Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Detailed assessment of mesh sensitivity for CFD simulation of coal combustion in a tangential-firing boiler

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) has become an essential tool for optimizing the design and diagnosing the operation of a boiler. However, the validity of the results depends on the degree of numerical diffusion as well as the reliability of the submodels. This study aims to assess mesh sensitivity in the reacting two-phase flow of pulverized coal in a common tangential-firing boiler. Three mesh versions were constructed for the boiler with the number of cells ranging between 1.2 million and 5.4 million, corresponding to 0.0114 -0.0022 m3 per cell in the burner zone. The velocity distribution was found to be highly sensitive compared to temperature, heat flux, and NO concentration. By contrast, the use of key performance parameters such as total wall heat absorption, exit NOx concentration, and carbon conversion, was not appropriate criteria for the mesh sensitivity test. These parameters were determined by integration over the entire surface or volume, which made them sensitive to the overall reaction stoichiometry instead of the mesh fineness. It suggests that the use of a coarse mesh could be acceptable in evaluating the key performance parameters influenced by major operation variables, such as air distribution and fuel properties. However, sufficient mesh fineness is necessary for studies requiring accurate prediction of detailed flow patterns such as the evaluation of burner tilting/yawing or ash deposition on the wall.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. A. Gonzalez-Salazar, T. Kirsten and L. Prchlik, Review of the operational flexibility and emissions of gas-and coal-fired power plants in a future with growing renewables, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82 (2018) 1497–1513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. V. V. Ranade and D. F. Gupta, Computational Modeling of Pulvenzed Coal Fired Boilers, CRC Press (2014).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Gao, A. Runstedtler, A. Majeski, P. Boisvert and D. Campbell, Optimizing a woodchip and coal co-firing retrofit for a power utility boiler using CFD, Biomass and Bioenergy, 88 (2016) 35–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. X. Zhang, J. Zhou, S. Sun, R. Sun and M. Qin, Numerical investigation of low NOx combustion strategies in tangentially-fired coal boilers, Fuel, 142 (2015) 215–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. N. Modlinski, Computational modeling of a utility boiler tangen-tially-fired furnace retrofitted with swirl burners, Fuel Processing Technology, 91 (11) (2010) 1601–1608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. S. R. Gubba, D. B. Ingham, K. J. Larsen, L. Ma, M. Pourkashanian, H. Z. Tan, A. Williams and H. Zhou, Numerical modelling of the co-firing of pulverised coal and straw in a 300 MWe tangentially fired boiler, Fuel Processing Technology, 104 (2012) 181–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. C. R. Choi and C. N. Kim, Numerical investigation on the flow, combustion and NOx emission characteristics in a 500 MWe tangentially fired pulverized-coal boiler, Fuel, 88 (9) (2009) 1720–1731.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Jang, K. Han, G. Lee, S. H. Baek, H. Y. Park and K. Y. Huh, Prediction of the ash deposition characteristics of blended coals in a 500 MWe tangentially fired boiler, Energy & Fuels, 32 (7) (2018) 7827–7840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Akkinepally, J. Shim and K. Yoo, Numerical and experimental study on biased tube temperature problem in tangential firing boiler, Applied Thermal Engineering, 126 (2017) 92–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. P. Tan, Q. Fang, S. Zhao, C. Yin, C. Zhang, H. Zhao and G. Chen, Causes and mitigation of gas temperature deviation in tangentially fired tower-type boilers, Applied Thermal Engineering, 139 (2018) 135–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. L. I. Díez, C. Cortés and J. Pallarés, Numerical investigation of NOx emissions from a tangentially-fired utility boiler under conventional and overfire air operation, Fuel, 87 (7) (2008) 1259–1269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Liu, W. Fan and Y. Li, Numerical investigation of air-staged combustion emphasizing char gasification and gas temperature deviation in a large-scale, tangentially fired pulverized-coal boiler, Applied Energy, 177 (2016) 323–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Chen, B. He, D. He, Y. Cao, G. Ding, X. Liu, Z. Duan, X. Zhang, J. Song and X. Lia, Numerical investigations on different tangential arrangements of burners for a 600 MW utility boiler, Energy, 122 (2017) 287–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. C. Liu, W. D. Fan and M. Z. Wu, Experimental and numerical studies on the gas velocity deviation in a 600 MWe tangentially fired boiler, Applied Thermal Engineering, 110 (2017) 553–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Q. Zha, D. Li, C. A. Wang and D. Che, Numerical evaluation of heat transfer and NOx emissions under deep-air-staging conditions within a 600 MWe tangentially fired pulverized-coal boiler, Applied Thermal Engineering, 116 (2017) 170–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. P. Tan, D. Tian, Q. Fang, L. Ma, C. Zhang, G. Chen, L. Zhong and H. Zhang, Effects of burner tilt angle on the combustion and NOx emission characteristics of a 700 MWe deep-air-staged tangentially pulverized-coal-fired boiler, Fuel, 196 (2017) 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. H. Y. Park, M. Faulkner, M. D. Turrell, P. J. Stopford and D. S. Kang, Coupled fluid dynamics and whole plant simulation of coal combustion in a tangentially-fired boiler, Fuel, 89 (8) (2010) 2001–2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. T. Chen and W. Z. Wang, Modeling of combustion and hydrodynamics for a coal-fired supercritical boiler with double-reheat cycle, International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid Flow (2019).

    Google Scholar 

  19. H. Y. Park, J. E. Lee, H. H. Kim, S. Park, S. H. Baek, I. Ye and C. Ryu, Thermal resistance by slagging and its relationship with ash properties for six coal blends in a commercial coal-fired boiler, Fuel, 235 (2019) 1377–1386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S. Niksa, PC Coal Lab Version 4.1: User Guide and Tutorial, Niksa Energy Associates LLC, Belmont, CA (1997).

    Google Scholar 

  21. C. Y. Wen and T. Z. Chaung, Entrainment coal gasification modeling, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Process Design and Development, 18 (4) (1979) 684–695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. W. P. Jones and R. P. Lindstedt, Global reaction schemes for hydrocarbon combustion, Combustion and Flame, 73 (3) (1988) 233–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. L. D. Smoot and P. J. Smith, Coal Combustion and Gasification, Springer Science & Business Media (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  24. B. F. Magnussen and B. H. Hjertager, On mathematical modeling of turbulent combustion with special emphasis on soot formation and combustion, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 16 (1977) 719–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. T. H. Shih, W. W. Liou, A. Shabbir, Z. Yang and J. Zhu, A new k-∈ eddy viscosity model for high Reynolds number turbulent flows, Computers & Fluids, 24 (3) (1995) 227–238.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. C. D. Argyropoulos and N. C. Markatos, Recent advances on the numerical modelling of turbulent flows, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 39 (2015) 693–732.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. W. P. Adamczyk, B. Isaac, J. Parra-Alvarez, S. T. Smith, D. Harris, J. N. Thornock, M. Zhou, P. J. Smith and R. Zmuda, Application of LES-CFD for predicting pulverized-coal working conditions after installation of NOx control system, Energy, 160 (2018) 693–709.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. T. F. Smith, Z. F. Shen and J. N. Friedman, Evaluation of coefficients for the weighted sum of gray gases model, Journal of Heat Transfer, 104 (4) (1982) 602–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. J. K. Park, S. Park, M. Kim, C. Ryu, S. H. Baek, Y. J. Kim and H. Y. Park, CFD analysis of combustion characteristics for fuel switching to bioliquid in oil-fired power plant, Fuel, 159 (2015) 324–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Jakob, Heat transfer and flow resistance in cross flow of gases over tube bank, Transaction ASME, 60 (1938) 384.

    Google Scholar 

  31. R. K. Hanson and S. Salimian, Survey of rate constants in the N/H/O system, Combustion Chemistry, Springer, New York, NY (1984) 361–421.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. G. G. De Soete, Overall reaction rates of NO and N2 formation from fuel nitrogen, Proceedings of the Combustion Institute, 15 (1975) 1093–1102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. A. Zukauskas, Heat transfer from tubes in crossflow, Advances in Heat Transfer, 8 (1972) 93–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. L. Y. Huang, J. S. Norman, M. Pourkashanian and A. Williams, Prediction of ash deposition on superheater tubes from pulverized coal combustion, Fuel, 7 (1996) 271–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. G. Urbain, F. Cambier, M. Deletter and M. R. Anseau, Viscosity of silicate melts, Transactions and Journal of the British Ceramic Society, 80 (1981) 139–141.

    Google Scholar 

  36. S. Li, Y. Wu and K. J. Whitty, Ash deposition behavior during char-slag transition under simulated gasification conditions, Energy & Fuels, 24 (2010) 1868–1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) affiliated with the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy of the Korean Government (Contract No. 20181110200190). The authors would also like to thank Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction for their help and support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, Korea

    Hyunbin Jo, Kiseop Kang, Jongkeun Park & Changkook Ryu

  2. Doosan Heavy Industries and Construction, Yongin, 16858, Korea

    Hyunsoo Ahn & Younggun Go

Authors
  1. Hyunbin Jo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kiseop Kang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jongkeun Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Changkook Ryu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hyunsoo Ahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Younggun Go
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Changkook Ryu.

Additional information

Recommended by Editor Yong Tae Kang

Changkook Ryu is Professor at the School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University. He received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST). His research interests include combustion, gasification, and pyrolysis of solid fuels, and various applications to industrial-scale plants.

Hyunbin Jo is a Ph.D. student at the School of Mechanical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, who received his B.S from the same school. His research subject is computational modeling of coal and biomass combustion in industrial-scale boilers for NOx reduction and improved performance.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jo, H., Kang, K., Park, J. et al. Detailed assessment of mesh sensitivity for CFD simulation of coal combustion in a tangential-firing boiler. J Mech Sci Technol 34, 917–930 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0141-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12206-020-0141-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation