Skip to main content
Log in

Integration of Finite Difference Method and Genetic Algorithm to Seismic analysis of Circular Shallow Tunnels (Case Study: Tabriz Urban Railway Tunnels)

  • Tunnel Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

In this study, it is aimed to investigate the behavior of the concrete lining of circular shallow tunnels in sedimentary urban areas under seismic loads using integration of numerical and metaheuristic techniques. The Tabriz Urban Railway (TUR) Tunnel is used as a case study in this investigation. The seismic and geotechnical characteristics of the area were studied, and seismic analysis was carried out using a finite difference code (i.e., FLAC2D) and genetic algorithm. In the first step, final induced loads on lining due to Design Base Level (DBL), Maximum Credible Level (MCL) and static loads were determined using FLAC2D software. Then, eight parts of lining were classified using genetic algorithm based on axial force, bending moment and shear force for two types of earthquake loads. The results of classification were verified by the safety factors of the studied parts of the lining. By comparing these results, it can be concluded that the genetic algorithm can be reliably used to classify and evaluate the safety of lining based on static and dynamic loads.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ACI 318-05 (2005). Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-05) and Commentary (ACI 318R-05), American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills,MI, 9th ed, 430 p.

  • Alamoot (2005). Seismology and tectonic report on the Tabriz urban railway line 1 site, Alamoot Bridge and Building Engineering co., Tehran, Iran.

  • Arthe Civil & Structure B. V. (2005). Determination of final geotechnical and geo(hydro)logical parameters for calculations, Report No.: ACS05203-R06-S03, 26 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthe Civil & Structure B.V. (2006). - a. Design and calculation of concrete segments, Report No.: ACS05203-R09-S04 & ACS05203-R09-S05, 57 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arthe Civil & Structure B.V. (2006). - b. Mortar and Grouting, Report No.: ACS05203-R08-S05, 19 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chopra, A. K. (2006). Dynamics of structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, 876 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding, C. H. and Rozan, A. (1978). “Damage to rock tunnels from earthquake shaking.” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, Vol. 104, No. 2, pp. 175–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gomez-Masso, A. and Attalla, I. (1984). “Finite element vs. simplified methods in the seismic analysis of underground structures.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 347–367, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290120305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M. Hook, J. J. Schmidt, B., and Yao J. I. (2001). “Seismic design and analysis of underground structures, Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 247–293, DOI: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00051-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashash, Y. M., Park, D., and Chiang Yao, J. I. (2005). “Ovaling deformations of circular tunnels under seismic loading, an update on seismic design and analysis of underground structures.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 20, No. 5, pp. 435–441, DOI: 10.1016/j.tust.2005.02.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J. H. (1975). Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor, Michigan: University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huo, H., Bobet, A., Fernandez, G., and Ramirez, J. (2005). “Load transfer mechanisms between underground structure and surrounding ground: Evaluation of the failure of the Daikai station.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 12, pp. 1522–1533, DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2005)131:12(1522).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itasca (1999). FLAC, Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua, version 4.0.307, User’s manual, Itasca Consulting Group, Inc. Minneapolis, MN, http://itascacg.com.

  • Kawashima, K. (2000). Seismic design of underground structure in soft ground: A review, Geot. Aspects of Underground Construction in Soft Ground, Kusakabe, Fujita & Miyazaki (Eds), A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp. 3–20.

  • Kavzoglu, T., Sahin, E. K., and Colkesen, I. (2015). “Selecting optimal conditioning factors in shallow translational landslide susceptibility mapping using genetic algorithm.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 192, pp. 101–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA. 653 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuesel, T. R. (1969). “Earthquake design criteria for subways.” Journal of the structural division. Proc. ASCE. 95-ST: pp. 1213-1231. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monsees, J. E. and Merritt, J. L. (1991). Earthquake considerations in design of the Los Angeles metro, Proc. 3rd US Conf. Lifeline Earthquake Eng., ASCE: New York, USA, pp. 75–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikaeil, R., Haghshenas, S. S., Haghshenas, S. S., and Ataei, M. (2016). “Performance prediction of circular saw machine using imperialist competitive algorithm and fuzzy clustering technique.” Neural Computing and Applications, pp. 1–10, DOI: 10.1007/s00521-016-2557-4.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGO (2002). The gazetteer of township in the I.R. of Iran-Tabriz township, National Geographical Organization Inc. Tehran, Iran, 209 p.

