Abstract
There are substantive differences in international preferences in the medium through which eyewitness identification lineups are administered, but these jurisdictional preferences are not based on evidence. Regardless of whether one medium produces greater identification accuracy, it is the perception of evidence strength by triers of fact that determines its influence in judicial proceedings. Yet, we know little about how lineup mediums are perceived by potential triers of fact. Four-hundred six undergraduate students viewed a video interview of an eyewitness describing an identification that took place with one of three different lineup mediums (live, video, photo) to compare their relative persuasiveness. Participants also directly compared mediums. There was a clear preference for evidence elicited from live lineups in direct comparisons, but not in the experimental conditions. Live lineup superiority beliefs exist in policy and, these data show, in the beliefs of potential witnesses and triers of fact when various lineup mediums are directly compared.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Note. Percentages sum to more than 100% because participants could provide multiple responses.
References
Australian Law Reform Commission (2006) Uniform Evidence Law (ALRC Report 102). Retrieved from http://www.alrc.gov.au/sites/default/files/pdfs/publications/ALRC102.pdf
Bornstein BH (1999) The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out? Law Hum Behav 23:75–91. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1022326807441
Brewer N, Burke A (2002) Effects of testimonial inconsistencies and eyewitness confidence on mock-juror judgments. Law Hum Behav 26:353–364. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015380522722
Brewer N, Palmer MA (2010) Eyewitness identification tests. Leg Criminol Psychol 15:77–96. https://doi.org/10.1348/135532509X414765
Clark SE, Moreland MB, Rush RA (2015) Lineup composition and lineup fairness. In: Valentine T, Davis JP (eds) Forensic facial identification: theory and practice of identification from eyewitnesses, composites and CCTV. John Wiley and Sons, Winchester, pp 127–157
Cutler BL, Fisher RP (1990) Live lineups, videotaped lineups, and photoarrays. Forensic Reports 3:439–449
Cutler BL, Penrod SD, Stuve TE (1988) Jury decision making in eyewitness identification cases. Law Hum Behav 12:41–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064273
Cutler BL, Berman GL, Penrod SD, Fisher RP (1994) Conceptual, practical, and empirical issues associated with eyewitness identification test media. In: Ross DF, Read JD, Toglia MP (eds) Adult eyewitness testimony: current trends and developments. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 163–181
Dent HR, Stephenson GM (1979) Identification evidence: experimental investigations of factors affecting the reliability of juvenile and adult witnesses. In: Farrington DP, Hawkins K, Lloyd-Bostock SM (eds) Psychology, law and legal processes. Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, pp 195–206
Fitzgerald RJ, Price HL, Valentine T (2018) Eyewitness identification: live, photo, and video lineups. Psychol Public Policy Law 24:307–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/law0000164
Home Office (2017) Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) Code D. Retrieved from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/pace-code-d-2017
Kerstholt JH, Koster ER, van Amelsvoort AG (2004) Eyewitnesses: a comparison of live, video, and photo line-ups. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 19:15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02813869
Peters DP (1991) The influence of stress and arousal on the child witness. In: Doris J (ed) The suggestibility of children’s recollections: implications for eyewitness testimony. American Psychological Association, Washington, pp 60–76
Pike G, Brace N, Kynan S (2002) The visual identification of suspects: procedures and practice. Home Office Briefing Note. Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate, London. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download;jsessionid=AC651534A1894C27AEBD75ECE61AC6A3?doi=10.1.1.608.8076&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Rice A, Phillips PJ, Natu V, An X, O’Toole AJ (2013) Unaware person recognition from the body when face identification fails. Psychol Sci 24:2235–2243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797613492986
Rust A, Tredoux C (1998) Identification parades: an empirical survey of legal recommendations and police practice in South Africa. South African Journal of Criminal Justice 11:196–212
S v Moti (1998) SACR 245 (SCA)
Semmler C, Brewer N, Douglass AB (2011) Jurors believe eyewitnesses. In: Cutler BL (ed) Conviction of the innocent: lessons from psychological research. APA Books, Washington, DC, pp 185–209
Valentine T, Heaton P (1999) An evaluation of the fairness of police line-ups and video identifications. Appl Cogn Psychol 13:S59–S72. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.679
Valentine T, Harris N, Piera AC, Darling S (2003) Are police video identifications fair to African-Caribbean suspects? Appl Cogn Psychol 17:459–476. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.880
Valentine T, Hughes C, Munro R (2009) Recent developments in eyewitness identification procedures in the United Kingdom. In: Bull R, Valentine T, Williamson T (eds) Handbook of psychology of investigative interviewing: current developments and future directions. Wiley, Chichester, pp 221–240
Yarmey AD (1986) Verbal, visual, and voice identification of a rape suspect under different levels of illumination. J Appl Psychol 71:363–370
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Price, H.L., Harvey, M.B., Anderson, S.F. et al. Evidence for the Belief in Live Lineup Superiority. J Police Crim Psych 34, 263–269 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9305-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-018-9305-x