Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of wind speed on surface layer stability and turbulent fluxes over southern Indian peninsula station

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Surface to atmosphere exchange has received much attention in numerical weather prediction models. This exchange is defined by turbulent parameters such as frictional velocity, drag coefficient and heat fluxes, which have to be derived experimentally from high-frequency observations. High-frequency measurements of wind speed, air temperature and water vapour mixing ratio (eddy covariance measurements), were made during the Integrated Ground Observation Campaign (IGOC) of Cloud Aerosol Interaction and Precipitation Enhancement Experiment (CAIPEEX) at Mahabubnagar, India (1644N, 7759E) in the south-west monsoon season. Using these observations, an attempt was made to investigate the behaviour of the turbulent parameters, mentioned above, with respect to wind speed. We found that the surface layer stability derived from the Monin–Obukhov length scale, is well depicted by the magnitude of wind speed, i.e., the atmospheric boundary layer was under unstable regime for wind speeds >4 m s−1; under stable regime for wind speeds <2 m s−1 and under neutral regime for wind speeds in the range of 2–3 m s−1. All the three stability regimes were mixed for wind speeds 3–4 m s−1. The drag coefficient shows scatter variation with wind speed in stable as well as unstable conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal P, Yadav A K, Gulati A, Raman S, Rao S, Singh M P, Nigam S and Reddy N 1995 Surface layer turbulence processes in low wind speeds over land; Atmos. Environ. 29 2089–2098.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhuri S, Prabha T V, Karipot A, Dharamraj T and Patil M N 2015 Relationship between the momentum and scalar fluxes close to the ground during the Indian post-monsoon period; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 154 333–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark C A and Arritt R W 1995 Numerical simulations of the effect of soil moisture and vegetation cover on the development of deep convection; J. Appl. Meteorol. 34 2029–2045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claus J, Krogstad P -Å and Castro Ian P 2012 Some measurements of surface drag in urban-type boundary layers at various wind angles; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 145 407–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enriquez A G and Friehe C A 1997 Bulk parameterization of momentum, heat and moisture fluxes over a coastal upwelling area; J. Geophys. Res. 102 (C3) 5781–5798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foken T and Wichura B 1996 Tools for quality assessment of surface-based flux measurements; Agri. Forest Meteorol. 78 83–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garratt J R 1977 Review of drag coefficients over oceans and continents; Mon. Wea. Rev. 105 915–929.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies J A, Nickling W G and King J 2002 Drag coefficient and plant form response to wind speed in three plant species: Burning Bush (Euonymus alatus), Colorado Blue Spruce (Picea pungens glauca.), and Fountain Grass (Pennisetum setaceum); J. Geophys. Res. 107(D24).

  • Ham J M and Heilman J L 2003 Experimental test of density and energy-balance corrections on carbon dioxide flux as measured using open-path eddy covariance; Agron. J. 95 1393–1403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnan P and Kunhikrishnan P K 2002 Some characteristics of atmospheric surface layer over a tropical inland region during southwest monsoon period; Atmos. Res. 62 111–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni J R et al. 2012 Cloud Aerosol Interaction and Precipitation Enhancement Experiment (CAIPEEX): Overview and preliminary results; Curr. Sci. 102 413–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kusuma G R. 2004 Estimation of the exchange coefficient of heat during low wind convective conditions; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 111 247–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kusuma G R., Narasimha R and Prabhu A 1996 Estimation of drag coefficient at low wind speeds over the monsoon trough land region during MONTBLEX-90; Geophys. Res. Lett. 23 2617–2620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee X and Massman W J 2011 A perspective on Thirty Years of the Webb, Pearman and Leuning density corrections; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 139 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee X, Massman W and Law B 2004 Handbook of Micrometeorology: A Guide for Surface Flux Measurement and Analysis; Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 60–61.

  • Leuning R and Moncrieff J 1990 Eddy covariance CO 2 flux measurements using open- and closed-path analysers: Corrections for analyser water vapour sensitivity and damping fluctuations in air sampling tubes; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 53 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuning R, Denmead O T and Lang A R G 1982 Effects of heat and water vapor transport on eddy covariance measurement of CO 2 fluxes; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 23 209–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B and Avissar R 1994 The impact of spatial variability of land-surface characteristics on land surface heat-fluxes; J. Climate 7 527–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebethal C and Foken T 2003 On the significance of the Webb correction to fluxes; Bound-Layer Meteorol. 109 99–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liebethal C and Foken T 2004 On the significance of the Webb correction to fluxes: Corrigendum; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 113 301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L, Vickers D, Sun J, Jensen N O, Jorgensen H, Pardyjak E and Fernando H 2001 Determination of the surface drag coefficient; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 99 249–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahrt L, Sun J and Stauffer D 2015 Dependence of turbulent velocities on wind speed and stratification; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 155 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massman W J 1991 The attenuation of concentration fluctuations in turbulent-flow through a tube; J. Geophys. Res. 96D 15,269–15,273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauder M and Foken T 2006 Impact of post-field data processing on eddy covariance flux estimates and energy balance closure; Meteorologische Z 15 597–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao M and Ji J 1996 Study on diurnal variation of bulk drag coefficient over different land surfaces; Meteorol. Atmos. Phys. 61 (3–4) 217–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller M J, Beljaars A C M and Palmer T N 1992 The sensitivity of the ECMWF model to the parameterization of evaporation from the tropical oceans; J. Climate 5 418–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panda J and Sharan M 2012 Influence of land-surface and turbulent parameterization schemes on regional-scale boundary layer characteristics over northern India; Atmos. Res. 112 89–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil M N 2006 Aerodynamic drag coefficient and roughness length for three seasons over a tropical western Indian station; Atmos. Res. 80 280–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil M N, Waghmare R T, Halder S and Dharmaraj T 2011 Performance of Noah land surface model over the tropical semi-arid conditions in western India; Atmos. Res. 99 85–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patil M N, Dharmaraj T, Waghmare R T, Prabha T V and Kulkarni J R 2014 Measurements of carbon dioxide and heat fluxes during monsoon-2011 season over rural site of India by eddy covariance technique; J. Earth Syst. Sci. 123 177–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Segal M and Arritt R W 1992 Non-classical mesoscale circulations caused by surface sensible heat flux gradients; Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 73 1593–1604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suzuki N, Toba Y, Komori S, Takagaki N, Baba Y, Kubo T, Shintaku K and Yamamoto M 2014 Variation of the drag coefficient investigated by using tower-based long period measurements – condition of high wind speed with following and cross swell; Int. J. Offshore and Polar Engg. 24 (3) 168–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb E K, Pearman G I and Leuning R 1980 Correction of the flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer; Quart. J. Roy. Meteorol. Soc. 106 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wen F, Gao Z, Wu Z and Lu H 2005 Wind speed scaling and the drag coefficient; Acta Oceanol. Sin. 24 (4) 29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiao W, Liu S, Wang W, Yang D, Xu J, Cao C, Li H and Lee X 2013 Transfer coefficients of momentum, heat and water vapour in the atmospheric surface layer of a large freshwater lake; Bound.-Layer Meteorol. 148 479–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zachry B C, Schroeder J L, Kennedy A B, Westerink J J and Letchford C W 2013 A case study of nearshore drag coefficient behavior during hurricane Ike (2008); J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 52 2139–2146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu P and Furst J 2013 On the parameterization of surface momentum transport via drag coefficient in low-wind conditions; Geophys. Res. Lett. 40 2824–2828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their gratitude to Dr M Rajeevan, Director, Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology, Pune for inspiration. The CAIPEEX-IGOC program was fully funded by the Ministry of Earth Sciences, Govt. of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M N Patil.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: K Rajendran

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Patil, M.N., Waghmare, R.T., Dharmaraj, T. et al. The influence of wind speed on surface layer stability and turbulent fluxes over southern Indian peninsula station. J Earth Syst Sci 125, 1399–1411 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0735-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-016-0735-5

Keywords

Navigation