Skip to main content
Log in

On rogue La Niñas, with below-average monsoon rainfall

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of the seasonal monsoon rainfall over India relies largely on the well-known relationship with El Niño and Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and is possible because reasonably reliable seasonal predictions of ENSO are now available. Usually, the cold phase of ENSO is associated with above-normal monsoon rainfall and the warm phase of ENSO with below-normal rainfall. There are, however, exceptions: years in the cold phase of ENSO with below-normal monsoon rainfall and even drought conditions. We term these exceptional events ‘rogue La Niñas’. Clearly, an explanation of these exceptional cases will improve the predictive skill. Here we show that for the part of the Arabian Sea, east of the upwelling region and north of the equatorial belt (60°–70°E, 10°–23°N), the correlation of outgoing longwave radiation with Indian summer monsoon rainfall is even higher than that with the equatorial central Pacific associated with ENSO. Convection over this region is triggered by ENSO, but is modulated by the underlying sea surface temperature (SST). There is a minimum of SST of about 28.1°C above which the convection over the Arabian Sea is high enough and there are no rogue La Niñas. Furthermore, we show that, in this region, the SST of June–September is related to the SST of April–May. When April–May SST is >29.6°C, June–September mean SST is always >28.1°C and there are no rogue La Niñas; the monsoon rainfall is always normal or above normal as expected with a La Niña. Thus the chance of a rogue La Niña can be predicted from the April–May SST of the Arabian Sea.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ashok Karumuri, Guan Zhaoyong and Yamagata Toshio 2001 Impact of Indian Ocean dipole on the relationship between the Indian monsoon rainfall and ENSO; Geophys. Res. Lett. 28, https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL013294.

  • Gadgil Sulochana 2003 The Indian monsoon and its variability; Ann. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 31 429–467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil Sulochana and Gadgil Siddhartha 2006 The Indian monsoon, GDP and agriculture; Economic and Political Weekly, pp. 4887–4895.

  • Gadgil Sulochana, Joseph P V and Joshi N V 1984 Ocean–atmosphere coupling over monsoon regions; Nature 312 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil Sulochana, Vinaychandran P N, Francis P A and Gadgil Siddhartha 2004 Extremes of Indian summer monsoon rainfall, ENSO, equatorial Indian Ocean Oscillation; Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL019733.

  • Gadgil Sulochana, Francis P A, Vinayachandran P N and Sajani S 2020 Interannual variation of the Indian summer monsoon, ENSO, IOD and EQUINOO; In: Monsoon Teleconnections (eds) Jasti Chowdary, Anant Parekh and C Gnanaseelan, Elsevier Publications.

  • Graham Nicholas E and Barnett Tim P 1987 Sea surface temperature, surface wind divergence, and convection over tropical oceans; Science 238 657–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Boyin, Peter W Thorne, Viva F Banzon, Tim Boyer, Gennady Chepurin, Jay H Lawrimore, Matthew J Menne, Thomas M Smith, Russell S Vose and Huai-Min Zhang 2017 NOAA Extended Reconstructed Sea Surface Temperature (ERSST) Version 5; NOAA National Centers for Environmental Information, https://doi.org/10.7289/V5T72FNM.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ihara Chie, Yochanan Kushnir, Mark A Cane and Victor H De La Pena 2007 Indian summer monsoon rainfall and its link with ENSO and Indian Ocean climate indices; Int. J. Climatol. 27 179–187, https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izumo T, de Boyer Montégut C, Luo J J, Behera S K, Masson S and Yamagata T 2008 The role of the western Arabian Sea upwelling in Indian monsoon rainfall variability; J. Climate 21 5603–5623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson N and Xie S P 2010 Changes in the sea surface temperature threshold for tropical convection; Nature Geosci. 3 842–845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph P V 1976 Proc. Symp. Tropical Monsoons; Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorlogy Pune, 378p.

  • Kumar K, Rajagopalan Balaji, Hoerling Martin, Bates Gary and Cane Mark 2006 Unraveling the Mystery of Indian Monsoon Failure During El Nino; Science 314 115–119, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1131152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebmann B and Smith C A 1996 Description of a complete (interpolated) outgoing longwave radiation dataset; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77 1275–1277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parthasarathy B A, Munot A and Kothawale D R 1994 All-India monthly and seasonal rainfall series: 1871–1993; Theor. Appl. Climatol. 49(4) 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmusson E M and Carpenter T H 1983 The relationship between the eastern Pacific sea surface temperature and rainfall over India and Sri Lanka; Mon. Weather Rev. 111 354–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiter E R 1978 Long-term wind variability in the tropical Pacific, its possible causes and effects; Mon. Weather Rev. 106(3) 324–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saji N H, Goswami B N, Vinayachandran P N and Yamagata T 1999 A dipole mode in the tropical Indian Ocean; Nature 401 360–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sikka D R 1980 Some aspects of the large-scale fluctuations of summer monsoon rainfall over India in relation to fluctuations in the planetary and regional scale circulation parameters; Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Earth & Planet. Sci.) 89 179–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun C, Li J, Kucharski F, Kang I S, Jin F F, Wang K et al. 2019 Recent acceleration of Arabian Sea warming induced by the Atlantic–western Pacific trans-basin multidecadal variability; Geophys. Res. Lett. 46 1662–1671, https://doi.org/10.1029/2018GL081175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi G A and Harrison D E 2004 Interannual Indian rainfall variability and Indian Ocean sea surface temperature anomalies; Geophys. Monogr. Ser., Am. Geophys. Union, Washington DC 147 3–9, https://doi.org/10.1029/147GM14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster P J, Moore A M, Loschnigg J P and Leben R R 1999 Coupled ocean–atmosphere dynamics in the Indian Ocean during 1997–1998; Nature 401 356–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Shang-Ping, Deser Clara, Vecchi Gabriel, Ma Jian, Teng Haiyan and Wittenberg Andrew 2010 Global warming pattern formation: Sea surface temperature and rainfall; J. Climate 23, https://doi.org/10.1175/2009JCLI3329.1.

Download references

Acknowledgements

It is a pleasure to acknowledge discussions with Dr M Rajeevan, Profs. J Srinivasan, P Vinayachandran and Dr S Sajani at different stages of this research. We also thank NOAA, USA (https://www.cdc.noaa.gov) for making the OLR and SST datasets used in this study and the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Ministry of Earth Sciences (https://tropmet.res.in) for providing All India Summer Monsoon Rainfall data for public access. MAC is supported by NSF grant OCE-2219829. The figures used in this article are prepared using GrADS and GNU Octave.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors contributed to the development of the research concept. Most part of the article is written by SG. Analysis of the data is done by PF and SG. SG, MAC and PF contributed to the interpretation of the results.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sulochana Gadgil.

Additional information

Communicated by Somnath Dasgupta

Appendices

Appendix: ENSO–Monsoon associations

Siddhartha Gadgil1 and Sulochana Gadgil2


1Department of Mathematics, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.


2Centre for Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore.


The following text and analysis are available as a Jupyter notebook on Google Colaboratory at https://drive.google.com/file/d/1tBu6btHHZb5BL9CjGTxU9yFNkJx4H7dl/view?usp=sharing.

Questions

We investigate whether for the monsoon season as a whole, is there an association between ENSO index and rainfall. To do this, we compare with the appropriate null hypothesis using appropriate distributions and compute p values.

Null hypothesis and distributions/tests

To test for association, we take the null hypothesis to be that the signs of the ENSO index and rainfall anomaly are independent. We use the Fisher exact test.

We use scipy, specifically Fisher’s exact test.

Import scipy.stats as stats.

Functions for p values

For the monsoon season, we have input a 22 matrix of frequencies, and we calculate three different p values, those for independence and for binomial on the right and left (with appropriate direction). For neatness, we capture all these in a single function, which returns these as percentages. Concretely, we return a triple with independence, positive ENSO and anomaly, and negative ENSO and anomaly.

figure a

We shall also return raw values, since we wish to correct for multiple hypotheses, i.e., cherry-picking statements that show stronger effects.

figure b

We now correct for cherry-pick. We have chosen whether to consider positive or negative associations after looking at the data. The general correction to the p-value is to observe that if we compute the probability q of an event X occurring, the \(p\)-value is not \(q\) but the probability of at least one of \(k\) independent events \({X}_{1},\dots ,{X}_{k}\) occurring, with each having probability q. This probability is

$$p=1-(1-q)^{k}$$

We define a function

figure c

Since we like to deal with percentages, it will be convenient to directly correct these.

figure d

Computations

We test associations for total rainfall, and the positive and negative cases.

figure e

Results

  • The clear conclusion is that there is a significant association, since the p-value is 0.05% and there are no multiple hypotheses.

  • Both sides are well below 5%. Since this applies to both sides, no cherry-picking was involved, so we can conclude associations for both negative and positive ENSO for the conventional threshold of 5%.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gadgil, S., Cane, M.A. & Francis, P.A. On rogue La Niñas, with below-average monsoon rainfall. J Earth Syst Sci 132, 111 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02121-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-023-02121-1

Keywords

Navigation