Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Chronic Daily Headache (S-J Wang and S-P Chen, Section Editors)
  • Published:
Current Pain and Headache Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Management of chronic daily headaches (CDH) remains challenging due to the limited efficacy of standard prophylactic pharmacological measures. Several studies have reported that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can effectively treat chronic headaches. The objective was to determine the utility of rTMS for immediate post-treatment and sustained CDH prophylaxis.

Recent Findings

All procedures were conducted per PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest databases were searched for controlled clinical trials that have tested the efficacy of rTMS on populations with CDH. DerSimonian-Laird random-effects meta-analyses were performed using the ‘meta’ package in R to examine the post- vs. pre-rTMS changes in standardized headache intensity and frequency compared to sham-control conditions. Thirteen trials were included with a combined study population of N = 538 patients with CDH (rTMS, N = 284; Sham, N = 254). Patients exposed to rTMS had significantly reduced standardized CDH intensity and frequency in the immediate post-treatment period (Hedges’ g = -1.16 [-1.89, -0.43], p = 0.002 and Δ = -5.07 [-10.05, -0.11], p = 0.045 respectively). However, these effects were sustained marginally in the follow-up period (Hedges’ g = -0.43 [-0.76, -0.09], p = 0.012 and Δ = -3.33 [-5.52, -1.14], p = 0.003). Significant between-study heterogeneity was observed, at least partially driven by variations in rTMS protocols.

Summary

Despite the observed clinically meaningful and statistically significant benefits in the immediate post-treatment period, the prophylactic effects of rTMS on CDH do not seem to sustain with discontinuation. Thus, the cost-effectiveness of the routine use of rTMS for CDH prophylaxis remains questionable.

Registration

Protocol preregistered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021250100)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Abbreviations

CDH :

Chronic daily headaches

CM:

Chronic migraine

CTTH:

Chronic tension-type headaches

TCA:

Tricyclic antidepressants

BTX-A:

Botulinum toxin A

CGRP :

Calcitonin gene-related peptide

rTMS :

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

dlPFC :

Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex

PRISMA:

Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

MCID:

Minimal clinically important difference

GRADE:

Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation

MC:

Motor cortex

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Garza I, Schwedt TJ. Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Daily Headache. Semin Neurol. 2010;30(02):154–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Sheikh HU. Approach to chronic daily headache. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2015;15:1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pascual J, Colás R, Castillo J. Epidemiology of chronic daily headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2001;5(6):529–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dodick DW. Chronic daily headache. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(2):158–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Lantéri-Minet M, et al. Quality of life impairment, disability and economic burden associated with chronic daily headache, focusing on chronic migraine with or without medication overuse: a systematic review. Cephalalgia. 2011;31(7):837–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB. Chronic daily headache. Curr Opin Neurol. 2000;13(3):277–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Silberstein SD, Lipton RB, Sliwinski M. Classification of daily and near-daily headaches: field trial of revised IHS criteria. Neurology. 1996;47(4):871–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Headache Classification Committee of the International Headache Society (IHS). The International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3rd edition (beta version). Cephalalgia. 2013;33(9):629-808.

  9. Yancey JR, Sheridan R, Koren KG. Chronic daily headache: diagnosis and management. Am Fam Physician. 2014;89(8):642–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dharmshaktu P, Tayal V, Kalra BS. Efficacy of antidepressants as analgesics: a review. J Clin Pharmacol. 2012;52(1):6–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Silberstein SD, et al. Efficacy and safety of topiramate for the treatment of chronic migraine: A randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled trial. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2007;47(2):170–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rothrock JF, et al. Predictors of a negative response to topiramate therapy in patients with chronic migraine. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2005;45(7):932–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Scheffler A, et al. CGRP antibody therapy in patients with drug resistant migraine and chronic daily headache: a real-world experience. J Headache Pain. 2021;22(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipton RB, et al. Efficacy and safety of eptinezumab in patients with chronic migraine: PROMISE-2. Neurology. 2020;94(13):e1365–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Ornello R, et al. Early management of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in chronic migraine: insights from a Real-Life European Multicenter Study. Pain Ther. 2021;10:637–50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Urits I, et al. CGRP antagonists for the treatment of chronic migraines: a comprehensive review. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2019;23:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Coppola G, et al. Neuromodulation for chronic daily headache. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2022;26(3):267–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. • AbdElkader AA, et al. The efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in treating patients with chronic daily headache. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatr Neurosurg. 2021;57:1–7. This is the only RCT conducted on chronic daily headaches as a whole. All the other included studies considered a particular type of chronic daily headache.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chail A, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a review of its evolution and current applications. Ind Psychiatry J. 2018;27(2):172.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Lefaucheur JP, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020;131(2):474–528.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rosa MA, Lisanby SH. Somatic treatments for mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2012;37(1):102–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mansur C, et al. A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients. Neurology. 2005;64(10):1802–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Peinemann A, et al. Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004;115(7):1519–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Bestmann S, et al. Functional MRI of the immediate impact of transcranial magnetic stimulation on cortical and subcortical motor circuits. Eur J Neurosci. 2004;19(7):1950–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Graff-Guerrero A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex increases tolerance to human experimental pain. Cogn Brain Res. 2005;25(1):153–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Fierro B, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) during capsaicin-induced pain: modulatory effects on motor cortex excitability. Exp Brain Res. 2010;203:31–8.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoo W-K, et al. High frequency rTMS modulation of the sensorimotor networks: behavioral changes and fMRI correlates. Neuroimage. 2008;39(4):1886–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Boyer L, et al. rTMS in fibromyalgia: a randomized trial evaluating QoL and its brain metabolic substrate. Neurology. 2014;82(14):1231–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Brighina F, et al. rTMS of the prefrontal cortex in the treatment of chronic migraine: a pilot study. J Neurol Sci. 2004;227(1):67–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kalita J, et al. Efficacy of single versus three sessions of high rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic migraine and tension-type headache. J Neurol. 2016;263(11):2238–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Seminowicz DA, Moayedi M. The dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in acute and chronic pain. J Pain. 2017;18(9):1027–35.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Moisset X, de Andrade DC, Bouhassira D. From pulses to pain relief: An update on the mechanisms of rTMS-induced analgesic effects. Eur J Pain. 2016;20(5):689–700.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Misra UK, et al. Role of β endorphin in pain relief following high rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine. Brain Stimul. 2017;10(3):618–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Keck M, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases the release of dopamine in the mesolimbic and mesostriatal system. Neuropharmacology. 2002;43(1):101–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Strafella AP, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human prefrontal cortex induces dopamine release in the caudate nucleus. J Neurosci. 2001;21(15):RC157.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Michael N, et al. Metabolic changes after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the left prefrontal cortex: a sham-controlled proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) study of healthy brain. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17(11):2462–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ueyama E, et al. Chronic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increases hippocampal neurogenesis in rats. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2011;65(1):77–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Conforto AB, et al. Randomized, proof-of-principle clinical trial of active transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic migraine. Cephalalgia. 2014;34(6):464–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Granato A, et al. Dramatic placebo effect of high frequency repetitive TMS in treatment of chronic migraine and medication overuse headache. J Clin Neurosci. 2019;60:96–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Moher D, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009;6(7): e1000097.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Sauro KM, et al. HIT‐6 and MIDAS as measures of headache disability in a headache referral population. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2010;50(3):383–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Norman GR, Sloan JA, and Wyrwich KW. Interpretation of changes in health-related quality of life: the remarkable universality of half a standard deviation. Med Care. 2003;41(5):582-592.

  43. Lemieux J, et al. Three methods for minimally important difference: no relationship was found with the net proportion of patients improving. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(5):448–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Silberstein SD, et al. Headache prophylaxis with BoNTA: patient characteristics. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2010;50(1):53–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Evans AG, et al. Outcomes of Surgical Treatment of Migraines: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2023;31(2):192-205.

  46. Egger M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Higgins JP, Thompson SG. Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta-analysis. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1539–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Higgins JP, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.4 (updated August 2023). Cochrane, 2023. Available from https://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.

  49. Thompson SG, Sharp SJ. Explaining heterogeneity in meta-analysis: a comparison of methods. Stat Med. 1999;18(20):2693–708.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Sterne JA, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ, 2019. 366: l4898.

  51. Schünemann H, et al. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. Available from https://guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook.

  52. GRADEpro GDT: GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool [Software]. McMaster University and Evidence Prime, 2024. Available from https://www.gradepro.org/.

  53. Kumar A, et al. Neuronavigation based 10 sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation therapy in chronic migraine: an exploratory study. Neurol Sci. 2021;42(1):131–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Leung A, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in managing mild traumatic brain injury-related headaches. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2016;19(2): 133–41.

  55. Leung A, et al. Left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex rTMS in alleviating MTBI related headaches and depressive symptoms. Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface. 2018;21(4): 390–401.

  56. Mattoo B, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in chronic tension-type headache: A pilot study. Indian J Med Res. 2019;150(1):73–80.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Rapinesi C, et al. Add-on deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (dTMS) for the treatment of chronic migraine: A preliminary study. Neurosci Lett. 2016;623:7–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stilling J, et al. Treatment of Persistent Post-Traumatic Headache and Post-Concussion Symptoms Using Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A Pilot, Double-Blind. Randomized Controlled Trial J Neurotrauma. 2020;37(2):312–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rajain M, et al. Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Tension-Type Headache: A Randomized Controlled Study. Cureus. 2023;15(2):e34922.

  60. Wei J, et al. Clinical efficacy of Deanxit combined with low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of chronic tension-type headache. J Clin Intern Med. 2023;40(4):277–8.

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  61. •• Todorov V, et al. Repetitive transcranial stimulation over two target areas, sham stimulation and topiramate in the treatment of chronic migraine. Proceedings of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. 2020;73(9):1298–305. The only study that tested the efficacy of applying rTMS on different regions of the brain.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Leung A, et al. rTMS in Alleviating Mild TBI Related Headaches–A Case Series. Pain Physician. 2016;19(2):E347–54.

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. • Zhong J, et al. Efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic migraine: A meta-analysis. Front Neurol. 2022;13:1050090. This a meta-analysis conducted recently on the application of rTMS for treating chronic migraine. However, they have included several studies on episodic migraine as well.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  64. Mohamad Safiai NI, et al. High-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for migraine prevention: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2022;42(10):1071–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lan L, et al. The efficacy of transcranial magnetic stimulation on migraine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trails. J Headache Pain. 2017;18:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sevel LS, et al. Interhemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex connectivity is associated with individual differences in pain sensitivity in healthy controls. Brain Connect. 2016;6(5):357–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  67. Kanda M, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the sensorimotor cortex and medial frontal cortex modifies human pain perception. Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;114(5):860–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. May A, Schulte LH. Chronic migraine: risk factors, mechanisms and treatment. Nat Rev Neurol. 2016;12(8):455–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Boyer N, et al. General trigeminospinal central sensitization and impaired descending pain inhibitory controls contribute to migraine progression. PAIN®. 2014;155(7):1196–205.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Filippi M, Messina R. The chronic migraine brain: what have we learned from neuroimaging? Front Neurol. 2020;10:1356.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Vieira DSS, et al. Glutamate levels in cerebrospinal fluid and triptans overuse in chronic migraine. Headache J Head Face Pain. 2007;47(6):842–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Andreou AP, Edvinsson L. Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. J Headache Pain. 2019;20(1):1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Bigal ME, et al. Obesity, migraine, and chronic migraine: possible mechanisms of interaction. Neurology. 2007;68(21):1851–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Siebner H, Rothwell J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: new insights into representational cortical plasticity. Exp Brain Res. 2003;148:1–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Fumal A, et al. Induction of long-lasting changes of visual cortex excitability by five daily sessions of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in healthy volunteers and migraine patients. Cephalalgia. 2006;26(2):143–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Choi G-S, et al. Effect of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on chronic central pain after mild traumatic brain injury: a pilot study. J Rehabil Med. 2018;50(3):246–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Giri S, et al. Randomized controlled studies evaluating Topiramate, Botulinum toxin type A, and mABs targeting CGRP in patients with chronic migraine and medication overuse headache: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2023;43(4):03331024231156922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Zheng H, et al. Topiramate, acupuncture, and BoNT-A for chronic migraine: a network meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. 2021;143(5):558–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Herd CP, et al. Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of botulinum toxin for the prevention of migraine. BMJ Open. 2019;9(7): e027953.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  80. Frank F, et al. CGRP-antibodies, topiramate and botulinum toxin type A in episodic and chronic migraine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cephalalgia. 2021;41(11–12):1222–39.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  81. Jackson JL, et al. A Comparative Effectiveness Meta-Analysis of Drugs for the Prophylaxis of Migraine Headache. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(7): e0130733.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  82. Yang CP, et al. Comparative Effectiveness and Tolerability of the Pharmacology of Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide and Its Receptor for the Prevention of Chronic Migraine: a Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials [published correction appears in Neurotherapeutics. 2021 Oct 6]. Neurotherapeutics. 2021;18(4):2639-2650.

  83. Sacco S, et al. European Headache Federation guideline on the use of monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene related peptide pathway for migraine prevention–2022 update. J Headache Pain. 2022;23(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Lanteri-Minet M, et al. Effectiveness of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) for the preventive treatment of chronic migraine: A meta-analysis on 10 years of real-world data. Cephalalgia. 2022;42(14):1543–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  85. Shehata HS, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation versus botulinum toxin injection in chronic migraine prophylaxis: a pilot randomized trial. J Pain Res. 2016;9:771–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  86. Zhang L, et al. Short-and long-term effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb motor function after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(9):1137–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Nyffeler T, et al. Repetitive TMS over the human oculomotor cortex: comparison of 1-Hz and theta burst stimulation. Neurosci Lett. 2006;409(1):57–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. •• Hoogendam JM, Ramakers GM, Di Lazzaro V. Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain. Brain Stimul. 2010;3(2):95–118. A comprehensive review of the mechanism of action of rTMS.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Hayashi T, et al. Long-term effect of motor cortical repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation induces. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(1):77–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Aydin-Abidin S, et al. High-and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation differentially activates c-Fos and zif268 protein expression in the rat brain. Exp Brain Res. 2008;188:249–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  91. Huang Y-Z, et al. The after-effect of human theta burst stimulation is NMDA receptor dependent. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007;118(5):1028–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Huang Y-Y, et al. Genetic evidence for the bidirectional modulation of synaptic plasticity in the prefrontal cortex by D1 receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2004;101(9):3236–41.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  93. Mennemeier MS, et al. Sham transcranial magnetic stimulation using electrical stimulation of the scalp. Brain Stimul. 2009;2(3):168–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  94. Duecker F, Sack AT. Rethinking the role of sham TMS. Front Psychol. 2015;6:210.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  95. Lisanby SH, et al. Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials. Biol Psychiat. 2001;49(5):460–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  96. Loo CK, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some “sham” forms active? Biol Psychiat. 2000;47(4):325–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. García-Larrea L, et al. Electrical stimulation of motor cortex for pain control: a combined PET-scan and electrophysiological study. Pain. 1999;83(2):259–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Lorenz J, Minoshima S, Casey KL. Keeping pain out of mind: the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in pain modulation. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 5):1079–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Misra UK, Kalita J, Bhoi SK. High-rate repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in migraine prophylaxis: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Neurol. 2013;260(11):2793–801.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Avery DH, et al. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the acute treatment of major depressive disorder: clinical response in an open-label extension trial. J Clin Psychiatry. 2008;69(3):441–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  101. Rossi S, et al. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009;120(12):2008–39.

    Article  ADS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Machii K, et al. Safety of rTMS to non-motor cortical areas in healthy participants and patients. Clin Neurophysiol. 2006;117(2):455–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Loo CK, McFarquhar TF, Mitchell PB. A review of the safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation as a clinical treatment for depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11(1):131–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Miron J-P, et al. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for major depressive disorder: basic principles and future directions. Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2021;11:20451253211042696.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  105. Stultz DJ, et al. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) Safety with Respect to Seizures: A Literature Review. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:2989-3000.

  106. Lerner AJ, Wassermann EM, Tamir DI. Seizures from transcranial magnetic stimulation 2012–2016: results of a survey of active laboratories and clinics. Clin Neurophysiol. 2019;130(8):1409–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was funded in part by the Medical Student Summer Research Project of the School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, TX, 2021.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CSD and CNK have full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. CSD, CLS, CRL, and CNK designed the study; ES, AB, RH, AR and CSD collected the data; CLS, CRL and CNK supervised data collection; CSD and CNK extracted and analyzed the data; ES, CSD and CNK wrote the manuscript; all authors read, revised and helped finalize the manuscript. All authors accept full responsibility for all aspects of to the work described.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chanaka N. Kahatuduwa.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflicts of interest to declare pertinent to the content in the manuscript.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1358 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Stephens, E., Dhanasekara, C.S., Montalvan, V. et al. Utility of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Chronic Daily Headache Prophylaxis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Curr Pain Headache Rep 28, 149–167 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01210-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11916-024-01210-0

Keywords

Navigation