Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical analysis of flow characteristics of a swirl-stabilized premixed burner with different swirl vane configurations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study numerically investigates the flow and combustion characteristics of a swirl-premixed burner with a curved vane swirler (i.e., curved type) to reduce the pressure loss of the burner nozzle with a conventional vane swirler (i.e., flat type). For the curved type swirler, the pressure loss is decreased by 35 % due to the inhibition of flow separation at the vane, and NOX emission is reduced by 69 % because fuel-air mixing is enhanced at the flame front, leading to more uniform fuel distribution toward downstream. In addition, the characteristics of the jet penetration are analyzed because the jet behavior is crucial to fuel-air mixing. The jet trajectory in non-swirling flow can be reasonably predicted by a conventional formula, but it is difficult to predict the jet trajectory in swirling flow by this formula because of the effect of a radial pressure gradient formed by the swirling flow.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c :

Reaction progress variable

d j :

Diameter of fuel jet

D hub :

Diameter of swirler hub

D sw :

Diameter of swirler vane

f :

Fuel mass fraction

f′:

Fluctuation of fuel mass fraction (f − \(\overline f \))

\(\overline f \) :

Mean of fuel mass fraction

G t :

Axial thrust

G m :

Axial flux of angular momentum

p :

Static pressure

r :

Radius of vane

S N :

Swirl number

S N,const :

Swirl number for swirler with constant vane

S N,var :

Swirl number for swirler with variable vane

u, U :

Axial velocity

U g :

Velocity magnitude of upstream gas

U j :

Velocity magnitude of jet

w, W :

Tangential velocity

X :

Axial distance

Y :

Penetration depth

θ :

Angle of vane

ρ :

Density

ρ g :

Density of upstream gas

ρ j :

Density of jet

JIC :

Jet in cross type

FS1 :

Fuel stage 1

FS2 :

Fuel stage 2

FV :

Fuel velocity

References

  1. M. Ameri and N. Enadi, Thermodynamic modeling and second law based performance analysis of a gas turbine power plant (exergy and exergoeconomic analysis), J. of Power Tech., 92 (3) (2012) 183–191.

    Google Scholar 

  2. R. Tuccillo and M. C. Cameretti, Combustion and combustors for MGT applications, Micro Gas Turbines, NATO RTO-EN-AVT-131 (2005) 5.1–5.56.

  3. P. Flohr and P. Stuttaford, Modern Gas Turbine Systems: High Efficiency, Low Emission, Fuel Flexible Power Generation, Chapter 5, Woodhead Publishing, Cambridge, UK (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  4. K. Döbbeling, J. Hellat and H. Koch, 25 years of BBC/ABB/Alstom lean premix combustion technologies, J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power, 129 (1) (2007) 2–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A. H. Lefebvre and D. R. Ballal, Gas Turbine Combustion: Alternative Fuels And Emissions, Chapter 5, 3rd Ed., CRC Press, Florida, USA (2010).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. B. Khandelwal, D. Lili and V. Sethi, Design and study on performance of axial swirler for annular combustor by changing different design parameters, J. the Energy Inst., 87 (2014) 372–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. R. Rahim and M. N. M. Jaafa, Effect of flame angle using various swirler angle in combustion performance, J. Teknologi, 72 (4) (2015) 71–75.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. L. Mathur and N. R. L. Maccalum, Swirling air jets issuing from vane swirlers, part 1: Free jets, J. of Inst. of Fuel, 40 (1967) 214–225.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. Kilik, Better swirl generation by using curved vane swirler, AIAA 23rd Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA-85-0187 (1985).

  10. C. A. Martin, Aspects of the design of swirlers as used in fuel injectors for gas turbine combustors, Gas Turbine Conference and Exhibition (1987).

  11. A. H. Lefebvre, Gas Turbine Combustion, Chapter 4, 1st Ed., Hemisphere Publishing Corporation, USA (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  12. V. McDonell, Lean Combustion, Chapter 5, 2nd Ed., Academic Press, Massachusetts, USA (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. C. C. Galeazzo, G. Donnert, P. Habisreuther, N. Zarzlis, R. J. Valdes and W. Krebs, Measurement and simulation of turbulent mixing in a jet in crossflow, J. Eng. Gas Turbines and Power, 133 (2011) 061504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. D. G. Lilley, Lateral jet injection into swirling combustor flow fields, AIAA 24th Joint Propulsion Conference, AIAA-88-3183 (1988).

  15. J. M. Beer and N. A. Chigier, Combustion Aerodynamics, Chapter 5, Applied Science Publishers, London, UK (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  16. H. Ju, J. H. Cho, J. Hwang, M. K. Kim, H. S. Kim and W. J. Lee, Investigation of the swirl flow characteristics of a swirl-premixed burner in a micro gas turbine, Trans. Korean Soc. Mech. Eng. B, 43 (12) (2019) 825–832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. R. Mongia, E. Tomita, F. Hsu, L. Tarbot and R. Dibble, Use of an optical probe for time-resolved in situ measurement of local air-to fuel ratio and extent of fuel mixing with applications to low NOX emissions in premixed gas turbines, 26th Symposium on Combustion, The Combustion Institute (1996) 2749–2755.

  18. F. Biagioli and F. Guthe, Effect of pressure and fuel-air unmixedness on NOX emissions from industrial gas turbine burners, Combust. Flame, 151 (2007) 274–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. F. Magni, D. Hudgins, W. Geng and F. Grimm, Reduction of NOX emissions in alstom GT11NM engines: development, validation and engine operation experience of the EV-alpha burner, ASME Turbo Expo 2012, GT2012-68345 (2012).

  20. S. Mohammadnejad, P. Vena, S. Yun and S. Kheirkhah, Internal structure of hydrogen-enriched methane-air turbulent premixed flames: flamelet and non-flamelet behavior, Combust. Flame, 208 (2019) 139–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by KIMM’s research funds for gas turbine development.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ju Hyeong Cho.

Additional information

Hae-ji Ju is a Ph.D. candidate of Mechanical Engineering, University of Science & Technology, Daejeon, Korea. Her research interests include burner design and numerical simulation of gas turbine combustors.

Ju Hyeong Cho is a Principal Researcher in Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, and a professor in University of Science & Technology, Daejeon, Korea. His research interests include design of gas turbine combustors and thermoacoustic analysis.

Jeongjae Hwang is a Senior Researcher in Korea Institute of Machinery & Materials, Daejeon, Korea. His research interests include design of gas turbine combustors and experimental analysis using laser diagnostics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ju, Hj., Cho, J.H. & Hwang, J. Numerical analysis of flow characteristics of a swirl-stabilized premixed burner with different swirl vane configurations. J Mech Sci Technol 36, 5793–5800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1040-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-1040-7

Keywords

Navigation