Skip to main content
Log in

Magnetized anisotropic dark energy models with constant deceleration parameter

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we have studied the solutions of plane-symmetric Universe with variable ω in the presence and the absence of magnetic field of energy density ρ B . A special law of variation for Hubble’s parameter proposed by Bermann in Nuovo Cimento B 74, 182 (1983) has been utilized to solve the field equations. Some physical and kinematical properties of the models are also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A G Riess et al, Astron. J. 116, 1009 (1998)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. S Perlmutter et al, Astrophys. J. 517, 565 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. C L Bennet et al, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 148, 1 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. P J Steinhardt, L M Wang, and I Zlatev, Phys. Rev. D 59, 123504 (1999)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. R R Caldwell, Phys. Lett. B 545, 23 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. M C Bento, O Bertolami, and A A Sen, Phys. Rev. D 66, 043507 (2002)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. X Zhang, F Q Wu, and J Zhang, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 01, 003 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. B Hu and Y Ling, Phys. Rev. D 73, 123510 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. H Kim, H W Lee, and Y S Myung, Phys. Lett. B 632, 605 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M R Setare, J. Cosmol. Astropart. Phys. 0701, 023 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. C Deffayet, G R Dvali, and G Gabadadze, Phys. Rev. D 65, 044023 (2002)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. M Li, Phys. Lett. B 603, 1 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. E Komatsu et al, Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 180, 330 (2009)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. R K Knop et al, Astrophys. J. 598, 102 (2003)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. M Tegmark et al, Phys. Rev. D 69, 103501 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozgür Akarsü and Can Battal Kılınç, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 119 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A K Yadav and L Yadav, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50, 218 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. S D Tade and M M Sambhe, Prespacetime J. 2(5) (2011)

  19. A Pradhan, H Amirhashchi, and B Saha, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50, 2923 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. S Kumar and C P Singh, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 43, 1427 (2011)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. S D Katore and M M Sancheti, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 50(8), 2477 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. A K Yadav, F Rahaman, S Ray, and G K Goswami, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 127, 127 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. A Pradhan, R Jaiswal, K Jotania, and R K Khare, Astrophys. Space Sci. 337(1), 401 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Priyanka, S Chandel, M K Singh and Shri Ram, Global Journal of Science Frontier Research Mathematics and Decision Sciences, Volume 12, Issue 12, Version 1.0 (2012)

  25. Bijan Saha, arXiv:1209.6339v1 [physics.gen-ph] (2012)

  26. Bijan Shah, arXiv:1209.6029v1 [gr-qc] (2012)

  27. K L Mahanta, A K Biswal and P K Sahoo, Can. J. Phys. 92, 295 (2014), DOI:10.1139/cjp-2013-0490

  28. H R Ghate and S Sonttake, Int. J. Astron. Astrophys. 4, 181 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. S D Katore and A Y Shaikh, The African Rev. Phys. 9, 0035 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  30. S D Katore and A Y Shaikh, Electron. J. Theor. Phys. (2014) (accepted)

  31. P K Sahoo and B Mishra, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 129, 196 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. U K Panigrahi and R C Sahu, Theor. Appl. Mech. 30(3), 163 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. D D Pawar, S W Bhaware, and A G Deshmukh, Rom. J. Phys. 54(1–2), 187 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  34. K L Mahanta and A K Biswal, J. Mod. Phys. 3, 1479 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. S D Katore and A Y Shaikh, Rom. J. Phys. 59(7–8), 715 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  36. K C Jacobs, Astrophs. J. 155, 379 (1969)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  37. E King and P Coles, Class. Quantum Grav. 24, 2061 (2007)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. M Sharif and M Zubair arXiv:1005.4480v1 [gr-qc] (2010)

  39. S D Katore, A Y Shaikh, N K Sarkate, and G B Tayade, Prespacetime J. 3(2), 154 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Ya B Zeldovich, A A Ruzmainkin, and D D Sokoloff, Magnetic field in astrophysics (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  41. E R Horrison, Phys. Rev. Lett. 30, 188 (1973)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  42. K S Throne, Astrophys. J. 148, 503 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  43. R Kantowski and R K Sachs, J. Math. Phys. 7, 433 (1966)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. J Kristian and R K Sachs, Astrophys. J. 143, 379 (1966)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. C B Collins, E N Glass, and D A Wilkisons, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 12, 805 (1980)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  46. M Sharif and M Zubair, Astrophys. Space Sci. (2010) DOI:10.1007/s10509-010-0414-y

  47. A K Yadav and L Yadav, arXiv:1007.1411v2 [gr-qc] (2010)

  48. M S Bermann, Nuovo Cimento B 74, 182 (1983)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  49. B Saha and A K Yadav, Astrophys. Space Sci. 341, 651 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  50. C P Singh and S Kumar, Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 15, 419 (2006)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  51. C P Singh and S Kumar, Astrophys. Space Sci. 310, 31 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  52. C P Singh and S Kumar, Pramana – J. Phys. 68, 707 (2007)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  53. D R K Reddy, M V Subba Rao, and G Koteswara Rao, Astrophys. Space Sci. 306, 171 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  54. K S Adhav, A S Nimkar, M R Ugale, and M V Dewanve, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 47, 634 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. J P Singh and P S Bhaghel, Int. J. Phys. 48, 449 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. R G Vishwakarma, Class. Quant. Grav. 17, 3833 (2003)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  57. P H Frampton, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 19, 801 (2004)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  58. P H Frampton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 37, 1378 (1976)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  59. B Wang, Y Gong, and E Abdalla, Phys. Rev. D 74, 083520 (2006)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  60. M Tegmark et al, Astrophys. J. 606, 702 (2004)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. O Akarsu and C B Kilinc, Gen. Relativ. Gravit. 42, 763 (2010)

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the anonymous referee and editor for constructive suggestions to make an improved version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A Y SHAIKH.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SHAIKH, A.Y., KATORE, S.D. Magnetized anisotropic dark energy models with constant deceleration parameter. Pramana - J Phys 87, 88 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1272-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-016-1272-0

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation