Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Does Metformin Reduce Cancer Risks? Methodologic Considerations

  • Diabetes Epidemiology (NM Maruthur, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Diabetes Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The substantial burden of cancer and diabetes and the association between the two conditions has been a motivation for researchers to look for targeted strategies that can simultaneously affect both diseases and reduce their overlapping burden. In the absence of randomized clinical trials, researchers have taken advantage of the availability and richness of administrative databases and electronic medical records to investigate the effects of drugs on cancer risk among diabetic individuals. The majority of these studies suggest that metformin could potentially reduce cancer risk. However, the validity of this purported reduction in cancer risk is limited by several methodological flaws either in the study design or in the analysis. Whether metformin use decreases cancer risk relies heavily on the availability of valid data sources with complete information on confounders, accurate assessment of drug use, appropriate study design, and robust analytical techniques. The majority of the observational studies assessing the association between metformin and cancer risk suffer from methodological shortcomings and efforts to address these issues have been incomplete. Future investigations on the association between metformin and cancer risk should clearly address the methodological issues due to confounding by indication, prevalent user bias, and time-related biases. Although the proposed strategies do not guarantee a bias-free estimate for the association between metformin and cancer, they will reduce synthesis of and reporting of erroneous results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance •• Of major importance

  1. Bloom DE, Cafiero ET, Jané-Llopis E, Abrahams-Gessel S, Bloom LR, Fathima S, et al. The global economic burden of non-communicable diseases. Geneva: World Economic Forum, 2011.

  2. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C, Rebelo M, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136(5):E359–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Giovannucci E, Harlan DM, Archer MC, Bergenstal RM, Gapstur SM, Habel LA, et al. Diabetes and cancer: a consensus report. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(7):1674–85.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Algire C, Zakikhani M, Blouin MJ, Shuai JH, Pollak M. Metformin attenuates the stimulatory effect of a high-energy diet on in vivo LLC1 carcinoma growth. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2008;15(3):833–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anisimov VN, Berstein LM, Egormin PA, Piskunova TS, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA, et al. Effect of metformin on life span and on the development of spontaneous mammary tumors in HER-2/neu transgenic mice. Exp Gerontol. 2005;40(8–9):685–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Azoulay L, Dell’Aniello S, Gagnon B, Pollak M, Suissa S. Metformin and the incidence of prostate cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011;20(2):337–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Currie CJ, Poole CD, Gale EA. The influence of glucose-lowering therapies on cancer risk in type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2009;52(9):1766–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Libby G, Donnelly LA, Donnan PT, Alessi DR, Morris AD, Evans JM. New users of metformin are at low risk of incident cancer: a cohort study among people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2009;32(9):1620–5.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YD, Park KG, Lee YS, Park YY, Kim DK, Nedumaran B, et al. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis through AMP-activated protein kinase-dependent regulation of the orphan nuclear receptor SHP. Diabetes. 2008;57(2):306–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Madiraju AK, Erion DM, Rahimi Y, Zhang XM, Braddock DT, Albright RA, et al. Metformin suppresses gluconeogenesis by inhibiting mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase. Nature. 2014;510(7506):542–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Algire C, Amrein L, Zakikhani M, Panasci L, Pollak M. Metformin blocks the stimulative effect of a high-energy diet on colon carcinoma growth in vivo and is associated with reduced expression of fatty acid synthase. Endocr Relat Cancer. 2010;17(2):351–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben Sahra I, Laurent K, Loubat A, Giorgetti-Peraldi S, Colosetti P, Auberger P, et al. The antidiabetic drug metformin exerts an antitumoral effect in vitro and in vivo through a decrease of cyclin D1 level. Oncogene. 2008;27(25):3576–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ben Sahra I, Regazzetti C, Robert G, Laurent K, Le Marchand-Brustel Y, Auberger P, et al. Metformin, independent of AMPK, induces mTOR inhibition and cell-cycle arrest through REDD1. Cancer Res. 2011;71(13):4366–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Foretz M, Hebrard S, Leclerc J, Zarrinpashneh E, Soty M, Mithieux G, et al. Metformin inhibits hepatic gluconeogenesis in mice independently of the LKB1/AMPK pathway via a decrease in hepatic energy state. J Clin Investig. 2010;120(7):2355–69.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gallagher EJ, LeRoith D. Diabetes, cancer, and metformin: connections of metabolism and cell proliferation. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2011;1243:54–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gotlieb WH, Saumet J, Beauchamp MC, Gu J, Lau S, Pollak MN, et al. In vitro metformin anti-neoplastic activity in epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;110(2):246–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Suissa S, Azoulay L. Metformin and the risk of cancer: time-related biases in observational studies. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2665–73. This study offers a thorough explanation on time-related biases in studies on metformin and cancer.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Suissa S, Dell’aniello S, Vahey S, Renoux C. Time-window bias in case–control studies: statins and lung cancer. Epidemiology. 2011;22(2):228–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang XL, Ma RC, So WY, Kong AP, Xu G, Chan JC. Addressing different biases in analysing drug use on cancer risk in diabetes in non-clinical trial settings—what, why and how? Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012;14(7):579–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Patorno E, Patrick AR, Garry EM, Schneeweiss S, Gillet VG, Bartels DB, et al. Observational studies of the association between glucose-lowering medications and cardiovascular outcomes: addressing methodological limitations. Diabetologia. 2014;57(11):2237–50. This paper provides a detailed overview of limitations and biases in pharmacoepidemiological studies of anti-hyperglycemic medications and cardiovascular events.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Targownik LE, Suissa S. Understanding and avoiding immortal-time bias in gastrointestinal observational research. Am J Gastroenterol. 2015.

  22. Lai SW, Liao KF, Chen PC, Tsai PY, Hsieh DP, Chen CC. Antidiabetes drugs correlate with decreased risk of lung cancer: a population-based observation in Taiwan. Clin Lung Cancer. 2012;13(2):143–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Levesque LE, Hanley JA, Kezouh A, Suissa S. Problem of immortal time bias in cohort studies: example using statins for preventing progression of diabetes. BMJ. 2010;340:b5087.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhou Z, Rahme E, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L. Survival bias associated with time-to-treatment initiation in drug effectiveness evaluation: a comparison of methods. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;162(10):1016–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yang X, Chan JC. Metformin and the risk of cancer in type 2 diabetes: methodological challenges and perspectives. Ann Transl Med. 2014;2(6):52.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang X, Weng J. Increased cancer risk with drug use among patients with diabetes: are the biased methods the culprit? J Diabetes Investig. 2012;3(6):479–80.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ray WA. Evaluating medication effects outside of clinical trials: new-user designs. Am J Epidemiol. 2003;158(9):915–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mamtani R, Pfanzelter N, Haynes K, Finkelman BS, Wang X, Keefe SM, et al. Incidence of bladder cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with metformin or sulfonylureas. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(7):1910–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mazzone PJ, Rai H, Beukemann M, Xu M, Jain A, Sasidhar M. The effect of metformin and thiazolidinedione use on lung cancer in diabetics. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:410.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Smiechowski BB, Azoulay L, Yin H, Pollak MN, Suissa S. The use of metformin and the incidence of lung cancer in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(1):124–9.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Badrick E, Renehan AG. Diabetes and cancer: 5 years into the recent controversy. Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(12):2119–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Bosco JL, Silliman RA, Thwin SS, Geiger AM, Buist DS, Prout MN, et al. A most stubborn bias: no adjustment method fully resolves confounding by indication in observational studies. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63(1):64–74.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Morden NE, Liu SK, Smith J, Mackenzie TA, Skinner J, Korc M. Further exploration of the relationship between insulin glargine and incident cancer: a retrospective cohort study of older Medicare patients. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(9):1965–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ko EM, Sturmer T, Hong JL, Castillo WC, Bae-Jump V, Funk MJ. Metformin and the risk of endometrial cancer: a population-based cohort study. Gynecol Oncol. 2015;136(2):341–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kowall B, Rathmann W, Kostev K. Are sulfonylurea and insulin therapies associated with a larger risk of cancer than metformin therapy? A retrospective database analysis. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):59–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsilidis KK, Capothanassi D, Allen NE, Rizos EC, Lopez DS, van Veldhoven K, et al. Metformin does not affect cancer risk: a cohort study in the U.K. clinical practice research datalink analyzed like an intention-to-treat trial. Diabetes Care. 2014;37(9):2522–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Smiechowski B, Azoulay L, Yin H, Pollak MN, Suissa S. The use of metformin and colorectal cancer incidence in patients with type II diabetes mellitus. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013;22(10):1877–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin HC, Kachingwe BH, Lin HL, Cheng HW, Uang YS, Wang LH. Effects of metformin dose on cancer risk reduction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 6-year follow-up study. Pharmacotherapy. 2014;34(1):36–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. van Staa TP, Patel D, Gallagher AM, de Bruin ML. Glucose-lowering agents and the patterns of risk for cancer: a study with the General Practice Research Database and secondary care data. Diabetologia. 2012;55(3):654–65. This study demonstrates how patients with diabetes using different anti-hyperglycemic medications have different underlying risks (presence of confounding by indication) and as result, they should not be compared.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. But A, Wang H, Mannisto S, Pukkala E, Haukka J. Assessing the effect of treatment duration on the association between anti-diabetic medication and cancer risk. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e113162.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Qiu H, Rhoads GG, Berlin JA, Marcella SW, Demissie K. Initial metformin or sulphonylurea exposure and cancer occurrence among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(4):349–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ruiter R, Visser LE, van Herk-Sukel MP, Coebergh JW, Haak HR, Geelhoed-Duijvestijn PH, et al. Lower risk of cancer in patients on metformin in comparison with those on sulfonylurea derivatives: results from a large population-based follow-up study. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(1):119–24.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Becker C, Meier CR, Jick SS, Bodmer M. Case–control analysis on metformin and cancer of the esophagus. Cancer Causes Control. 2013;24(10):1763–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Hagberg KW, McGlynn KA, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Jick S. Anti-diabetic medications and risk of primary liver cancer in persons with type II diabetes. Br J Cancer. 2014;111(9):1710–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Margel D, Urbach D, Lipscombe LL, Bell CM, Kulkarni G, Austin PC, et al. Association between metformin use and risk of prostate cancer and its grade. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(15):1123–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Walker JJ, Johnson JA, Wild SH. Diabetes treatments and cancer risk: the importance of considering aspects of drug exposure. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2013;1(2):132–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Dowling RJ, Niraula S, Stambolic V, Goodwin PJ. Metformin in cancer: translational challenges. J Mol Endocrinol. 2012;48(3):R31–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was support by the NIDDK-funded Baltimore Diabetes Research Center (P30DK079637).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Chieh Yeh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Asieh Golozar, Shuiqing Liu, Joeseph A. Lin, Kimberly Peairs, Hsin-Chieh Yeh declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Diabetes Epidemiology

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Golozar, A., Liu, S., Lin, J.A. et al. Does Metformin Reduce Cancer Risks? Methodologic Considerations. Curr Diab Rep 16, 4 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0697-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-015-0697-z

Keywords

Navigation