Abstract
The investigation of abnormal increases in uplift pressure can lead to the discovery of seepage paths that may cause damage to concrete arch dams. A new methodology has been developed in this study in order to analyze the causes of abnormally high uplift pressure increases and their influence on the structural safety assessments of dams. A series of borehole video tests were performed on an area of the Huaguangtan Dam and its foundations in order to investigate seepage phenomena under different working conditions. The reasons for the existence of the seepage paths causing abnormally high uplift pressures were identified by examining stresses on the dam, using a detailed three-dimensional numerical model. The results from the monitoring and on-site inspection showed that the high uplift pressure did not constitute a direct threat to the dam’s safety. However, grouting treatment of the existing cracks was recommended so as to prevent them from developing further within the dam’s foundations and to ensure the long-term stability of the foundation seepage. It was concluded that the methodology in this study could be used to solve practical engineering problems effectively as well as acting as a frame of reference for similar projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ANSYS (2004). ANSYS 10.0 user’s guide, ANSYS Inc.
Berchten, A. R. (1985). “Repair of the zeuzier arch dam in switzerland.” Proc., 15th International Congress on Large Dams, Lausanne, Switzerland, pp. 693–711.
Cai, M., Morioka, H., Kaiser, P. K., Tasaka, Y., Kurose, H., Minami, M., and Maejima, T. (2007). “Back-analysis of rock mass strength parameters using AE monitoring data.” International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, Vol. 44, No. 4, pp. 538–549.
Chai, J. R., Wu, Y. Q., and Li, S. Y. (2004). “Analysis of coupled seepage and stress fields in rock mass around the Xiaowan arch dam.” Communications in Numerical Methods in Engineering, Vol. 20, No. 8, pp. 607–617.
Fanelli, M. and Fanelli, A. (1999). “Evaluation of Schlegeis dam with simplified methods.” International Journal on Hydropower & Dams, Vol. 6, No. 4, pp. 116–118.
Farinha, M. L. B., Lemos, J. V., and Maranha Das Neves, E. (2010). “Numerical modelling of borehole water-inflow tests in the foundation of the Alqueva arch dam.” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 72–88.
Finger, W. (1976). “The development of the kolnbrein arch dam project.” Proceedings of ICOLD Congress, Mexico, pp. 433–447.
Gell, K. and Wittke, W. (1986). “A new design concept for arch dams taking into account seepage forces.” Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 187–204.
Ghobadi, M. H., Khanlari, G. R., and Djalaly, H. (2005). “Seepage problems in the right abutment of the Shahid Abbaspour dam, southern Iran.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 119–126.
Lombardi, G. (1991). “Koelnbrein dam: An unusual solution for an unusual problem.” International Water Power and Dam Construction, Vol. 43, No. 6, pp. 31–34.
Londe, P. (1987). “Malpasset dam failure.” Engineering Geology, Vol. 24, Nos. 1–4, pp. 295–329.
Lund, G. S. and Boggs, H. L. (1991). “Effects of uplift on a gravity arch dam.” Waterpower’ 91: a New View of Hydro Resources-ASCE, Denver, Colorado, United States, pp. 1408–1417.
Sakurai, S., Akutagawa, S., Takeuchi, K., Shinji, M., and Shimizu, N. (2003). “Back analysis for tunnel engineering as a modern observational method.” Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 185–196.
Yu, Y., Zhang, B., and Yuan, H. (2007). “An intelligent displacement back-analysis method for earth-rockfill dams.” Computers and Geotechnics, Vol. 34, No. 6, pp. 423–434.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fu, C., Yao, X., Li, T. et al. Investigation and evaluation of increasing uplift pressure in an arch dam: A case study of the Huaguangtan Dam. KSCE J Civ Eng 18, 1858–1867 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0432-3
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-014-0432-3