Skip to main content

Criminal Justice Decisions and People with Intellectual Disabilities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Decision Making by Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities

Part of the book series: Positive Psychology and Disability Series ((POPD))

  • 878 Accesses

Abstract

In this Chapter, we consider two approaches to criminal justice decisions by people with intellectual disabilities (ID). First, we discuss a status or ‘individual differences’ approach, which has been used to examine why some people with ID may be more likely than their peers, or their general population (GP) counterparts, to engage in illegal behaviour. We illustrate this approach with studies relating to moral and prosocial decision making. Second, we discuss a functional approach, which has been used in studies that seek to examine the process through which some people with ID become convicted offenders. This approach is illustrated through examples of studies relating to understanding of the Miranda rights (USA) or caution (England and Wales), to appreciation of the significance of decisions made during police interviewing and at court, and to understanding of the terminology, actors, and proceedings of magistrates’ (lower) courts in England and Wales. Throughout, practical implications of the findings of each study are highlighted. We conclude by drawing attention to some of the methodological problems that currently limit the progress of research relating to criminal justice decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1988). Assessing patients’ capacities to consent to treatment. The New England Journal of Medicine, 319, 1635–1638.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P. S., & Grisso, T. (1995). The MacArthur Treatment Competence Study - I: Mental illness and competence to consent to treatment. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 105–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beccaria, C., & Caso, A. (2013). On crimes and punishments. Branden Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirne, P. (1993). Inventing criminology: Essays on the rise of “Homo Criminalis”. State University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, J. (2017). An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. Anados Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, C. S. (2006). Pro-social decision making in men with learning disabilities. PhD Thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. C. H. (2003). ‘Psychological vulnerabilities’ of adults with mild learning disabilities: Implications for suspects during police detention and interviewing. PhD Thesis. London: King’s College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. C. H., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1991). Recall and understanding of the caution and rights in police detention among persons of average intellectual ability and persons with mild mental handicap. In Proceedings of the 1st Annual Conference of the Division of Criminological and Legal Psychology, 1, pp. 34–42. Leicester: British Psychological Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. C. H., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). Devising and piloting an experimental version of the “Notice to Detained Persons”. Royal Commission on Criminal Justice, Research Study No. 7. H.M.S.O.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. C. H., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1993). Interrogative suggestibility, confabulation, and acquiescence in people with mild learning disabilities (mental handicap): Implications for reliability during police interrogations. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 32, 295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. C. H., & Gudjonsson, G. H. (1995). The vulnerability of suspects with intellectual disabilities during police interviews: A review and experimental study of decision making. Mental Handicap Research (Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities), 8, 110–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clare, I. C. H., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Harari, P. M. (1998). Understanding of the current police caution (England and Wales). Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 8, 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D. J., & Philip, L. (1998). Comprehending the Scottish caution: Do offenders understand their right to remain silent? Legal and Criminological Psychology, 3, 13–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, L., Maras, K., Hawken, T., Mulcahy, S., & Memon, A. (2016). Experiences of autism spectrum disorder and policing in England and Wales: Surveying Police and the Autism Community. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46(6), 2028–2041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., & Van Court, B. (1995). Prosocial Development in Late Adolescence: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66(4), 1179–1197.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg-Berg, N., & Hand, M. (1979). The relationship of preschoolers’ reasoning about prosocial moral conflicts to prosocial behavior. Child Development, 50, 356–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England & Wales in the Act not England and Wales Mental Capacity (England & Wales) 2005. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2005/9/contents.

  • Ericson, K. L., & Perlman, N. B. (2001). Knowledge of legal terminology and court proceedings in adults with developmental disabilities. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 529–545.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrington, D. P., & West, D. J. (1995). Effects of marriage, separation and children on offending by adult males. In Z. S. Blau & J. Hagan (Eds.), Current perspectives on aging and the life cycle (Vol. 4: Delinquency and disrepute in the life course, pp. 249–281). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenner, S., Gudjonsson, G. H., & Clare, I. C. H. (2002). Understanding of the current police caution (England and Wales) among suspects in police detention. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulero, S. M., & Everington, C. (1995). Assessing competency to waive Miranda rights in defendants with mental retardation. Law and Human Behavior, 19, 533–543.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrigan, B., Adlam, A. L. R., & Langdon, P. E. (2018). Moral decision making and moral development: Toward an integrative framework. Developmental Review, 49, 80–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C. (2010). Moral development and reality: Beyond the theories of Kohlberg and Hoffman (2nd ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C., Basinger, K. S., & Fuller, D. (1992). Moral maturity: Measuring the development of Sociomoral reflection. Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G., & Goldstein, A. P. (1995). The EQUIP programme: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer-helping approach. Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, J. C., Potter, G., Barriga, A. Q., & Liau, A. K. (1996). Developing the helping skills and prosocial motivation of aggressive adolescents in peer group programs. Aggression and Violent Behavior, I, 283–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women’s development. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, G. H., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1981). Juveniles’ waiver of rights. Legal and psychosocial competence. Plenum Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (1986). Evaluating competencies. Forensic assessments and instruments. Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T. (2003). Evaluating competencies. Forensic assessments and instruments (2nd ed.). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grisso, T., & Appelbaum, P. S. (1998). Assessing competence to consent to treatment: A guide for physicians and other health professionals. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1992). The psychology of interrogations, confessions and testimony. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (1994). Psychological vulnerability: Suspects at risk. In D. Morgan & G. Stephenson (Eds.), Suspicion and silence: The right to silence in criminal investigations. Blackstone Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H. (2003). The psychology of interrogations and confessions. A handbook. John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gudjonsson, G. H., & Petursson, H. (1991). Custodial interrogation: Why do suspects confess and how does it relate to their crime, attitude and personality? Personality & Individual Differences, 12, 295–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hannibal, M., & Mountford, L. (2013). Criminal litigation handbook. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilgendorf, E. L., & Irving, B. (1981). A decision making model of confessions. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock (Ed.), Psychology in legal contexts. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgins, S. (1992). Mental disorder, intellectual deficiency and crime: Evidence from a birth cohort. Archives of General Psychiatry, 49, 476–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irving, B., & Hilgendorf, L. (1980). Police interrogation: The psychological approach. Research Studies No. 1. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stag and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In D. A. Goslin (Ed.), Handbook of socialization theory and research (pp. 347–480). Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2010a). Developing an understanding of the literature relating to the moral development of people with intellectual disabilities. Developmental Review, 112, 629–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Palmer, E. (2010b). The psychometric properties of the Socio-Moral Reflection Measure – Short Form and the Moral Theme Inventory for men with and without intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 1204–1215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. E., Clare, I. C. H., & Murphy, G. H. (2011a). Moral reasoning theory and illegal behaviour by adults with intellectual disabilities. Psychology, Crime & Law, 17, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., Steverson, T., & Palmer, E. J. (2011b). Relationships among moral reasoning, empathy, and distorted cognitions in men with intellectual disabilities and a history of criminal offending. American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 116, 438–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, P. E., Murphy, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., Palmer, E. J., & Rees, J. (2013). An evaluation of the EQUIP Treatment Programme with men who have intellectual or other developmental disabilities. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 26, 167–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaVigna, G. W., & Willis, T. J. (1995). A positive behavioural support model for breaking the barriers to social and community inclusion. Learning Disability Review, 10, 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Law Commission. (2016). Unfit to plead? Volumes 1 and 2. (Report no. 364). H.M.S.O. http://www.lawcom.gov.uk

  • Lindsay, W. R., & Dernevick, M. (2013). Risk and offenders with intellectual disabilities: Reappraising Hodgins (1991) classic study. Criminal Behaviour and Mental Health, 23, 151–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, W. R., & Taylor, J. L. (2018). Historical and theoretical approaches to offending in people with intellectual and developmental disabilities. In W. R. Lindsay & J. L. Taylor (Eds.), Offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 3–20). Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Maras, K., Mulcahy, S., Crane, L., Hawken, T., & Memon, A. (2018). Obtaining best evidence from the autistic interviewee: Police-reported challenges, legal requirements and psychological research-based recommendations. Investigative Interviewing: Research and Practice, 9, 52–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCombie, A. J. L. (2017). Understanding magistrates’ courts: Implications for individuals with intellectual disabilities. PhD Thesis. Cambridge: University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McConville, M., & Hodgson, J. (1993). Custodial legal advice and the right to silence. The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice Research Study No. 16. HMSO.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, E., & Langdon, P. E. (2016). The moral reasoning abilities of men and women with intellectual disabilities who have a history of criminal offending behaviour. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 21(1), 25–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLeod, R., Philpin, C., Sweeting, A., Joyce, L., & Evans, R. (2010). Court experience of adults with mental health conditions, learning disabilities and limited mental capacity. Report 3: At Court. Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G., & Clare, I. C. H. (2003). Adults’ capacity to make legal decisions. In D. Carson & R. Bull (Eds.), Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2nd ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G., & Clare, I. C. H. (2012). Working with offenders or alleged offenders with intellectual disabilities. In E. Emerson, C. Hatton, K. Dickson, R. Gone, A. Caine, & J. Bromley (Eds.), Clinical psychology and people with intellectual disabilities (2nd. ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, G. H., & Mason, J. (2014). People with intellectual disabilities and offending behaviours. In E. Tsakanikos & J. McCarthy (Eds.), Handbook of psychopathology in intellectual disability. Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, S., Gray, N. S., & Snowden, R. J. (2018). In W. R. Lindsay & J. L. Taylor (Eds.), Offenders with intellectual and developmental disabilities (pp. 3–20). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noble, J. H., & Conley, J. W. (1992). Towards an epidemiology of relevant attributes. In R. W. Conley, R. Luckasson, & G. N. Bouthilet (Eds.), The criminal justice system and mental retardation (pp. 17–53). Paul H. Brookes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olley, M. C., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (1993). Competency to understand charter cautions: A preliminary investigation. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Canadian Psychological Association, Montreal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, E. J. (2003). Offending behaviour: Moral reasoning, criminal conduct and the rehabilitation of offenders. Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearse, J., Gudjonsson, G. H., Clare, I. C. H., & Rutter, S. C. (1998). Police interviewing and psychological vulnerabilities: Predicting the likelihood of a confession. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 8, 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1932). The moral judgement of the child. Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pojman, L. P. (2004). Introduction to philosophy: Classical and contemporary readings (3rd ed.). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, G. B., Gibbs, J. C., & Goldstein, A. P. (2001). The EQUIP implementation guide: Teaching youth to think and act responsibly through a peer-helping approach. Research Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smetana, J. G. (2006). Social-cognitive domain theory: Consistencies and variations in children’s moral and social judgements. In M. Millen & J. G. Smetana (Eds.), Handbook of moral development (pp. 119–155). Laurence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza, K., & Kemp, V. (2009). Study of defendants in magistrates’ courts. Ministry of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stams, G. J., Brugman, D., Dekovic, M., van Rosmalen, L., van der Laan, P., & Gibbs, J. C. (2006). The moral judgement of juvenile delinquents: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talbot, J. (2008). No one knows: Report and final recommendations. Prisoners’ voices: Experiences of the criminal justice system by prisoners with learning difficulties and disabilities. Prison Reform Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turiel, E. (1983). The development of social knowledge: Morality and convention. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Underwood, L., Forrester, A., Chaplin, E., & McCarthy, J. (2013). Prisoners with neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of Intellectual Disabilities and Offending Behaviour., 4(1/2), 17–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Someren, M. W., Barnard, Y. F., & Sandberg, J. A. C. (1994). The think aloud method: A practical guide to modeling cognitive processes. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, L. J. (1995). Sexism in Kohlberg’s moral psychology. In W. M. Kurtines & J. L. Gerwirtz (Eds.), Moral development: An introduction (pp. 83–108). Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, T., & Brown, M. (2004). The good lives model and conceptual issues in offender rehabilitation. Psychology, Crime & Law, 10, 243–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1981). Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised (WAIS-R). The Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI). Pearson Assessment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2011). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence – 2nd edition (WAIS-II). NCS Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O. (2004). Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J. McCord (Ed.), Advances in Criminological Theory 13, Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime (pp. 1–37). Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikström, P.-O., & Treiber, K. (2007). The role of self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology, 4(2), 237–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, M., Webb, R. T., & Conti-Ramsden, G. (2020). Developmental language disorders and risk of recidivism among young offenders, The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpp.13299

  • Woodbury-Smith, M. R., Clare, I. C. H., Holland, A. J., Kearns, A., Staufenberg, E., & Watson, P. (2005). A case-control study of offenders with high functioning autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 16, 747–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury-Smith, M. R., Clare, I. C. H., Holland, A. J., & Kearns, A. (2006). High functioning autistic spectrum disorders, offending and other law-breaking: Findings from a community sample. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 17, 108–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodbury-Smith, M. R., Clare, I. C. H., Holland, A. J., Watson, P., Bambrick, M., Kearns, A., & Staufenberg, E. (2010). Circumscribed interests and ‘offenders’ with autism spectrum disorders: A case-control study. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 21, 366–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1996). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD-10). World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2018). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems (ICD-11). World Health Organization. https://icd.who.int/browse11/l-m/en

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Dr Clare Bolton and Dr Andrew McCombie for permission to include data from their doctoral theses and for their comments on the text. We are also grateful to Dr Peter Langdon for information about his RCT of EQUIP.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabel C. H. Clare .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Clare, I.C.H., Murphy, G.H. (2021). Criminal Justice Decisions and People with Intellectual Disabilities. In: Khemka, I., Hickson, L. (eds) Decision Making by Individuals with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities. Positive Psychology and Disability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-74675-9_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics