Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Deconfounding the effects of acute stress on abstract moral dilemma judgment

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

People often make moral judgments under acute stress. Increasing studies have investigated the influence of acute stress on moral judgment, but the findings are quite divergent. This study attempted to address the inconsistency by employing a new approach, the CNI model, which disentangles the effect of three determinants of moral decision-making, sensitivity to consequences (C), sensitivity to moral norms (N), or general preference for inaction (I). Seventy-eight undergraduates (45 females and 33 males) were randomly assigned to the stress group or the control group. All participants made judgments on a set of 24 moral dilemmas. Responses to self-reported questionnaires and heart rate were recorded for assessing the levels of stress. The traditional dilemma analysis indicated that acutely stressed participants made more deontological judgments than participants in the control group. The process dissociation analysis showed that the stress group had higher deontological inclinations than the control group. Moreover, the CNI model analysis revealed that the stress group showed a stronger sensitivity to moral norms and a higher general preference for inaction than the control group. In sum, our findings resolved interpretational ambiguities of traditional analysis and extended our understanding regarding the mechanism underlying the association between acute stress and moral judgment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Białek, M., Paruzel-Czachura, M., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Foreign language effects on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon, S. M., Carr, S., Jin, E. S., Josephs, R. A., & Gawronski, B. (2019). Exogenous testosterone increases sensitivity to moral norms in moral dilemma judgements. Nature Human Behaviour, 3(8), 856–866. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0641-3

  • Buchanan, T. W., & Preston, S. D. (2014). Stress leads to prosocial action in immediate need situations. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104, 216–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17, 1082–1089.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Morality and prosocial behavior: The role of awareness, responsibility, and norms in the norm activation model. The Journal of Social Psychology, 149, 425–449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dedovic, K., D'Aguiar, C., & Pruessner, J. C. (2009). What stress does to your brain: A review of neuroimaging studies. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry, 54, 6–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson, S. S., & Kemeny, M. E. (2004). Acute stressors and cortisol responses: A theoretical integration and synthesis of laboratory research. Psychological Bulletin, 130, 355–391.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fumagalli, M., & Priori, A. (2012). Functional and clinical neuroanatomy of morality. Brain, 135, 2006–2021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J., Friesdorf, R., & Hütter, M. (2016). Understanding responses to moral dilemmas. In J. P. Forgas, L. Jussim, & P. A. M. V. Lange (Eds.), The social psychology of morality (pp. 91–110). New York: Psychology Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., Armstrong, J., Conway, P., Friesdorf, R., & Hutter, M. (2017). Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113, 343–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gawronski, B., Conway, P., Armstrong, J., & Hütter, M. (2018). Effects of incidental emotions on moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Emotion, 18, 989–1008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J., Haidt, J., Koleva, S., Motyl, M., Iyer, R., Wojcik, S. P., & Ditto, P. H. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 55–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 322–323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.004.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D. (2015). The rise of moral cognition. Cognition, 135, 39–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science., 293, 2105–2108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. D., Nystrom, L. E., Engell, A. D., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Günzel, F. M. (2014). The impact of stress on stimulus-response learning (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Ruhr University Bochum.

  • Haidt, J. (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316, 998–1002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Het, S., Rohleder, N., Schoofs, D., Kirschbaum, C., & Wolf, O. T. (2009). Neuroendocrine and psychometric evaluation of a placebo version of the ‘Trier social stress test’. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 1075–1086.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, S., Oakes, T. R., Stone, C. K., McAuliff, E. M., Kirschbaum, C., & Davidson, R. J. (2008). Glucose metabolic changes in the prefrontal cortex are associated with HPA axis response to a psychosocial stressor. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 517–529.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschbaum, C., Pirke, K. M., & Hellhammer, D. H. (1993). The 'Trier social stress Test'--a tool for investigating psychobiological stress responses in a laboratory setting. Neuropsychobiology, 28, 76–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1971). From is to ought: How to commit the naturalistic fallacy and get away with it in the study of moral development. In T. Mischel (Ed.), Cognitive development and epistemology (pp. 151–235). New York: Academic Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kossowska, M., Czernatowicz-Kukuczka, A., Szumowska, E., & Czarna, A. (2016). Cortisol and moral decisions among young men: The moderating role of motivation toward closure. Personality and Individual Differences, 101, 249–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kudielka, B. M., Hellhammer, D. H., & Kirschbaum, C. (2007). Ten years of research with the Trier social stress test (TSST)–revisited. In E. Harmon-Jones & P. Winkielman (Eds.), Social neuroscience: Integrating biological and psychological explanations of social behavior (pp. 56–83). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Qian, M. (1995). Revision of the state-trait anxiety inventory with sample of Chinese college students. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Universitatis Pekinensis, 31, 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Wu, X., Zhang, L., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Habitual cognitive reappraisal was negatively related to perceived immorality in the harm and fairness domains. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1805.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Z., Xia, S., Wu, X., & Chen, Z. (2018). Analytical thinking style leads to more utilitarian moral judgments: An exploration with a process-dissociation approach. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 180–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liere, K. D., & Dunlap, R. E. (1978). Moral norms and environmental behavior: An application of Schwartz's norm-activation model to yard burning. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 8, 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malle, B. F., Scheutz, M., Arnold, T., Voiklis, J., & Cusimano, C. (2015). “Sacrifice one for the good of many? People apply different moral norms to human and robot agents,” presented at the 2015 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-robot Interaction (HRI’ 15), 2015.

  • Moshagen, M. (2010). multiTree: A computer program for the analysis of multinomial processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, 42, 42–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nater, U. M., & Rohleder, N. (2009). Salivary alpha-amylase as a non-invasive biomarker for the sympathetic nervous system: Current state of research. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 486–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patil, I., Cogoni, C., Zangrando, N., Chittaro, L., & Silani, G. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas. Social Neuroscience, 9, 94–107.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pruessner, J. C., Dedovic, K., Khalili-Mahani, N., Engert, V., Pruessner, M., Buss, C., Renwick, R., Dagher, A., Meaney, M. J., & Lupien, S. (2008). Deactivation of the limbic system during acute psychosocial stress: Evidence from positron emission tomography and functional magnetic resonance imaging studies. Biological Psychiatry, 63, 234–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos, B. P., & Arnsten, A. F. (2007). Adrenergic pharmacology and cognition: Focus on the prefrontal cortex. Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 113, 523–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, N., Sommer, M., Döhnel, K., Zänkert, S., Wüst, S., & Kudielka, B. M. (2017). Acute psychosocial stress and everyday moral decision-making in young healthy men: The impact of cortisol. Hormones and Behavior, 93, 72–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sollberger, S., Bernauer, T., & Ehlert, U. (2016). Stress influences environmental donation behavior in men. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 63, 311–319.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, M., Rothmayr, C., Döhnel, K., Meinhardt, J., Schwerdtner, J., Sodian, B., & Hajak, G. (2010). How should I decide? The neural correlates of everyday moral reasoning. Neuropsychologia, 48, 2018–2026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spielberger, C. D., Gorsuch, R. L., Lushene, R. E., Vagg, P. R., & Jacobs, G. A. (1977). State-trait anxiety inventory for adults. Redwood City: Mind Garden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starcke, K., & Brand, M. (2012). Decision making under stress: A selective review. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 36, 1228–1248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starcke, K., Polzer, C., Wolf, O. T., & Brand, M. (2011). Does stress alter everyday moral decision-making? Psychoneuroendocrinology, 36, 210–219.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Starcke, K., Ludwig, A.-C., & Brand, M. (2012). Anticipatory stress interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Judgment and Decision making, 7, 61–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starcke, K., Brand, M., & Kluge, A. (2016). Stress influences decisions to break a safety rule in a complex simulation task in females. Biological Psychology, 118, 35–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson, J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94, 1395–1415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valentino, R. J., & Van Bockstaele, E. (2008). Convergent regulation of locus coeruleus activity as an adaptive response to stress. European Journal of Pharmacology, 583, 194–203.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Rao, H., Wetmore, G. S., Furlan, P. M., Korczykowski, M., Dinges, D. F., & Detre, J. A. (2005). Perfusion functional MRI reveals cerebral blood flow pattern under psychological stress. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 17804–17809.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, L., Li, Z., Liu, H., & Du, W. (2007). Factor structure of general dimension scales of PANAS-X in Chinese people. Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology, 15, 565–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, D., Clark, L., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 1063–1070.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiu, L., Zhou, R., & Jiang, Y. (2016). Working memory training improves emotion regulation ability: Evidence from HRV. Physiology & Behavior, 155, 25–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youssef, F. F., Dookeeram, K., Basdeo, V., Francis, E., Doman, M., Mamed, D., Maloo, S., Degannes, J., Dobo, L., Ditshotlo, P., & Legall, G. (2012). Stress alters personal moral decision making. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 37, 491–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, R. (2016). Stress potentiates decision biases: A stress induced deliberation-to-intuition (SIDI) model. Neurobiology of Stress, 3, 83–95.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., Kong, M., Li, Z., Zhao, X., & Gao, L. (2018). Chronic stress and moral decision-making: An exploration with the CNI model. Frontiers in Psychology, 9, 1702.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences, Ministry of Education of the PRC (No.16YJA190003), and Project of Philosophy and Social Sciences from the Education Department, Jiangsu Province (No. 2018SJZDI203). We would like to express our thanks to Prof. Jun Bi and Dr. Jianxun Yang for their support in collecting physiological data. We also greatly appreciate Dr. Richard Ferraro and two anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Nanjing University, 163 Xianlin Avenue, Qixia District, Nanjing, 210023, Jiangsu, China

    Zhongquan Li, Liuping Gao, Xia Zhao & Bingchao Li

Authors
  1. Zhongquan Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Liuping Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Xia Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Bingchao Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhongquan Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional Review Board of Nanjing University.

Informed Consent

All individual participants included in the study provided informed consent.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix 1

Table 2 Moral dilemmas (English version; Gawronski et al. 2017)
Full size table

Appendix 2

Table 3 Moral dilemmas (Chinese version)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, Z., Gao, L., Zhao, X. et al. Deconfounding the effects of acute stress on abstract moral dilemma judgment. Curr Psychol 40, 5005–5018 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00453-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00453-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation