Skip to main content
Log in

High-cycle and very high-cycle bending fatigue strength of shot peened spring steel

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examined bending fatigue strength of shot-peened spring steel under the high cycle fatigue (HCF) and very high cycle fatigue (VHCF), and analyzed the effects of shot-peening on the high strength spring steel through service life. Hourglass shape specimens made of spring steel (Si-Cr alloys) were prepared for the rotary bending fatigue test. Actual local stresses were quantitatively calculated to compensate for the applied stress amplitudes, through which it was clarified that the shot-peening had strongly positive effects on the HCF strength, but rather negative effect on the VHCF strength. The fracturing process examination confirmed that most fish-eye fractures arose at sites deeper than the compressive residual stress zone, which did not prevent the creation of the fish-eye. The fatigue strength improvement in the VHCF range was scarcely expected as a result of the shot-peening treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

R:

Stress ratio

σ :

Nominal stress of the gauge portion

M:

The maximum bending moment

c:

Distance from the neutral axis to a designated height

I:

Geometrical moment of inertia at the gage part

α:

Stress concentration factor

P:

Load

m:

Fixed test span

d:

Gage part cross-section diameter

Ra :

Average roughness

Rq :

Root mean square

Ktn :

Stress concentration factor

σ0 :

Nominal stress

σa :

Stress amplitude

Nf :

Number of fatigue test cycles

A:

Y-intercept that indicates the initial fatigue strength

B:

Decreasing slope of fatigue strength as the life cycle increases

σf :

Fatigue limit

σu :

Tensile strength

σf0 :

Fatigue limit of unpeened uniaxial specimen

σu0 :

Tensile strength of unpeened uniaxial specimen

σm :

Mean stress

σrd :

The maximum residual stress

R2 :

Regression coefficient

SSR:

Residual sum of squares

SST:

Total sum of squares

σA :

Actual stress

σL :

Local stress

Df :

Diameter of fish-eye

References

  1. B. Pyttel, D. Schwerdt and C. Berger, Very high cycle fatigue — is there a fatigue limit?, International Journal of Fatigue, 33 (2011) 49–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. K. Shiozawa and L. Lu, Very high cycle fatigue behavior of shot-peened high carbon chromium bearing steel, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 25(8–9) (2002) 813–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Y. Furuya, T. Abe and S. Matsuoka, 1010-cycle fatigue properties of 1800 MPa-class JIS-SUP7 spring steel, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 26 (2003) 641–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Sakai, A. Nakagawa, N. Oguma, Y. Nakamura, A. Ueno, S. Kikuchi and A. Sakaida, A review on fatigue fracture modes of structural metallic materials in very high cycle regime, International Journal of Fatigue, 93 (2016) 339–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Kim, G. Kim, W. Ji, Y. S. Lee, S. Jang and C. M. Shin, Random vibration fatigue analysis of a multi-material battery pack structure for an electric vehicle, Functional Composites and Structures, 3 (2021) 025006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. Bathias and P. C. Paris, Giga-cycle Fatigue in Mechanical Practice, Marcel Dekker, New York (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Nie, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhao and Q. Zhong, Very high cycle fatigue behavior of shot-peened 3Cr13 high strength spring steel, Materials & Design, 50 (2013) 503–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Y. Akiniwa, S. Stanzl-Tschegg, H. Mayer, M. Wakita and K. Tanaka, Fatigue strength of spring steel under axial and torsional loading in the very high cycle regime, International Journal of Fatigue, 30 (2008) 2057–2063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Berger and B. Kaiser, Results of very high cycle fatigue tests on helical compression springs, International Journal of Fatigue, 28(11) (2006) 1658–1663.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. B. Pyttel, I. Brunner, B. Kaiser, C. Berger and M. Mahendran, Fatigue behavior of helical compression springs at a very high number of cycles — investigation of various influences, International Journal of Fatigue, 60 (2014) 101–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. T. Abe, Y. Furuya and S. Matsuoka, Gigacycle fatigue properties of 1800 MPa class spring steels, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 27(2) (2004) 159–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Furuya and T. Abe, Effect of mean stress on fatigue properties of 1800 MPa-class spring steels, Materials & Design, 32 (2011) 1101–1107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Murakami, Metal Fatigue: Effects of Small Defects and Nonmetallic Inclusions, 1st Ed., Elsevier, Oxford (2002).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Murakami, S. Kodama and S. Konuma, Quantitative evaluation of effects of non-metallic inclusions on fatigue strength of high strength steels, International Journal of Fatigue, 11(5) (1989) 291–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. S. Nishijima and K. Kanazawa, Stepwise S-N curve and fish-eye failure in gigacycle fatigue, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 50(7) (1997) 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. R. Yakura, M. Matsuda, T. Sakai and A. Ueno, Effect of inclusion size on fatigue properties in very high cycle region of low alloy steel used for solid type crankshaft, Kobelco Technology Review, 35 (2017) 7–13.

    Google Scholar 

  17. S. T. Tu and X. C. Zhang, Fatigue crack initiation mechanisms, Reference Module in Materials Science and Materials Engineering (2016).

  18. K. Shiozawa, L. Lu and S. Ishihara, S-N curve characteristics and subsurface crack initiation behavior in ultra-long life fatigue of a high carbon-chromium bearing steel, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 24(12) (2001) 781–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. K. Shiozawa, Y. Morii, S. Nishino and L. Lu, Subsurface crack initiation and propagation mechanism in high-strength steel in a very high cycle fatigue regime, International Journal of Fatigue, 28(11) (2006) 1521–1532.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. M. Marini, F. Piona, V. Fontanari, M. Bandini and M. Benedetti, A new challenge in the DEM/FEM simulation of the shot peening process: the residual stress field at a sharp edge, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 169 (2020) 105327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Wu, H. Liu, P. Wei, Q. Lin and S. Zhou, Effect of shot peening coverage on residual stress and surface roughness of 18CrNiMo7-6 steel, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 183 (2020) 105785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. K. Sherafatnia, G. H. Farrahi and A. H. Mahmoudi, Effect of initial surface treatment on shot peening residual stress field: analytical approach with experimental verification, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 137 (2018) 171–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Wang, L. Wang, X. Wang and Y. Xu, Numerical study of grain refinement induced by severe shot peening, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 146–147 (2018) 280–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Korzynski, Predicting the height of uneven surface after ball-peening machining, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 150 (2019) 617–624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. X. Xiao, X. Tong, Y. Liu, R. Zhao, G. Gao and Y. Li, Prediction of shot peen forming effects with single and repeated impacts, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 137 (2018) 182–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. J. K. Xenonphon, Shot peening viable method to extending component life, SAE Technical Paper Series 891932 (1989) 1–8.

  27. S. J. Yoon, J. H. Park and N. S. Choi, Fatigue life analysis of shot-peened bearing steel, Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 26(6) (2012) 1747–1754.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. S. C. Chung and S. D. Back, Effect of shot peening on fatigue properties in spring steel, Transaction of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, 22(6) (1998) 1009–1015.

    Google Scholar 

  29. T. S. Lee, J. H. Jang, C. M. Suh, J. H. Kim and S. C. Kim, Fatigue characteristics of bearing steel in giga cycles, Transaction of the Korean Society of Mechanical Engineers A, 10 (2007) 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  30. G. Fargas, J. J. Roa and A. Mateo, Effect of peening on metastable austenitic stainless steels, Materials Science and Engineering A, 641 (2015) 290–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. J. K. Li, M. Yao, D. Wang and R. Wang, An analysis of stress concentrations caused by shot peening and its application in predicting fatigue strength, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures, 15(12) (1992) 1271–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. S. Bagherifard, I. Fernandez-Pariente, R. Ghelichi and M. Guagliano, Fatigue behavior of notched steel specimens with nanocrystallized surface obtained by severe shot peening, Materials & Design, 45 (2013) 497–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. L. Trško, O. Bokůvka, F. Nový and M. Guagliano, Effect of severe shot peening on ultra-high-cycle fatigue of a low-alloy steel, Materials & Design, 57 (2014) 103–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. M. Benedetti, V. Fontanari, M. Bandini and E. Savio, High-and very high-cycle plain fatigue resistance of shot peened high-strength aluminum alloys: the role of surface morphology, International Journal of Fatigue, 70 (2015) 451–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. KS B ISO 1143:2003, Metals — Rotating Bar Bending Fatigue Testing, Korean Standard Association, Republic of Korea (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  36. M. G. Moore and W. P. Evans, Correction for stress layers in X-ray diffraction residual stress analysis, SAE Transaction, 64(1) (1958) 340–345.

