Skip to main content
Log in

Influence of nuclear size on nuclear dynamics, peak mass production’s energy and onset of multifragmentation

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of nuclear size on different observables in fragmentation reactions is investigated using the quantum molecular dynamics approach. The present study is carried out using \(^{36, 37}\)Mg projectiles on various target nuclei ranging from \(^{27}\)Al to \(^{80}\)Br over a wide range of incident energies. Our findings revealed a significant influence (\(\sim \)20\(\%\)) of nuclear size on the energy of peak mass production in reactions involving lighter nuclei and this effect of nuclear size decreases for heavier targets. The role of nuclear size on the onset of multifragmentation is also investigated. Various order parameters, such as slopes of charge distribution and moments are seen to get influenced by this initialisation effect. However, the energy of the onset of multifragmentation in \(^{37}\)Mg\(\,+\,^{27}\)Al reaction is observed to be independent of nuclear size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. I Tanihata et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2676 (1985)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. I Tanihata et al, Phys. Lett. B 206, 592 (1988)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. B N Pomorska and K Pomorski, Z. Phys. A 348, 169 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. G Royer, Nucl. Phys. A 807, 105 (2008)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. C Hartnack et al, Eur. Phys. J. A 1, 151 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Y Yariv and Z Fraenkel, Phys. Rev. C 20, 2227 (1979)

  7. J Aichelin, Phys. Rep. 202, 233 (1991)

  8. J Cugnon, Phys. Rev. C 22, 1885 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. R Kumari, Nucl. Phys. A 917, 85 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. R Bansal et al, Phys. Rev. C 87, 061602 (R) (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. S Gautam, Phys. Rev. C 88, 057603 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sangeeta et al, Nucl. Phys. A 220, 927 (2014); ibid., 20, 966 (2017)

  13. D Q Fang et al, Chin. Phys. Lett. 28, 102102 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. J Y Liu et al, Phys. Lett. B 617, 24 (2005)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. G F Peaslee et al, Phys. Rev. C 49, R2271 (1994)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. D Sisan et al, Phys. Rev. C 63, 027602 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. S Kaur and R K Puri, Phys. Rev. C 87, 014620 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. P Bansal, S Gautam and R K Puri, Eur. Phys. J. A 51, 139 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. G Peilert et al, Phys. Rev. C 39, 1402 (1989)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Y G Ma and W Q Shen, Phys. Rev. C 51, 710 (1995)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. M Takechi et al, Phys. Lett. B 707, 357 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. M Takechi et al, Phys. Rev. C 90, 061305 (2014); M Takechi, EPJ Web Conf. 66, 021305 (2014)

  23. N Kobayashi et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 242501 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. M K Sharma et al, Phys. Rev. C 93, 014322 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  25. S Goyal and R K Puri, Phys. Rev. C 83, 047601 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. S Kumar and R K Puri, Phys. Rev. C 58, 320 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. V Kireyeu, Phys. Rev. C 103, 054905 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  28. S Kumar and R K Puri, Phys. Rev. C 58, 2858 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. S Kumar and Y G Ma, Phys. Rev. C 91, 034612 (2015)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  30. N J Davidson et al, Phys. Lett. B 315, 12 (1993); ibid., Nucl. Phys. A 570, 61 (1994)

  31. R Kumar, S Gautam and R K Puri, Phys. Rev. C 89, 064608 (2014); ibid., J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 43, 025104 (2016)

  32. K Zbiri et al, Phys. Rev. C 75, 034612 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  33. E Lehmann et al, Z. Phys. A 355, 55 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  34. Y K Vermani and R K Puri, J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 36, 105103 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  35. J E Finn et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1321 (1982)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  36. C A Ogilvie et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1214 (1991)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. T Li et al, Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 1214 (1991); ibid., Phys. Rev. C 49, 1630 (1994)

  38. X Campi, J. Phys. A 19, L917 (1986)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  39. Y G Ma, J. Phys. G Nucl. Part. Phys. 27, 2455 (2001)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  40. M Belkacem et al, Phys. Rev. C 54, 2435 (1996)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  41. J Pan, S D Gupta and M Grant, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1182 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. S Das Gupta, S Mallik and G Chaudhuri, Phys. Rev. C 97, 044605 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  43. S Sood et al, Chin. Phys. C 45, 014101 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  44. S Sood et al, Phys. Rev. C 99, 054612 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

SG acknowledges the partial support of Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR) vide Project No. 03/1513/2023/EMR-II.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sucheta.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sucheta, Gautam, S. Influence of nuclear size on nuclear dynamics, peak mass production’s energy and onset of multifragmentation. Pramana - J Phys 98, 56 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-024-02729-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-024-02729-y

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation