Skip to main content
Log in

How do sound and color features affect self-report emotional experience in response to film clips?

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Previous research has shown that the use of short film clips is one of the most successful and widely-used methods of emotion elicitation. Nevertheless, there is a high degree of audiovisual variation across film clips, resulting in a trade-off in terms of controllability. To address this complexity, the present study aimed to investigate the potential effects of sound and color on film clips’ emotion-elicitation levels. For this purpose, four different film clips were selected for each of the eight emotion categories: amusement, tenderness, calmness, anger, sadness, disgust, fear, and neutrality. All film clips were manipulated in terms of features of sound (sound versus silent) × color (color versus BW). In total, 128 film clips were tested online on various parameters: intensity of target emotion, valence, arousal, discreteness, and non-target emotions. The results revealed that sound was a mild contributing factor in increasing the degree of target emotions and evoking less boredom and more interest. However, color effects were less pronounced in emotion-elicitation using film clips. Furthermore, the study provided preliminary evidence that for most of the film clips, there was no significant difference in emotional reactivity in response to subtitled versus dubbed film clips. In conclusion, the current study showed that film clips (with a few exceptions) can evoke moderate to high levels of emotions independent of their bottom-up features, such as sound or color.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the OSF repository [https://osf.io/3yftb/?view_only=64af7862f3034d9389f29ada8f680bb9].

Notes

  1. Valence corresponds to the degree of unpleasantness–pleasantness, while arousal refers to the degree of relaxed–aroused feelings (e.g., Bradley & Lang, 1994; Russell, 1980).

  2. In Gabert-Quillen et al. (2015), there were four BW film clips out of a total of 18. These BW film clips included Modern Times (amusement), Gentleman's Agreement (anger), Psycho (fear), and D.O.A. (surprise). In the study conducted by Schaefer et al. (2010), there were six BW film clips out of a total of 70. The BW film clips in this study were American History X (anger), Man Bites Dog (2) (anger), Schindler's List (2) (anger), Schindler's List (3) (anger), Schindler's List (1) (sadness), and Man Bites Dog (1) (disgust).

  3. The elicitation index scores were calculated by averaging the degree and discreteness scores (Zupan & Eskritt, 2020). The degree score represents the intensity of the target emotion. It was calculated by converting the mean target emotion rating into a proportion-based score (i.e., mean target emotion rating divided by 8. It is important to note that in the current study, we used a-priori defined target emotions (e.g., amusement ratings for the amusement category) for this calculation, whereas Zupan and Eskritt (2020) used the highest rated emotion. The discreteness score represents the proportion of instances in which the target emotion was felt at least one point more intensely than the non-target emotions, relative to the total number of non-target emotions (Gabert-Quillen et al., 2015). Specifically, for each film clip version, the number of comparisons in which target emotion was at least 1 point higher than the non-target emotion was divided by the total number of comparisons between target and non-target emotions. This score was then averaged across all participants who had viewed that particular film clip.

  4. In addition to the aforementioned advantages, subtitling may offer a minor advantage in terms of preserving the original sound effects. We observed that certain sound effects might be canceled in the dubbed versions (e.g., The sound of flies buzzing was absent in the dubbed version of the toilet scene from Trainspotting).

  5. Using G*Power version 3.1 (Faul et al., 2009), we performed a power analysis based on a between-subjects factorial design (k = 16) and a small effect size (d = 0.2). It was found that the minimum sample size of 277 participants was needed to reach the desired power level (1-β = .80, α = .05).

  6. In each emotion category, one of the film clips was from a widely-cited database (i.e., amusement: Hangover, Gabert-Quillen et al., 2015; tenderness: Forrest Gump, Schaefer et al., 2010; calmness: Pride and Prejudice, Gabert-Quillen et al., 2015; anger: My Bodyguard, Gross & Levenson, 1995; sadness: The Champ, Gross & Levenson, 1995; disgust: Trainspotting, Schaefer et al., 2010; fear: The Shining, Schaefer et al., 2010; neutrality: Hannah and Her Sisters, Hewig et al., 2005). The remaining three film clips in each category were the scenes that were obtained via a survey in a Turkish sample (Arıkan İyilikci et al., 2023). All film clips were validated in a Turkish sample by Arıkan İyilikci et al. (2023).

  7. The items were amusement, anger, anxiety, boredom, calmness, confusion, desire, disgust, fear, guilt, happiness, interest, joy, love, pride, sadness, shame, surprise, tenderness, and unhappiness. The original questionnaire contains 18 items; but following Arıkan İyilikci et al. (2023) we modified the form by excluding two items (i.e., contempt, and embarrassment) and adding four new items (i.e., boredom, calmness, desire, and tenderness).

  8. We put gender as a third variable into the 2 (sound) × 2 (color) ANOVAs. The results replicated previous studies that women, compared to men, reported higher levels of negative emotions in response to negatively-valenced film clips (e.g., Gabert-Quillen et al., 2015; Gross & Levenson, 1995; Hagemann et al., 1999). Additionally, we found that women reported higher levels of tenderness after watching tenderness-eliciting film clips, which is also consistent with prior research (e.g., Arıkan İyilikci et al., 2023; Lishner et al., 2011). However, there was no interaction between gender, sound, or color.

  9. For instance, previous research has demonstrated that the silent version of the anger-eliciting film clip My Bodyguard from the set of Gross and Levenson (1995) evoked intense levels of anger (e.g., Hewig et al., 2005: M = 7.24, SD = 2.12 on a 0-9 scale). Similarly, the silent version of the sadness-eliciting film clip The Champ from the set of Gross and Levenson (1995) evoked above moderate level of sadness on a 0-9 scale (e.g., Hagemann et al., 1999: M = 6.64, SD = 2.35; Hewig et al., 2005: M = 7.21, SD = 2.07). When we compared the current ratings in response to these pre-existing stimuli with those obtained in previous research, we observed that our results were highly comparable: My Bodyguard, M = 7.44, SD = 0.98; and The Champ, M = 6.96, SD = 1.58 on a 0-8 scale. To our knowledge, the other film clips in the current study were not used as silent in previous research, thus it was not possible to provide comparisons for the remaining stimuli.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Belgüzar Nilay Türkan and Dr. Yıldız Özkılıç for their help with the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elvan Arıkan İyilikci.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was conducted in full accordance with the approved ethics procedure granted by the Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Ege University (EGEBAYEK).

Informed consent

All participants gave voluntary consent to take part in the study and informed consent was required from all individual participants included in the study.

Conflicts of interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 274 KB)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 279 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

İyilikci, E.A., Demirel, A., Işık, F. et al. How do sound and color features affect self-report emotional experience in response to film clips?. Curr Psychol 43, 10185–10216 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05127-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05127-6

Keywords

Navigation