Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of the Volatile Profiles from Wild, Cultivated, and Commercial Roots of Gentiana lutea L. by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS–SPME) Coupled to Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS)

  • Published:
Food Analytical Methods Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The root of Gentiana lutea L. is famous for its bitter properties and often used in alcoholic bitter beverages, food products, and traditional medicine to stimulate the appetite and improve digestion. This study presents the first report of an accurate, simple, fast, and reliable headspace solid phase microextraction (HS–SPME) method coupled to gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) for the analysis of the volatile profile of G. lutea roots. The developed method proved to be reliable to perform comparative analysis of the volatiles constituents from different populations of cultivated, wild, and commercial roots of G. lutea. HS–SPME/GC–MS analysis of 22 samples led to identification of 154 compounds belonging to terpenoids, alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, alkanes, fatty acid derivatives, benzene derivatives, and others. The results proved that the composition of the volatile fraction of cultivated G. lutea is mostly similar to that of the wild samples but quite different with respect to commercial roots, and this was confirmed by principal component analysis (PCA).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arberas I, Leiton MJ, Dominguez JB, Bueno JM, Arino A, Diegos ED, Renobales G, Renobales MD (1995) The volatile flavor of fresh Gentians lutea L. roots. Dev Food Sci 37:207–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arino A, ArberasI LMJ, Renobales MD, Dominguez JB (1997) The extraction of yellow gentian root (Gentiana lutea L.). Z Lebensm Unters Forsch A 205:295–299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschek W, Ebel S, Hackenthal E, Holzgrabe U, Keller K, Reichling J, Schulz V (2006) Hagers handbuch der drogen und arzneistoffe: Gentianae radix (Enzianwurzel). Springer Medizin Verlag, HagerROM

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnat A, Fraisse D, Carnat AP, Felgines C, Chaud D, Lamaison JL (2005) Influence of drying mode on iridoid bitter constituent levels in gentian root. J Sci Food Agr 85:598–602

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chialva F, Frattini C, Martelli A (1986) Unusual essential oils with aromatic properties. III. Volatile components of gentian roots. Z Lebensm Unters Forsch 182:212–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • European Medicines Agency (EMA) (2009) Assessment report on Gentiana lutea L. radix. Doc. Ref.: EMA/HMPC/578322/2008.

  • Georgieva E, Handjieva N, Popov S, Evstatieva L (2005) Comparative analysis of the volatiles from flowers and leaves of three Gentiana species. Biochem Syst Ecol 33:938–947

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hänsel R, Sticher O (2007) Pharmakognosie–phytopharmazie. Springer Medizin Verlag, Heidelberg

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen SR, Schripsema J (2002) Chemotaxonomy and pharmacology of Gentianaceae. In: Struwe L, Albert VA (eds) Gentianaceae: systematics and natural history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 573–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Knudsen J, Tollsten L, Bergstrom L (1993) Floral scents—a checklist of volatile compounds isolated by head-space techniques. Phytochemistry 33:253–253

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mihailovic V, Vukovic N, Niciforovic N, Solujic S, Mladenovic M, Maškovic P, Stankovic MS (2011) Studies on the antimicrobial activity and chemical composition of the essential oils and alcoholic extracts of Gentiana asclepiadea L. J Med Plants Res 5:1164–1174

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa AM, Ricciutelli M, Maggi F, Sagratini G, Vittori S, Caprioli G (2014) Simultaneous determination of 18 bioactive compounds in Italian bitter liqueurs by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatography–diode array detection. Food Anal Meth 7:697–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustafa AM, Caprioli G, Ricciutelli M, Maggi F, Marín R, Vittori S, Sagratini G (2015) Comparative HPLC/ESI-MS and HPLC/DAD study of different populations of cultivated, wild and commercial Gentiana lutea L. Food Chem 174:426–433

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wani BA, Ramamoorthy D, Rather MA, Ganai BA, Masood A, Zargar MA, Wani IH (2011) Headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) gas chromatography mass spectrometric (GC-MS) analysis of the volatile aroma components of Gentiana kurroo Royle. J Pharm Res 4:2943–2945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of Interest

None of the authors has any conflict of interest that could affect the performance of the work or the interpretation of the data.

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gianni Sagratini.

Additional information

Ahmed M. Mustafa and Giovanni Caprioli contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mustafa, A.M., Caprioli, G., Maggi, F. et al. Comparative Analysis of the Volatile Profiles from Wild, Cultivated, and Commercial Roots of Gentiana lutea L. by Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction (HS–SPME) Coupled to Gas Chromatography Mass Spectrometry (GC–MS). Food Anal. Methods 9, 311–321 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0196-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12161-015-0196-5

Keywords

Navigation