Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of Willow Biochar Amendment on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Greenhouse Gas Production in Two Fertilized Temperate Prairie Soils

  • Published:
BioEnergy Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The potential of biochar to improve numerous soil physical, chemical and biological properties is well known. However, previous research has concentrated on old and highly weathered tropical soils with poor fertility, while reports regarding the influence of biochar application on relatively young and fertile temperate prairie soils are limited. Furthermore, the mechanism(s) underlying biochar-induced effects on the plant availability of inorganic nitrogen (N) fertilizers and their relationship to greenhouse gas production is not well understood. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of a biochar soil amendment, produced by slow pyrolysis using shrub willow (Salix spp.) bioenergy feedstock, on CO2, N2O and CH4 fluxes by two contrasting marginal soils from Saskatchewan, Canada with and without added urea, over a 6-week incubation period. Biochar decreased soil N availability after 6 weeks only in the lower organic matter (Brown) soil, with no effect on the Black soil, regardless of fertilizer N addition, which was attributed to soil N immobilization by heterotrophs mineralizing the labile biochar-carbon. There appeared to be a synergistic effect when combining biochar and urea, evidenced by enhanced urease activity and higher initial nitrification rates compared to biochar or fertilization alone. The accelerated urea hydrolysis in the presence of biochar may increase NH3 volatilization losses associated with urea fertilization and, therefore, warrants further investigation. The decreased N2O emissions following biochar addition, with (both soils) or without (Black soil) fertilizer N, could be due to decreased ammonium and nitrate availability, along with changes in denitrification potential as related to improved aeration. Biochar significantly reduced the water-filled pore space, which concurrently increased CH4 consumption in both soils. The lack of biochar effect on CO2 emissions from either soil, with or without fertilizer N, suggests enhanced CO2 consumption by autotrophic nitrifiers. Biochar application appears to be an effective management approach for improving N2O and CH4 fluxes in temperate prairie soils.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Djomo SN, Kasmioui OE, Ceulemans R (2011) Energy and greenhouse gas balance of bioenergy production from poplar and willow: a review. Glob Chang Biol Bioenerg 3(3):181–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rowe RL, Street NR, Taylor G (2009) Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renew Sust Energ Rev 13(1):271–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann J, Gaunt J, Rondon M (2006) Bio-char sequestration in terrestrial ecosystems a review. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 11:395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fowles M (2007) Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass Bioenerg 31(6):426–432

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kwapinski W, Byrne CMP, Kryachko E, Wolfram P, Adley C, Leahy JJ, Novotny EH, Hayes MHB (2010) Biochar from biomass and waste. Waste Biomass Valoriz 1(2):177–189

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bridgwater AV (2003) Renewable fuels and chemicals by thermal processing of biomass. Chem Eng J 91:87–102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43(9):1812–1836

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Spokas KA, Cantrell KB, Novak JM, Archer DW, Ippolito JA, Collins HP, Boateng AA, Lima IM, Lamb MC, McAloon AJ, Lentz RD, Nichols KA (2012) Biochar: a synthesis of its agronomic impact beyond carbon sequestration. J Environ Qual 41(4):973–989

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Matovic D (2011) Biochar as a viable carbon sequestration option: global and Canadian perspective. Energy 36(4):2011–2016

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Volk TA, Luzadis VA (2009) Willow biomass production for bioenergy, biofuels, and bioproducts in New York. In: Solomon BDL, V.A. (ed) Renewable Energy from Forest Resources in the United States. Routledge Explorations in Environmental Economics. Routledge, New York, pp 238–260

  12. Aylott MJ, Casella E, Farrall K, Taylor G (2010) Estimating the supply of biomass from short-rotation coppice in England, given social, economic and environmental constraints to land availability. Biofuels 1(5):719–727

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Quaye AK (2011) Biomass production, foliage and soil nutrient dynamics in organic and inorganic fertilized short rotation willow systems. College of Environmental Science and Forestry, State University of New York, Ph.D. Dissertation

    Google Scholar 

  14. Stolarski MJ, Szczukowski S, Tworkowski J, Klasa A (2011) Willow biomass production under conditions of low-input agriculture on marginal soils. For Ecol Manag 262(8):1558–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hangs RD, Schoenau JJ, Van Rees KCJ, Bélanger N, Volk T, Jensen T (2014) First rotation biomass production and nutrient cycling within short-rotation coppice willow plantations in Saskatchewan, Canada. Bioenerg Res 7(4):1091–1111

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Malhi SS, Lemke R, Wang ZH, Chhabra BS (2006) Tillage, nitrogen and crop residue effects on crop yield, nutrient uptake, soil quality, and greenhouse gas emissions. Soil Tillage Res 90(1–2):171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Helgason B, Janzen H, Chantigny M, Drury C, Ellert B, Gregorich E, Lemke R, Pattey E, Rochette P, Wagner-Riddle C (2005) Toward improved coefficients for predicting direct N2O emissions from soil in Canadian agroecosystems. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 72(1):87–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Six J, Ogle SM, Jay-breidt F, Conant RT, Mosier AR, Paustian K (2004) The potential to mitigate global warming with no-tillage management is only realized when practised in the long term. Global Chang Biol 10(2):155–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Gregorich EG, Rochette P, VandenBygaart AJ, Angers DA (2005) Greenhouse gas contributions of agricultural soils and potential mitigation practices in Eastern Canada. Soil Tillage Res 83(1):53–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. St. Clair S, Hillier J, Smith P (2008) Estimating the pre-harvest greenhouse gas costs of energy crop production. Biomass Bioenerg 32(5):442–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Styles D, Jones MB (2007) Energy crops in Ireland: quantifying the potential life-cycle greenhouse gas reductions of energy-crop electricity. Biomass Bioenerg 31(11–12):759–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Buchholz T, Volk T (2011) Improving the profitability of willow crops–identifying opportunities with a crop budget model. Bioenerg Res 4(2):85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Nowakowski DJ, Jones JM, Brydson RMD, Ross AB (2007) Potassium catalysis in the pyrolysis behaviour of short rotation willow coppice. Fuel 86(15):2389–2402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Greenhalf CE, Nowakowski DJ, Harms AB, Titiloye JO, Bridgwater AV (2012) Sequential pyrolysis of willow SRC at low and high heating rates—implications for selective pyrolysis. Fuel 93:692–702

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Greenhalf CE, Nowakowski DJ, Harms AB, Titiloye JO, Bridgwater AV (2013) A comparative study of straw, perennial grasses and hardwoods in terms of fast pyrolysis products. Fuel 108:216–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ameloot N, De Neve S, Jegajeevagan K, Yildiz G, Buchan D, Funkuin YN, Prins W, Bouckaert L, Sleutel S (2013) Short-term CO2 and N2O emissions and microbial properties of biochar amended sandy loam soils. Soil Biol Biochem 57:401–410

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Christiansen EA (1979) The wisconsinan deglaciation, of southern Saskatchewan and adjacent areas. Can J Earth Sci 16(4):913–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Saskatchewan Centre for Soil Research (SCSR) (1985) The soils of the swift current Map area, number 72J. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK

    Google Scholar 

  29. SCSR (1989) The soils of the rural municipality of Prince Albert, number 461. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hangs RD, Schoenau JJ, Rees KCJ, Bélanger N, Volk T (2014) Leaf litter decomposition and nutrient-release characteristics of several willow varieties within short-rotation coppice plantations in Saskatchewan, Canada. Bioenerg Res 7(4):1074–1090

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Maynard DG, Kalra YP, Crumbaugh JA (2008) Nitrate and exchangeable ammonium nitrogen. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 71–80

    Google Scholar 

  32. Qian P, Schoenaru JJ, Karamanos RE (1994) Simultaneous extraction of available phosphorus and potassium with a new soil test: a modification of Kelowna extraction. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 25(5–6):627–635

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu ZY, Zhao FJ, McGrath SP (2005) Sulphur fractionation in calcareous soils and bioavailability to plants. Plant Soil 268(1):103–109

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (2008) Ion exchange and exchangeable cations. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 197–206

    Google Scholar 

  35. Thomas RL, Sheard RW, Moyer JR (1967) Comparison of conventional and automated procedures for nitrogen, phosphorous, and potassium analysis of plant material using a single digestion. Agron J 57:240–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang D, Anderson DW (1998) Direct measurement of organic carbon content in soils by the Leco CR-12 carbon analyzer. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 29:15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Skjemstad JO, Baldock JA (2008) Total and organic carbon. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 225–237

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hendershot WH, Lalande H, Duquette M (2008) Soil reaction and exchangeable acidity. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 173–178

    Google Scholar 

  39. Schroeder W, Kort J, Savoie P, Preto F (2009) Biomass harvest from natural willow rings around prairie wetlands. Bioenerg Res 2(3):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Mirck J, Schroeder W (2013) Composition, stand structure, and biomass estimates of “Willow Rings” on the Canadian prairies. Bioenerg Res 6(3):864–876

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Wismer M (2008) Comparison of agroforestry and traditional feedstocks used for ethanol production with life cycle assessment. SRC Publication No. 12205-1E08. Saskatchewan Research Council, Saskatoon, SK

    Google Scholar 

  42. Anderson N, Jones JG, Page-Dumroese D, McCollum D, Baker S, Loeffler D, Chung W (2013) A comparison of producer gas, biochar, and activated carbon from two distributed scale thermochemical conversion systems used to process forest biomass. Energies 6:164–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Dane JH, Hopmans JW (2002) Pressure plate extractor. In: Dane JH, Topp GC (eds) Methods of soil analysis, vol 5, 4th edn, Physical methods. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 688–690

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hao X, Ball BC, Culley JLB, Carter MR, Parkin GW (2008) Soil density and porosity. In: Carter MR, Gregorich EG (eds) Soil sampling and methods of analysis. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 743–759

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kandeler E, Gerber H (1988) Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol Fertil Soils 6(1):68–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Qian P, Schoenau JJ (2002) Practical applications of ion exchange resins in agricultural and environmental soil research. Can J Soil Sci 82(1):9–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Qian P, Schoenau J (1995) Assessing nitrogen mineralization from soil organic matter using anion exchange membranes. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 40(2):143–148

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bontti E, Burke I, Lauenroth W (2011) Nitrogen partitioning between microbes and plants in the shortgrass steppe. Plant Soil 342(1):445–457

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Harrison DJ, Maynard DG (2014) Nitrogen mineralization assessment using PRS™-probes (ion-exchange membranes) and soil extractions in fertilized and unfertilized pine and spruce soils. Can J Soil Sci 94(1):21–34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Hangs RD, Greer KJ, Sulewski CA (2004) The effect of interspecific competition on conifer seedling growth and nitrogen availability measured using ion-exchange membranes. Can J For Res 34(3):754–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Smethurst PJ (2000) Soil solution and other soil analyses as indicators of nutrient supply: a review. For Ecol Manag 138(1–3):397–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lajtha K, Jarrell W, Johnson DW, Sollins P (1999) Collection of soil solution. In: Robertson GP, Bledsoe CS, Coleman DC, Sollins P (eds) Standard soil methods for long term ecological research. Oxford University Press, New York, USA, pp 166–182

    Google Scholar 

  53. Case SDC, McNamara NP, Reay DS, Whitaker J (2012) The effect of biochar addition on N2O and CO2 emissions from a sandy loam soil—the role of soil aeration. Soil Biol Biochem 51:125–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Hangs RD, Schoenau JJ, Lafond GP (2013) The effect of nitrogen fertilization and no-till duration on soil nitrogen supply power and post-spring thaw greenhouse gas emissions. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 176(2):227–237

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Lemke RL, Izaurralde RC, Nyborg M, Solberg ED (1999) Tillage and N source influence soil-emitted nitrous oxide in the Alberta parkland region. Can J Soil Sci 79(1):15–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Yates TT, Si BC, Farrell RE, Pennock DJ (2006) Wavelet spectra of nitrous oxide emission from hummocky terrain during spring snowmelt. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70(4):1110–1120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Agnew J, Laguë C, Schoenau J, Farrell R (2010) Greenhouse gas emissions measured 24 hours after surface and subsurface application of different manure types. Trans ASABE 53:1689–1701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Ginting D, Anabayan K, Eghball B, Doran J (2003) Greenhouse gas emissions and soil indicators four years after manure and compost applications. J Environ Qual 32(1):23–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Hutchinson GL, Mosier AR (1981) Improved soil cover method for field measurement of nitrous oxide fluxes. Soil Sci Soc Am J 45:311–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS system for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute, Inc., Cary, NC

    Google Scholar 

  61. Saxton AM (1998) A macro for converting mean separation output to letter groupings in proc mixed. Proc. 23rd SAS users group Intl. SAS Institute, Cary, NC, pp 1243–1246

    Google Scholar 

  62. Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, Virginia, USA, pp 67–81

    Google Scholar 

  63. Karhu K, Mattila T, Bergström I, Regina K (2011) Biochar addition to agricultural soil increased CH4 uptake and water holding capacity—results from a short-term pilot field study. Agric Ecosyst Environ 140(1–2):309–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Krapfl KJ, Hatten JA, Roberts SD, Baldwin BS, Rousseau RJ, Shankle MW (2014) Soil properties, nitrogen status, and switchgrass productivity in a biochar-amended silty clay loam. Soil Sci Soc Am J 78:136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Ulyett J, Sakrabani R, Kibblewhite M, Hann M (2014) Impact of biochar addition on water retention, nitrification and carbon dioxide evolution from two sandy loam soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65:96–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Akinremi OO, McGinn SM, Barr AG (1996) Evaluation of the palmer drought index on the Canadian prairies. J Clim 9(5):897–905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Hogg EH, Schwarz AG (1997) Regeneration of planted conifers across climatic moisture gradients on the Canadian prairies: implications for distribution and climate change. J Biogeogr 24(4):527–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Hangs RD, Schoenau JJ, Van Rees KCJ, Knight JD (2012) The effect of irrigation on nitrogen uptake and use efficiency of two willow (Salix spp.) biomass energy varieties. Can J Plant Sci 92(3):563–575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Havlin JL, Tisdale SL, Nelson WL, Beaton JD (2014) Soil fertility and fertilizers, 8th edn. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  70. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337(1–2):1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Jassal RS, Johnson MS, Molodovskaya M, Black TA, Jollymore A, Sveinson K (2015) Nitrogen enrichment potential of biochar in relation to pyrolysis temperature and feedstock quality. J Environ Manag 152:140–144

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Hamel C, Hanson K, Selles F, Cruz AF, Lemke R, McConkey B, Zentner R (2006) Seasonal and long-term resource-related variations in soil microbial communities in wheat-based rotations of the Canadian prairie. Soil Biol Biochem 38(8):2104–2116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Wu F, Jia Z, Wang S, Chang S, Startsev A (2013) Contrasting effects of wheat straw and its biochar on greenhouse gas emissions and enzyme activities in a Chernozemic soil. Biol Fertil Soils 49(5):555–565

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Du Z, Wang Y, Huang J, Lu N, Liu X, Lou Y, Zhang Q (2014) Consecutive biochar application alters soil enzyme activities in the winter wheat–growing season. Soil Sci 179(2):75–83

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Ding Y, Liu Y-X, Wu W-X, Shi D-Z, Yang M, Zhong Z-K (2010) Evaluation of biochar effects on nitrogen retention and leaching in multi-layered soil columns. Water Air Soil Pollut 213(1–4):47–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  76. Bandick AK, Dick RP (1999) Field management effects on soil enzyme activities. Soil Biol Biochem 31(11):1471–1479

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. Magaña-Plaza I, Ruiz-Herrera J (1967) Mechanisms of regulation of urease biosynthesis in Proteus rettgeri. J Bacteriol 93:1294–1301

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Dharmakeerthi RS, Thenabadu MW (1996) Urease activity in soils: a review. J Natn Sci Coun Sri Lanka 24:159–195

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  79. Lloyd AB, Sheaffe MJ (1973) Urease activity in soils. Plant Soil 39(1):71–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  80. Xu G, Wei LL, Sun JN, Shao HB, Chang SX (2013) What is more important for enhancing nutrient bioavailability with biochar application into a sandy soil: direct or indirect mechanism? Ecol Eng 52:119–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Clough T, Condron L, Kammann C, Müller C (2013) A review of biochar and soil nitrogen dynamics. Agronomy 3(2):275–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  82. Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Harris K, Das KC, Bibens B (2008) Effect of low-temperature pyrolysis conditions on biochar for agricultural use. Trans ASABE 51:2061–2069

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Singh B, B.P. S, A.L. C (2010) Characterisation and evaluation of biochars for their application as a soil amendment. Aust J Soil Res 48:516–525

  84. DeLuca TH, Gundale MJ, MacKenzie MD, Jones DL (2015) Biochar effects on soil nutrient transformations. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science. Technology and Implementation. Taylor and Francis, Ney York, USA, pp 421–454

    Google Scholar 

  85. Zimmerman AR (2010) Abiotic and microbial oxidation of laboratory-produced black carbon (biochar). Environ Sci Technol 44(4):1295–1301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Grant RF, Pattey E (1999) Mathematical modeling of nitrous oxide emissions from an agricultural field during spring thaw. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 13(2):679–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  87. Liebig MA, Morgan JA, Reeder JD, Ellert BH, Gollany HT, Schuman GE (2005) Greenhouse gas contributions and mitigation potential of agricultural practices in northwestern USA and western Canada. Soil Tillage Res 83(1):25–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Rochette P (2008) No-till only increases N2O emissions in poorly-aerated soils. Soil Tillage Res 101(1–2):97–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Jordan C (1989) The effect of fertiliser type and application rate on denitrification losses from cut grassland in Northern Ireland. Fert Res 19(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. Khalil K, Mary B, Renault P (2004) Nitrous oxide production by nitrification and denitrification in soil aggregates as affected by O2 concentration. Soil Biol Biochem 36(4):687–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  91. Tortoso AC, Hutchinson GL (1990) Contributions of autotrophic and heterotrophic nitrifiers to soil NO and N2O emissions. Appl Environ Microbiol 56(6):1799–1805

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Spokas KA, Reicosky DC (2009) Impacts of sixteen different biochars on soil greenhouse gas production. Ann Environ Sci 3:179–193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  93. Taghizadeh-Toosi A, Clough TJ, Condron LM, Sherlock RR, Anderson CR, Craigie RA (2011) Biochar incorporation into pasture soil suppresses in situ nitrous oxide emissions from ruminant urine patches. J Environ Qual 401(2):468–476

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  94. Song Y, Zhang X, Ma B, Chang SX, Gong J (2014) Biochar addition affected the dynamics of ammonia oxidizers and nitrification in microcosms of a coastal alkaline soil. Biol Fertil Soils 50(2):321–332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  95. Prommer J, Wanek W, Hofhansl F, Trojan D, Offre P, Urich T, Schleper C, Sassmann S, Kitzler B, Soja G, Hood-Nowotny RC (2014) Biochar decelerates soil organic nitrogen cycling but stimulates soil nitrification in a temperate arable field trial. PLoS ONE 9(1), e86388

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  96. Regina K, Alakukku L (2010) Greenhouse gas fluxes in varying soils types under conventional and no-tillage practices. Soil Tillage Res 109(2):144–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. van Zwieten L, Singh B, Joseph S, Kimber S, Cowie A, Chan KY (2009) Biochar and emission of non-CO2 greenhouse gases from soil. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, Virginia, USA, pp 227–250

    Google Scholar 

  98. Whitman T, Bhupinder PS, Zimmerman AR (2015) Priming effects in biochar-amended soils: implications of biochar-soil organic matter interactions for carbon storage. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S (eds) Biochar for environmental management: science. Technology and Implementation. Taylor and Francis, New York, USA, pp 455–487

    Google Scholar 

  99. Bates ST, Berg-Lyons D, Caporaso JG, Walters WA, Knight R, Fierer N (2011) Examining the global distribution of dominant archaeal populations in soil. ISME J 5(5):908–917

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Hatzenpichler R (2012) Diversity, physiology, and niche differentiation of ammonia-oxidizing archaea. Appl Environ Microbiol 78(21):7501–7510

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Könneke M, Schubert DM, Brown PC, Hügler M, Standfest S, Schwander T, Schada von Borzyskowski L, Erb TJ, Stahl DA, Berg IA (2014) Ammonia-oxidizing archaea use the most energy-efficient aerobic pathway for CO2 fixation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(22):8239–8244

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  102. Olsson P, Linder S, Giesler R, Högberg P (2005) Fertilization of boreal forest reduces both autotrophic and heterotrophic soil respiration. Global Chang Biol 11(10):1745–1753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. Fleischer S, Bouse IVO (2008) Nitrogen cycling drives a strong within-soil CO2-sink. Tellus B 60(5):782–786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  104. Al-Kaisi MM, Kruse ML, Sawyer JE (2008) Effect of nitrogen fertilizer application on growing season soil carbon dioxide emission in a corn-soybean rotation. J Environ Qual 37:325–332

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. Le Mer J, Roger P (2001) Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: a review. Eur J Soil Biol 37(1):25–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  106. Pisante M, Stagnari F, Acutis M, Bindi M, Brilli L, Di Stefano V, Carozzi M (2015) Conservation agriculture and climate change. In: Farooq M, Siddique KHM (eds) Conservation Agriculture. Springer International Publishing, pp 579–620

  107. Sadasivam B-Y, Reddy KR (2013) Study of methane adsorption by biochar in landfill cover. Air and Waste Management Association Annual Conference and Exhibition. Air and Waste Management Association, Chicago, IL, USA

    Google Scholar 

  108. Sadasivam B-Y, Reddy KR (2015) Influence of physico-chemical properties of different biochars on landfill methane adsorption. International Foundation Congress and Equipment Expo, San Antonio TX, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  109. Seghers D, Top EM, Reheul D, Bulcke R, Boeckx P, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2003) Long-term effects of mineral versus organic fertilizers on activity and structure of the methanotrophic community in agricultural soils. Environ Microbiol 5:867–877

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Acton SD, Baggs EM (2011) Interactions between N application rate, CH4 oxidation and N2O production in soil. Biogeochemistry 103(1–3):15–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  111. Nyerges G, Han S-K, Stein LY (2010) Effects of ammonium and nitrite on growth and competitive fitness of cultivated methanotrophic bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:5648–5651

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Heller MC, Keoleian GA, Volk TA (2003) Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenerg 25(2):147–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  113. Keoleian G, Volk T (2005) Renewable energy from willow biomass crops: life cycle energy, environmental and economic performance. Crit Rev Plant Sci 24:385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. Pacaldo RS, Volk TA, Briggs RD (2013) Greenhouse gas potentials of shrub willow biomass crops based on below- and above-ground biomass inventory along a 19-year chronosequence. Bioenerg Res 6(1):252–262

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  115. Pacaldo R, Volk T, Briggs R (2014) Carbon sequestration in fine roots and foliage biomass offsets soil co2 effluxes along a 19-year chronosequence of shrub willow (Salix x dasyclados) biomass crops. Bioenerg Res:1–8

  116. Caputo J, Balogh S, Volk T, Johnson L, Puettmann M, Lippke B, Oneil E (2014) Incorporating uncertainty into a life cycle assessment (LCA) model of short-rotation willow biomass (Salix spp.) crops. Bioenerg Res 7(1):48–59

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  117. Soil Classification Working Group (1998) The Canadian system of soil classification (third edition). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  118. Soil Survey Staff (1999) Soil taxonomy: a basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436

  119. SCSR (1978) The soils of the Saskatoon Map area, number 73B. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks to the Saskatchewan Agriculture Development Fund for funding; Western Ag Innovations Inc. for supplying the PRS™ probes; M. Providenti (Saskatchewan Research Council) and Jonah Levine (Biochar Solutions Inc.) for providing the willow biochar; C. Fatteicher, D. Hahn, R. Hangs, T. King, F. Krijnen, D. Richman, M. St. Arnaud and R. Urton for their logistical support and the two anonymous Reviewers for their critical comments and suggestions that improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada

    R. D. Hangs, H. P. Ahmed & J. J. Schoenau

Authors
  1. R. D. Hangs
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. H. P. Ahmed
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. J. Schoenau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. D. Hangs.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 1.07 mb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hangs, R.D., Ahmed, H.P. & Schoenau, J.J. Influence of Willow Biochar Amendment on Soil Nitrogen Availability and Greenhouse Gas Production in Two Fertilized Temperate Prairie Soils. Bioenerg. Res. 9, 157–171 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9671-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12155-015-9671-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation