Skip to main content
Log in

Capture cross-section and rate of the 14C(n, γ) 15C reaction from the Coulomb dissociation of 15C

  • Published:
Pramana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We calculate the Coulomb dissociation of 15C on a Pb target at 68 MeV/u incident beam energy within the fully quantum mechanical distorted wave Born approximation formalism of breakup reactions. The capture cross-section and the subsequently rate of the 14C(n, γ) 15C reaction are calculated from the photodisintegration of 15C, using the principle of detailed balance. Our theoretical model is free from the uncertainties associated with the multipole strength distributions of the projectile.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M Wiescher, J Görres and H Schatz, J. Phys. G 25, R133 (1999)

  2. M Wiescher, J Görres and F K Thielemann, Astrophys. J. 363, 340 (1990)

  3. J H Applegate, C J Hogan and R J Scherrer, Astrophys. J. 329, 572 (1988)

  4. T Sasaqui et al, Astrophys. J. 634, 1173 (2005)

  5. H Beer et al, Astrophys. J. 387, 258 (1992)

  6. R Reifarth et al, Phys. Rev. C 77, 015804 (2008)

  7. Á Horváth et al, Astrophys. J. 570, 926 (2002)

  8. U Datta Pramanik et al, Phys. Lett. B 551, 63 (2003)

  9. U Datta Pramanik et al, J. Phys. G 31, S1583 (2005)

  10. T Nakamura et al, Phys. Rev. C 79, 035805 (2009)

  11. C Rolfs, Nucl. Phys. A 217, 29 (1973)

  12. H Herndl et al, Phys. Rev. C 60, 064614 (1999)

  13. P Descouvemont, Nucl. Phys. A 675, 559 (2000)

  14. N K Timofeyuk, D Baye, P Descouvemont, R Kamouni and I J Thompson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 162501 (2006)

  15. N C Summers and F M Nunes, Phys. Rev. C 78, 011601(R) (2008)

  16. H Esbensen, Phys. Rev. C 80, 024608 (2009)

  17. P Banerjee, R Chatterjee and R Shyam, Phys. Rev. C 78, 035804 (2008)

  18. R Chatterjee, P Banerjee and R Shyam, Nucl. Phys. A 675, 477 (2000)

  19. A Nordsieck, Phys. Rev. 93, 785 (1954)

  20. R Shyam and M A Nagarajan, Ann. Phys. (New York) 163, 265 (1985)

  21. R Chatterjee, Phys. Rev. C 68, 044604 (2003)

  22. M Zadro, Phys. Rev. C 66, 034603 (2002)

  23. C A Bertulani and G Baur, Phys. Rep. 163, 299 (1988)

  24. J T Huang, C A Bertulani and V Guimarães, Atomic Data Nucl. Data Tables 96, 824 (2010), arXiv:nucl-th/0810.3867

  25. G Baur, C A Bertulani and H Rebel, Nucl. Phys. A 458, 188 (1986)

  26. A N F Aleixo and C A Bertulani, Nucl. Phys. A 505, 448 (1989)

  27. M A Nagrajan, S Lenzi and A Vitturi, Eur. Phys. J. A 24, 63 (2005)

  28. S Typel and G Baur, Nucl. Phys. A 759, 247 (2005)

  29. R Chatterjee, L Fortunato and A Vitturi, Eur. Phys. J. A 35, 213 (2008)

  30. http://www.nndc.bnl.gov; EXFOR database (X4 dataset-22995)

  31. T Kajino, G J Matthews and G M Fuller, Astrophys. J. 364, 7 (1990)

  32. L H Kawano, W A Fowler, R W Kavanagh and R A Malaney, Astrophys. J. 372, 1 (1991)

  33. C E Rolfs and W S Rodney, Couldrons in the cosmos (University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1988)

Download references

Acknowledgements

This text presents results from research supported by the Department of Science and Technology, Govt. of India, (SR/S2/HEP-040/2012). The authors would like to thank Prof. T Nakamura for sending them the data of ref. [10] in a tabular form. Support from MHRD grants, Govt. of India, to Shubhchintak and Neelam are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R CHATTERJEE.

Appendix A. Validity of the local momentum approximation

Appendix A. Validity of the local momentum approximation

The factorization of the breakup amplitude (eq. (2)) is affected with the help of the local momentum approximation [2022], on the outgoing charged fragment b. Essentially, one uses the Taylor expansion of \(\chi _{b}^{(-)*}({\mathbf {q}}_{b},{\mathbf {r}})\) about r i, which is exact and helps in the separation of variables r i and r 1,

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \chi^{(-)}_{b}(\mathbf{q}_{b},\mathbf{r}) = \mathrm{e}^{-\alpha\mathbf{r}_{1}.\nabla_{r_{i}}}\chi^{(-)}_{b}(\mathbf{q}_{b},\mathbf{r}_{\mathrm{i}}). \end{array} $$
(A.1)

The approximation involves the replacement of del-operator by an effective local momentum, K( = −i r i ), whose magnitude is given by

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \mathbf{K} = \sqrt{\frac{2\mu_{bt}}{\hbar^{2}}(E_{bt}-V(R))}, \end{array} $$
(A.2)

where μ bt is the reduced mass of the bt system, E bt is the energy of particle b relative to the target in the c.m. system and V(R) is the Coulomb potential between b and the target at a distance R. Thus, the local momentum K is evaluated at some distance R (10 fm, in our case) and its magnitude is held fixed for all the values of r. The direction of K is taken as that of the outgoing fragment b. The condition of validity (see eg. [20]) is that the quantity

$$\begin{array}{@{}rcl@{}} \eta(r) = \frac{{1\over 2} K(r)}{\left| {\mathrm{d} K(r)}/{\mathrm{d}r} \right|}, \end{array} $$
(A.3)

calculated at some representative distance R should be more than the projectile radius, r a .

To check the validity of the approximation, in figure 5 we show the variation of η(r) (upper half) and K(r) (the magnitude of the local momentum) (lower half) as a function of r, for the Coulomb breakup reaction 15C + Pb → 14C + n + Pb at the beam energy of 68 MeV/u. At r = 10 fm, η(r)≫r a = 3.12 fm, the projectile r.m.s. radius.

Figure 5
figure 5

Variation of η(r) (upper half) and K(r) (lower half) with r for the Coulomb breakup of 15C.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

SHUBHCHINTAK, ᅟ., NEELAM, ᅟ. & CHATTERJEE, R. Capture cross-section and rate of the 14C(n, γ) 15C reaction from the Coulomb dissociation of 15C. Pramana - J Phys 83, 533–543 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0798-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12043-014-0798-2

Keywords

PACS Nos

Navigation