Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Quantifying abrasive-blasted surface roughness profiles using scanning electron microscopy

  • Published:
Journal of Coatings Technology and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rough surface profiles are specified for metal surfaces so that corrosion preventative coatings adhere well and provide long-term protection. Simple stylus scans and replica tape are widely used in industry to characterize surfaces and control the quality of surface preparation. Unfortunately, a scientific, quantitative connection between adhesion and surface profile parameters remains unclear. Stereo-pair images from scanning electron microscopy, SEM, were used to digitally reconstruct and then characterize 3D surfaces, which is a technique that seems previously unreported in coatings applications. SEM results were consistent with those from a stylus profilometer, but the data from a surface scan are much more numerous than from a line scan, and SEM can provide very high magnifications. 3D surfaces at high magnification gave larger values for the increase in area developed by the abrasive blasting than were determined at lower magnifications and by the stylus profilometer. Nevertheless, both techniques showed that the surface roughness height and ramification was far less than might be expected from illustrations in the existing literature on coatings’ adhesion. Quantified characterization, with details shown at high magnification, may provide scientific insight into how the various features of a roughened surface enhance the adhesion of protective coatings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ASTM D7127-17, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Surface Roughness of Abrasive Blast Cleaned Metal Surfaces Using a Portable Stylus Instrument. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, United States

  2. ASTM D4417-14, Standard Test Methods for Field Measurement of Surface Profile of Blast Cleaned Steel. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, United States

  3. Leach, R, “Surface Topography Measurement Instrumentation.” In: Leach, R (ed.) Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology, Chapter 6, 2nd ed., pp. 133–204. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Beamish, D, “Replica Tape: Unlocking Hidden Information.” J. Protect. Coat. Linings, 32 (6) 1–6 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roper, HJ, Weaver, R, Brandon, JH, “The Effect of Peak Count on Surface Roughness on Coating Performance.” J. Protect. Coat. Linings, 22 (6) 52–64 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Tordonato, D, “Adhesion Testing: How Much is Sufficient?” J. Protect. Coat. Linings, 35 (11) 11–16 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Momber, AW, Koller, S, Dittmers, HJ, “Effects of Surface Preparation Methods on Adhesion of Organic Coatings to Steel Substrates.” J. Protect. Coat. Linings, 21 (11) 44–50 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dickie, RA, “Paint Adhesion, Corrosion Protection, and Interfacial Chemistry.” Prog. Org. Coat., 25 3–22 (1994)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keane, JD, Bruno, JA, Weaver, REF, “Surface Profile for Anti-Corrosion Paints.” SSPC Report on Research Project no. 71-14, Carnegie-Mellon Institute of Research, October 11 (1976)

  10. Cuenat, A, Leach, R, “Scanning Probe and Particle Beam Microscopy.” In: Leach, R (ed.) Fundamental Principles of Engineering Nanometrology, Chapter 7, 2nd ed., pp. 205–239. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. ISO 4287 Geometrical Product Specifications (GPS)—Surface Texture: Profile Method—Terms, Definitions and Surface Texture Parameters (1997)

  12. ASME B46.1-2009, Surface Texture (Surface Roughness, Waviness, and Lay). American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, NY (2010)

  13. Peitgen, H-O, Saupe, D (eds.), The Science of Fractal Images. Springer, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amada, S, Satoh, A, “Fractal Analysis of Surfaces Roughened by Grit Blasting.” J. Adhes. Sci. Technol., 14 (1) 27–41 (2000)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mannelqvist, A, Ring Groth, M, “Comparison of Fractal Analyses Methods and Fractal Dimension for Pre-Treated Stainless Steel Surfaces and the Correlation to Adhesive Joint Strength.” Appl. Phys. A, 73 347–355 (2001)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Bouchard, E, Lapasset, G, Planès, J, “Fractal Dimension of Fractured Surfaces: A Universal Value?” Europhys. Lett., 13 (1) 73–79 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Persson, BNJ, “On the Fractal Dimension of Rough Surfaces.” Tribol. Lett. B, 54 99–106 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. SSPC-SP 10/NACE No. 2, Near-White Metal Blast Cleaning, 2006, The Society for Protective Coatings, Pittsburgh, PA 15222, United States

  19. Budinski, KG, Chin, H, “Surface Alteration in Abrasive Blasting.” In: Ludema, KC (ed.) Wear of Materials-1983, pp. 311–318. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, B, “Digital Image Correlation for Surface Deformation Measurement: Historical Developments, Recent Advances and Future Goals.” Meas. Sci. Technol., 29 082001 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tafti, AP, Kirkpatrick, AB, Alavic, Z, Owen, HA, Yua, Z, “Recent Advances in 3D SEM Surface Reconstruction.” Micron, 78 54–66 (2015)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Danzl, R, Scherer, S, Kolednik, O, “Automatic Registration of Corresponding Fracture Surfaces.” In: Proceedings of the 12th International Metallographic-Tagung, Leoben, pp. 127–134 (2006)

  23. Podsiadlo, P, Stachowiak, GW, “Characterization of Surface Topography of Wear Particles by SEM Stereoscopy.” Wear, 206 39–52 (1997)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Abbott, S, Adhesion Science Principles and Practice. Destech Publications, Lancaster, PA (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Richardson, LF, “The Problem of Contiguity: An Appendix of Statistics of Deadly Quarrels.” Gen. Syst. Yearb., 6 139–187 (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Losa, G, Ristanović, D, Ristanović, D, Zaletel, I, Beltraminelli, S, “From Fractal Geometry to Fractal Analysis.” Appl. Math., 7 346–354 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Hurst, HE, “A Suggested Statistical Model of Some Time Series Which Occur in Nature.” Nature, 180 494 (1957)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Gneiting, T, Schlather, M, “Stochastic Models Which Separate Fractal Dimension and Hurst Effect.” SIAM Rev., 46 (2) 269–282 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Clarke, KC, “Computation of the Fractal Dimension of Topographic Surfaces Using the Triangular Prism Surface Area Method.” Comput. Geosci., 12 (5) 713–722 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Leach, R, Evans, C, He, L, Davies, A, Duparré, A, Henning, A, Jones, CW, O’Connor, D, “Open Questions in Surface Topography Measurement: A Roadmap.” Surf. Topogr. Metrol. Prop., 3 013001 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Griffith, AA, “The Phenomena of Rupture and Flow in Solids.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A, 221 163–198 (1921)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (SGC) would like to thank his colleagues and contacts in industry, especially at Northwest Pipe and the Bureau of Reclamation, for many discussions and helping with materials and samples. This material is based on the work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0619098.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Coatings and Polymeric Materials, North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA

    Stuart G. Croll

  2. Electron Microscopy Center Core Facility, North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA

    Scott A. Payne

Authors
  1. Stuart G. Croll
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Scott A. Payne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stuart G. Croll.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Croll, S.G., Payne, S.A. Quantifying abrasive-blasted surface roughness profiles using scanning electron microscopy. J Coat Technol Res 17, 1231–1242 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-020-00342-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11998-020-00342-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation