Abstract
Many international studies focus empirically on integrating the history of mathematics in mathematics education. Over the last 2 decades, some studies also revealed theoretical elements concerning the implementation of learning sessions and/or their didactical analysis and effectiveness. This paper has the aim of complementing these empirical studies with a more systematic approach in the French context. Defended for decades within the IREM (Institut de recherche sur l’enseignement des mathématiques), the history of mathematics is now officially introduced in the French curriculum. Nevertheless, is it really sufficient for teachers to change their habits by implementing the history of mathematics in their practices? To answer this question, I first present an unpublished survey with secondary school mathematics teachers (pupils from 10- to 18 years old) about the introduction of the history of mathematics in their classes. This survey allows the comparison of teachers’ desires (‘history of mathematics in potentiality’) and realities in classrooms (‘history of mathematics in actuality’). Then I focus on French mathematics textbooks (for pupils from 15- to 18 years old) in order to question their effectiveness as tools for the introduction of a historical perspective. I describe the historical/mathematical tasks available in these textbooks focusing on their reference to Fibonacci. Finally, I present a proposition to implement the history of mathematics in mathematics education starting from the textbooks, aiming to help mathematics teachers to redesign the tasks of their textbooks so as to be more relevant.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In this study, I did not address the classroom use of mathematics textbooks and its impact. Numerous international studies showed how teachers and students use (or do not use) textbooks, as well as how they are used in class. See, e.g., the international comparative study by Pepin and Haggarty (2001) or more recent surveys (Fan et al., 2013, 2018; Schubring & Fan, 2018).
In the following, I do not differentiate the results of the survey between middle and high schools, except in the case where a clear difference between the two is observed. I then mention it explicitly.
In France, a teaching sequence takes about 2 weeks and is generally devoted to a mathematical theme, including an activity, a lesson, exercises, and assessments.
The question I asked was: “Have you already set up a reading of ancient texts with your pupils?”.
Jankvist (2009a, 2009b) identified three different approaches to including history: illumination approaches (the teaching and learning of mathematics is supplemented by succinct historical information such as names, biographical information, or narratives stories), modules approaches (instructional units devoted to history, and quite often, based on case studies, original sources), and history-based approaches (in which mathematical concepts and results are presented in the order of their historical appearance, and HM is used to structure courses, though not necessarily explicitly). In the following, I use this terminology.
I keep here the main idea advocated by Tzanakis et al. (2000), namely, “in a genetic approach, the emphasis is less on how to use theories, methods and concepts, and more why they provide an answer to specific mathematical problems and questions, without however disregarding the ‘technical’ role of mathematical knowledge” (p. 209).
In the following, I focus only on the Liber Abbaci even though I could obviously have mentioned other of Fibonacci’s works, and in particular his important Practica Geometriae for the numerous geometric problems (Hughes, 2008; Moyon, 2017). I cite Fibonacci (2020) as reference to the Latin edition of the Liber Abbaci (with this spelling, except in references and citations where I kept the original spelling), Sigler (2002) as reference to the English translation, and Moyon (2016) as reference to the French translation (only excerpts).
Tzanakis et al., (2000, pp. 214–215) proposed another categorization for what they call “historical snippets” in textbooks according to their format and their content. This categorization is really interesting as a first approach, for example, when it is necessary to analyze textbooks in pre-service teacher training.
It would be the case for any other name of a mathematician to whom a mathematical result (theorem, proof, or reasoning) or a mathematical object has been attributed.
The methodological remarks of Chemla (2021) about textual anachronism in the HM are particularly relevant to the work on Fibonacci’s texts.
A folio of an original manuscript (Biblioteca Nazionale di Firenze, Codice magliabechiano Conv. Soppr. C 1, 2616, fol. 124r.) is available on Wikipedia showing the excerpt on the Rabbit problem. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonardo_Fibonacci#/media/Fichier:Liber_abbaci_magliab_f124r.jpg.
We could stop the mathematical activity here. Then I would be in a task of the acting past type (remain in the past, historical information, mathematical acting), of which there are very few according to Fig. 1.
Fried et al. (2016, p. 216) present hermeneutics as the “art or the science of interpreting texts”. Following basic guidelines, this procedure is based on the systematic distinction between the author and the reader of a text. It considers both the historical perspective and the modern conception of a mathematical topic. From this tension, a deeper understanding of both the mathematics itself and the HM result (Barnett et al., 2014, p. 23).
Scientific knowledge and practices are time-dependent: they have a historical origin and developed through history. Even if we can only observe—indirectly—the effects of the past thanks to primary sources (manuscripts for example), it is necessary to identify them as being part of history (and not only as an anecdote, a legend, or a myth). See, for example, Barbin’s work on the historicity of evidence and demonstration (as cited in Guitart, 2018).
The relation between the Eye of Horus and fractions must be questioned. In particular, Ritter (2003) argued that “the ‘Horus-eye fractions’ were, in their origin at least, neither fractions nor associated with the Eye of Horus (p. 297)”.
An explanation of the text was made by Dunton and Grimm (1966). It is useful for modern readers who do not know medieval Latin.
See, in particular, the notions of circularity, condescension and recapitulation developed by Herreman (2018).
References
Antibi, A. (2019). Transmath première. Nathan.
Arnaud, D., Fournet-Fayas, T., Gringoz, H., Magana, L., Martin-Meriadec, E., Milan, P., & Hascoët, M. (2020). Mathématiques spécialité terminale. Magnard.
Barbazo, É., & Barnet, C. (2020). Terminale mathématiques. Hachette.
Barnett, J. H., Lodder, J., & Pengelley, D. (2014). The pedagogy of primary historical sources in mathematics: Classroom practice meets theoretical frameworks. Science & Education, 23(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-013-9618-1
Beltramone, J. P. (2019). Déclic 2de mathématiques. Hachette.
Boyé, A., Demattè, A, Lakoma, E., & Tzanakis, C. (2011). The history of mathematics in school textbooks. In É. Barbin, M. Kronfellener, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), History and epistemology in mathematics education. Proceedings of the Sixth European Summer university ESU 6 (pp. 153–163). Holzhausen.
Brann, E. T. H. (1979). Paradoxes of education in a Republic. The University of Chicago Press.
Cantor, M. (1880). Vorlesungen über Geschichte der Mathematik. Teubner.
Castaneda, A., Aguilar, M. S., Gómez-Blancarte, A. L., Romo-Vázquez, A., Lezama-Andalón, J., & Miranda-Viramontes, I. (2019). Representations of Mathematicians in Lower Secondary Mathematics Textbooks, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(7), em1716. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/106056.
Chemla, K. (2021). From reading rules to reading algorithms: Textual anachronisms in the history of mathematics and their effects on interpretation. In N. Guicciardini (Ed.), Anachronisms in the history of mathematics: Essays on the historical interpretation of mathematical texts (pp. 42–82). Cambridge University Press.
Clark, K. M., Kjeldsen T. H., Schorcht, S., & Tzanakis, C. (2019). History of mathematics in mathematics education—An overview. Mathematica Didactica, 42(1), 1–26. http://www.mathematica-didactica.com/Pub/md_2019/md_2019_Clark_Kjeldsen_Schorcht_Tzanakis-1.pdf
De Sousa, P. (2020). Terminale mathématiques expertes. Le livre scolaire.
Dunton, M., & Grimm, R. E. (1966). Fibonacci on Egyptian fractions. The Fibonacci Quarterly, 4, 339–354.
El Idrissi, A. (2006). L’histoire des mathématiques dans les manuels scolaires. In N. Bednarz & C. Mary (Eds.), Actes du colloque EMF 2006 L’enseignement des mathématiques face aux défis de l’école et des communautés (pp. 1–12). Université de Sherbrooke.
Erdös, P. (1950). Az \(\frac{1}{{x}_{1}}+\frac{1}{{x}_{2}}+\dots +\frac{1}{{x}_{n}}=\frac{a}{b}\) egyenlet egész számú megoldásairól [On a diophantine equation] (in Hungarian with an English summary). Matematikai Lapok, 1(3), 192–210
Eren, M., Bulut, M., & Bulut, N. (2015). A content analysis study about the usage of history of mathematics in textbooks in Turkey. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(1), 53–82. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2015.1305a
Fan, L., & Li, N. (2020). How are mathematicians as part of mathematics history represented in contemporary Chinese school mathematics textbooks? Inovacije u Nastavi—Časopis Za Savremenu Nastavu, 33(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.5937/inovacije2001107L
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: development status and directions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
Fan, L., Trouche, L., Qi, C., Rezat, S., & Visnovska, J. (Eds.). (2018). Research on mathematics textbooks and teachers’ resources: Advances and issues. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73253-4
Fibonacci, L. (2020). Liber abbaci. Giusti, E. (Ed.). Olschki.
Fried, Μ. (2001). Can mathematics education and history of mathematics coexist? Science & Education, 10(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011205014608
Fried, M. N., Guillemette, D., & Jahnke, H. N. (2016). Theoretical and/or conceptual frameworks for integrating history in mathematics education. In L. Radford, F. Furinghetti, & T. Hausberger (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2016 ICME satellite meeting of the international study group on the relations between the history and pedagogy of mathematics (pp. 211–230). IREM de Montpellier.
Furinghetti, F. (2020). Rethinking history and epistemology in mathematics education. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 51(6), 967–994. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020739X.2019.1565454
Gardes, M. L. (2010). Démarche d’investigation en arithmétique, entre essais et conjectures. Un exemple en classe de terminale scientifique. Petit x, 83, 51–78.
Gardes, M. L., & Mizony, M. (2012). La conjecture d’Erdös-Straus: Expérimentation en classe et travail du chercheur. Repères IREM, 87, 79–90.
Guitart, R. (2018). Évelyne Barbin, entre épistémologie, histoire et enseignement. In J. Auvinet, G. Moussard, & X. SaintRaymond (Eds.), Circulation: Mathématiques, histoire, enseignement (pp. 221–240). PULIM.
Herreman, A. (2018). Aux sources du ‘théorème du perroquet’ : sur l’intérêt pour l’histoire des mathématiques, Images des mathématiques, CNRS. https://images.math.cnrs.fr/Aux-sources-du-theoreme-du-perroquet.html
Hughes, B. (2008). Fibonacci’s De Practica Geometrie. Springer.
Imhausen, A. (2016). Mathematics in Ancient Egypt: A contextual history. Princeton University Press.
Jankvist, U. T. (2009b). A categorization of the “whys” and “hows” of using history in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 71(3), 235–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-008-9174-9
Jankvist, U. T. (2010). An empirical study of using history as a “goal.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 74(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-009-9227-8
Jankvist, U. T., Clark, K. M., & Mosvold, R. (2020). Developing mathematical knowledge for teaching teachers: Potentials of history of mathematics in teacher educator training. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(3), 311–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-09424-x
Jankvist, U. T. (2009a). Using history as a “goal” in mathematics education, PhD Dissertation, Roskilde University, Department of Science, Systems and Models, IMFUFA. http://thiele.ruc.dk/imfufatekster/pdf/464.pdf
Ju, M. K., Moon, J. E., & Song, R. J. (2016). History of mathematics in Korean mathematics textbooks: Implication for using ethnomathematics in culturally diverse school. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(7), 1321–1338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-015-9647-0
Lakoma, E. (2002). History of mathematics in curricula and school: A case study of Poland. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI study (pp. 19–29). Springer.
Lucas, É. (1877). Recherches sur plusieurs ouvrages de Léonard de Pise et sur diverses questions d’arithmétique supérieure. Imprimerie des sciences mathématiques et physiques.
Ministry of National Education. (2019a). Decree of January 17, 2019a published in the special BO n° 1 (January 22, 2019a).
Ministry of National Education (2019b). Decree of July 19, 2019b published in the special BO n° 8 (July 25, 2019b).
Moyon, M. (2012). Algèbre & Practica geometriae en Occident médiéval latin: Abū Bakr, Fibonacci et Jean de Murs. In S. Rommevaux, M. Spiesser, & M. R. Massa Esteve (Eds.), Pluralité de l’algèbre à la Renaissance (pp. 33–65). Honoré Champion.
Moyon, M. (2016). Fibonacci: Extraits du livre de calcul (Liber abaci). ACL-Kangourou.
Moyon, M. (2017). La géométrie de la mesure dans les traductions arabo-latines médiévales. Brepols.
