Abstract
Expectancy-value theory (EVT) positing that expectancy of success (e.g., self-concept) and task values (e.g., intrinsic value) jointly predict individual’s outcome-related performance has been widely used to explain students’ motivational process worldwide. However, cross-national generalizability of EVT in reading domains has been less studied. This study examines the relation of reading self-concept (i.e., perception of competence and perception of difficulty) and intrinsic value to reading achievement and reading amount, and tests the generalizability of the relation across different cultures. Hierarchical linear models were used to analyze nationally representative samples from 80 countries/regions. The results showed that perception of competence positively predicted both reading achievement and reading amount. Perception of difficulty had a significant negative association with reading achievement only and not with reading amount. In addition, intrinsic value positively predicted reading achievement and reading amount. More importantly, the result patterns generalized well across different cultures, which indicates that no matter where students live and learn, EVT acts as a powerful framework to explain student motivational process and achievement-related outcomes in reading.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability statement
The study is based on a secondary analysis of PISA data that are freely available (https://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/). Information on how to access these data and conduct the analyses is reported in the Method section.
References
Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 773–785.
Berry, J. W., Poortinga, Y. H., Breugelmans, S. M., Chasiotis, A., & Sam, D. L. (2002). Cross-cultural psychology: Research and applications. Cambridge University Press.
Cantrell, S. C., & Rintamaa, M. (2020). The nature of rural high school students’ reading engagement. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 36(4), 297–319.
Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (1995). Development of young children’s reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87(1), 154.
Chapman, J. W., & Tunmer, W. E. (2003). Reading difficulties, reading-related self-perceptions, and strategies for overcoming negative self-beliefs. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 5–24.
Chapman, J. W., Tunmer, W. E., & Prochnow, J. E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and the development of academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(4), 703.
Chiu, M. M., & Klassen, R. M. (2009). Calibration of reading self-concept and reading achievement among 15-year-olds: Cultural differences in 34 countries. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(3), 372–386.
Chiu, M. M., McBride-Chang, C., & Lin, D. (2012). Ecological, psychological, and cognitive components of reading difficulties: Testing the component model of reading in fourth graders across 38 countries. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 391–405.
Coddington, C. S., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Teacher and student perceptions of boys’ and girls’ reading motivation. Reading Psychology, 30(3), 225–249.
Conlon, E. G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(1), 11–32.
Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 127–164.
Datu, J. A. D., & McInerney, D. M. (2017). Does culture matter for grit? Mapping cross-cultural directions in grit research programs. In F. Guay, H. W. Marsh, R. G. Craven, & D. M. McInerney (Eds.), Self-driving positive psychology and well-being: International advances in self research (Vol. 6, pp. 113–133). Information Age Publishing.
Datu, J. A. D., Valdez, J. P. M., & King, R. B. (2016). Perseverance counts but consistency does not! Validating the short grit scale in a collectivist setting. Current Psychology, 35(1), 121–130.
Durik, A. M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 382–393.
Eccles, J. (1983). Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motives (pp. 75–146). Freeman.
Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44, 78–89.
Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132.
Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2014). Learning progress assessment and goal setting: Effects on reading achievement, reading motivation and reading self-concept. Learning and Instruction, 32, 91–100.
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Morin, A. J., Parker, P. D., & Kaur, G. (2015). Directionality of the associations of high school expectancy-value, aspirations, and attainment: A longitudinal study. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 371–402.
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., & Dicke, T. (2018). Cross-cultural generalizability of social and dimensional comparison effects on reading, math, and science self-concepts for primary school students using the combined PIRLS and TIMSS data. Learning and Instruction, 58, 210–219.
Guo, J., Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Morin, A. J., & Dicke, T. (2017). Extending expectancy-value theory predictions of achievement and aspirations in science: Dimensional comparison processes and expectancy-by-value interactions. Learning and Instruction, 49, 81–91.
Guthrie, J. T., & Klauda S. L. (2014) Effects of classroom practices on reading comprehension, engagement, and motivations for adolescents. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(4), 387–416.
Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199–205.
Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 231–256.
Hofstede, G., Garibaldi de Hilal, A. V., Malvezzi, S., Tanure, B., & Vinken, H. (2010). Comparing regional cultures within a country: Lessons from Brazil. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(3), 336–352.
Hulleman, C. S., Durik, A. M., Schweigert, S. B., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2008). Task values, achievement goals, and interest: An integrative analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 398–416.
Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. S. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(3), 261–276.
King, R. B., & McInerney, D. M. (2014). Culture’s consequences on student motivation: Capturing cross-cultural universality and variability through personal investment theory. Educational Psychologist, 49(3), 175–198.
King, R. B., McInerney, D. M., & Pitliya, R. J. (2018). Envisioning a culturally imaginative educational psychology. Educational Psychology Review, 30(3), 1031–1065.
Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 239–269.
Kozina, A. (2019). The development of multiple domains of self-concept in late childhood and in early adolescence. Current Psychology, 38(6), 1435–1442.
Lafontaine, D., Dupont, V., Jaegers, D., & Schillings, P. (2019). Self-concept in reading: Factor structure, cross-cultural invariance and relationships with reading achievement in an international context (PIRLS 2011). Studies in Educational Evaluation, 60, 78–89.
Lau, K.-L. (2009). Reading motivation, perceptions of reading instruction and reading amount: A comparison of junior and senior secondary school students in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 366–382.
Lauermann, F., Tsai, Y.-M., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Math-related career aspirations and choices within Eccles et al.’s expectancy–value theory of achievement-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 53(8), 1540–1559.
Liu, Y., Hau, K. T., Liu, H., Wu, J., Wang, X., & Zheng, X. (2020a). Multiplicative effect of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation on academic performance: A longitudinal study of Chinese students. Journal of Personality, 88(3), 584–595.
Liu, Y., Hau, K. T., & Zheng, X. (2020b). Does instrumental motivation help students with low intrinsic motivation? Comparison between Western and Confucian students. International Journal of Psychology, 55(2), 182–191.
Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The Importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers’ reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21, 124–128.
Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 129–149.
Marsh, H. W. (2007). Self-concept theory, measurement and research into practice: The role of self-concept in educational psychology. British Psychological Society.
Marsh, H. W., & Hau, K. T. (2003). Big-Fish–Little-Pond effect on academic self-concept: A cross-cultural (26-country) test of the negative effects of academically selective schools. American Psychologist, 58(5), 364.
Marsh, H. W., Hau, K.-T., & Craven, R. G. (2004). The big-fish-little-pond effect stands up to scrutiny. American Psychologist, 59, 269–271.
Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., Basarkod, G., Niepel, C., & Van Zanden, B. (2020a). Illusory gender-equality paradox, math self-concept, and frame-of-reference effects: New integrative explanations for multiple paradoxes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000306
Marsh, H. W., Parker, P. D., Guo, J., Pekrun, R., & Basarkod, G. (2020b). Psychological comparison processes and self-concept in relation to five distinct frame-of-reference effects: Pan-human cross-cultural generalizability over 68 Countries. European Journal of Personality, 34(2), 180–202.
Maxwell, S. E., Cole, D. A., & Mitchell, M. A. (2011). Bias in cross-sectional analyses of longitudinal mediation: Partial and complete mediation under an autoregressive model. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 46(5), 816–841.
McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a US survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283–306.
McElvany N, Kortenbruck M, Becker M. Lesekompetenz und Lesemotivation: Entwicklung und Mediation des Zusammenhangs durch Leseverhalten[J]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, 2008, 22(34): 207-219.
Melhuish, E. C., Sylva, K., Sammons, P., Siraj-Blatchford, I., Taggart, B., Phan, M. B., & Malin, A. (2008). Preschool influences on mathematics achievement. Science, 321(5893), 1161–1162.
Möller, J., Zitzmann, S., Helm, F., Machts, N., & Wolff, F. (2020). A meta-analysis of relations between achievement and self-concept. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 376–419.
Morgan, P. L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children’s reading skills and reading motivation? Exceptional Children, 73(2), 165–183.
Nagengast, B., & Marsh, H. W. (2012). Big fish in little ponds aspire more: Mediation and cross-cultural generalizability of school-average ability effects on self-concept and career aspirations in science. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1033.
Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K. T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the “×” out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22(8), 1058–1066.
Nicholls, J. G., & Miller, A. T. (1984). Development and its discontents: The differentiation of the concept of ability. In J. G. Nicholls (Ed.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 3, pp. 185–218). JAI Press.
OECD. (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en
OECD. (2019b). PISA 2018 technical report. Paris: OECD publishing. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/data/pisa2018technicalreport/#d.en.423800
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (1999). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
Rubin, D. B. (1987). Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Seaton, M., Marsh, H. W., & Craven, R. G. (2009). Earning its place as a pan-human theory: Universality of the big-fish-little-pond effect across 41 culturally and economically diverse countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 403.
Schunk, D. H., & Pajares, F. (2005). Competence perceptions and academic functioning. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 85–104). Guilford Press.
Stack, M. H., Moorefield-Lang, H., & Barksdale, M. A. (2015). ABLE: An instrument for assessing elementary students’ perceptions of access to books, beliefs, and literacy environment. Reading Psychology, 36(6), 499–518.
Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading & Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 85–106.
Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy–value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 763.
Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. The Journal of Educational Research, 100, 81–101.
Wang, J.H.-Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–186.
Wang, M.-T., & Eccles, J. S. (2013). School context, achievement motivation, and academic engagement: A longitudinal study of school engagement using a multidimensional perspective. Learning and Instruction, 28, 12–23.
Watt, H. M., Richardson, P. W., Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Beyer, B., Trautwein, U., & Baumert, J. (2012). Motivations for choosing teaching as a career: An international comparison using the FIT-Choice scale. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(6), 791–805.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). The development of competence beliefs, expectancies for success, and achievement values from childhood through adolescence. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 91–120). Academic Press.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Yoon, K. S., Harold, R. D., Arbreton, A. J., Freedman-Doan, C., & Blumenfeld, P. C. (1997). Change in children’s competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 451.
Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., Fredricks, J. A., Simpkins, S., Roeser, R. W., & Schiefele, U. (2015). Development of achievement motivation and engagement. In R. M. Lerner, & M. Lamb (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology and developmental science, Vol. 3: Socioemotional processes (7th ed., pp. 657–700). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432.
Wigfield, A., & Karpathian, M. (1991). Who am I and what can I do? Children’s self-concepts and motivation in achievement situations. Educational Psychologist, 26(3–4), 233–261.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This study does not require ethics approval as rigorous ethics application processes were conducted by PISA and this study analyzed pre-existing secondary data from PISA2018.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geng, S., Lu, Y. & Shu, H. Cross-cultural generalizability of expectancy-value theory in reading: A multilevel analysis across 80 societies. Curr Psychol 42, 18943–18958 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03014-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03014-0