Skip to main content
Log in

Do you feel the same way I do? Relationship between efficacy of emotion regulation strategies and affective convergence

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Despite the social nature of emotions, research to date has focused on emotion regulation at the intrapersonal level. Thus, the efficacy of specific emotion regulation strategies within a social dynamic is unclear. This study investigated the relationship between affective convergence and the efficacy of two emotion regulation strategies: reappraisal and suppression. In Study 1, 37 university students in Korea participated in a 2 × 2 laboratory experiment that manipulated emotion regulation strategies and affective convergence (divergence) through a live social interaction with a confederate. The reduction in negative affect was measured to indicate the efficacy of emotion regulation strategies. In Study 2, 248 North American participants completed a 2 × 2 online experiment that included the manipulation of emotion regulation strategies and affective convergence (divergence). To assess each strategy’s efficacy, we measured participants’ reduction in negative affect and their working memory performance through Stroop task scores. The findings showed that reappraisal was more efficient than suppression when participants received a companion’s feedback that was affectively divergent from their own. However, reappraisal was less efficient than suppression in reducing negative affect when participants received a companion’s feedback that was affectively convergent with their own. In addition, using reappraisal resulted in better working memory performance in the affective divergence condition but not the affective convergence condition. The findings suggest that the efficacy of emotion regulation strategies depends on interpersonal-level affective constructs, namely, affective convergence (divergence). Future research should revisit the efficacy of emotion regulation strategies under a social dynamic.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Min Young Kim.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics approval

We complied with APA ethical standards for the treatment of our sample. The study protocol was approved by the IRB of Yonsei University (approval code: 1040917-201507-SB-177-02). The IRB approved the procedures that included deception, as they were necessary for the study and involved no more than minimal risk to the participants.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

The authors affirm that human research participants provided written informed consent for publication.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Han, K., Kim, M.Y. Do you feel the same way I do? Relationship between efficacy of emotion regulation strategies and affective convergence. Curr Psychol 43, 9216–9229 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05037-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05037-7

Keywords

Navigation