Skip to main content
Log in

Machine learning for prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength within carbonate rocks

  • RESEARCH
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) is an essential parameter in various fields (e.g., civil engineering, geotechnical engineering, mechanical engineering, and material sciences). Indeed, the determination of UCS in carbonate rocks allows evaluation of its economic value. The relationship between UCS and numerous physical and mechanical parameters has been extensively investigated. However, these models lack accuracy, where as regional and small samples negatively impact these models' reliability. The novelty of this work is the use of state-of-the-art machine learning techniques to predict the Uniaxial Compressive Strength (UCS) of carbonate rocks using data collected from scientific studies conducted in 16 countries. The data reflect the rock properties including Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity, density and effective porosity. Machine learning models including Random Forest, Multi Layer Perceptron, Support Vector Regressor and Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) are trained and evaluated in terms of prediction performance. Furthermore, hyperparameter optimization is conducted to ensure maximum prediction performance. The results showed that XGBoost performed the best, with the lowest Mean Absolute Error (ranging from 17.22 to 18.79), the lowest Root Mean Square Error (ranging from 438.95 to 590.46), and coefficients of determination (R2) ranging from 0.91 to 0.94. The aim of this study was to improve the accuracy and reliability of models for predicting the UCS of carbonate rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The dataset and associated source codes analyzed during the current study are available in the GitHub repository (https://github.com/RatebJabbar/uniaxial-compressive-strength-within-carbonate-rocks).

References

  • Abdelhedi M, Abbes C (2021) Study of physical and mechanical properties of carbonate rocks and their applications on georesources exploration in Tunisia. Carbonates Evaporites 36(2):1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13146-021-00688-8/FIGURES/12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelhedi M, Jabbar R, Mnif T, Abbes C (2020) Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks and cement mortar using artificial neural network and multiple linear regressions. Acta Geodynamica Et Geromaterialia 17(3):367–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelhedi M, Jabbar R, Mnif T, Abbes C (2020) Ultrasonic velocity as a tool for geotechnical parameters prediction within carbonate rocks aggregates. Arab J Geosci 13(4):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/S12517-020-5070-0/FIGURES/10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdelhedi M, Abbes C, M A, Aloui M, Mnif T (2017) Ultrasonic velocity as a tool for mechanical and physical parameters prediction within carbonate rocks. Res Gate Net 13(3):371-384.https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2017.13.3.371

  • Abdelhedi M, Jabbar R, Mnif T, Abbes C(2020a). Prediction of uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks and cement mortar using artificial neural network and multiple linear regressions. Irsm Cas Cz, 17(3):367–377. https://doi.org/10.13168/AGG.2020.0027

  • Aboutaleb S, Behnia M, Bagherpour R, Bluekian B (2018) Using non-destructive tests for estimating uniaxial compressive strength and static Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks via some modeling techniques. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-017-1043-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abulibdeh A, Zaidan E, Jabbar R (2022) The impact of COVID 19 pandemic on electricity consumption and electricity demand forecasting accuracy Empirical evidence from the state of Qatar. Energy Strategy Reviews 44:100980 https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESR.2022.100980

  • Abdurrahim A (2020)Comparative Analysis of Regression Learning Methods for Estimation of Energy Performance of Residential Structures Erzincan University. J Sci Technol 13(2):600-608.https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.691398

  • Amiri M, Lashkaripour GR, Hafezi Moghaddas N, Ghobadi MH, Amiri M (2022) Estimating Uniaxial Compressive Strength of Ilam. Limestones Formation from Index Parameters by Learning Methods

  • Ammari A, Abbes C, Abida H (2022) Geometric properties and scaling laws of the fracture network of the Ypresian carbonate reservoir in central Tunisia Examples of Jebels Ousselat and Jebil. J Afr Earth Sci 196:104718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2022.104718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderssen E, Dyrstad K, Westad F, Martens H (2006) Reducing over-optimism in variable selection by cross-model validation Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 84 1–2 SPEC ISS.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemolab.2006.04.021

  • Arman H (2021) Correlation of Uniaxial Compressive Strength with Indirect Tensile Strength Brazilian and 2nd Cycle of Slake Durability Index for Evaporitic Rocks. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 39:2.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01578-x

  • Assam SA, Agunwamba JC (2020) Potentials of Processed Palm Kernel Shell Ash Local Stabilizer and Model Prediction of CBR and UCS Values of Ntak Clayey Soils in Akwa Ibom State Nigeria. European Journal of Engineering Research and Science 5:12 https://doi.org/10.24018/ejers.2020.5.12.2143

  • Ayadi S, Ben Said A, Jabbar R, Aloulou C, Chabbouh A, Achballah AB (2020) Dairy Cow Rumination Detection: A Deep Learning Approach. Communications in Computer and Information Science 1348:123–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65810-6_7/COVER

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagherzadeh F, Mehrani MJ, Basirifard M, Roostaei J (2021a) Comparative study on total nitrogen prediction in wastewater treatment plant and effect of various feature selection methods on machine learning algorithms performance. J Wat Proc Eng 41.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2021.102033

  • Bagherzadeh F, Nouri AS, Mehrani MJ, Thennadil S (2021b) Prediction of energy consumption and evaluation of affecting factors in a full-scale WWTP using a machine learning approach. Process Safety and Environmental Protection 154.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.08.040

  • Bagherzadeh F, Shafighfard T (2022) Ensemble Machine Learning approach for evaluating the material characterization of carbon nanotube-reinforced cementitious composites. Case Studies in Construction Materials 17:e01537. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barham WS, Rabab’ah SR, Aldeeky HH, Al Hattamleh OH (2020) Mechanical and Physical Based Artificial Neural Network Models for the Prediction of the Unconfined Compressive Strength of Rock. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 38:5.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01327-0

  • Ben Othman D, Ayadi I, Abida H, Laignel B (2018) Spatial and inter-annual variability of specific sediment yield: case of hillside reservoirs in Central Tunisia. Bull Eng Geol Environ 77:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-016-0976-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben Said A, Erradi A (2022) Spatiotemporal Tensor Completion for Improved Urban Traffic Imputation. IEEE Trans Intell Transp Syst 23(7):6836–6849. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2021.3062999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biecek P, Burzykowski T (2021) Shapley Additive Explanations SHAP for Average Attributions In Explanatory Model Analysis 95–106 https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429027192-10

  • Brereton RG (2006) Consequences of sample size variable selection, and model validation and optimisation, for predicting classification ability from analytical data. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry 25:11.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2006.10.005

  • Broadhurst DI, Kell DB (2006) Statistical strategies for avoiding false discoveries in metabolomics and related experiments. Metabolomics 2:4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-006-0037-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bui XN, Bui HB, Nguyen H (2021) A Review of Artificial Intelligence Applications in Mining and Geological Engineering 109:109–142. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60839-2_7/COVER

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calvo JP, Regueiro M (2010) Carbonate rocks in the mediterranean region From classical to innovative uses of building stone. Geological Society Special Publication 331.https://doi.org/10.1144/SP331.3

  • Ceryan N, Samui P (2020) Application of soft computing methods in predicting uniaxial compressive strength of the volcanic rocks with different weathering degree. Arab J Geosci 13:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-5273-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Schmitt DR, Kessler JA, Evans J, Kofman R (2015) Empirical relations between ultrasonic P-wave velocity porosity and uniaxial compressive strength. CSEG Rec 40(5):24–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen T, Guestrin C (2016) XGBoost A scalable tree boosting system Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining 13–17-August-2016 785–794.https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939785

  • Chen T, He T (2020) xgboost: eXtreme Gradient Boosting

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V, Saitta L (1995) Support vector networks. Machine Learning 1995 20 3 20 3 273 297 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00994018

  • Del Río LM, Jiménez A, López F, Rosa FJ, Rufo MM, Paniagua JM (2004) Characterization and hardening of concrete with ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics 42(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Río LM, Jiménez A, López F, Rosa FJ, Rufo MM, Paniagua JM (2004) Characterization and hardening of concrete with ultrasonic testing. Ultrasonics 421:9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2004.01.053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebid AM (2020) 35 Years of (AI) in Geotechnical Engineering State of the Art. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering 2020 39 2 39 2 637 690 https://doi.org/10.1007/S10706-020-01536-7

  • Elleuch MA, Hassena ABen, Abdelhedi M, Pinto FS (2021) Real time prediction of COVID 19 patients health situations using Artificial Neural Networks and Fuzzy Interval. Mathematical modeling Applied Soft Computing 110:107643.https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2021.107643

  • Ghorbani A, Hasanzadehshooiili H (2018) Prediction of UCS and CBR of microsilica-lime stabilized sulfate silty sand using ANN and EPR models application to the deep soil mixing. Soils Found 58:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gowida A, Elkatatny S, Gamal H (2021) Unconfined compressive strength UCS prediction in real-time while drilling using artificial intelligence tools. Neural Comput Appl 33:13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-020-05546-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta I, Devegowda D, Jayaram V, Rai C, Sondergeld C (2019) Machine learning regressors and their metrics to predict synthetic sonic and mechanical properties. Interpretation 7:3. https://doi.org/10.1190/INT-2018-0255.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasanipanah M, Jamei M, Mohammed AS, Amar MN, Hocine O, Khedher KM (2022) Intelligent prediction of rock mass deformation modulus through three optimized cascaded forward neural network models. Earth Sci Inf 15(3):1659–1669. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00823-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan MY, Arman H (2022) Several machine learning techniques comparison for the prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength of carbonate rocks. Sci Rep 12(1):20969.https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1712005/v1

  • Jabbar R, Al-Khalifa K, Kharbeche M, Alhajyaseen W, Jafari M, Jiang S (2018) Applied Internet of Things IoT Car monitoring system for Modeling of Road Safety and Traffic System in the State of Qatar 2018 3 ICTPP1072 https://doi.org/10.5339/QFARC.2018.ICTPP1072

  • Jabbar R, Zaidan E, Said B, Ghofrani A, Jabbar R, Zaidan E, Ghofrani A (2021) Reshaping Smart Energy Transition: An analysis of human-building interactions in Qatar Using Machine Learning Techniques

  • Kamaci Z, Ozer P (2018) Engineering Properties of Egirdir-Kızıldag Harzburgitic Peridotites in Southwestern Turkey. International Journal of Computational and Experimental Science and Engineering 4:2.https://doi.org/10.22399/ijcesen.348339

  • Korobov M (2017) eli5. https://github.com/eli5-org/eli5/blob/master/docs/source/blackbox/permutation_importance.rst

  • Kumar V, Vardhan H, Murthy CSN (2020) Multiple regression model for prediction of rock properties using acoustic frequency during core drilling operations Geomechanics and Geoengineering 15 4 https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1641631

  • Kurtulus C, Bozkurt A, Endes H (2012) Physical and mechanical properties of Serpentinized ultrabasic rocks in NW Turkey. Pure Appl Geophys 169:7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00024-011-0394-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lafhaj Z, Goueygou M (2009) Experimental study on sound and damaged mortar: Variation of ultrasonic parameters with porosity. Constr Build Mater 23:2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.05.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai GT, Rafek AG, Serasa AS, Hussin A, Ern LK (2016) Use of ultrasonic velocity travel time to estimate uniaxial compressive strength of granite and schist in Malaysia. Sains Malaysiana 45:2

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Dai F (2021) A review of experimental and theoretical research on the deformation and failure behavior of rocks subjected to cyclic loading. In Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 13(5):1203–1230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.03.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Z, Shao J, Xu W, Wu Q (2015) Indirect estimation of unconfined compressive strength of carbonate rocks using extreme learning machine. Acta Geotech 10:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-014-0316-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luckner M, Topolski B, Mazurek M (2017) Application of XGBoost algorithm in fingerprinting localisation task. IFIP International Conference on Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management 661:671

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Mohammadi M, Abdulhamid SN, Ali HFH, Ibrahim HH, Rashidi S (2022) Forecasting tunnel path geology using Gaussian process regression. Geomechanics and Engineering 28(4):359–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Mohammadi M, Abdulhamid SN, Ibrahim HH, Ali HFH, Nejati HR, Rashidi S (2022) Prediction of duration and construction cost of road tunnels using Gaussian process regression. Geomechanics and Engineering 28(1):65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Mohammadi M, Abdulhamid SN, Ibrahim HH, Ali HFH, Nejati HR, Rashidi S (2022b) Prediction of duration and construction cost of road tunnels using Gaussian process regression. Geomechanics and Engineering 28(1):65-75.https://doi.org/10.12989/GAE.2022.28.1.065

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Nejati HR, Ibrahim HH, Ali HFH, Mohammed A, Rashidi S, Majeed MK (2022c) Several models for tunnel boring machine performance prediction based on machine learning. Geomechanics and Engineering 30(1):75 91.https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.30.1.075

  • Mahmoodzadeh, A., Nejati, H. R., Mohammadi, Ibrahim, H. H., Rashidi, S., & Mohammed, A., 2022d Meta-heuristic Optimization algorithms for Prediction of Fly-rock in the Blasting Operation of Open-Pit Mines Geomechanics and Engineering 30 6 489 502 https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.30.6.489

  • Mahmoodzadeh A, Ali HFH, Ibrahim HH, Mohammed A, Rashidi S, Mahmood ML, Ali MS (2022e) Application of Autoregressive Model in the Construction Management of Tunnels Acta Montanistica Slovaca 27(3):581-588. https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v27i3.02

  • Mirzaei, M., Mahmoodzadeh, A., Ibrahim, H., Rashidi, S., Majeed, M. K., Mohammed, A. 2022 Prediction of squeezing phenomenon in tunneling projects Application of Gaussian process regression Geomechanics and Engineering 30 1 1126 https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2022.30.1.011

  • Mohamed A, Thameur M, Chedly A (2018) Ultrasonic Velocity as a Tool for Physical and Mechanical Parameters Prediction within Geo-Materials: Application on Cement Mortar. Russ J Nondestr Test 54(5):345–355. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830918050091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molnar, C. 2022 9.6 SHAP SHapley Additive exPlanations | Interpretable Machine Learning https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/shap.html

  • Moussas VC, Diamantis K (2021) Predicting uniaxial compressive strength of serpentinites through physical dynamic and mechanical properties using neural networks. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 13:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2020.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mridekh, Abdelaziz. 2002 Géodynamique des bassins mésocénozoïques de subsurface de l’offshore d’Agadir Maroc sud-occidental contribution à la reconnaissance de l’histoire atlasique d’un segment de la marge atlantique marocaine

  • Müller, A. C., & Guido, S. 2016 Introduction to machine learning with Python: a guide for data scientists “O’Reilly Media Inc.”

  • Nguyen-Sy T, WakimJ, ToQD, VuMN, NguyenTD, NguyenTT (2020) Predicting the compressive strength of concrete from its compositions and age using the extreme gradient boosting method Construction and Building Materials 260 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119757

  • Nielsen, D. 2016 Tree boosting with xgboost-why does xgboost win" every" machine learning competition? NTNU

  • Okan M (2020) AERODYNAMIC FORCE FORECASTING WITH MACHINE LEARNING. Istanbul Technical University, Faculty of Aeronautics and Astronautics

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradkar, M. M., Singhal, R. S., & Kulkarni, P. R. 2001 An approach to the detection of synthetic milk in dairy milk 4 Effect of the addition of synthetic milk on the flow behaviour of pure cow milk International Journal of Dairy Technology 54 1 36 37 https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-0307.2001.00005.x

  • Peng S, Zhang J (2007) Engineering geology for underground rocks. In Engineering Geology for Underground Rocks. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-73295-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rzychoń, M., Żogała, A., & Róg, L. 2021 Experimental study and extreme gradient boosting XGBoost based prediction of caking ability of coal blends Journal of Analytical and Applied Pyrolysis 156 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaap.2021.105020

  • Sakız U, Kaya GU, Yaralı O (2021) Prediction of drilling rate index from rock strength and cerchar abrasivity index properties using fuzzy inference system. Arab J Geosci 14:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-06647-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffer, C., & Edu, S. A. H. C. 1993 Selecting a classification method by cross-validation Machine Learning 1993 13 1 13 1) 135–143 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993106

  • Schonlau M, Zou RY (2020) The random forest algorithm for statistical learning. Stata Journal 20:1. https://doi.org/10.1177/1536867X20909688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seo, H., & Cho, D. H. 2020 Cancer-Related Gene Signature Selection Based on Boosted Regression for Multilayer Perceptron IEEE Access 8 https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2985414

  • Shafighfard T, Bagherzadeh F, Rizi RA, Yoo D-Y (2022) Data-driven compressive strength prediction of steel fiber reinforced concrete SFRC subjected to elevated temperatures using stacked machine learning algorithms. Journal of Materials Research and Technology 21(3777):3794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.10.153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shariati, M., Ramli-Sulong, N. H., Mohammad Mehdi Arabnejad, K. H., Shafigh, P., & Sinaei, H. 2011 Assessing the strength of reinforced Concrete Structures Through Ultrasonic Pulse Velocity And Schmidt Rebound Hammer tests Scientific Research and Essays 6 1

  • Sharma, L. K., Vishal, V., & Singh, T. N. 2017 Developing novel models using neural networks and fuzzy systems for the prediction of strength of rocks from key geomechanical properties Measurement Journal of the International Measurement Confederation 102 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2017.01.043

  • Solanki P, Baldaniya D, Jogani D, Chaudhary B, Shah M, Kshirsagar A (2022) Artificial intelligence: New age of transformation in petroleum upstream. Petroleum Research 7(1):106–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PTLRS.2021.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Na SH (2021) Comparison of machine learning methods for ground settlement prediction with different tunneling datasets. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2021.08.006

  • Tiyasha, Tung, T. M., & Yaseen, Z. M. 2020 A survey on river water quality modelling using artificial intelligence models 2000–2020 In Journal of Hydrology Vol 585). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124670

  • Vasconcelos G, Lourenço PB, Alves CAS, Pamplona J (2008) Ultrasonic evaluation of the physical and mechanical properties of granites. Ultrasonics 48:5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultras.2008.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westerhuis JA, Hoefsloot HCJ, Smit S, Vis DJ, Smilde AK, Velzen EJJ, Duijnhoven JPM, Dorsten FA (2008) Assessment of PLSDA cross validation Metabolomics 4:1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-007-0099-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue X, Wei Y (2020) A hybrid modelling approach for prediction of UCS of rock materials. CR Mec 348:3. https://doi.org/10.5802/CRMECA.17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yasar E, Erdogan Y (2004) Correlating sound velocity with the density compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 41:5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2004.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaidan E, Abulibdeh A, Alban A, Jabbar R (2022) Motivation preference socioeconomic and building features New paradigm of analyzing electricity consumption in residential buildings. Build Environ 219:109177. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2022.109177

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work received financial support from the “Ministère de l’Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique en Tunisie”. Experimental assays were performed in the ‘Département des Sciences de la Terre’ of the ‘Faculté des Sciences de Sfax, Université de Sfax-Tunisie’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Rateb Jabbar, Ahmed Ben Said, Noora Fetais and Chedly Abbes. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mohamed Abdelhedi. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed Abdelhedi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

There is no financial or personal relationship between the authors of this paper and any other individuals or organizations that could inappropriately influence or bias the content of the paper.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdelhedi, M., Jabbar, R., Said, A.B. et al. Machine learning for prediction of the uniaxial compressive strength within carbonate rocks. Earth Sci Inform 16, 1473–1487 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00979-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-023-00979-9

Keywords

Navigation