Skip to main content
Log in

Involvement of Opioid Peptides in the Analgesic Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Neuroscience Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS)-induced analgesia was characterized, and its underlying mechanisms were examined in a spared nerve injury model of neuropathic pain in rats. The analgesic effect of SCS with moderate mechanical hypersensitivity was increased with increasing stimulation intensity between the 20% and 80% motor thresholds. Various frequencies (2, 15, 50, 100, 10000 Hz, and 2/100 Hz dense-dispersed) of SCS were similarly effective. SCS-induced analgesia was maintained without tolerance within 24 h of continuous stimulation. SCS at 2 Hz significantly increased methionine enkephalin content in the cerebrospinal fluid. The analgesic effect of 2 Hz was abolished by μ or κ opioid receptor antagonist. The effect of 100 Hz was prevented by a κ antagonist, and that of 10 kHz was blocked by any of the μ, δ, or κ receptor antagonists, suggesting that the analgesic effect of SCS at different frequencies is mediated by different endorphins and opioid receptors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shealy CN, Mortimer JT, Reswick JB. Electrical inhibition of pain by stimulation of the dorsal columns: Preliminary clinical report. Anesth Analg 1967, 46: 489–491.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sdrulla AD, Guan Y, Raja SN. Spinal cord stimulation: Clinical efficacy and potential mechanisms. Pain Pract 2018, 18: 1048–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Melzack R, Wall PD. Pain mechanisms: A new theory. Pain Forum 1996, 5: 3–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guan Y. Spinal cord stimulation: Neurophysiological and neurochemical mechanisms of action. Curr Pain Headache Rep 2012, 16: 217–225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tazawa T, Kamiya Y, Kobayashi A, Saeki K, Takiguchi M, Nakahashi Y. Spinal cord stimulation modulates supraspinal centers of the descending antinociceptive system in rats with unilateral spinal nerve injury. Mol Pain 2015, 11: 36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saadé NE, Barchini J, Tchachaghian S, Chamaa F, Jabbur SJ, Song Z, et al. The role of the dorsolateral funiculi in the pain relieving effect of spinal cord stimulation: A study in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Exp Brain Res 2015, 233: 1041–1052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Song Z, Ansah OB, Meyerson BA, Pertovaara A, Linderoth B. The rostroventromedial medulla is engaged in the effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rodent model of neuropathic pain. Neuroscience 2013, 247: 134–144.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ultenius C, Song ZY, Lin PY, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. Spinal GABAergic mechanisms in the effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rodent model of neuropathic pain: Is GABA synthesis involved? Neuromodulation 2013, 16: 114–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Song ZY, Meyerson BA, Linderoth B. Spinal 5-HT receptors that contribute to the pain-relieving effects of spinal cord stimulation in a rat model of neuropathy. Pain 2011, 152: 1666–1673.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang F, Xu Q, Shu B, Tiwari V, He SQ, Vera-Portocarrero LP, et al. Activation of cannabinoid CB1 receptor contributes to suppression of spinal nociceptive transmission and inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity by Aβ-fiber stimulation. Pain 2016, 157: 2582–2593.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sun L, Tai L, Qiu Q, Mitchell R, Fleetwood-Walker S, Joosten EA, et al. Endocannabinoid activation of CB1 receptors contributes to long-lasting reversal of neuropathic pain by repetitive spinal cord stimulation. Eur J Pain 2017, 21: 804–814.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ding XH, Hua F, Sutherly K, Ardell JL, Williams CA. C2 spinal cord stimulation induces dynorphin release from rat T4 spinal cord: Potential modulation of myocardial ischemia-sensitive neurons. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2008, 295: R1519–R1528.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Sato KL, King EW, Johanek LM, Sluka KA. Spinal cord stimulation reduces hypersensitivity through activation of opioid receptors in a frequency-dependent manner. Eur J Pain 2013, 17: 551–561.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tonelli L, Setti T, Falasca A, Martignoni E, Torcia E, Calcaterra FM, et al. Investigation on cerebrospinal fluid opioids and neurotransmitters related to spinal cord stimulation. Appl Neurophysiol 1988, 51: 324–332.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Han JS. Acupuncture: neuropeptide release produced by electrical stimulation of different frequencies. Trends Neurosci 2003, 26: 17–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ulett GA, Han S, Han JS. Electroacupuncture: Mechanisms and clinical application. Biol Psychiatry 1998, 44: 129–138.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Han JS, Terenius L. Neurochemical basis of acupuncture analgesia. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1982, 22: 193–220.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Decosterd I, Woolf CJ. Spared nerve injury: An animal model of persistent peripheral neuropathic pain. Pain 2000, 87: 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dixon WJ. Efficient analysis of experimental observations. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 1980, 20: 441–462.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chaplan SR, Bach FW, Pogrel JW, Chung JM, Yaksh TL. Quantitative assessment of tactile allodynia in the rat paw (Von Frey hairs). Journal of Neuroscience Methods 1994, 53: 55–63.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ju J, Shin DJ, Na YC, Yoon MH. Role of spinal opioid receptor on the antiallodynic effect of intrathecal nociceptin in neuropathic rat. Neurosci Lett 2013, 542: 118–122.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Chen XH, Han JS. All three types of opioid receptors in the spinal cord are important for 2/15 Hz electroacupuncture analgesia. Eur J Pharmacol 1992, 211: 203–210.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Smits H, Ultenius C, Deumens R, Koopmans GC, Honig WMM, van Kleef M, et al. Effect of spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain relates to degree of tactile “allodynia.” Neuroscience 2006, 143: 541–546.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Smits H, van Kleef M, Joosten EA. Spinal cord stimulation of dorsal columns in a rat model of neuropathic pain: Evidence for a segmental spinal mechanism of pain relief. Pain 2012, 153: 177–183.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Xing GG, Liu FY, Qu XX, Han JS, Wan Y. Long-term synaptic plasticity in the spinal dorsal horn and its modulation by electroacupuncture in rats with neuropathic pain. Exp Neurol 2007, 208: 323–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jiang YX, Wang Y, Liu HX. Comparison between therapeutic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation with the frequency of 2 Hz and 100 Hz on Chronic inflammatory pain in rats. ZhongGuo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi 2001, 21: 923–925.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shechter R, Yang F, Xu Q, Cheong YK, He SQ, Sdrulla A, et al. Conventional and kilohertz-frequency spinal cord stimulation produces intensity- and frequency-dependent inhibition of mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Anesthesiology 2013, 119: 422–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sato KL, Johanek LM, Sanada LS, Sluka KA. Spinal cord stimulation reduces mechanical hyperalgesia and glial cell activation in animals with neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg 2014, 118: 464–472.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Meuwissen KPV, Gu JW, Zhang TC, Joosten EAJ. Conventional-SCS vs burst-SCS and the behavioral effect on mechanical hypersensitivity in a rat model of chronic neuropathic pain: Effect of amplitude. Neuromodulation 2018, 21: 19–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Han JS. Acupuncture analgesia: Areas of consensus and controversy. Pain 2011, 152: S41–S48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao WL, Wang C, Li ZZ, Chen L, Li JB, Cui WD, et al. Efficacy and safety of transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation to treat muscle spasticity following brain injury: A double-blinded, multicenter, randomized controlled trial. PLoS One 2015, 10: e0116976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Song ZY, Viisanen H, Meyerson BA, Pertovaara A, Linderoth B. Efficacy of kilohertz-frequency and conventional spinal cord stimulation in rat models of different pain conditions. Neuromodulation Technol Neural Interface 2014, 17: 226–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Kapural L, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, et al. Comparison of 10-kHz high-frequency and traditional low-frequency spinal cord stimulation for the treatment of chronic back and leg pain: 24-month results from a multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial. Neurosurgery 2016, 79: 667–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Vallejo R, Kelley CA, Gupta A, Smith WJ, Vallejo A, Cedeño DL. Modulation of neuroglial interactions using differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Mol Pain 2020, 16: 1744806920918057.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Fishman M, Cordner H, Justiz R, Provenzano D, Merrell C, Shah B, et al. Twelve-Month results from multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled clinical trial comparing differential target multiplexed spinal cord stimulation and traditional spinal cord stimulation in subjects with chronic intractable back pain and leg pain. Pain Pract 2021, 21: 912–923.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gong WY, Johanek LM, Sluka KA. A comparison of the effects of burst and tonic spinal cord stimulation on hyperalgesia and physical activity in an animal model of neuropathic pain. Anesth Analg 2016, 122: 1178–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Huo R, Han SP, Liu FY, Shou XJ, Liu LY, Song TJ, et al. Responses of primary afferent fibers to acupuncture-like peripheral stimulation at different frequencies: Characterization by single-unit recording in rats. Neurosci Bull 2020, 36: 907–918.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Duan B, Cheng LZ, Ma QF. Spinal circuits transmitting mechanical pain and itch. Neurosci Bull 2018, 34: 186–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank Beijing PINS Medical Co., Ltd., China for technical assistance. Special thanks go to Fu Xu (Beijing PINS Medical Co., Ltd.) and colleagues for modifying the SCS equipment for animal studies. This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of the Ministry of Science and Technology, China (2016YFC0105501, 2019YFD1712000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Rong Zhang or Ji-Sheng Han.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has conflict of interest regarding the contents of this article.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 197 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhai, FJ., Han, SP., Song, TJ. et al. Involvement of Opioid Peptides in the Analgesic Effect of Spinal Cord Stimulation in a Rat Model of Neuropathic Pain. Neurosci. Bull. 38, 403–416 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00844-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12264-022-00844-7

Keywords

Navigation