Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of weld geometry on fatigue performance of 6061-T6 aluminum GMAW: part 3. T-fillet joint

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effects of various weld geometries on the fatigue performance of T-fillet joint aluminum arc welding were investigated by conducting gas metal arc weld (GMAW) experiments using 6061-T6 material for various weld geometries. The results of the fatigue tests conducted using a 5-ton grade tester demonstrated that the fatigue performance of T-fillet joint aluminum arc welding is primarily affected by the area of the welded part and weld reinforcement. A large welded area can be obtained by full penetration, and a large weld reinforcement can be obtained by a large throat size and a small toe angle. Contrary to expectations, it was observed that optimal size and higher quantity of porosities can increase fatigue performance. This can be attributed to porosities behaving similarly to crack stop holes, which can prevent stress focusing. The deviation in fatigue performance in the case of minute penetration depth and minute throat size is not remarkable. Therefore, deeper penetration and larger weld reinforcement are crucial factors in obtaining higher fatigue performance in the industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. Cho, Weldability increase of aluminum by variable polarity arc, Journal of Welding and Joining, 32(1) (2014) 108–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. J. Cho, J. J. Lee and S. H. Bae, Heat input analysis of variable polarity arc welding of aluminum, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 81 (2015) 1273–1280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Jeong, K. Park, S. Baek and J. Cho, Thermal efficiency decision of variable polarity aluminum arc welding through molten pool analysis, International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 138 (2019) 729–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. D. R. Askeland and W. J. Wright, Essentials of Materials Science and Engineering, 4th Ed., Cengage Learning, Boston (2019) 245–247.

    Google Scholar 

  5. R. S. Florea, D. J. Bammann, A. Yeldell, K. N. Solanki and Y. Hammi, Welding parameters influence on fatigue life and microstructure in resistance spot welding of 6061-T6 aluminum alloy, Materials and Design, 45 (2013) 456–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Gean, S. A. Westgate, J. C. Kucza and J. C. Ehrstrom, Static and fatigue behavior of spot-welded 51 82-0 aluminum alloy sheet, Welding Journal, 78(3) (1999) 80s–86s.

    Google Scholar 

  7. K. V. Jata, K. K. Sankara and J. J. Ruschau, Friction stir welding effects on microstructure and fatigue of aluminum alloy 7050-T7451, Metallurgical and Materials Transaction A, 31 (2000) 2181–2192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. N. Ilman, Kusmono and P. T. Iswanto, Fatigue crack growth rate behaviour of friction-stir aluminium alloy AA2024-T3 welds under transient thermal tensioning, Materials and Design, 50 (2013) 235–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. G. D’Urso, C. Giardini, S. Lorenzi and T. Pastore, Fatigue crack growth in the welding nugget of FSW joints of a 6060 aluminum alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214(10) (2014) 2075–2084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. D. G. Moghadam and K. Farhangdoost, Influence of welding parameters on fracture toughness and fatigue crack growth rate in friction stir welded nugget of 2024-T351 aluminum alloy joints, Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China, 26(10) (2016) 2567–2585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. D. A. Wang and C. H. Chen, Fatigue lives of friction stir spot welds in aluminum 6061-T6 sheets, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209(1) (2009) 367–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. E. Ma, Z. C. Xia, R. R. Jiang and W. Y. Li, Effect of welding parameters on mechanical and fatigue properties of friction stir welded 2198 T8 aluminum-lithium alloy joints, Engineering Fracture Mechanics, 114 (2013) 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. P. C. Lin, J. Pan and T. Pan, Failure modes and fatigue life estimations of spot friction welds in lap-shear specimens of aluminum 6111-T4 sheets, part 2: welds made by a flat tool, International Journal of Fatigue, 30(1) (2008) 90–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. H. R. Ghazvinloo, A. Honarbakhsh-Raouf and N. Shadfar, Effect of arc voltage, welding current and welding speed on fatigue life, impact energy and bead penetration of AA6061 joints produced by robotic MIG welding, Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 3(2) (2010) 156–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Gori and R. P. Verma, Experimental fatigue life estimation of AA5083 aluminium alloys welded by two welding processes-gas metal arc (GMA) welding and friction stir welding (FSW), Journal of Graphic Era University, 5(1) (2017) 10–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. J. da Silva, J. M. Costa, A. Loureiro and J. M. Ferreira, Fatigue behaviour of AA6082-T6 MIG welded butt joints improved by friction stir processing, Materials and Design, 51 (2013) 315–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. C. Zhang, M. Gao and X. Zeng, Effect of microstructural characteristics on high cycle fatigue properties of laser-arc hybrid welded AA6082 aluminum alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 231 (2016) 479–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Qiao, H. Zhang, L. Zhao and Q. Feng, Fatigue crack growth properties of AA 5754 aluminum alloy gas tungsten arc welding and friction stir welding joints, Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance, 29 (2020) 2113–2124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. M. Kuk, K. C. Jang, D. G. Lee and I. S. Kim, Effects of temperature and shielding gas mixture on fatigue life of 5083 aluminum alloy, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 155–156(30) (2004) 1408–1414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. P. Livieri and P. lazzarin, Fatigue strength of steel and aluminium welded joints based on generalised stress intensity factors and local strain energy values, International Journal of Fracture, 133 (2005) 247–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. S. W. Han, H. J. Lee and S. R. Lee, Fatigue strength evaluation of butt-welded aluminum alloy component for railway vehicles, Processing of Spring Conference of Korean Society for Railway (2020) 242–249.

  22. N. L. Person, Fatigue of aluminum alloy welded joints, Weld Journal, 50(2) (1971) 77s–87s.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (No.2021R1A4A1033141) and (No.2021R1F1A1064238).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jungho Cho.

Additional information

Jungho Cho received his Ph.D. at KAIST in 2007 and now he is a faculty of Chungbuk National University after working at Hyundai Motors and Ohio State University, USA for several years. His major is development of welding and joining techniques, welding physics and thermo-dynamical analysis of weld pool.

Sang-Woo Han is a visiting scholar of Research Institute of Industrial Science & Technology, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from KAIST. His research interests include arc welding, laser processing, and numerical simulation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, S.W., Lee, G., Kim, H. et al. Effect of weld geometry on fatigue performance of 6061-T6 aluminum GMAW: part 3. T-fillet joint. J Mech Sci Technol 36, 5215–5221 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0934-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-022-0934-8

Keywords

Navigation