Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of changing coating process parameters in the preparation of antimicrobial-coated silk sutures: An in vitro study

  • Published:
Fibers and Polymers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Braided silk sutures were coated using a combination of poly(ε-caprolactone) (PCL) and sulfamethoxazole trimethroprim (SMZ) to investigate their antimicrobial performance. SMZ (2500 μg/ml) was combined with different PCL concentrations, i.e., 2.5 %, 5 %, 7.5 %, and 10 % (w/v). Antimicrobial test results showed that SMZ and PCL-treated silk sutures exhibited increasing antimicrobial efficacy against Gram-negative (Escherichia coli) and -positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus) with increasing PCL concentrations. The tensile and knot strength of sutures coated with 10 % PCL were significantly higher than those of sutures coated with 7.5 %, 5 %, and 2.5 % PCL. Treatment with PCL exhibited a positive effect on drug release from the sutures. Significant traits of antibacterial activity were observed up to 4 days after instalment of 10 % PCL-coated silk sutures. Under a scanning electron microscope, untreated silk sutures showed a surface heavily coated with bacteria, whereas treated sutures showed a smooth surface without bacteria. The results of this study indicate that SMZ combined with high concentrations of PCL may afford a suitable antibacterial coating agent for braided silk sutures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. Mingmalairak, Formatex, 1, 313 (2011).

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. A. Seal and D. Paul-Cheadle, Am. J. Infect. Control., 32, 57 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. X. Ming, S. Rothenburger, and M. M. Nichols, Surg. Infect. (Larchmt), 9, 451 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Rothenburger, D. Spangler, S. Bhende, and D. Burkley, Surg. Infect. (Larchmt), 3, 79 (2002).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. Gómez-Alonso, F. J. García-Criado, F. C. Parreño-Manchado, J. E. García-Sánchez, E. García-Sánchez, A. Parreño-Manchado, and Y. Zambrano-Cuadradoa, J. Infect., 54, 82 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. G. H. Altman, F. Diaz, C. Jakuba, T. Calabro, R. L. Horan, J. Chen, H. Lu, J. Richmond, and D. L. Kaplan, Biomaterials, 24, 401 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. N. A. Swanson and T. A. Tromovitch, Int. J. Dermatol., 21, 373 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Vepari and D. L. Kaplan, Prog. Polym. Sci., 32, 991 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D. Leaper, A. J. McBain, A. Kramer, O. Assadian, J. L. Alfonso Sanchez, J. Lumio, and M. Kiernan, Ann. R. Coll. Surg. Eng., 92, 453 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. W. Hu, Z. M. Huang, S. Y. Meng, and C. L. He, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 20, 2275 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Ghanem and I. Adekogbe, Biomaterials, 26, 7241 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. F. D. Matl, A. Obermeier, S. Repmann, W. Friess, A Stemberger, and K. D. Kuehn, Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother., 52, 1957 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. B. D. Masini, D. J Stinner, S. M. Waterman, and J. C. Wenke, J. Surg. Educ., 68, 101 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. B. Elayarajah, R. Rajendran, B. Venkatrajah, S. Sreekumar, A. Sudhakar, P. K. Janiga, and S. Sreekumar, Pak. J. Biol. Sci., 14, 336 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. E. Pinho, L. Magalhães, M, Henriques, and R. Oliveira, Ann. Microbiol., 61, 493 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Singh, A. Jain, S. Panwar, D. Gupta, and S. K. Khare, Dyes Pigments, 66, 99 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. K. Erdem, A. S. Yurudu, and N. Ozlem, IUFS J. Biol., 67, 115 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  18. X. Ming, S. Rothenburger, and D. Yang, Surg. Infect. (Larchmt), 8, 201 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. R. F. Edlich and W. B. Long III, “Surgical Knot Tying Manual”, 3rd ed., pp.36–43, Coviden, New York, USA, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  20. O. Guillaume, X. Garric, J. P. Lavigne, H. V. D. Berghe, and J. Coudane, J. Control. Release., 162, 492 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. O. L. Shanmugasundaram, R. V. M. Gowda, and D. Saravanan, Int. J. Biotechnol. Mol. Biol. Res., 2, 80 (2011).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. J. C. Kim, Y. K. Lee, B. S. Lim, S. H. Rhee, and H. C. Yang, J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Med., 18, 2363 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. B. Gupta, R. Jain, and H. Singh, Polym. Adv. Technol., 19, 1698 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. P. K. Janiga, B. Elayarajah, R. Rajendran, R. Rammohan, B. Venkatrajah, and S. Asa, J. Ind. Text., 42, 176 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Viju and G. Thilagavathi, Fiber. Polym., 13, 782 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. J. P. Borges, S. R. Gomes, C. R. Henriques, and J. C. Silva, “Proc. Tissue. Eng. Regenerative. Med. Int. Society”, p.473, NUI Galway, Ireland, 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  27. S. Viju and G. Thilagavathi, J. Ind. Text., 42, 256 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. H. Liu, K. K. Leonas, and Y. Zhao, J. Eng. Fiber. Fab., 5, 10 (2010).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. M. H. Huang, S. M. Li, and M. Vert, Polymer, 45, 8675 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. R. S. Bezwada, D. D. Jamiolkowski, and E. A. Lee, Biomaterials, 16, 1141 (1995).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. D. J. Carr, A. G. Heward, R. M. Laing, and B. E. Niven, J. Text. Inst., 100, 51 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lu Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pethile, S., Chen, XJ., Hou, Dd. et al. Effect of changing coating process parameters in the preparation of antimicrobial-coated silk sutures: An in vitro study. Fibers Polym 15, 1589–1595 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1589-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12221-014-1589-6

Keywords

Navigation