auris. Microbiol Spectr. 2022;10:e0063422.
Chowdhary A, Prakash A, Sharma C, Kordalewska M, Kumar A, Sarma S, et al. A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009–17) in India: role of the ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2018;73:891–9.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Antifungal susceptibility testing and interpretation. https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-antifungal.html (accessed on September 13, 2022)
Arendrup MC, Prakash A, Meletiadis J, Sharma C, Chowdhary A. Comparison of EUCAST and CLSI reference microdilution MICs of eight antifungal compounds for Candida auris and associated tentative epidemiological cutoff values. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61:e00485.
Kilburn S, Innes G, Quinn M, Southwick K, Ostrowsky B, Greenko JA, et al. Antifungal resistance trends of Candida auris clinical isolates in New York and New Jersey from 2016 to 2020. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0224221.
Yadav A, Singh A, Wang Y, Hi van Haren M, Singh A, de Groot T, et al. Colonisation and transmission dynamics of Candida auris among chronic respiratory diseases patients hospitalised in a Chest Hospital, Delhi, India: a comparative analysis of whole genome sequencing and microsatellite typing. J Fungi 2021;7:81.
Maphanga TG, Naicker SD, Kwenda S, Muñoz JF, van Schalkwyk E, Wadula J, et al. In-vitro antifungal resistance of Candida auris isolates from bloodstream infections. South Africa Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65:e00517-e521.
Ruiz-Gaitán AC, Cantón E, Fernández-Rivero ME, Ramírez P, Pemán J. Outbreak of Candida auris in Spain: a comparison of antifungal activity by three methods with published data. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;53:541–6.
Kathuria S, Singh PK, Sharma C, Prakash A, Masih A, Kumar A, et al. Multidrug-resistant Candida auris misidentified as Candida haemulonii: characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing and its antifungal susceptibility profile variability by Vitek 2, CLSI broth Microdilution, and Etest method. J Clin Microbiol. 2015;53:1823–30.
Ceballos-Garzon A, Garcia-Effron G, Cordoba S, Rodriguez JY, Alvarez-Moreno C, Pape PL, et al. Head-to-head comparison of CLSI, EUCAST, Etest and VITEK2 results for Candida auris susceptibility testing. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2022;59:106558.
Rybak JM, Cuomo CA, Rogers PD. The molecular and genetic basis of antifungal resistance in the emerging fungal pathogen Candida auris. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2022;70:102208.
Healey KR, Kordalewska M, Jiménez Ortigosa C, Singh A, Berrío I, Chowdhary A, et al. Limited ERG11 mutations identified in isolates of Candida auris directly contribute to reduced azole susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62:e01427-e1518.
Ahmad S, Khan Z, Al-Sweih N, Alfouzan W, Joseph L. Candida auris in various hospitals across Kuwait and their susceptibility and molecular basis of resistance to antifungal drugs. Mycoses. 2020;63:104–12.
Rybak JM, Sharma C, Doorley LA, Barker KS, Palmer GE, Rogers PD. Delineation of the direct contribution of Candida auris ERG11 mutations to clinical triazole resistance. Microbiol Spectr. 2021;9:e0158521.
Rybak JM, Doorley LA, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Palmer GE, Rogers PD. Abrogation of triazole resistance upon deletion of CDR1 in a clinical isolate of Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63:e00057-e119.
Rybak JM, Muñoz JF, Barker KS, Parker JE, Esquivel BD, Berkow EL, et al. Mutations in TAC1B: a novel genetic determinant of clinical fluconazole resistance in Candida auris. mBio. 2020;11:e00365–20.
Li J, Coste AT, Bachmann D, Sanglard D, Lamoth F. Deciphering the Mrr1/Mdr1 pathway in azole resistance of Candida auris. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0006722.
Rybak J, Barker KS, Munoz JF, Parker JE, Ahmad S, Mokaddas E, et al. In vivo emergence of high-level resistance during treatment reveals the first identified mechanism of amphotericin B resistance in Candida auris. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2022;28:838–43.
Kordalewska M, Guerrero KD, Mikulski TD, Elias TN, Garcia-Rubio R, Berrio I, et al. Rare modification in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway leads to amphotericin B resistance in Candida auris clinical isolates. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.10.22.465535. Corpus ID: 240327944. Published 29 October 2021.
Al-Obaid I, Asadzadeh M, Ahmad S, Alobaid K, Alfouzan W, Bafna R, Emara M, Joseph L. Fatal breakthrough candidemia in an immunocompromised patient in Kuwait due to Candida auris exhibiting reduced susceptibility to echinocandins and carrying a novel mutation in hotspot-1 of FKS1. J Fungi. 2022;8:267.
Sharma D, Paul RA, Rudramurthy SM, Kashyap N, Bhattacharya S, Soman R, et al. Impact of genotype on echinocandin in vitro susceptibility in Candida auris and in vivo response in a murine model of infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2022;66:e0165221.
Fayed B, Jayakumar MN, Soliman SSM. Caspofungin-resistance in Candida auris is cell wall-dependent phenotype and potential prevention by zinc oxide nanoparticles. Med Mycol. 2021;59:1243–56.
Welsh RM, Bentz ML, Shams A, Houston H, Lyons A, Rose LJ, Litvintseva AP. Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a plastic health care surface. J Clin Microbiol. 2017;55:2996–3005.
Abdolrasouli A, Armstrong-James D, Ryan L, Schelenz S. In vitro efficacy of disinfectants utilised for skin decolonisation and environmental decontamination during a hospital outbreak with Candida auris. Mycoses. 2017;60:758–63.
Singh R, Kaur M, Chakrabarti A, Shankarnarayan SA, Rudramurthy SM. Biofilm formation by Candida auris isolated from colonising sites and candidemia cases. Mycoses. 2019;62:706–9.
Kenters N, Kiernan M, Chowdhary A, Denning DW, Pemán J, Saris K, et al. Control of Candida auris in healthcare institutions: outcome of an International Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy expert meeting. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2019;54:400–6. This paper described specific expert recommendations of the Infection Prevention and Control Working Group of the International Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy for the prevention of C. auris infections and outbreaks in healthcare facilities.
Aldejohann AM, Wiese-Posselt M, Gastmeier P, Kurzai O. Expert recommendations for prevention and management of Candida auris transmission. Mycoses. 2022;65:590–8.
Garcia-Bustos V, Salavert M, Ruiz-Gaitán AC, Cabañero-Navalon MD, Sigona-Giangreco IA, Pemán J. A clinical predictive model of candidaemia by Candida auris in previously colonized critically ill patients. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020;26:1507–13.
Briano F, Magnasco L, Sepulcri C, Dettori S, Dentone C, Mikulska M, et al. Candida auris candidemia in critically ill, colonized patients: cumulative incidence and risk factors. Infect Dis Ther. 2022;11:1149–60.
Khan Z, Ahmad S, Benwan K, Purohit P, Al-Obaid I, Bafna R, et al. Invasive Candida auris infections in Kuwait hospitals: epidemiology, antifungal treatment and outcome. Infection. 2018;46:641–50.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Infection prevention and control for Candida auris (2018). Available online: https://www.cdc.gov/fungal/candida-auris/c-auris-infection-control.html (accessed on September 25, 2022).
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Candida auris in healthcare settings—Europe—First update-23 April 2018. Stockholm, ECDC. 2018. Available online: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/portal/files/documents/RRA-Candida-auris-European-Union-countries.pdf (accessed on September 25, 2022).
Public Health England. Candida auris: laboratory investigation, management and infection prevention and control. Guidance for the laboratory investigation, management and infection prevention and control for cases of Candida auris (C. auris). 2016. Available online: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/candida-auris-laboratory-investigation-management-and-infection-prevention-and-control. (accessed on September 25, 2022).
Pan-American Health Organization/World Health Organization. Epidemiological alert: Candida auris outbreaks in health care services in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic- 6 February 2021. https://www.paho.org/en/documents/epidemiological-alert-candida-auris-outbreaks-health-care-services-context-covid-19 (accessed on September 25, 2022)
Ruiz-Gaitán A, Moret AM, Tasias-Pitarch M, Aleixandre-López AI, Martínez-Morel H, Calabuig E, et al. An outbreak due to Candida auris with prolonged colonisation and candidaemia in a tertiary care European hospital. Mycoses. 2018;61:498–505.
Karmarkar EN, O’Donnell K, Prestel C, Forsberg K, Gade L, Jain S, et al. Rapid assessment and containment of Candida auris transmission in postacute care settings-Orange County, California, 2019. Ann Intern Med. 2021;174:1554–62.
