Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Personality traits as predictors of reading comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Personality is an aspect of individual differences that contribute to one’s confidence and self-esteem, which can then impact on learning achievement such as reading ability as well as self-assessments of reading comprehension (i.e., metacomprehension). The present study investigated the role of individual differences on the Big Five personality in predicting reading comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy before and after a test. Personality traits were found to uniquely relate to reading comprehension, self-assessed confidence in comprehension, and metacomprehension accuracy. Openness to Experience positively correlated with all measures of confidence assessments on reading comprehension but failed to correlate to actual reading performance, indicating that participants were overconfident in their ability to perform. Extraversion negatively correlated with self-evaluation of comprehension performance and did not predict actual comprehension performance. More findings and educational implications from these findings were discussed to address the potential impacts of personality traits on reading and metacomprehension skills.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bagheri, M. S., & Faghih, M. (2012). The relationship between self-esteem, personality type and reading comprehension of Iranian EFL students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 2(8), 1641–1650. https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.2.8.1641-1650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaujean, A. A., Firmin, M. W., Attai, S., Johnson, C. B., Firmin, R. L., & Mena, K. E. (2011). Using personality and cognitive ability to predict academic achievement in a young adult sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 709–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedict, R. (1959). Patterns of culture. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buratti, S., Allwood, C. M., & Kleitman, S. (2013). First- and second-order metacognitive judgments of semantic memory reports: The influence of personality traits and cognitive styles. Metacognition and Learning, 8, 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-013-9096-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003a). Personality predicts academic performance: Evidence from two longitudinal university samples. Journal of Research in Personality, 37(4), 319–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-6566(02)00578-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamorro-Premuzic, T., & Furnham, A. (2003b). Personality traits and academic examination performance. European Journal of Personality, 17(3), 237–250. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church, A. T., Katigbak, M. S., Miramontes, L. G., Del Prado, A. M., & Cabrera, H. F. (2007). Culture and the behavioural manifestations of traits: An application of the act frequency approach. European Journal of Personality, 21, 389–417. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.631.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Commander, N. E., Zhao, Y., Li, H., Zabrucky, K. M., & Agler, L. L. (2014). American and Chinese students' calibration of comprehension and performance. Current Psychology, 33(4), 655–671. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-014-9235-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992a). The NEO PI/NEO-FFI manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992b). The revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa: Psychological Assessment Resources.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, M., Allwood, C. M., Rennemark, M., & Hagberg, B. (2010). The relation between personality and the realism in confidence judgements in older adults. European Journal of Ageing, 7(4), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10433-010-0164-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Lipko, A. (2007). Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 228–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-721.2007.00509.xD.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R. (1990). When children and adults do not use learning strategies: Toward a theory of settings. Review of Educational Research, 60, 517–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garner, R., & Alexander, P. A. (1989). Metacognition: Answered and unanswered questions. Educational Psychologist, 24, 143–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954). Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, S., Basran, J., Paterson, K. B., Kowalski, R., Filik, R., & Maltby, J. (2014). Individual differences in the effectiveness of text cohesion for science text comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 29, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1037/t21546-000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heine, S. J. (2001). Self as cultural product: An examination of east Asian and north American selves. Journal of Personality, 69, 881–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., & McCrae, R. R. (2004). Personality and culture revisited: Linking traits and dimensions of culture. Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 38(1), 52–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069397103259443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G., Bond, M. H., & Luke, C. L. (1993). Individual perceptions of organizational cultures: A methodological treatise on levels of analysis. Organization Studies, 14, 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. (2015). Personality traits, learning and academic achievements. Journal of Education and Learning, 4(4), 91–118. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v4n4p91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102–138). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanagawa, C., Cross, S. E., & Markus, H. R. (2001). “Who am I?”: The cultural psychology of the conceptual self. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 90–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. T., McCauley, C. R., & Draguns, J. G. (Eds.). (1999). Personality and person perception across cultures. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., & Zabrucky, K. (1998). Calibration of comprehension: Research and implications for education and instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 23, 345–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, L., Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2001). An assessment of students’ calibration of comprehension and calibration of performance using multiple measures. Reading Psychology, 22, 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin-Agler, L., Moore, D., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2004). Effects of personality on metacognitive self-assessments. College Student Journal, 38(3), 453–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maki, R. H., Jonas, D., & Kallod, M. (1994). The relationship between comprehension and metacomprehension ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1(1), 126–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2003). Personality in adulthood: A five-factor theory perspective (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, J. G. (1999). Cultural psychology: Implications for basic psychological theory. Psychological Science, 10, 85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T. O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(1), 116–130. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schaefer, P. S., Williams, C. C., Goodie, A. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2004). Overconfidence and the Big Five. Journal of Research in Personality, 38(5), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2003.09.010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolp, S., & Zabrucky, K. M. (2009). Contributions of metacognitive and self-regulated learning theories to investigations of calibration of comprehension. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 2(1), 7–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swanberg, A. B., & Martinsen, O. L. (2010). Personality, approaches to learning and achievement. Educational Psychology, 30(1), 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thiede, K. W., Anderson, M. C. M., & Therriault, D. (2003). Accuracy of metacognitive monitoring affects learning of texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kraayenoord, C. E. (2010). The role of metacognition in reading comprehension. In H. Trolldenier, W. Lenhard, & P. Marx (Eds.), Brennpunkte der Gedachtnishforschung entwicklungs-und padagogisch-psychologische Perspektiven (pp. 277–302). Gottingen: Hogrefe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. Journal of General Psychology, 132, 408–428. https://doi.org/10.3200/GENP.132.4.408-428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zabrucky, K. M., Agler, L. L., & Moore, D. (2009). Metacognition in Taiwan: Students’ calibration of comprehension and performance. International Journal of Psychology, 44(4), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207590802315409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zabrucky, K. M., Moore, D., Agler, L. L., & Cummings, A. (2015). Students’ metacomprehension knowledge: Components that predict comprehension performance. Reading Psychology, 0, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2014.950536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Psychology, University of Southern Mississippi Gulf Coast, 730 E. Beach Blvd., Long Beach, MS, 39560, USA

    Lin-Miao L. Agler, Kenji Noguchi & Larisa K. Alfsen

Authors
  1. Lin-Miao L. Agler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kenji Noguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Larisa K. Alfsen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lin-Miao L. Agler.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The project was reviewed and approved by The University of Southern Mississippi Institutional Review Board.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agler, LM.L., Noguchi, K. & Alfsen, L.K. Personality traits as predictors of reading comprehension and metacomprehension accuracy. Curr Psychol 40, 5054–5063 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00439-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00439-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation