Abstract
In heterosexual marriages, women’s marital last name change is a prevalent social custom, but one that was challenged by first- and second-wave feminism. In the present study, we examined whether attitudes, plans, and rationales about marital last name change differed between men and women, and between self-identified feminists and non-feminists. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected from emerging adult college students using an online survey. Women’s attitudes about name change were more egalitarian than men’s, but conformity to patriarchal norms was more evident in women’s plans than men’s plans. Women most frequently invoked tradition and family unity/commitment as rationales for name change plans, whereas men most frequently invoked tradition and social norms. Compared to non-feminists, feminists reported more egalitarian attitudes, but there were few differences in their rationales. For men only, feminists’ plans conformed less to patriarchal norms. Post-feminist ideology was evident in participants’ (particularly women’s) rationales for their name-change plans and in results indicating that attitudes about others’ name change are more egalitarian than personal plans.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anderson, K. J. (2015). Modern misogyny: Antifeminism in a post-feminist era. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aronson, P. (2003). Feminists or “postfeminists”? Young women’s attitudes toward feminism and gender relations. Gender & Society, 17(6), 903–922.
Atkins-Sayre, W. (2005). Naming women: The emergence of “Ms.” as a liberatory title. Women and Language, 28(1), 8–16.
Bay-Cheng, L. Y., & Zucker, A. N. (2007). Feminism between the sheets: Sexual attitudes among feminists, nonfeminists, and egalitarians. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31(2), 157–163.
Blair-Loy, M. (2005). Competing devotions: Career and family among women executives. Boston: Harvard University Press.
Bolzendahl, C. I., & Myers, D. J. (2004). Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: Opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Social Forces, 83(2), 759–789.
Brown, W. (2003). Neo-liberalism and the end of liberal democracy. Theory and Event, 7(1). http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/theory_and_event/v007/7.1brown.html. Accessed April 2, 2015.
Clarke, V., Burns, M., & Burgoyne, C. (2008). ‘Who would take whose name?’ Accounts of naming practices in same-sex relationships. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 420–439.
DiDonato, L., & Strough, J. (2013). Do college students’ gender-typed attitudes about occupations predict their real-world decisions? Sex Roles, 68(9–10), 536–549.
Douglas, S. (2010). Enlightened sexism: The seductive message that feminism’s work is done. New York: Times Books.
Dralle, P., Asson, W., & Mackiewicz, K. (1981). Psychological impact of women’s name change at marriage: Literature review and implications for further study. American Journal of Family Therapy, 9, 50–55.
Duncan, L. E. (2010). Women’s relationship to feminism: Effects of generation and feminist self-labeling. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34(4), 498–507.
Eagly, A. H., & Steffen, V. J. (1984). Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(4), 735–754.
Eisele, H., & Stake, J. (2008). The differential relationship of feminist attitudes and feminist identity to self-efficacy. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 32(3), 233–244.
Etaugh, C. E., Bridges, J. S., Cummings-Hill, M., & Cohen, J. (1999). ‘Names can never hurt me?’ The effects of surname use on perceptions of married women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 23(4), 819–823. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1999.tb00400.x.
Foss, K. A., & Edson, B. A. (1989). What’s in a name? Accounts of married women’s name choices. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 53(4), 356–373.
Gallup, G. (2002). The Gallup poll: Public opinion 2001. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Gill, R. C. (2007). Critical respect: The difficulties and dilemmas of agency and ‘choice’ for feminism: A reply to Duits and van Zoonen. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 14(1), 69–80. doi:10.1177/1350506807072318.
Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21.
Goldin, C., & Shim, M. (2004). Making a name: Women’s surnames at marriage and beyond. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 18(2), 143–160.
Gooding, G. E., & Kreider, R. M. (2010). Women’s marital naming choices in a nationally representative sample. Journal of Family Issues, 31(5), 681–701.
Hamilton, L., Geist, C., & Powell, B. (2011). Marital name change as a window into gender attitudes. Gender & Society, 25, 145–175.
Hoffnung, M. (2006). What’s in a name? Marital name choice revisited. Sex Roles, 55(11–12), 817–825.
Johnson, D. R., & Scheuble, L. (1995). Women’s marital naming in two generations: A national study. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 57(3), 724–732. doi:10.2307/353926.
Kerns, M. Y. (2011). North American women’s surname choice based on ethnicity and self-identification as feminists. Names, 59(2), 104–117.
King, N. (1998). Template analysis. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative methods and analysis in organisational research: A practical guide (pp. 118–134). London: Sage.
Kline, S. L., Stafford, L., & Miklosovic, J. C. (1996). Women’s surnames: Decisions, interpretations, and associations with relational qualities. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 13(4), 593–617.
Lazar, M. M. (2011). The right to be beautiful: Postfeminist identity and consumer beauty advertising. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: Postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp. 37–51). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Leaper, C. (2014). Gender similarities and differences in language. In: Oxford handbooks online. Retrieved from http://www.oxfordhandbooks.com/view/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199838639.001.0001/oxfordhb-9780199838639-e-002.
Leaper, C., & Arias, D. M. (2011). College women’s feminist identity: A multidimensional analysis with implications for coping with sexism. Sex Roles, 64(7–8), 475–490.
Liben, L. S., & Bigler, R. S. (2002). The developmental course of gender differentiation: Conceptualizing, measuring, and evaluating constructs and pathways. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 67(2), 1–147.
Liss, M., O’Connor, C., Morosky, E., & Crawford, M. (2001). What makes a feminist? Predictors and correlates of feminist social identity in college women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(2), 124–133.
Lockwood, P., Burton, C., & Boersma, K. (2011). Tampering with tradition: Rationales concerning women’s married names and children’s surnames. Sex Roles, 65, 827–839.
McCabe, J. (2005). What’s in a label? The relationship between feminist self-identification and “feminist” attitudes among US women and men. Gender & Society, 19(4), 480–505.
McHugh, M. C., & Frieze, I. (1997). The measurement of gender-role attitudes: A review and commentary. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21(1), 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1997.tb00097.x.
McRobbie, A. (2004). Post-feminism and popular culture. Feminist Media Studies, 4, 255–264. doi:10.1080/1468077042000309937.
Miller, A. H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G., & Malanchuk, O. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 25(3), 494–511.
Murnen, S. K., & Smolak, L. (2009). Are feminist women protected from body image problems? A meta-analytic review of relevant research. Sex Roles, 60(3–4), 186–197.
Murray, T. E. (1997). Attitudes toward married women’s surnames: Evidence from the American Midwest. Names: A Journal of Onomastics, 45(3), 163–183.
Nugent, C. (2010). Children’s surnames, moral dilemmas: Accounting for the predominance of fathers’ surnames for children. Gender & Society, 24(4), 499–525. doi:10.1177/0891243210376380.
Pearson, J. C. (1985). Gender and communication. Dubuque, IA: Brown.
Peterson, R. D., Tantleff-Dunn, S., & Bedwell, J. S. (2006). The effects of exposure to feminist ideology on women’s body image. Body Image, 3(3), 237–246.
Press, A. L. (2011). ‘Feminism? That’s so seventies’: Girls and young women discuss femininity and feminism in America’s Next Top Model. In R. Gill & C. Scharff (Eds.), New femininities: postfeminism, neoliberalism, and subjectivity (pp. 117–133). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Reaney, P. H. (1967). origin of English surnames. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
Reich, J. A. (2014). Neoliberal mothering and vaccine refusal: Imagined gated communities and the privilege of choice. Gender & Society, 28(5), 679–704. doi:10.1177/0891243214532711.
Rich, E. (2005). Young women, feminist identities and neoliberalism. Women’s Studies International Forum, 28(6), 495–508.
Ridgeway, C. L., & Bourg, C. (2004). Gender as status: An expectation states theory approach. In A. H. Eagly, A. E. Beall, & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 217–241). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
Rippeyoung, P. L. F. (2009). Feeding the state: Breastfeeding and women’s well-being in context. Journal of the Motherhood Initiative for Research and Community Involvement, 11(1), 1–13.
Robnett, R. D., & Leaper, C. (2013). “Girls don’t propose! Ew”.: A mixed-methods examination of marriage tradition preferences and benevolent sexism in emerging adults. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28(1), 96–121. doi:10.1177/0743558412447871.
Scheuble, L., & Johnson, D. R. (1993). Marital name change: Plans and attitudes of college students. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55(3), 747–754. doi:10.2307/353354.
Scheuble, L. K., & Johnson, D. R. (2007). Social and cognitive factors in women’s marital name choice. Names, 55(3), 229–251.
Scheuble, L. K., Johnson, D. R., & Johnson, K. M. (2012). Marital name changing attitudes and plans of college students: Comparing change over time and across regions. Sex Roles, 66(3–4), 282–292. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0089-z.
Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgments. In M. Killen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–153). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Stafford, L., & Kline, S. L. (1996). Married women’s name choices and sense of self. Communication Reports, 9(1), 85–92.
Stone, P. (2008). Opting out? Why women really quit careers and head home. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Strough, J., Leszczynski, J. P., Neely, T. L., Flinn, J. A., & Margrett, J. (2007). From adolescence to later adulthood: Femininity, masculinity, and androgyny in six age groups. Sex Roles, 57(5–6), 385–396.
Suarez, E. (1996). A woman’s freedom to choose her surname: Is it really a matter of choice? Women’s Rights Law Reporter, 18(2), 233–242.
Suter, E. A. (2004). Tradition never goes out of style: The role of tradition in women’s naming practices. Communication Review, 7(1), 57–87.
Suter, E. A., & Oswald, R. F. (2003). Do lesbians change their last names in the context of a committed relationship? Journal of Lesbian Studies, 7(2), 71–83.
Twenge, J. M. (1997). Mrs. His Name: Women’s preferences for married names. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 21, 417–429.
Williams, R., & Wittig, M. A. (1997). “I’m not a feminist, but…”: Factors contributing to the discrepancy between pro-feminist orientation and feminist social identity. Sex Roles, 37(11–12), 885–904.
Yoder, J. D., Tobias, A., & Snell, A. F. (2011). When declaring “I am a feminist” matters: Labeling is linked to activism. Sex Roles, 64(1–2), 9–18.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Rachel Stoiko and JoNell Strough declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Stoiko, R.R., Strough, J. ‘Choosing’ the Patriarchal Norm: Emerging Adults’ Marital Last Name Change Attitudes, Plans, and Rationales. Gend. Issues 34, 295–315 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-017-9183-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12147-017-9183-z