Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modern concepts from old ideas in manufacture of cardiac valve prostheses

  • Mini Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In reviewing the history of mechanical prosthetic valves, it appears evident how many improvements and technical advances have been obtained in this field. Looking to the past, it must also be underlined how some old concepts, which can be considered quite revolutionary for those years, clearly indicate the great skill and ingenuity of those who conceived them. Old ideas have been revitalized by modern concepts, and this is exemplified when considering the developments of bileaflet and sutureless prostheses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hufnagel CA, Harvey WP. The surgical correction of aortic regurgitation. Preliminary report. Bull Georgetown Univ Med Center. 1954;6:60–1.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gott VL, Alejo DE, Cameron DE. Mechanical heart valves: 50 years of evolution. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:S2230–9.

  3. Harken DE, Soroff HS, Taylor WJ, Lefemine AA, Gupta SK, Lunzer S. Partial and complete prostheses in aortic insufficiency. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1960;40:744–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Braunwald NS, Cooper TC, Morrow AG. Complete replacement of the mitral valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1960;40:1–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Norman AF. The first mitral valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 1991;51:525–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Starr A, Edwards ML. Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Ann Surg. 1961;154:726–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Cale AR, Sang CT, Campanella C, Cameron EW. Hufnagel revisited: a descending thoracic aortic valve to treat prosthetic valve insufficiency. Ann Thorac Surg. 1993;55:1218–21.

  8. Ellis FH Jr, Healy RW, Alexander S. Mitral valve replacement with the modified University of Cape Town (UCT) prosthesis: clinical and hemodynamic results. Ann Thorac Surg. 1977;23:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gott VL, Daggett RL, Whiffen JD, Koeple DE, Rowe GG, Young WP. A hinged-leaflet valve for total replacement of the human aortic valve. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1964;48:713–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Milano A, Bortolotti U, Mazzucco A, Gallucci V. Extended survival after mitral valve replacement with a Gott-Daggett prosthesis. Am J Cardiol. 1984;54:1147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lillehei CW, Nakib A, Kaster RL, Kalke BR, Rees JR. The origin and development of three new mechanical valve designs: toroidal disc, pivoting disc, and rigid bileaflet cardiac prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:S35–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lund O, Pilegaard HK, Ilkjaer LD, Nielsel SL, Arildsen H, Albrechtsen OK. Performance profile of the Starr-Edwards aortic cloth covered valve, track valve, and silastic ball valve. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1999;16:403–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Schoen FJ, Levy RJ, Phieler HR. Pathological considerations in replacement cardiac valves. Cardiovasc Pathol. 1992;1:29–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Pibarot P, Dumesnil JG. Prosthetic heart valves. Selection of the optimal prosthesis and long-term management. Circulation. 2009;119:1034–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Murday AJ, Hochstitzky A, Mansfield J, et al. A prospective controlled trial of St. Jude versus Starr Edwards aortic and mitral valve prostheses. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;76:66–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Amrane M, Soulat G, Carpentier A, Jouan J. Starr-Edwards aortic valve. 50+ years and still going strong: a case report. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjcr/ytx014.

  17. Villafana MA. “It will never work” – the St. Jude valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:S53–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Emery RW, Krogh CC, Arom KV, et al. The St. Jude Medical cardiac valve prosthesis: a 25-year experience with single valve replacement. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005;79:776–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Celiento M, Filaferro L, Milano AD, Anastasio G, Ferrari G, Bortolotti U. Single center. experience with the Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis. A 17-year clinical follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;148:2039–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Magovern GJ, Kent EM, Cromie HW. Sutureless prosthetic heart valves. Circulation. 1963;27:784–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Magovern GJ, Liebler GA, Park SB, Burkholder JA, Sakert T, Simpson KA. Twenty-five-year review of the Magovern-Cromie sutureless aortic valve. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989;48:S33–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. D’Onofrio A, Salizzoni S, Filippini C, et al. Surgical aortic valve replacement with new generation bioprostheses: sutureless versus rapid-deployment. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;159:432–42.

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Uberto Bortolotti.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethics Comm approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Not applicable.

Human and animal rights statements

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De Martino, A., Falcetta, G., Milano, A.D. et al. Modern concepts from old ideas in manufacture of cardiac valve prostheses. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 36, 502–505 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-020-00941-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-020-00941-0

Keywords

Navigation