Ahmad S, Khan Z. Invasive candidiasis: a review of nonculture-based laboratory diagnostic methods. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2012;30:264–9.
Clancy CJ, Nguyen MH. Diagnosing invasive candidiasis. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56:e01909-e1917.
Keighley C, Garnham K, Harch SAJ, Robertson M, Chaw K, Teng JC, et al. Candida auris: diagnostic challenges and emerging opportunities for the clinical microbiology laboratory. Curr Fungal Infect Rep. 2021;15:116–26.
Freitas BL, Leach L, Chaturvedi V, Chaturvedi S. Reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) assay for the rapid enumeration of live Candida auris cells from the health care environment. J Clin Microbiol. 2022;60:e0077921.
Kordalewska M, Perlin DS. Detection and identification of Candida auris from clinical skin swabs. Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2542:245–56.
Crawford LC, Kidd SE, Anninos TM, Turra M, Weldhagen GF. Candida auris PCR for high-throughput infection control screening. Med Mycol. 2022;60:myac057.
Lee PW, Totten M, Chen L, Chen FE, Trick AY, Shah K, et al. A portable droplet magnetofluidic device for point-of-care detection of multidrug-resistant Candida auris. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022;10:826694.
Rossow J, Ostrowsky B, Adams E, Greenko J, McDonald R, Vallabhaneni S, et al. Factors associated with Candida auris colonization and transmission in skilled nursing facilities with ventilator Units, New York, 2016–2018. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:e753–60.
Piatti G, Sartini M, Cusato C, Schito AM. Colonization by Candida auris in critically ill patients: role of cutaneous and rectal localization during an outbreak. J Hosp Infect. 2022;120:85–9.
Kean R, Sherry L, Townsend E, McKloud E, Short B, Akinbobola A, et al. Surface disinfection challenges for Candida auris: an in-vitro study. J Hosp Infect. 2018;98:433–6.
Biswal M, Rudramurthy SM, Jain N, Shamanth AS, Sharma D, Jain K, et al. Controlling a possible outbreak of Candida auris infection: lessons learnt from multiple interventions. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97:363–70.
Decker BK, Clancy CJ. Lanyards as source of a Candida auris outbreak: as you investigate the environment, do not overlook hand hygiene. Crit Care Med. 2021;49:714–6.
Ku TSN, Walraven CJ, Lee SA. Candida auris: disinfectants and implications for infection control. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:726.
Rutala WA, Kanamori H, Gergen MF, Sickbert-Bennett EE, Weber DJ. Susceptibility of Candida auris and Candida albicans to 21 germicides used in healthcare facilities. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2019;40:380–2.
Kumar JA, Cadnum JL, Jencson AL, Donskey CJ. Are reduced concentrations of chlorine-based disinfectants effective against Candida auris? Am J Infect Control. 2020;48:448–50.
Bandara HMHN, Samaranayake LP. Emerging strategies for environmental decontamination of nosocomial fungal pathogen Candida auris. J Med Microbiol. 2022;71:001548.
Ledwoch K, Maillard JY. Candida auris dry surface biofilm (DSB) for disinfectant efficacy testing. Materials. 2018;12:18.
Moore G, Schelenz S, Borman AM, Johnson EM, Brown CS. Yeasticidal activity of chemical disinfectants and antiseptics against Candida auris. J Hosp Infect. 2017;97:371–5.
Cadnum JL, Shaikh AA, Piedrahita CT, Sankar T, Jencson AL, Larkin EL, et al. Effectiveness of disinfectants against Candida auris and other Candida species. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2017;38:1240–3.
de Groot T, Chowdhary A, Meis JF, Voss A. Killing of Candida auris by UV-C: importance of exposure time and distance. Mycoses. 2019;62:408–12.
Kelly S, Schnugh D, Thomas T. Effectiveness of ultraviolet-C vs aerosolized hydrogen peroxide in ICU terminal disinfection. J Hosp Infect. 2022;121:114–9.
Mariita RM, Davis JH, Lottridge MM, Randive RV. Shining light on multi-drug resistant Candida auris: Ultraviolet-C disinfection, wavelength sensitivity, and prevention of biofilm formation of an emerging yeast pathogen. Microbiologyopen. 2022;11:e1261.
Livingston S, Cadnum JL, Gestrich S, Jencson AL, Donskey CJ. Efficacy of automated disinfection with ozonated water in reducing sink drainage system colonization with Pseudomonas species and Candida auris. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2018;39:1497–8.
AlJindan R, AlEraky DM. Silver nanoparticles: a promising antifungal agent against the growth and biofilm formation of the emergent Candida auris. J Fungi. 2022;8:744.
Eyre DW, Sheppard AE, Madder H, Moir I, Moroney R, Quan TP, et al. A Candida auris outbreak and its control in an intensive care setting. N Engl J Med. 2018;379:1322–31.
Johnson CJ, Eix EF, Lam BC, Wartman KM, Meudt JJ, Shanmuganayagam D, Nett JE. Augmenting the activity of chlorhexidine for decolonization of Candida auris from porcine skin. J Fungi. 2021;7:804.
Huang LZY, Elbourne A, Shaw ZL, Cheeseman S, Goff A, Orrell-Trigg R, et al. Dual-action silver functionalized nanostructured titanium against drug resistant bacterial and fungal species. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2022;628(Pt B):1049–60.
Eadie E, Hiwar W, Fletcher L, Tidswell E, O’Mahoney P, Buonanno M, Welch D, Adamson CS, Brenner DJ, Noakes C, Wood K. Far-UVC (222 nm) efficiently inactivates an airborne pathogen in a room-sized chamber. Sci Rep. 2022;12:4373.
Haq MF, Cadnum JL, Pearlmutter BS, Jencson AL, Donskey CJ. Effectiveness of a novel 1-step cleaner and disinfectant against Candida auris. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2022;28:1–3.
Ziental D, Mlynarczyk DT, Kolasinski E, Güzel E, Dlugaszewska J, Popenda Ł, et al. Zinc(II), palladium(II), and metal-free phthalocyanines bearing nipagin-functionalized substituents against Candida auris and selected multidrug-resistant microbes. Pharmaceutics. 2022;14:1686.
de Moraes DC. Current scenario of the search for new antifungal agents to treat Candida auris infections: an integrative review. J Mycol Med. 2022;32:101232.
Bandara N, Samaranayake L. Emerging and future strategies in the management of recalcitrant Candida auris. Med Mycol. 2022;60:myac008. This review provides emerging data on antimicrobial peptides, immunotherapy, photodynamic therapy, nanoparticles, natural compounds, combinational therapy and repurposed drugs as new/emerging antifungals for the management of C. auris infections.
Bapat PS, Nobile CJ. Photodynamic therapy is effective against Candida auris biofilms. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2021;11:713092.
Schwarz P, Nikolskiy I, Bidaud AL, Sommer F, Bange G, Dannaoui E. In vitro activity of amphotericin B in combination with colistin against fungi responsible for invasive infections. J Fungi. 2022;8:115.
Dekkerová J, Černáková L, Kendra S, Borghi E, Ottaviano E, Willinger B, et al. Farnesol boosts the antifungal effect of fluconazole and modulates resistance in Candida auris through regulation of the CDR1 and ERG11 genes. J Fungi. 2022;8:783.
Shahi G, Kumar M, Skwarecki AS, Edmondson M, Banerjee A, Usher J, et al. Fluconazole resistant Candida auris clinical isolates have increased levels of cell wall chitin and increased susceptibility to a glucosamine-6-phosphate synthase inhibitor. Cell Surf. 2022;8:100076.
Wiederhold NP, Najvar LK, Olivo M, Morris KN, Patterson HP, Catano G, et al. Ibrexafungerp demonstrates in vitro activity against fluconazole-resistant Candida auris and in vivo efficacy with delayed initiation of therapy in an experimental model of invasive candidiasis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2021;65:e02694-e2720.
Caballero U, Eraso E, Quindós G, Jauregizar N. In vitro interaction and killing-kinetics of amphotericin B combined with anidulafungin or caspofungin against Candida auris. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13:1333.
de Jong AW, Al-Obaid K, Tap RM, van den Ende BG, Groenewald M, Joseph L, et al. Candida khanbhai sp. nov., a new clinically relevant yeast within the Candida haemulonii species complex. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.12.01.518802.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent
This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ahmad, S., Asadzadeh, M. Strategies to Prevent Transmission of Candida auris in Healthcare Settings. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 17, 36–48 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-023-00451-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12281-023-00451-7