Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Response of Indian Growth Hormone Deficient Children to Growth Hormone Therapy: Association with Pituitary Size

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To ascertain the impact of pituitary size as judged by Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), on response to Growth Hormone (GH) therapy in GH deficient children.

Methods

Thirty nine children (9.1 ± 2.7 y, 22 boys) with non-acquired GH deficiency (21 Isolated GH deficiency and 18 Combined pituitary hormone deficiency) were consecutively recruited and followed up for one year. Clinical, radiological (bone age and MRI) and biochemical parameters were studied.

Results

Children with hypoplastic pituitary (pituitary height < 3 mm) had more severe height deficit (height for age Z-score −6.0 vs. −5.0) and retardation of skeletal maturation (bone age chronological age ratio of 0.59 vs. 0.48) at baseline as compared to children with normal pituitary heights (p < 0.05 for both). After one year of GH therapy, height for age Z scores and percentage change in height for age Z scores were significantly higher in children with hypoplastic pituitaries (13.8 ± 3.6 and 28.7 % vs. 11.2 ± 4.1 and 21.4 %). Significant co-relation was observed between pituitary height and height for age Z-scores at baseline (r = 0.39, p < 0.05). The predicted adult height using Tanner Whitehouse-2 equations improved from 140.8 to 152.3 cm in children with hypoplastic pituitary when compared to an increase from 145.8 to 153.5 cm observed in children with normal pituitary height (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Indian growth hormone deficient children with hypoplastic pituitary respond better to therapy with GH in short term.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Desai MP, Colaco P. Growth hormone deficiency and insensitivity. In: Desai MP, Menon PSN, Bhatia V, eds. Pediatric endocrine disorders. Hyderabad: Universities Press (India) Pvt. Ltd; 2008. pp. 121–52.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zenaty D, Garel C, Limoni C, Czernichow P, Léger J. Presence of magnetic resonance imaging abnormalities of the hypothalamic-pituitary axis is a significant determinant of the first 3 years growth response to human growth hormone treatment in prepubertal children with nonacquired growth hormone deficiency. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 2003;58:647–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bajpai A, Menon PS. Growth hormone therapy. Indian J Pediatr. 2005;72:139–44.

  4. Dutta P, Bhansali A, Singh P, Rajput R, Bhadada S. Clinico-radiological correlation in childhood hypopituitarism. Indian Pediatr. 2010;47:615–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Acharya SV, Gopal RA, Lila A, Sanghvi DS, Menon PS, Bandgar TR, et al. Phenotype and radiological correlation in patients with growth hormone deficiency. Indian Pediatr. 2011;78:49–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wales JK. Evaluation of growth disorders. In: Brook C, Clayton P, Brown R, eds. Clinical pediatric endocrinology. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009. pp. 124–54.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lee PA, Sävendahl L, Oliver I, Tauber M, Blankenstein O, Ross J, et al. Comparison of response to 2-years’ growth hormone treatment in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency, born small for gestational age, idiopathic short stature, or multiple pituitary hormone deficiency: Combined results from two large observational studies. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012;2012:22.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khadilkar VV, Khadilkar AV, Cole TJ, Sayyad MG. Cross sectional growth curves for height, weight and body mass index for affluent Indian children, 2007. Indian Pediatr. 2009;46:477–89.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanner JM. Growth and Adolescence. 2nd ed. Oxford, England: Blackwell Scientific Publications; 1962.

  10. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Takaishi M. Standards from birth to maturity for height, weight, height velocity, and weight velocity: British children, I965. Arch Dis Child. 1966;41:613.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rikken B, Wit JM. Prepubertal height velocity references over a wide age range. Arch Dis Child. 1992;67:1277–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Juul A, Bang P, Hertel NT, Main K, Dalgaard P, Jørgensen K, et al. Serum insulin-like growth factor-I in 1030 healthy children, adolescents, and adults: Relation to age, sex, stage of puberty, testicular size, and body mass index. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1994;78:744–52.

  13. Argyropoulou M, Perignon F, Brunelle F, Brauner R, Rappaport R. Height of normal pituitary gland as a function of age evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging in children. Pediatr Radiol. 1991;21:247–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Takano K, Utsunomiya H, Ono H, Ohfu M, Okazaki M. Normal development of the pituitary gland: Assessment with three-dimensional MR volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1999;20:312–5.

  15. Marinis L, Bonadonna S, Bianchi A, Maira G, Giustina A. Primary empty sella. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2005;91:3329–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hamilton J, Blaser S, Daneman D. MR imaging in idiopathic growth hormone deficiency. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1609–15.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagel BH, Palmbach M, Petersen D, Ranke MB. Magnetic resonance images of 91 children with different causes of short stature: pituitary size reflects growth hormone secretion. Eur J Pediatr. 1997;156:758–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tanner JM, Whitehouse RH, Cameron N, Marshall WA, Healy MJR, Goldstein H. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method). London: Academic Press; 1983.

  19. Ranke MB. Growth hormone therapy in children: when to stop? Horm Res. 1995;43:122–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Scotti G, Triulzi F, Chiumello G, di Natale B. New imaging techniques in endocrinology: magnetic resonance of the pituitary gland and sella turcica. Acta Paediatr Stand. 1989;356S:5–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Marwaha R, Menon PS, Jena A, Pant C, Sethi AK, Sapra ML. Hypothalamo-pituitary axis by magnetic resonance imaging in isolated growth hormone deficiency patients born by normal delivery. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1992;74:654–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bordallo MA, Tellerman LD, Bosignoli R, Oliveira FF, Gazolla FM, Madeira IR, et al. Neuroradiological investigation in patients with idiopathic growth hormone deficiency. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2004;80:223–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Coutant R, Rouleau S, Despert F, Magontier N, Loisel D, Limal J-M. Growth and adult height in GH-treated children with nonacquired GH deficiency and idiopathic short stature: the influence of pituitary magnetic resonance imaging findings. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;86:4649–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Maghnie M, Strigazzi C, Tinelli C, Autelli M, Cisternino M, Loche S, et al. Growth hormone (GH) deficiency (GHD) of childhood onset: Reassessment of GH status and evaluation of the predictive criteria for permanent GHD in young adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1999;84:1324–8.

  25. Hilczer M, Szalecki M, Smyczynska J, Stawerska R, Kaniewska D, Lewinski A. Growth hormone (GH) secretion and pituitary size in children with short stature. Efficacy of GH therapy in GH-deficient children, depending on the pituitary size. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2005;26:447–52.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the children and their parents who participated in the study.

Contributions

JS is the neuroradiologist involved in the radiological evaluation of the MRI scans. AVK and VVK are the pediatrician and pediatric endocrinologists involved in the management of these children. VR and VE are involved in the collection of data. VE, SAC, HKP and AVK are involved in statistical analysis of the data. All authors contributed to the manuscript and AVK shall act as a guarantor for the study.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Role of Funding Source

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anuradha V. Khadilkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khadilkar, V.V., Prasad, H.K., Ekbote, V.H. et al. Response of Indian Growth Hormone Deficient Children to Growth Hormone Therapy: Association with Pituitary Size. Indian J Pediatr 82, 404–409 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1412-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-014-1412-9

Keywords

Navigation