Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Assessment of mixing performance in a spiral micromixer with different inlet path configurations

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article presents a numerical analysis of mixing and pressure drop in a spiral micromixer with four different inlet flow path configurations. Micromixers Type 1 and Type 2 (M-Type 1 and M-Type 2) have Y-shaped and T-shaped entry into the main channel with fluid entry into a spiral channel at 90°, whereas, in Micromixers Type 3 and Type 4 (M-Type 3 and M-Type 4), the entries of fluid are in line with spiral channel. The mass fraction contours of the species, velocity vectors, mixing efficiency, and pressure drops are analyzed for Reynolds number in the range 1 ≤ Re ≤ 100. The results show that the mixing efficiency first decreases with the increase in Re and then increases with Re values. In contrast, pressure drops and mixing performance increase with the increase in Re values irrespective of the micromixer design. Higher mixing is observed in micromixers having Y-shaped inlets. The mixing efficiency of 97.2% is observed in M-Type 3, followed by 94% in M-Type 1. In M-Type 2 and M-Type 4, the values of mixing efficiency are 89% and 90.3%, respectively. The mixing performance of micromixers in M-Type 1 and M-Type 3 is lower than M-Type 2 and M-Type 4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

\({\varvec{V}}\) :

Velocity of fluids, ms−1

\(P\) :

Pressure, Nm−2

\(Re\) :

Reynolds number

\(D\) :

Dean number

\(D_{h}\) :

Hydraulic diameter of the micromixer, mm

\(s\) :

Radius of curvature of the convex surface of spiral

t :

Total number of a specimen point

\(C_{i}\) :

Concentration of the species, molm−3

\( C_{r}\) :

Species fraction at specimen point r

\(\overline{{C_{n} }}\) :

Average mixing species fraction

MP:

Mixing performance

Q :

Total flow rate of the fluids

\(\rho\) :

Density of fluid, kgm−3

\(\alpha\) :

Diffusivity of the mixture, m2 s−1

\(\nu\) :

Kinematic viscosity, m2s−1

\(\chi\) :

Standard deviation of species concentration

\(\overline{\chi }\) :

maximum standard deviation

References

  1. Lee C Y, Wang W T, Liu C C and Fu L M 2016 Passive mixers in microfluidic systems: A review. J. Chem. Eng. 288: 146–160 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2015.10.122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Mondal B, Mehta S K, Patowari P K and Pati S 2019 Numerical study of mixing in wavy micromixers: comparison between raccoon and serpentine mixer. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 136: 44–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biswas S K, Das T and Chakraborty S 2012 Nontrivial augmentations in mixing performance through integrated active and passive mixing in serpentine microchannels. Journal of Applied Physics 111(5): 054904

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vasista K N, Mehta S K and Pati S 2022 Electroosmotic mixing in a microchannel with heterogeneous slip dependent zeta potential. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 176: 108940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mehta S K, Pati S and Mondal P K 2021 Numerical study of the vortex-induced electroosmotic mixing of non-Newtonian biofluids in a nonuniformly charged wavy microchannel: Effect of finite ion size. Electrophoresis 42(23): 2498–2510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mondal B, Mehta S K, Pati S and Patowari P K 2021 Numerical analysis of electroosmotic mixing in a heterogeneous charged micromixer with obstacles. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 168: 108585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mehta S K, Mondal B, Pati S and Patowari P K 2022 Enhanced electroosmotic mixing of non-Newtonian fluids in a heterogeneous surface charged micromixer with obstacles. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects 648: 129215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfa.2022.129215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mehta S K and Pati S 2022 Enhanced Electroosmotic Mixing in a Wavy Micromixer Using Surface Charge Heterogeneity. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research 61(7): 2904–2914. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.1c04318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vasista K N, Mehta S K and Pati S 2021 Numerical assessment of hydrodynamic and mixing characteristics for mixed electroosmotic and pressure-driven flow through a wavy microchannel with patchwise surface heterogeneity. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, p. 09544089211051640

  10. Tripathi E and Patowari P K 2020 Design and Computational Analysis of Spiral Microchannel for Mixing of Fluids. In: Techno-Societal 2018, Pawar P, Ronge B, Balasubramaniam R, Vibhute A, Apte S (eds), pp. 305-313 Cham: Springer, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16962-6_31

  11. Mondal B, Pati S and Patowari P K 2021 Serpentine square wave microchannel fabrication with WEDM and soft lithography. Materials Today: Proceedings 46: 8513–8518

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tripathi E, Patowari P K and Pati S 2019 Fabrication of spiral micromixer using mold machined by CO2 assisted laser machine. In: Paper presented at 11th International conference on precision, meso, micro and nano engineering COPEN 11 IIT Indore, 12–14 Dec. 2019

  13. Mariotti A, Galletti C, Mauri R, Salvetti M V and Brunazzi E 2018 Steady and unsteady regimes in a T-shaped micro-mixer: Synergic experimental and numerical investigation. Chemical Engineering Journal 341: 414–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Mondal B, Pati S and Patowari P K 2020 Numerical analysis of mixing performance in microchannel with different ratio of outlet to inlet width. In: Techno-Societal 2018 (eds) Pawar P, Ronge B, Balasubramaniam R, Vibhute A and Apte S, Springer, Cham, pp 257–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-16962-6_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Tripathi E, Patowari P K and Pati S 2022 Mixing characteristics and pressure drop analysis in a spiral micromixer. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering, p. 09544089221095636. https://doi.org/10.1177/09544089221095636

  16. Borgohain P, Arumughan J and Dalal A 2018 Natarajan G. Design and performance of a three-dimensional micromixer with curved ribs. Chemical Engineering Research and Design 136: 761–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mondal B, Pati S and Patowari P K 2019 Analysis of mixing performances in microchannel with obstacles of different aspect ratios. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part E: Journal of Process Mechanical Engineering 233(5): 1045–1051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Borgohain P, Dalal A, Natarajan G and Gadgil H P 2018 Numerical assessment of mixing performances in cross-T microchannel with curved ribs. Microsystem Technologies 24(4): 1949–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sudarsan A P and Ugaz V M 2006 Fluid mixing in planar spiral microchannels. Lab on a Chip 6(1): 74–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tripathi E, Patowari P K and Pati S 2021 Comparative assessment of mixing characteristics and pressure drop in spiral and serpentine micromixers. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 162: 108335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ngo I L, Lai T K, Choi H J, Le H T T, Kim G M and Dang T D 2020 A study on mixing performance of dean flows through spiral micro-channel under various effects. Physics of Fluids 32(2): 022004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Duryodhan V S, Chatterjee R, Singh S G and Agrawal A 2017 Mixing in planar spiral microchannel. Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 89: 119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Vatankhah P and Shamloo A 2018 Parametric study on mixing process in an in-plane spiral micromixer utilizing chaotic advection. Analytica Chimica Acta 1022: 96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Balasubramaniam L, Arayanarakool R, Marshall S D, Li B, Lee P S and Chen P C 2017 Impact of cross-sectional geometry on mixing performance of spiral microfluidic channels characterized by swirling strength of Dean-vortices. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 27(9): 095016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tripathi E, Patowari P K and Pati S 2021 Numerical investigation of mixing performance in spiral micromixers based on Dean flows and chaotic advection. Chemical Engineering and Processing-Process Intensification 169: 108609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sarma P and Patowari P K 2016 Design and analysis of passive Y-type micromixers for enhanced mixing performance for biomedical and microreactor application. Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems 15(03): 161–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chen X, Li T and Hu Z 2017 A novel research on serpentine microchannels of passive micromixers. Microsystem Technologies 23(7): 2649–2656

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Raza W, Hossain S and Kim K Y 2018 Effective mixing in a short serpentine split-and-recombination micromixer. Sensors and Actuators B: Chemical 258: 381–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rahimi M, Akbari M, Parsamoghadam M A and Alsairafi A A 2015 CFD study on effect of channel confluence angle on fluid flow pattern in asymmetrical shaped microchannels. Computers & Chemical Engineering 73: 172–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Hsieh S S, Lin J W and Chen J H 2013 Mixing efficiency of Y-type micromixers with different angles. International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow 44: 130–1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Mondal B, Pati S and Patowari P K 2020 Influence of confluence angle between inlets on the mixing performance of micro-mixer with obstacles. In: Techno-Societal 2018 (eds) Pawar P, Ronge B, Balasubramaniam R, Vibhute A and Apte S, Springer, Cham, pp 275–283

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Dundi M, Raju V R K and Chandramohan V P 2021 Simple structured and highly efficient passive T-type micromixer with circumferential in-step at entry. Asia-Pacific Journal of Chemical Engineering 16(4): e2667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Fatima U, Shakaib M and Memon I 2020 Analysis of mass transfer performance of micromixer device with varying confluence angle using CFD. Chemical Papers 74(4): 1267–1279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ansari M A, Kim K Y, Anwar K and Kim S M 2010 A novel passive micromixer based on unbalanced splits and collisions of fluid streams. Journal of Micromechanics and Microengineering 20(5): 055007. https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/20/5/055007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gao Y, Zhu D F, Han Y and Torrente-Murciano L 2021 Rational design of the inlet configuration of flow systems for enhanced mixing. Journal of Flow Chemistry 11(3): 589–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Nivedita N, Ligrani P and Papautsky I 2017 Dean flow dynamics in low-aspect ratio spiral microchannels. Scientific Reports 7(1): 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Viktorov V, Mahmud M R and Visconte C 2016 Numerical study of fluid mixing at different inlet flow-rate ratios in Tear-drop and Chain micromixers compared to a new HC passive micromixer. Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics 10(1): 182–192

  38. Pati S 2012 A textbook on fluid mechanics and hydraulic machines. McGraw-Hill Education (India) Pvt. Ltd, New Delhi

  39. Solehati N, Bae J and Sasmito A P 2014 Numerical investigation of mixing performance in microchannel T-junction with wavy structure. Computers & Fluids 96: 10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Silchar, Silchar, 788010, Assam, India

    EKTA TRIPATHI, PROMOD KUMAR PATOWARI & SUKUMAR PATI

Authors
  1. EKTA TRIPATHI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. PROMOD KUMAR PATOWARI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. SUKUMAR PATI
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SUKUMAR PATI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

TRIPATHI, E., PATOWARI, P.K. & PATI, S. Assessment of mixing performance in a spiral micromixer with different inlet path configurations. Sādhanā 47, 240 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02019-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-02019-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation