Skip to main content
Log in

Three-dimensional numerical study on aerodynamics of non-flapping bird flight

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerical investigations have been carried out to study aerodynamics of non-flapping characteristics of bird flight. Commercial software ANSYS Fluent 16.1 has been used for three-dimensional computations by considering four types of wing models. At first, square prisms with built-in side flaps are considered and the effects of Reynolds number (Re), angle of attack and dihedral angle on flow characteristics have been investigated. Thereafter, flow past actual bird wing has been considered for wings of owl, seagull, teal and bat. Role of shear layer formation at mid-span of wings has been illustrated with the help of streamline plots for different values of Re. In addition, pulsating flow is imposed on inlet velocity and the responses are obtained in form of force coefficients, phase portraits, time-dependent signals and their spectra.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bachmann T 2010 Anatomical, morphometrical and biomechanical studies of barn owls’ and pigeons’ wings (Master’s thesis). Aachen: RWTH Aachen University

  2. Jacob J 1998 On the fluid dynamics of adaptive airfoils. Am. Soc. Mech. Eng. Aerosp. Div. 57: 167–176

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shyy W, Lian Y, Tang J, Liu H, Trizila P, Stanford B, Bernal L, Cesnik C, Friedmann P and Ifju P 2008 Computational aerodynamics of low Reynolds number plunging, pitching and flexible wings for MAV applications. Acta Mech. Sin. 24(4): 351–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bechert D, Bruse M, Hage W and Meyer R 2008 Fluid mechanics of biological surfaces and their technological application. Naturwissenschaften 87(4):157–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brücker C and Weidner C 2014 Influence of self-adaptive hairy flaps on the stall delay of an airfoil in ramp-up motion. J. Fluid Struct. 47: 31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ennos A, Hickson J and Roberts A 1995 Functional morphology of the vanes of the flight feathers of the Pigeon Columba livia. J. Exp. Biol. 198(5): 1219–1228

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown R E and Fedde M R 1993 Airflow sensors in the avian wing. J. Exp. Biol. 179(1): 13–30

    Google Scholar 

  8. Guerrero J E, Maestro D and Bottaro A 2012 Biomimetic spiroid winglets for lift and drag control. C. R. Mec. 340(1–2): 67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mazellier N, Feuvrier A and Kourta A 2012 Biomimetic bluff body drag reduction by self-adaptive porous flaps. C. R. Mec. 340(1–2): 81–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Withers P C 1981 An aerodynamic analysis of bird wings as fixed aerofoils. J. Exp. Biol. 90(1): 143–162

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tulapurkar E G 2005 Hundred years of the boundary layer—some aspects. Sadhna 30(4): 499–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carruthers A, Walker S, Thomas A and Taylor G 2010 Aerodynamics of aerofoil sections measured on a free-flying bird. Proc. IME G J. Aerosp. Eng. 224(8): 855–864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen K, Liu Q, Liao G, Yang Y, Ren L, Yang H and Chen X 2012 The sound suppression characteristics of wing feather of owl (Bubo bubo). J. Bionic Eng. 9(2): 192–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Geyer T, Sarradj E and Fritzsche C 2014 Measuring owl flight noise. In: Proceedings of the Inter-Noise Congress and Conference, Melbourne, Australia

  15. Tobalske B W, Hearn J W D and Warrick D R 2009 Aerodynamics of intermittent bounds in flying birds. Exp. Fluids 46(5): 963–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Moelyadi M A and Sachs G 2007 CFD based determination of dynamic stability derivatives in yaw for a bird. J. Bionic Eng. 4: 201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bostandzhiyan S, Bokov A and Shteinberg A 2008 Flexural characteristics and aerodynamic aspects of the design of the bird feather shaft. Dokl. Phys. 53(9): 476–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stowers Amanda K and Lentink David 2015 Folding in and out: passive morphing in flapping wings. Bioinspiation Biomim. 10: 025001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tobalske B W 2010 Hovering and intermittent flight in birds. Bioinspiation Biomim. 5: 045004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dhawan S 1991 Bird flight. Sadhna 16: 275–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hedenstrom A, Johansson L C and Spedding G R 2009 Bird or bat: comparing airframe design and flight performance. Bioinspiation Biomim. 4: 015001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu T, Kuykendoll K, Rhew R and Jones S 2006 Avian wing geometry and kinematics. AIAA J. 44: 954–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Cedomir Kostic 2015 Review of the Spalart–Allamars turbulence model and its modification to three-dimensional supersonic configurations. Sci. Tech. Rev. 65:043–049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. A Crivellini, V D’Alessandro, D Di Benedetto, S Montelpare and R Ricci 2014 Study of laminar separation bubble on low Reynolds number operating airfoils: RANS modelling by means of an high-accuracy solver and experimental verification. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 501:012024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Taira K, Dickson W B, Colonius T and Dickinson M H 2007 Unsteadiness in flow over a flat plate at angle-of-attack at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA Aerosp. Sci. Meet. Exhib. 45: 710–726

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kondo K 2014 Computational comparative study for design of low Reynolds number airfoil. In: 29th Congress of the International Council of the Aeronautical Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia

  27. Soni A, Naik H and Tiwari S 2015 Three dimensional flow characteristics for flow along a square prism having built in side flaps. In: 42nd National Conference on Fluid Mechanics and Fluid Power, Surathkal, India

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaligram Tiwari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soni, A., Tiwari, S. Three-dimensional numerical study on aerodynamics of non-flapping bird flight. Sādhanā 44, 31 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-1018-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-1018-4

Keywords

Navigation