Abstract
This paper deals with the use of original sources in mathematics education, with emphasis on preservice teachers’ education and the exploration of historical texts. In this context, there is a real challenge, for both teachers and learners, to conduct both ‘synchronic’ and ‘diachronic’ reading. As reported extensively in research, learners seem to have a strong propensity to focus on and to ‘translate’ the texts into modern mathematics, which makes it difficult to deepen both their understanding of history and their own set of conceptualizations. Rather than propose practical solutions, in the paper we explore a theoretical positioning that may help us think differently about these difficulties and, ultimately, provide articulated and different avenues for interventions. Drawing on the philosophy of language of Mikhaïl Bakhtin and Valentin Voloshinov, the idea is to question the Saussurean perspective that underpins the notions of synchrony and diachrony. From this theoretical perspective, we propose to think about the challenges associated with the reading of historical texts in terms of the ethical stance of answerability and engagement in the context of preservice mathematics teachers’ education, and we suggest envisioning a third possible reading, namely, that of the educator.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
HPM is the International Study Group on the Relations between the History and Pedagogy of Mathematics, affiliated with the International Commission on Mathematical Instruction (ICMI) (see International Mathematical Union, 2022).
More details on this Saussurean analyses of the prospective teachers’ tendency to deploy a reading based on a modern synchronic plan can be found in the report by Guillemette (2016). These analyses are part of a larger empirical study concerning the description of the prospective teachers’ lived experiences when engaging in the reading of historical texts (see Guillemette, 2017).
As de Saussure contends: “In separating language from speaking we are at the same time separating: (1) what is social from what is individual; and (2) what is essential from what is accessory and more or less accidental” (1916/1959, p. 14).
On the one hand, it is important to be aware that Bakhtin and his close collaborators do not propose a unified and precise theory, but an articulated epistemological position which is applied in quite heteroclite domains. On the other hand, it is also important to be aware of the important polemic around the authorship of this corpus. The origin of the various texts that appeared under the name of Bakhtin and the existence of a single and homogeneous Bakhtinian corpus are now discussed among literary scholars (see Bronckart & Bota, 2011).
References
Arcavi, A., & Isoda, M. (2007). Learning to listen: From historical sources to classroom practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9075-8
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: Four essays. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/1772435
Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/3684926
Bakhtin, M. M. (1993). Toward a philosophy of the act. University of Texas Press. https://doi.org/10.7560/765344-004. Originally published in 1986.
Barbin, É. (2011). Dialogism in mathematical writing: Historical, philosophical and pedagogical issues. In V. Katz, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), MAA notes, (Vol. 78, pp. 9–16). MAA.
Barbin, É., Guillemette, D., & Tzanakis, C. (2020). History of mathematics and education. In S. Lerman (Ed.), Encyclopedia of mathematics education (2nd ed., online). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_69
Barbin, É. (1997). Histoire et enseignement des mathématiques: Pourquoi ? Comment ? Bulletin De L’association Mathématique Du Québec, 37(1), 20–25.
Barbin, É. (2014). Une approche bakhtinienne des textes d’histoire des sciences. In A. L. Rey (Ed.), Méthode et histoire : Quelle histoire font les historiens des sciences et des techniques? (pp. 217–232). Garnier. https://doi.org/10.15122/isbn.978-2-8124-1421-3.p.0217
Bråting, K. (2019). Development of school algebra: A comparison between the 1980 and 2011 Swedish mathematics curricula. In E. Barbin, U. T. Jankvist, & T. H. Kjeldsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ESU 8 (pp. 711–726). Metropolitan University.
Bronckart, J.-P., & Bota, C. (2011). Bakhtin démasqué. Librairie Droz.
Clark, K., Kjeldsen, T. H., Schorcht, S., Tzanakis, C., & Wang, X. (2016). History of mathematics in mathematics education: Recent developments. In L. Radford, F. Furinghetti, & T. Hausberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 HPM meeting (pp. 135–179). IREM de Montpellier.
de Saussure, F. (1959). Course in general linguistics. Philosophical Library. Originally published in 1916.
Dentith, S. (2005). Bakhtinian thought. Routledge.
Djebbar, A. (2005). L’algèbre arabe : La genèse d’un art. Vuibert.
Fauvel, J., & van Maanen, J. (Eds.). (2002). History in mathematics education: The ICMI study. Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47220-1
Fried, M. N. (2000). Some difficulties in incorporating history of mathematics in teaching-training. In A. Ahmed, J. M. Kraemer, & H. Williams (Eds.), Proceedings of the CIEAEM 51 (pp. 73–78). Cultural diversity in mathematics education: Horwood Publishing Limited.
Fried, M. N. (2007). Didactics and history of mathematics: Knowledge and self-knowledge. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 66(2), 203–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-006-9025-5
Fried, M. N. (2008). History of mathematics in mathematics education: A Saussurean perspective. The Montana Mathematics Enthusiast, 5(2), 185–198. https://doi.org/10.54870/1551-3440.1100
Fried, M. N. (2018). Ways of relating to the mathematics of the past. Journal of Humanistic Mathematics, 8(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.5642/jhummath.201801.03
Fried, M. N., Guillemette, D., & Jahnke, H. N. (2016). Theoretical and/or conceptual frameworks for integrating history in mathematics education. In L. Radford, F. Furinghetti, & T. Hausberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 HPM meeting (pp. 211–230). IREM de Montpellier.
Grattan-Guinness, I. (2004). History or heritage? An important distinction in mathematics and for mathematics education. The American Mathematical Monthly, 111(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.2307/4145010
Guillemette, D. (2016). Quelques difficultés rencontrées dans la formation des enseignants du secondaire à l’aide de l’histoire des mathématiques : Une réflexion sur les modalités de lecture de textes historiques. MENON: Journal of Educational Research, [Special issue], 94–111.
Guillemette, D. (2017). History of mathematics in secondary school teachers’ training: Towards a nonviolent mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 96(3), 349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-017-9774-3
Guillemette, D. (2019). Being in research and doing research on history and mathematics education in a Bakhtinnian dialogical perspective. In E. Barbin, U. T. Jankvist, & T. H. Kjeldsen (Eds.), Proceedings of ESU 8 (pp. 91–106). Metropolitan University.
Gurevitch, Z. D. (1988). The other side of dialogue: On making the other strange and the experience of otherness. American Journal of Sociology, 93(5), 1179–1199. https://doi.org/10.1086/228868
Hegel, G. W. F. (1977). Phenomenology of spirit. Oxford University Press. Originally published in 1807.
International Mathematical Union. (2022). Organization—Affiliated Organizations—HPM. Retrieved April 8, 2022, from https://www.mathunion.org/icmi/organization/affiliated-organizations/hpm. Accessed 8 Apr 2022
Jahnke H. N. (1994). The historical dimension of mathematical understanding: Objectifying the subjective. In J. P. da Ponte, & J. F. Mato (Eds.), Proceedings of PME-18 (vol. 1, pp. 139–156). University of Lisbon.
Jahnke, H. N. (2014). History in mathematics education: A hermeneutic approach. In M. N. Fried & T. Dreyfus (Eds.), Mathematics & mathematics education: Searching for common ground (pp. 75–88). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7473-5_6
Jahnke, H. N., Arcavi, A., Barbin, E., Bekken, O., Furinghetti, F., El Idrissi, A., Silva da Silva, C. M., & Weeks, C. (2002). The use of original sources in the mathematics classroom. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI study (pp. 291–328). Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-306-47220-1_9
Jankvist, U. T. (2009). A categorization of the “whys” and “hows” of using history in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9174-9
Neuwirth, S. (2016). Un cours musique et mathématiques. In L. Radford, F. Furinghetti, & T. Hausberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 HPM meeting (pp. 715–725). IREM de Montpellier.
Radford, L. (2021a). The theory of objectification A Vygotskian perspective on knowing and becoming in mathematics teaching and learning. Brill/Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004459663
Radford, L. (2021b). Mathematics teaching and learning as an ethical event. La Matematica e La Sua Didattica, 29(2), 185–198.
Radford, L., & Santi, G. (2022). Learning as a critical encounter with the other: Prospective teachers conversing with the history of mathematics. ZDM Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01393-z
Rodriguez, O. H., & Lopez Fernandez, J. M. (2010). A semiotic reflection on the didactics of the Chain rule. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 7(2), Article 10. Retrieved April 8, 2022, from https://scholarworks.umt.edu/tme/vol7/iss2/10. Accessed 8 Apr 2022
Vauthier, B. (2002). Bakhtine et/ou Saussure ? » ou de l’histoire du malentendu des « malentendus saussuriens. Cahiers Ferdinand De Saussure, 55, 241–266.
Voloshinov, V. N. (1973). Marxism and the philosophy of language. Seminar Press. Originally published in 1929.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge the support of the Fond de Recherche du Québec—Société et Culture and the Conseil de Recherches en Sciences Humaines du Canada/Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Guillemette, D., Radford, L. History of mathematics in the context of mathematics teachers’ education: a dialogical/ethical perspective. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 1493–1505 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01437-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01437-4