  • O’Rourke, T. D., Goh, S. H., Menkiti, C. O., and Mair, R. J. (2001). Higway tunnel pererformance during the 1999 Duzce earthquake, Proc. 15th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical, Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, pp. 1365–1368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otha, Y. and Gota, N. (1978). “Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes.” Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 167–187, DOI: 10.1002/eqe.4290060205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. N. and Scholl, R. E. (1981). “Earthquake engineering of large underground structures.” prepared for the Federal Highway Administration, FHWA/RD-80/195.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pirouzan, D., Yahyaei, M., and Banisi, S. (2015). “Optimum flotation cells configuration for the Zarnd coal washing plant based on the sum-of-weighted method using an oriented genetic algorithm.” Iranian Journal of Mining Engineering, Vol. 10, No. 26, pp. 35–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, S., Kawashima, I., and Otani, T. (1994). “Environmental effects on critical strain of rocks. In Symposium Proceedings.” Developments in Geotechnical Engineering: From Harvard to New Delhi, pp. 1936–1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sakurai, S. (1997). “Lessons Learned from Field Measurements in Tunnelling.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 453–460, DOI: 10.1016/S0886-7798(98)00004-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, C. W. and Einstein, H. H. (1980). Improved design of tunnel supports, Simplified analysis for ground-structure intraction in tunneling. UMTA-MA-06-0100-80-4, Urban mas transit transportation administration, MA. Vol. 1.

  • Sharma, S. and Judd, W. R. (1991). “Underground opening damage from earthquakes.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 30, Nos. 3-4, pp. 263–276, DOI: 10.1016/0013-7952(91)90063-Q.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • STRUCTUREPOINT (2015). Pcacolumn Software, Structurepoint Engineering Software Group, Portland Cement Association (PCA), http://www.structurepoint.org.

  • Lloyd, S. (1982). “Least squares quantization in PCM.” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 129–137.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • St. John, C. M. and Zahrah, T. F. (1987). “Aseismic design of underground structures.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 165–197, DOI: 10.1016/0886-7798(87)90011-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TURO (2002). Geological report of Tabriz urban railway line 1, Tabriz Urban Railway Organization, Tabriz, Iran.

  • TURO (2005). Final results of geological and geotechnical investigation on Tabriz urban railway line 1. Report for the Tabriz Urban Railway Organization, Tabriz, Iran.

  • Wang, J. M. and Joe J. L. (1985). “The distribution of earthquake damage to underground facilities during the 1976 Tangshan earthquake.” Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 1, No. 4. pp. 741–757, DOI: 10.1193/1.1585291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. N. (1993). Seismic Design of Tunnels: A State-of-the-art Approach, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade & Douglas, Inc. New York, NY, Monograph 7, 147 p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, W. L. Wang, T. T. Su, J. J. Lin, C. H. Seng, C. R., and Huang, T. H. (2001). “Assessment of damage in mountain tunnels due to the Taiwan Chi-Chi earthquake, Tunnelling & Underground Space Tech.” Pergamum, Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 133–150, DOI: 10.1016/S0886-7798(01)00047-5.

    Google Scholar 

  • World statesmen (2008), http://www.worldstatesmen.org/Iran.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sina Shaffiee Haghshenas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salemi, A., Mikaeil, R. & Haghshenas, S.S. Integration of Finite Difference Method and Genetic Algorithm to Seismic analysis of Circular Shallow Tunnels (Case Study: Tabriz Urban Railway Tunnels). KSCE J Civ Eng 22, 1978–1990 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-2039-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-017-2039-y

Keywords

Navigation