Skip to main content
Log in

Personality and Perceptions of Common Odors

  • Published:
Chemosensory Perception

Abstract

Introduction

Common brain areas play a role in processing both personality and odor, while personality theory predicts that olfactory performance should vary according to personality traits. The Big Five model of personality is considered a gold standard measure but has yet to be directly applied in investigations linking personality and olfactory responses. Moreover, olfactory measures commonly used in personality studies are usually rudimentary sensory performance indices such as thresholds as opposed to higher-order perceptual and psychological metrics.

Methods

This cross-sectional study examined the relationship between comprehensive measures of personality and perceptual responses to odors. Personality was measured using a comprehensive test of the Big Five model of personality, while olfactory responses included identification, pleasantness, perceived intensity, and familiarity. Odors were presented using the Sniffin’ Sticks test.

Results

Small to moderate correlations were noted between aspects of personality and response to odor, even after controlling for participant (N = 74) characteristics such as age and gender. Regression analyses indicated that, overall, odor familiarity co-varies the most with aspects of personality.

Conclusions and Implications

Responses to olfactory stimuli are moderated by specific personality dimensions. This finding is consistent with approach and avoidance motivational models of personality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atanasova B, Graux J, El Hage W, Hommet C, Camus V, Belzung C (2008) Olfaction: a potential cognitive marker of psychiatric disorders. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 32:1315–1325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barresi M, Ciurleo R, Giacoppo S, Cuzzola V, Celi D, Bramanti P, Marino S (2012) Evaluation of olfactory dysfunction in neurodegenerative diseases. J Neurol Sci 323:16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bechara A, Damazio H, Damasio AR (2000) Emotion, decision making and the orbitofrontal cortex. Cereb Cortex 10:295–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Blair KS, Newman C, Mitchell DGV, Richell RA, Leonard A, Morton J, Blair RJR (2006) Differentiating among prefrontal substrates in psychopathy: neuropsychological test findings. Neuropsychology 20:153–165

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradley MM, Lang PJ (2000) Affective reactions to acoustic stimuli. Psychophysiology 37(2):204–215

  • Brocke B, Beauducel A, Tasche KG (1999) Biopsychological bases and behavioural correlates of sensation seeking: contributions to a multilevel validation. Personal Individ Differ 26:1103–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burón E, Bulbena A, Bulbena-Cabré A (2015) Olfactory functioning in panic disorder. J Affect Disord 175:292–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen D, Dalton P (2005) The effect of emotion and personality on olfactory perception. Chem Senses 30:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa PT, McCrae RR (1992) NEO PI-R professional manual. Psychological Assessment Resources, Odessa, FL

  • Croy I, Springborn M, Loetsch J, Johnston ANB, Hummel T (2011) Agreeable smellers and sensitive neurotics correlations among personality traits and sensory thresholds. PLoS One 6:e18701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Distel H, Ayabe-Kanamura S, Martinez-Gomez M, Schicker I, Kobayakawa T, Saito S, Hudson R (1999) Perception of everyday odours—correlation between intensity, familiarity and strength of hedonic judgement. Chem Senses 24:191–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot AJ, Thrash TM (2002) Approach–avoidance motivation in personality: approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. J Pers Soc Psychol 82:804–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck HJ (1967) The biological basis of personality. Thomas, Springfield

    Google Scholar 

  • Eysenck HJ, Eysenck MW (1985) Personality and individual differences. Plenum Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Filsinger EE, Fabes RA, Hughston G (1987) Introversion-extroversion and dimensions of olfactory perception. Percept Motor Skills 64:695–699

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrikson M, Georgiades A (1992) personality dimensions and classical conditioning of autonomic nervous system reactions 13:1013–1020

  • Herbener ES, Kagan J, Cohen M (1989) Shyness and olfactory threshold. Personal Individ Differ 10:1159–1163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobal G, Hummel T, Sekinger B, Barz S, Roscher S, Wolf S (1996) Sniffin’ sticks: screening of olfactory performance. Rhinology 34:222–226

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koelega HS (1994) Sex differences in olfactory sensitivity and the problem of the generality of smell acuity. Percept Mot Skills 78:203–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koenig J, Gillie B, Bernardi A, Williams D, Hillecke T, Thayer J (2015) Neuroticism influences affective but not sensory ratings of experimentally induced pain. Presented at the 34th annual scientific meeting of the American pain society, Columbus, OH. http://www.jpain.org/article/S1526-5900(15)00114-5/fulltext. doi:10.1016/j.jpain.2015.01.076

  • Larsson M, Finkel D, Pedersen NL (2000) Odor identification: influences of age, gender, cognition, and personality. J Gerontol 55:304–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ledoux J (2003) The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cell Mol Neurobiol 23:727–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee IH, Cheng CC, Yang YK, Yeh TL, Chen PS, Chiu NT (2005) Correlation between striatal dopamine D2 receptor density and neuroticism in community volunteers. Psychiatry Res Neuroimaging 138:259–264

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lehrner J, Kirchebner J, Auff E, Pusswald G (2015) Higher level of neuroticism in patients with problems with the sense of smell. Wien Klin Wochenschr (The Central European Journal of Medicine) 127:303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmut MK, Stevenson RJ (2012) Olfactory abilities and psychopathy: higher psychopathy scores are associated with poorer odor discrimination and identification. Chemical. Perception 5:300–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Martzke JS, Kopala LC, Good KP (1997) Olfactory dysfunction in neuropsychiatric disorders: review and methodological considerations. Biol Psychiatry 42:721–732

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pause BA, Ferstl R, Fehm-Wolfsdorf G (1998) Personality and olfactory sensitivity. J Res Pers 32:510–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perneger TV (1998) What’s wrong with the Bonferroni adjustments. Br Med Bull 316:1236–1238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd D, Hautus MJ (2015) The feasibility of gelatin-based retronasal stimuli to assess olfactory perception. Sage Open. doi:10.1177/2158244015610173

  • Shepherd D, Heinonen-Guzejevb M, Hautus MJ, Heikkiläb K (2015) Elucidating the relationship between noise sensitivity and personality. Noise and Health 17:54–59

  • Soudry Y, Lemognea C, Malinvaud D, Consoli SM, Bonfils P (2011) Olfactory system and emotion: common substrates. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 128:18–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Spinella M (2002) A relationship between smell identification and empathy. Int J Neurosci 112(6):605–612

  • Stelmack R, Rammsayer T (2008) Psychophysiological and biochemical correlates of personality. In: Boyle GJ, Matthews G, Saklofske DH (eds) The SAGE handbook of personality theory and assessment, Vol 1: personality theories and models. Sage Publications, Inc, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg G (1992) Personality and the EEG: arousal and emotional arousability. Personal Individ Differ 13:1097–1113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strelau J (1987) Personality dimensions based on arousal theories. In: Personality in dimensions and arousal edited by Jan Strelau, Michael Eysenck

  • Thayer JF, Lane RD (2009) Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 33:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zangwill N (2014) Aesthetic judgment. In: Zalta EN (ed) The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, fall 2014 edn. http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2014/entries/aesthetic-judgment

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Shepherd.

Ethics declarations

Sources of Funding

No external funding was obtained for the research.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

The procedures used in this study were approved by the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee before data collection began. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shepherd, D., Hautus, M.J. & Urale, P.W.B. Personality and Perceptions of Common Odors. Chem. Percept. 10, 23–30 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-016-9220-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12078-016-9220-4

Keywords

Navigation