Abstract
This research investigated how juvenile race and ctual disability affect case judgment involving recanted confession. We recruited 151 participants to serve as mock jurors using a 2 (juvenile race: Black, White) × 2 (intellectual disability: disabled, nondisabled) between-subjects design. We found that participants rendered more guilty verdicts, had higher confidence in the defendants’ guilt, and estimated a higher probability of crime commission when the juvenile defendants were White instead of Black. Consistent with the “bend-over-backwards” effect and the expectancy-violation theory, participants judged the nondisabled White juvenile defendants harshly but the nondisabled Black juvenile defendants leniently. In addition, intellectual disability was a mitigating factor, but mostly for White juvenile defendants. Black juvenile defendants with intellectual disability were often judged more harshly than Black juvenile defendants without intellectual disability. Finally, juvenile race and intellectual disability interacted to affect the evaluation of confession evidence and case outcome. Overall, the current research extended our understanding of public perception of Black and White juvenile defendants with intellectual disability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Autumn Pasquale murder: Judge sentences Justin Robinson to 17 years. (2013). NJ.Com. Retrieved from http://www.nj.com/gloucester.county/index.ssf/2013/09/autumn_pasquale_judge_sentences_her_killer_justin_robinson_to_17_years.html. Accessed 12 Sept 2013.
Berman, M. (2018). He was 16 when Louisiana charged him with murder. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2018/05/22/he-was-16-when-louisiana-charged-him-with-murder-two-decades-later-hes-free/?utm_term=.65bd82d4b468. Accessed 22 May 2018.
Bottoms BL, Nysse-Carris KL, Harris T, Tyda K (2003) Jurors’ perceptions of adolescent sexual assault victims who have intellectual disabilities. Law Hum Behav 27(2):205–227. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022551314668
Brief AP, Dietz J, Cohen RR, Pugh SD, Vaslow JB (2000) Just doing business: modern racism and obedience to authority as explanations for employment discrimination. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 81(1):72–97. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2867
Brown DA, Lewis CN (2013) Competence is in the eye of the beholder: perceptions of intellectually disabled child witnesses. Int J Disabil Dev Educ 60(1):3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/1034912X.2013.757132
Cauffman E, Piquero AR, Kimonis E, Steinberg L, Chassin L, Fagan J (2007) Legal, individual, and environmental predictors of court disposition in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Law Hum Behav 31(6):519–535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-006-9076-2
Cooper J, Neuhaus IM (2000) The ‘hired gun’ effect: assessing the effect of pay, frequency of testifying, and credentials on the perception of expert testimony. Law Hum Behav 24(2):149–171. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005476618435
Demuth S, Steffensmeier D (2004) Ethnicity effects on sentence outcomes in large urban courts: comparisons among white, black, and Hispanic defendants. Soc Sci Q 85(4):994–1011. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0038-4941.2004.00255.x
Feiler SM, Sheley JF (1999) Legal and racial elements of public willingness to transfer juvenile offenders to adult court. J Crim Just 27(1):55–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00036-1
Franklin CA, Fearn NE (2008) Gender, race, and formal court decision-making outcomes: chivalry/paternalism, conflict theory or gender conflict? J Crim Just 36(3):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2008.04.009
Franklin TW (2010) The intersection of defendants’ race, gender, and age in prosecutorialdecision making. J Crim Just 38(2):185–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2009.12.001
Forrest KD, Woody W, Brady SE, Batterman KC, Stastny BJ, Bruns JA (2012) False-evidence ploys and interrogations: mock jurors’ perceptions of false-evidence ploy type, deception, coercion, and justification. Behav Sci Law 30(3):342–364. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.1999
Goff PA, Jackson MC, Di Leone BAL, Culotta CM, DiTomasso NA (2014) The essence of innocence: consequences of dehumanizing Black children. J Pers Soc Psychol 106(4):526–545 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035663
Hayes AF (2013) Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: a regression based approach. Guilford Press, New York
Henkel LA (2008) Jurors’ reactions to recanted confessions: do the defendant’s personal and dispositional characteristics play a role? Psychology. Crim Law Forum 14(6):565–578
Henry LL, Ridley AA, Perry JJ, Crane LL (2011) Perceived credibility and eyewitness testimony of children with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res 55(4):385–391. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01383.x
Jackson LA, Sullivan LA, Hodge CN (1993) Stereotype effects of attributions, predictions, and evaluations: no two social judgments are quite alike. J Pers Soc Psychol 65(1):69–84
Jussim L, Coleman LM, Lerch L (1987) The nature of stereotypes: a comparison and integration of three theories. J Pers Soc Psychol 52(3):536–546. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.536
Kassin SM, Neumann K (1997) On the power of confession evidence: an experimental test of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Law Hum Behav 21(5):469–484. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024871622490
Kassin SM, Sukel H (1997) Coerced confessions and the jury: an experimental test of the 'harmless error' rule. Law Hum Behav 21(1):27–46. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024814009769
Kassin SM, Wrightsman LS (1980) Prior confessions and mock juror verdicts. J Appl Soc Psychol 10(2):133–146. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1980.tb00698.x
Kassin SM, Wrightsman LS (1981) Coerced confessions, judicial instruction, and mock juror verdicts. J Appl Soc Psychol 11(6):489–506. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1981.tb00838.x
Leo RA, Liu B (2009) What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions? Behav Sci Law 27(3):381–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.872
Malloy LC, Shulman EP, Cauffman E (2014) Interrogations, confessions, and guilty pleas among serious adolescent offenders. Law Hum Behav 38(2):181–193. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000065
Mann CR (1984) Race and sentencing of female felons: a field study. Int J Women's Stud 7(2):160–172
Maxwell CD, Robinson AL, Post LA (2003) The impact of race on the adjudication of sexual assault and other violent crimes. J Crim Just 31(6):523–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2003.08.005
McConahay JB (1983) Modern racism and modern discrimination: the effects of race, racial attitudes, and context on simulated hiring decisions. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 9(4):551–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167283094004
Meeker JW, Jesilow P, Aranda J (1992) Bias in sentencing: a preliminary analysis of community service sentences. Behav Sci Law 10(2):197–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370100205
Najdowski CJ, Bottoms BL (2012) Understanding jurors’ judgments in cases involving juvenile defendants: effects of confession evidence and intellectual disability. Psychol Public Policy Law 18(2):297–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025786
Najdowski CJ, Bottoms BL (2015) Effects of jurors’ gender and attitudes toward intellectual disability on judgments in cases involving disabled juvenile defendants. J Forensic Psychiatry Psychol 26(3):407–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/14789949.2015.1017592
Najdowski CJ, Bottoms BL, Vargas MC (2009) Jurors' perceptions of juvenile defendants: the influence of intellectual disability, abuse history, and confession evidence. Behav Sci Law 27(3):401–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.873
Nunez N, Dahl MJ, Tang CM, Jensen BL (2007) Trial venue decisions in juvenile cases: mitigating and extralegal factors matter. Leg Criminol Psychol 12(1):21–39
Olson MA, Fazio RH (2004) Trait inferences as a function of automatically activated racial attitudes and motivation to control prejudiced reactions. Basic Appl Soc Psychol 26(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp2601_1
Peck JH, Jennings WG (2016) A critical examination of ‘being Black’ in the juvenile justice system. Law Hum Behav 40(3):219–232. https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000180
Poulson RL (1990) Mock juror attribution of criminal responsibility: effects of race and the Guilty But Mentally Ill (GBMI) verdict option. J Appl Soc Psychol 20(19, Pt 1):1596–1611. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1990.tb01495.x
Preacher KJ, Hayes AF (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36(4):717–731. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03206553
Preacher KJ, Rucker DD, Hayes AF (2007) Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivar Behav Res 42(1):185–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
Pica E, Pettalia J, Pozzulo J (2017) The influence of a defendant’s chronological age, developmental age, and race on mock juror decision making. J Police Crim Psychol 32(1):66–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-016-9201-1
Pickel KL, Warner TC, Miller TJ, Barnes ZT (2013) Conceptualizing defendants as minorities leads mock jurors to make biased evaluations in retracted confession cases. Psychol Public Policy Law 19(1):56–69. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029308
Ratcliff JJ, Lassiter GD, Jager VM, Lindberg MJ, Elek JK, Hasinski AE (2010) The hidden consequences of racial salience in videotaped interrogations and confessions. Psychol Public Policy Law 16(2):200–218 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018482
Rattan A, Levine CS, Dweck CS, Eberhardt JL (2012) Race and the fragility of the legal distinction between juveniles and adults. PLoS One 7(5). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0036680
Redlich AD, Ghetti S, Quas JA (2008) Perceptions of children during a police interview: a comparison of alleged victims and suspects. J Appl Soc Psychol 38(3):705–735
Redlich AD, Shteynberg RV (2016) To plead or not to plead: a comparison of juvenile and adult true and false plea decisions. Law Hum Behav 40(6):611–625 https://doi.org/10.1037/lhb0000205
Redlich AD, Summers A, Hoover S (2010) Self-reported false confessions and false guilty pleas among offenders with mental illness. Law Hum Behav 34(1):79–90 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-009-9194-8
Romalino, C. Q. (2013). Autumn Pasquale murder: Clayton brother pleads guilty in adult court. NJ.Com. Retrieved from http://www.nj.com/gloucestercounty/index.ssf/2013/08/breaking_clayton_brother_pleads_guilty_in_adult_court_to_autumn_pasquale_kiling.Hhtml. Accessed 8 Oct 2019.
Stalans LJ, Henry GT (1994) Societal views of justice for adolescents accused of murder: inconsistency between community sentiment and automatic legislative transfers. Law Hum Behav 18(6):675–696. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01499331
Stevenson MC, Bottoms BL (2009) Race shapes perceptions of juvenile offenders in criminal court. J Appl Soc Psychol 39(7):1660–1689. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00499.x
Stobbs G, Kebbell M (2003) Jurors' perception of witnesses with intellectual disabilities and the influence of expert evidence. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil 16(2):107–114. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1468-3148.2003.00151.x
Tang CM (2018) Children and crime. Rowman & Littlefield, Lanham
Tang CM, Nunez N, Bourgeois M (2009) Effects of trial venue and pre-trial bias on the evaluation of juvenile defendants. Crim Justice Rev 34(2):210–225
Tang CM, Turner K (2013) Defendant age, pretrial bias, and crime severity influence the judgment of juvenile waiver cases. Am J Forensic Psychol 31(4):5–25
Taylor V (2004) Maddox, 366 F.3d 992 (9th Cir. 2004)
Toth J (2002) What happened to Johnnie Jordan? The story of a child turning violent. The Free Press, New York
Trowbridge BC (2003) Suggestibility and confessions. Am J Forensic Psychol 21(1):5–23
Wiley TA, Bottoms BL (2009) Effects of defendant sexual orientation on jurors’ perceptions of child sexual assault. Law Hum Behav 33(1):46–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-008-9131-2
Wilson C (2017), Study: “Adultification” has black girls facing harsher punishments. ABA J, 20
Woody W, Forrest KD (2009) Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors' verdicts, recommended sentences, and perceptions of confession evidence. Behav Sci Law 27(3):333–360. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.8
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the IRB of Stockton University and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Finally, informed consent was obtained from all participants included in the study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, C.M., Nunez, N. & Estrada-Reynolds, V. Intellectual Disability Affects Case Judgment Differently Depending on Juvenile Race. J Police Crim Psych 35, 228–239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09355-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-019-09355-0