Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

First Do No Harm: Ethical Issues in Pathologizing Normal Variations in Behavior and Functioning

  • Published:
Psychological Injury and Law Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been an increase in receipt of academic accommodations and growing disparities in who receives them. In the present study, we examine how decisions about diagnosis, impairment, and disability are made in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and learning disorder. Using the concept of medicalization, we present evidence that psychologists making diagnoses and disability determinations often over-pathologize everyday behaviors and experiences. We focus on the base rates of current and retrospective symptom reports, inaccuracies in self-reported impairment, misinterpretation of cognitive and psychoeducational test results, and the necessity of validity testing. Guided by ethical and professional codes for psychologists, we discuss the harm of over-pathologizing normal behavior for both individuals and for society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See Johnson and Suhr (2021) for a detailed methodology

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie A. Suhr.

Ethics declarations

Ethical Approval

No animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Consent to Participate

Data presented in the article were from a deidentified dataset of a previously published study that had been approved by the ethics board of Ohio University. All procedures in the previously published study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (national and institutional).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Suhr, J.A., Johnson, E.E.H. First Do No Harm: Ethical Issues in Pathologizing Normal Variations in Behavior and Functioning. Psychol. Inj. and Law 15, 253–267 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09455-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12207-022-09455-z

Keywords

Navigation