Skip to main content
Log in

Experimental investigation on the influence of central airflow on swirl combustion stability and flame shape

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Central airflow has been widely used to improve the performance of swirl burners in engineering applications. This paper reports an experimental investigation on the effects of such airflow on the combustion stability and shape of swirl flames. The results show that, for a low equivalence ratio, central airflow changes the flame shape from an “inverted cone” to a “rectangle” and significantly increases the flame height. Raising the speed of the central airflow increases the maximum temperature on the central axis of the swirl flame because the airflow enhances the upward momentum of the fuel. By contrast, for a high equivalence ratio, the swirl flame is prone to liftoff owing to the influence of the central airflow on the axial momentum of the fuel. In this case, increasing the fuel flow causes the swirl-flame blowout limit to increase and then decrease. This limit for different equivalence ratios is well described by dimensionless function. These findings will provide an important reference for the design of safe and high-performance swirl burners.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A t :

Total area of tangential air inlet (mm2)

D :

Ratio of vertical flowing air momentum to swirl air momentum

H :

Flame height (cm)

L :

Center axis distance (cm)

m 1 :

Central air mass flow (kg s−1)

m 2 :

Fuel mass flow (kg s−1)

m 3 :

Swirl air mass flow (kg s−1)

m ɵ :

Tangential mass flow (kg s−1)

m A :

Axial mass flow (kg s−1)

P f :

Combustion power (kW)

Q c :

Center airflow rate (L min−1)

r 0 :

Cross section radius of swirl generation chamber (mm)

R :

Nozzle radius (mm)

S :

Swirl strength

T :

Flame temperature (°C)

v 1 :

Central air velocity (m s−1)

v 2 :

Fuel flow rate (m s−1)

v 3 :

Swirl airflow rate (m s−1)

δ :

Dimensionless number of combinations

φ :

Equivalence ratio

References

  1. Syred N, Beer JM. Combustion in swirling flows: a review. Combust Flame. 1974;23(2):143–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(74)90057-1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jing J, Zhang C, Sun W, et al. Influence of mass-flow ratio of inner to outer secondary air on gas particle flow near a swirl burner. Particuology. 2013;11(5):540–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.partic.2012.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhou H, Meng S. Numerical prediction of swirl burner geometry effects on NOx emission and combustion instability in heavy oil-fired boiler. Appl Therm Eng. 2019;159:113843. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2019.113843.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Feyz ME, Esfahani JA, Pishbin I, et al. Effect of recess length on the flame parameters and combustion performance of a low swirl burner. Appl Therm Eng. 2015;89:609–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2015.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Z, Li Z, Zhu Q, et al. Gas/particle flow and combustion characteristics and NOx emissions of a new swirl coal burner. Energy. 2011;36(2):709–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.12.037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Al-Halbouni A, Giese A, Tali E, et al. Combustor concept for industrial gas turbines with single digit NOx and CO emission values. Energy Procedia. 2017;120:134–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.07.146.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Starner SH, Bilger RW. Joint measurements of velocity and scalars in a turbulent diffusion flame with moderate swirl. Symp Combust. 1988;21(1):1569–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(88)80390-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Xi Z, Fu Z, Hu X. An investigation on flame shape and size for a high-pressure turbulent non-premixed swirl combustion. Energies. 2018;11(4):930. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11040930.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guiberti TF, Durox D, Zimmer L, et al. Analysis of topology transitions of swirl flames interacting with the combustor side wall. Combust Flame. 2015;162(11):4342–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.07.001.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tong Y, Li M, Thern M, et al. An experimental study of effects of confinement ratio on swirl stabilized flame macrostructures. In: International conference on asme power conference joint with Icope-17 collocated with the asme international conference on energy sustainability, Charlotte, NC, USA, 2017;26–30. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY, USA, p. V001T004A007. https://doi.org/10.1115/power-icope2017-3064.

  11. Pishbin SI, Ghazikhani M, Razavi SMRM. Experimental study on the effects of flame regime on the exergy destruction in premixed low swirl combustion. Int J Exergy. 2015;17(3):267–86. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEX.2015.070499.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deng Y, Wu H, Su F. Combustion and exhaust emission characteristics of low swirl injector. Appl Therm Eng. 2017;110:171–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2016.08.169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cheng RK. Velocity and scalar characteristics of premixed turbulent flames stabilized by weak swirl. Combust Flame. 1995;101(1–2):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(94)00196-Y.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bédat B, Cheng RK. Experimental study of premixed flames in intense isotropic turbulence. Combust Flame. 1995;100(3):485–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-2180(94)00138-I.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Plessing T, Kortschik C, Peters N, et al. Measurements of the turbulent burning velocity and the structure of premixed flames on a low-swirl burner. Proc Combust Inst. 2000;28(1):359–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(00)80231-3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khalil AEE, Gupta AK. Flame fluctuations in Oxy-CO2-methane mixtures in swirl assisted distributed combustion. Appl Energy. 2017;204:303–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.07.037.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Mansouri Z, Aouissi M, Boushaki T. Numerical computations of premixed propane flame in a swirl-stabilized burner: effects of hydrogen enrichment, swirl number and equivalence ratio on flame characteristics. Int J Hydrog Energy. 2016;41(22):9664–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Carlsson H, Nordström E, Bohlin A, et al. Numerical and experimental study of flame propagation and quenching of lean premixed turbulent low swirl flames at different Reynolds numbers. Combust Flame. 2015;162(6):2582–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2015.03.007.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Tong Y, Li M, Thern M, et al. Experimental investigation on effects of central air jet on the bluff-body stabilized premixed methane-air flame. Energy Procedia. 2017;107:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2016.12.125.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Tong Y, Chen S, Li M, et al. Experimental study on bluff-body stabilized premixed flame with a central air/fuel jet. Energies. 2017;10(12):2011. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10122011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu F, Smallwood GJ. Control of the structure and sooting characteristics of a coflow laminar methane/air diffusion flame using a central air jet: an experimental and numerical study. Proc Combust Inst. 2011;33(1):1063–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proci.2010.06.097.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahesh S, Mishra DP. Effects of recessed air jet on turbulent compressed natural gas inverse diffusion flame shape and luminosity. Combus Explos Shock Waves. 2012;48(6):683–8. https://doi.org/10.1134/s0010508212060032.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lu H, Liu HF, Li WF, et al. Bubble formation in an annular granular jet dispersed by a central air round jet. AIChE J. 2013;59(6):1882–93. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.13974.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tangirala V, Chen RH, Driscoll JF. Effect of heat release and swirl on the recirculation within swirl-stabilized flames. Combust Sci Technol. 1987;51(1–3):75–95.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu C, Huang L, Deng T, et al. On the influence of nozzle geometry on jet diffusion flames under cross-wind. Fuel. 2020;263:116549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2019.116549.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu C, Liu X, Ge H, et al. On the influence of distance between two jets on flickering diffusion flames. Combust Flame. 2019;201:23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2018.12.003.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Terasaki T, Hayashi S. The effects of fuel-air mixing on NOx formation in non-premixed swirl burners. Symp (Int) Combust. 1996;26(2):2733–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0082-0784(96)80110-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhen HS, Leung CW, Cheung CS. A comparison of the thermal, emission and heat transfer characteristics of swirl-stabilized premixed and inverse diffusion flames. Energy Convers Manag. 2011;52(2):1263–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.023.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51604215), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 2016M590962) and the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China (Grant No. 2018JM5078).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

LH contributed to conceptualization, methodology and visualization; CL helped in formal analysis, data curation, writing - original draft; TD contributed to resources, and writing - review and editing; HJ validated the data; and PW done the supervision.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changchun Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The undersigned author transfers all copyright ownership of the paper entitled “Experimental investigation on the influence of central airflow on swirl combustion stability and flame shape” to the publisher in the event when the work is published. All co-authors have read and approved the submission of the manuscript. The manuscript is not currently under consideration elsewhere, and the research reported will not be submitted for publication elsewhere until a final decision has been made as to its acceptability by the journal. The manuscript is truthful original work without fabrication, fraud or plagiarism. The authors have made an important scientific contribution to the study and are thoroughly familiar with the primary data. In addition, I state that there are no financial or other relations that could lead to a conflict of interest and that none of the paper’s concerns have been previously published. I sign for and accept responsibility for releasing this material on behalf of any and all co-authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, L., Liu, C., Deng, T. et al. Experimental investigation on the influence of central airflow on swirl combustion stability and flame shape. J Therm Anal Calorim 144, 503–514 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10399-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-020-10399-2

Keywords

Navigation