Moyon, M. (2019a). Récréations mathématiques et algorithmique dans le Liber abaci de Fibonacci (XIIIe siècle). In N. Chevalarias, M. Gandit, M. Morales, & D. Tournès (Eds.), Mathématiques récréatives : éclairages historiques et épistémologiques (pp. 225–252). UGA Éditions-EDP Sciences.
Moyon, M., & Spiesser, M. (2015). L’arithmétique des fractions dans l’œuvre de Fibonacci: Fondements & usages. Archive for History of Exact Sciences, 69(4), 391–427. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00407-015-0155-y
Moyon, M. (2019b). Teaching mathematics and algorithmics with recreational problems: The ‘Liber Abaci’ of Fibonacci. In É. Barbin, U. T. Jankvist, T. H. Kjeldsen, B. Smestad, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings of the eighth European summer university on history and epistemology in mathematics education (pp. 417–436). Oslo Metropolitan University.
Pepin, B., & Haggarty, L. (2001). Mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: A way to understand teaching and learning cultures. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 33(5), 158–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02656616
Poncy, M., & Vieudrin, D. (2019). Mathématiques seconde. Bordas.
Rezat, S., Fan, L., & Pepin, B. (2021). Mathematics textbooks and curriculum resources as instruments for change. ZDM Mathematics Education, 53(6), 1189–1206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-021-01309-3
Ritter, J. (2003). Closing the eye of Horus: The rise and fall of ‘Horus-eye fractions.’ In A. Imhausen & J. Steele (Eds.), Under one sky: Astronomy and mathematics in the ancient near East (pp. 297–323). Ugarit-Verlag.
Schorcht, S. (2018a). Typisierung mathematikhistorischer Beispiele in deutschen Mathematikschulbüchern der Klassenstufen 1 bis 7. WTM.
Schorcht, S. (2018b). History of mathematics in German mathematics textbooks: Typology of tasks. In K. M. Clark, T. H. Kjeldsen, S. Schorcht, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Mathematics, education and history: Towards a harmonious partnership (pp. 143–162). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73924-3_8
Schubring, G., & Fan, L. (2018). Recent advances in mathematics textbook research and development: An overview. ZDM — Mathematics Education, 50(5), 765–771. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0979-4
Sigler, L. E. (2002). Fibonacci’s Liber Abaci. Springer.
Siu, M. K. (2006). No, I don’t use history of mathematics in my class: Why? In F. Furinghetti, S. Kaijser, & C. Tzanakis (Eds.), Proceedings HPM 2004 & ESU 4 (revised edition, pp. 268–277). University of Crete.
Smestad, B. (2000a). The introduction of history of mathematics in Norwegian schools. In W. S. Horng & F. L. Lin (Eds.), Proceedings of the HPM conference on history in mathematics education: Challenges for a new millennium. A satellite meeting of ICME-9 (vol. 2, pp. 27–30). National Taiwan Normal University.
Smestad, B. (2000b). History of mathematics in Norwegian textbooks. In presentation by distribution at WGA 13 (History and culture in mathematics education), ICME 9, Makuhari, Japan.
Sylvester, J. J. (1880). On a point in the theory of vulgar fractions. American Journal of Mathematics, 3(4), 332–335.
Thomaidis, Y., & Tzanakis, C. (2010). The implementation of the history of mathematics in the new curriculum and textbooks in Greek secondary education. In V. Durand-Guerrier, S. Soury-Lavergne, & F. Arzarelo (Eds.), Proceedings of CERME 6 (pp. 2801–2810). Institut National de Recherche Pédagogique.
Tzanakis, C., Arcavi, A., Correia de Sa, C., Isoda, M., Lit, C. K., Niss, M., Pitombeira de Carvalho, J., Rodriguez, M., & Siu, M. K. (2000). Integrating history of mathematics in the classroom: An analytic survey. In J. Fauvel & J. van Maanen (Eds.), History in mathematics education: The ICMI study (pp. 201–240). Springer.
Xenofontos, C., & Papadopoulos, C. E. (2015). Opportunities of learning through the history of mathematics: the example of national textbooks in Cyprus and Greece. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 16(2), 1–18. http://www.cimt.org.uk/journal/xenofontos.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 13.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Moyon, M. Desire of teachers and realities in textbooks: dealing with history of mathematics in the new French curriculum and its impact on teacher training. ZDM Mathematics Education 54, 1613–1630 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01427-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01427-6