    Google Scholar 

  37. A. Bahri, M. Ellouz, M. Klöcker, T. Kordisch and K. Elleuch, Brinell indentation behavior of the stainless steel X2CrNi18-9: modeling and experiments, International Journal of Mechanical Science, 163 (2019) 105142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Z. F. Zhang and Z. G. Wang, Grain boundary effects on cyclic deformation and fatigue damage, Progress in Materials Science, 53(7) (2008) 1025–1099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. F. Morel, A. Morel and Y. Nadot, Comparison between defects and micro-notches in multiaxial fatigue — the size effect and the gradient effect, International Journal of Fatigue, 31(2) (2009) 263–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Y. Murakami and M. Endo, Effects of defects, inclusions and inhomogeneities on fatigue strength, International Journal of Fatigue, 16(3) (1994) 163–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Y. Murakami, Effects of small defects and nonmetallic inclusions on the fatigue strength of metals, JSME International Journal, 32(2) (1989) 167–180.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Y. Murakami and T. Endo, Effects of small defects on fatigue strength of metals, International Journal of Fatigue, 1 (1980) 23–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. W. D. Pilkey and D. F. Pilkey, Peterson’s Stress Concentration Factors, 3rd Ed., John Wiley & Sons Publishing Company, New Jersey (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  44. H. Tada, P. C. Paris and G. R. Irwin, The Stress Analysis of Cracks Handbook, 3rd Ed., ASME Press, New York (2000).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  45. Z. Xu, W. Wen and T. Zhai, Effects of pore position in depth on stress/strain concentration and fatigue crack initiation, Metallurgy and Materials Transaction A, 43(8) (2011) 2763–2770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. F. N. Jespersen, J. H. Hattel and M. A. J. Somers, Modelling the evolution of composition-and stress-depth profiles in austenitic stainless steels during low-temperature nitriding, Modelling and Simulation of Materials Science and Engineering, 24(2) (2016) 025003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. T. Yasuoka, Y. Mizutani and A. Todoroki, The correction of stress intensity factor for crack growth evaluation under steep residual stress distribution and steep yield strength distribution, Materials and Fabrication, 6A (2013).

  48. A. Nakagawa, T. Sakai, D. G. Harlow, N. Oguma, Y. Nakamura, A. Ueno and A. Sakaida, A probabilistic model on crack initiation modes of metallic materials in very high cycle fatigue, Procedia Structural Integrity, 2 (2016) 1199–1206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning (NRF-2019R1A2C1002193). Thanks to the Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) for authorizing the use of XRD.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nak-Sam Choi.

Additional information

NohJun Myung received his Doctor’s degree from the Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University, Korea, in 2020. His research interests involve fatigue life analysis and material design.

Liang Wang received his Master’s degree from the Department of Mechanical Design Engineering, Hanyang University, Korea, in 2018. His research interests involve composite analysis and material design.

Nak-Sam Choi is a Professor of Department of Mechanical Engineering, Hanyang University (ERICA), Korea. He received his B.S. in Mechanical Engieering from Seoul National University, Korea, his M.S. in Mechanical Engieering from KAIST, and Ph.D. in Composite Materials & Applied Mechaics from Kyushu University, Japan. His research interests include composites science, fatigue life and microstrain analysis, and nondestructive examination of advanced materials.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Myung, N., Wang, L. & Choi, NS. High-cycle and very high-cycle bending fatigue strength of shot peened spring steel. J Mech Sci Technol 35, 4963–4973 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1015-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-021-1015-0

Keywords

Navigation