Abstract
Working memory and writing share a common resource. The authors investigated whether increasing the complexity of a finger-tapping task while simultaneously performing a serial verbal recall task while writing would decrease performance for recall, writing fluency, and tapping speed. Participants completed three verbal serial recall tasks which incrementally increased attentional load. Participants recalled word lists after listening to words while, (1) producing pseudo-handwriting movements without finger tapping (no-tapping), (2) producing pseudo-handwriting movements while tapping with a single finger (single-tapping), (3) producing pseudo-handwriting movements while tapping with two fingers (double tapping). The results showed that the double tapping condition caused a decrease in performance for recall, handwriting fluency, and tapping speed compared to the no-tapping condition and the single tapping conditions. However, no differences occurred between the no-tapping condition and the single tapping conditions. The authors concluded that by incrementally increasing the complexity of a concurrent tapping task we can achieve a decrease in performance across multiple cognitive processes. The results provided support for a central pool of shared resources that are utilised by non-working memory tasks and those reliant on working memory. The observed decreases in cognitive performance were dependent on task complexity rather than just performing a secondary task. The findings have implications for how multi-tasking while taking notes is detrimental for memory retention and handwriting fluency.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acheson, D. J., & MacDonald, M. C. (2009). Verbal working memory and language production: Common approaches to the serial ordering of verbal information. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 50–68. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014411.
Acheson, D. J., MacDonald, M. C., & Postle, B. R. (2011). The effect of concurrent semantic categorization on delayed serial recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 44–59. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021205.
Afonso, O., & Álvarez, C. J. (2019). Measuring Writing Durations in Handwriting Research: What Do They Tell Us about the Spelling Process? In Measuring writing durations in handwriting research: What do they tell us about the spelling process? (pp. 151–162). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004394988_009.
Baddeley, A. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 417–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2.
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4, 829–839. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn1201.
Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60452-1.
Baddeley, A., Lewis, V., Eldridge, M., & Thomson, N. (1984). Attention and retrieval from long-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 518–540. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.4.518.
Barrouillet, P., & Camos, V. (2007). The time-based resource-sharing model of working memory. In N. Osaka, R. H. Logie, R. H., & M. D’Esposito (Eds.), The Cognitive Neuroscience of Working Memory (pp. 59–80). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198570394.001.0001.
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production? A working memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591–620. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207599408248175.
Bourdin, B., & Fayol, M. (2002). Even in adults, written production is still more costly than oral production. International Journal of Psychology, 37, 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590244000070.
Bryant, M. S., Rintala, D. H., Lai, E. C., & Protas, E. J. (2010). An investigation of two interventions for micrographia in individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Clinical Rehabilitation, 24, 1021–1026. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215510371420.
Bui, D. C., Myerson, J., & Hale, S. (2013). Note-taking with computers: Exploring alternative strategies for improved recall. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030367.
Caligiuri, M. P., Teulings, H. L., Dean, C. E., Niculescu, A. B., & Lohr, J. B. (2011). Handwriting movement kinematics for quantifying eps in patients treated with atypical antipsychotics. Psychiatry Research, 177, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2009.07.005.
Chavez, E. L., Trautt, G. M., Brandon, A., & Steyaert, J. (1983). Effects of test anxiety and sex of subject on neuropsychological test performance: Finger tapping, trail making, digit span and digit symbol tests. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 56, 923–929. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1983.56.3.923.
Choi, Y. H. (2016). Writing strategies in the process of L2 computer-mode academic writing with the use of multiple resources. English Teaching, 71(3), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.15858/engtea.71.3.201609.3.
Coltheart, M. (1981). The MRC psycholinguistic database. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 33A, 497–505. https://doi.org/10.1080/14640748108400805.
Conway, A. R. A., Kane, M. J., Bunting, M. F., Hambrick, D. Z., Wilhelm, O., & Engle, R. W. (2005). Working memory span tasks: A methodological review and user’s guide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 769–786. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196772.
Cowan, N. (1999). An embedded-processes model of working memory. In A. Miyake & P. Shah (Eds.), Models of working memory: Mechanisms of active maintenance and executive control (p. 62–101). Cambridge University Pres.
Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X01003922.
Cowan, N. (2010). The magical mystery four: How is working memory capacity limited, and why? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721409359277.
Cowan, N., Fristoe, N. M., Elliott, E. M., Brunner, R. P., & Saults, J. S. (2006). Scope of attention, control of attention, and intelligence in children and adults. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1754–1768. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195936.
Dooijes, E. (1983). Analysis of handwriting movements. Acta Psychologica, 54, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(83)90026-4.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Buchner, A., & Lang, A.-G. (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 1149–1160. https://doi.org/10.3758/BRM.41.4.1149.
Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600.
Friedman, A., Polson, M. C., & Dafoe, C. G. (1988). Dividing attention between the hands and the head: Performance trade-offs between rapid finger tapping and verbal memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14, 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1037//0096-1523.14.1.60.
Gathercole, S. (2008). Working Memory. In J. Byrne (Ed.), Cognitive Psychology of Memory (Vol. H. L. Roed, pp. 33–52). Elsevier.
Gill, D. M., Reddon, J. R., Stefanyk, W. O., & Hans, H. S. (1986). Finger tapping: Effects of trials and sessions. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 62, 675–678. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1986.62.2.675.
Henson, R. N. A. (1998). Short-term memory for serial order: The start-end mode. Cognitive Psychology, 36(36), 73–137. https://doi.org/10.1006/cogp.1998.0685.
Hurlstone, M. J., Hitch, G. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2014). Memory for serial order across domains: An overview of the literature and directions for future research. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 339–373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034221.
Kellogg, R. T. (1996). A model of working memory in writing. In The science of writing. Theories, methods, individual differences and applications (pp. 57–71). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195739.
Kellogg, R. T. (1999). The psychology of writing. Oxford University Press.
Kellogg, R. T. (2001). Long-term working memory in text production. Memory & Cognition, 29, 43–52. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195739.
Kemper, S., Herman, R. E., & Lian, C. H. T. (2003). The costs of doing two things at once for young and older adults: Talking while walking, finger tapping, and ignoring speech of noise. Psychology and Aging, 18, 181–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.18.2.181.
Kucera and Francis, W.N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence: Brown University Press. https://doi.org/10.3115/990174.990181.
Logie, R. H. (2011). The functional organization and capacity limits of working memory. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411415340.
Logie, R. H., Della Sala, S., Wynn, V., & Baddeley, A. (2000). Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A. Human Experimental Psychology, 53, 626–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/713755916.
Piolat, A., Olive, T., & Kellogg, R. T. (2005). Cognitive effort during note taking. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(3), 291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.1086.
Ransdell, S., Levy, C. M., & Kellogg, R. T. (2002). The structure of writing processes as revealed by secondary task demands. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 2, 141–163. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020851300668.
Saito, S., Logie, R. H., Morita, A., & Law, A. (2008). Visual and phonological similarity effects in verbal immediate serial recall: A test with kanji materials. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.004.
Swanson, H. L., & Berninger, V. W. (1996). Individual differences in children’s working memory and writing skill. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 63, 358–385. https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0054.
Tan, L., & Ward, G. (2008). Rehearsal in immediate serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 535–542. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.3.535.
Teulings, H. L. (1996). Handwriting movement control. In Handbook of perception and action (Vol. 2, pp. 561-613). Academic Press.
Teulings, H. L., Contreras-Vidal, J. L., Stelmach, G. E., & Adler, C. H. (1997). Parkinsonism reduces coordination of fingers, wrist, and arm in fine motor control. Experimental Neurology, 146, 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1006/exnr.1997.6507.
Tindle, R., & Longstaff, M. G. (2015). Writing, reading, and listening differentially overload working memory performance across the serial position curve. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 11, 147–155. https://doi.org/10.5709/acp-0179-6.
Tindle, R., & Longstaff, M. (2016). Investigating the lower level demands of writing: Handwriting movements interfere with immediate verbal serial recall. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5911, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1135930.
Tse, L. F. L., Thanapalan, K. C., & Chan, C. C. H. (2014). Visual-perceptual-kinesthetic inputs on influencing writing performances in children with handwriting difficulties. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 340–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2013.11.013.
Tucha, O., Mecklinger, L., Thome, J., Reiter, A., Alders, G. L., Sartor, H., Naumann, M., & Lange, K. W. (2006). Kinematic analysis of dopaminergic effects on skilled handwriting movements in Parkinson’s disease. Journal of Neural Transmission, 113, 609–623. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00702-005-0346-9.
Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Schrock, J. C., & Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behavior Research Methods, 37, 498–505. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03192720.
Van Kleek, M. G. (2012). Effort, memory, attention and time: Paths to more effective personal information management. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 73(2-B), 1056.
Vanderberg, R., & Swanson, H. L. (2007). Which components of working memory are important in the writing process? Reading and Writing, 20, 721–752. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-006-9046-6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tindle, R., Longstaff, M.G. Working memory and handwriting and share a common resource: An investigation of shared attention. Curr Psychol 42, 3945–3956 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01733-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01733-4