Abstract
The classical separate treatments of competition and predation and difficulties in providing a sensible theoretical basis for mutualism attest to the inability of traditional models to provide a synthesising framework for trophic interactions, a fundamental component of ecology. Recent approaches to food web modelling have focused on consumer–resource interactions. We construct a unifying theoretical framework to explicitly represent finite resources for each population using Lotka–Volterra (LV) equations. We show that mixotrophy, a ubiquitous trophic interaction in marine plankton, provides the key to developing a synthesis of the various ways of making a living. This framework also facilitates an explicit redefinition of facultative mutualism, illuminating the over-simplification of the traditional definition. We demonstrate a continuum between types of trophic interactions: populations can smoothly evolve through these types without losing stable coexistence. This provides a theoretical basis for the evolution of trophic interactions from autotrophy through mixotrophy/mutualism to heterotrophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boucher DH (ed) (1985) The biology of mutualism. Croom Helm, London
Crane KW, Grover JP (2010) Coexistence of mixotrophs, autotrophs and heterotrophs in planktonic microbial communities. J Theor Biol 262:517–527
Cropp R, Norbury J. (2012a) Modelling plankton and the Library of Lotka. J Mar Syst
Cropp RA, Norbury J (2012b) Constructing ecologies. J Theor Biol 294:1–8
Cropp RA, Norbury J (2012c) The mechanisms of coexistence and competitive exclusion in complex plankton ecosystem models. Ecosyst 15:200–212
Cropp R, Norbury J (2014) Comment on “the paradox of the ‘paradox of the plankton’” by record et al. ICES J Marine Sci 71:293–295
Flynn KJ, Stoecker DK, Mitra A, Raven JA, Glibert PM, Hansen PJ, Graneli E, Burkholder JM (2013) Misuse of the phytoplankton – zooplankton dichotomy: the need to assign organisms as mixotrophs within plankton functional types. J Plankton Res 35:3–11
Graves WG, Peckham B, Pastor J (2006) A bifurcation analysis of a differential equations model for mutualism. Bull Math Biol 68:1851–1872
Hartmann M, Grob C, Tarran GA, Martin AP, Burkill PH, Scanlan DJ, Zubkov MV (2012) Mixotrophic basis of Atlantic oligotrophic ecosystems. Proc National Acad Sci USA 109:5756–5760
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2009) Consumer-resource theory predicts dynamic transitions between outcomes of interspecific interactions. Ecol Lett 12:1357–1366
Holland JN, DeAngelis DL (2010) A consumer-resource approach to the density-dependent population dynamics of mutualism. Ecology 91:1286–1295
Hussa EA, Goodrich-Blair H (2013) It takes a village: ecological and fitness impacts of multipartite mutualism. Annu Rev Microbiol 67:161–178
Jost C, Lawrence CA, Campolongo F, van de Bund W, Hill S, DeAngelis DL (2004) The effects of mixotrophy on the stability and dynamics of a simple planktonic food web model. Theor Popul Biol 66:37–51
Kolmogorov AN (1936) Sulla teoria di Volterra della Lotta per l’Esisttenza. G dell’ Inst Ital Degli Attuari 7:74–80
Kot M (2001) Elements of mathematical ecology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
May RM (1973) Stability and complexity in model ecosystems. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Mitra A, Flynn KJ, Burkholder JM, Berge T, Calbet A, Raven JA, Graneli E, Glibert PM, Hansen PJ, Stoecker DK, Thingstad F, Tillmann U, Vage S, Wilken S, Zubkov MV (2014) The role of mixotrophic protists in the biological carbon pump. Biogeosci 11:995–1005
Murray JD (2001) Mathematical biology. Springer, Berlin
Neuhauser C, Fargione JE (2004) A mutualism-parasite continuum model and its application to plant-mycorrhizae interactions. Ecol Model 177:337–352
Pastor J (2008) Mathematical ecology of populations and ecosystems. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester
Rescigno A, Richardson IW (1967) The struggle for life I. Two species. Bull. Math Biophys 29:377–388
Riebesell U, Czerny J, von Brockel K, Boxhammer T, Budenbender J, Deckelnick M, Fischer M, Hoffmann DA, Krug SA, Lentz U, Ludwig A, Muche R, Schulz KG (2013) Technical note: a mobile sea-going mesocosm system - new opportunities for ocean change research. Biogeosci 10:1835–1847
Stachowicz JJ (2001) Mutualism, facilitation, and the structure of ecological communities. Bioscience 51:235–246
Tilman D (2007) Interspecific competition and multispecies coexistence. In: May RM, McLean A (eds) Theoretical ecology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, p 257
Upadhyay RK, Rai V (2001) Crisis-limited chaotic dynamics in ecological systems. Chaos Solitons Fractals 12:205–218
Acknowledgments
We thank two anonymous reviewers for their perceptive and constructive comments on this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cropp, R., Norbury, J. Mixotrophy: the missing link in consumer-resource-based ecologies. Theor Ecol 8, 245–260 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-014-0248-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12080-014-0248-2