Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability, validity and invariance of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire in the China General Social Survey

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Moral sensitivity of individuals plays a crucial role in the prediction of moral behavior, but the moral values of Chinese culture are different from the west, and we need a simple way to measure the moral sensitivity of Chinese people. This study puts forward a method for measuring the moral sensitivity of Chinese individuals from the perspective of the levels of the moralization model. The sample in the study 1 included 21,054 Chinese persons aged between 18 and 95. Through exploratory factor analysis, we established a model of the scale and verified the stability and invariance of the model across gender and age through confirmatory factor analysis and multi-group confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 included a sample of 1951 primary, middle and high school students between the ages of 8 and 19. By means of confirmatory factor analysis, we again verified the factor structure of this questionnaire, and used a series of moral emotion questionnaires (Three Domains of Disgust Scale, Gratitude Questionnaire, Dispositional Positive Emotion Scales, Dispositional Greed Scale) to verify the structural validity. The results of confirmatory factor analysis showed that the goodness-of-fit indices fits well. The multi-group confirmatory factor analysis suggested that configural, metric, scalar, and error variance invariance holds across genders and age groups. The results of the latent mean difference test showed that the latent mean scores were comparable between genders and age groups. The results of correlational analysis show that the scale has a high structural validity. In conclusion, the results of this study showed that the moral sensitivity scale has high reliability and validity in Chinese people.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from Chinese General Social Survey (http://cgss.ruc.edu.cn/) but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of Chinese General Social Survey.

Funding

This work was supported by the General Program of National Social Science Foundation of China [grant numbers19BSH114].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

XY and ZW both conceived the study. ZW prepared the manuscript and performed statistical analysis and XY has edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanhui Xiang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study 2 protocol was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, the Hunan Normal University (410081).

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Wenrui Zhang and Yanhui Xiang are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Xiang, Y. Reliability, validity and invariance of the Moral Sensitivity Questionnaire in the China General Social Survey. Curr Psychol 41, 8646–8659 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01246-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-01246-6

Keywords

Navigation