Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Combining scaffolding for content and scaffolding for dialogue to support conceptual breakthroughs in understanding probability

  • Original Article
  • Published:
ZDM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we explore the relationship between scaffolding, dialogue, and conceptual breakthroughs, using data from a design-based research study that focuses on the development of understanding of probability in 10–12 year old students. The aim of the study is to gain insight into how the combination of scaffolding for content using technology and scaffolding for dialogue can facilitate conceptual breakthroughs. We analyse video-recordings and transcripts of pairs and triads of students solving problems using the TinkerPlots software with teacher interventions, focusing on moments of conceptual breakthrough. Data show that dialogue scaffolding promotes both dialogue moves specific to the context of probability and dialogue in itself. This paper focuses on episodes of learning that occur within dialogues framed and supported by dialogue scaffolding. We present this as support for our claim that combining scaffolding for content and scaffolding for dialogue can be effective in students’ conceptual development. This finding contributes to our understanding of both scaffolding and dialogic teaching in mathematics education by suggesting that scaffolding can be used effectively to prepare for conceptual development through dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The dialogic imagination: four essays by M.M. Bakhtin (trans: Emerson, C., & Holquist, M.). Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays (trans: McGee, V. W.) Austin: University of Texas Press.

  • Ben-Zvi, D. (2006). Scaffolding students’ informal inference and argumentation. In A. Rossman & B. Chance (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on teaching of statistics (CD-ROM), Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 2–7 July, 2006. Voorburg: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21–34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P., Confrey, J., diSessa, A., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2003). Design experiments in educational research. Educational Researcher, 32, 9–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, L., Mercer, N., & Wegerif, R. (2000). Thinking together: a programme of activities for developing speaking, listening and thinking skills for children aged 8–11. Birmingham: Imaginative Minds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillon, J. T. (Ed.). (1988). Questioning and discussion: a multidisciplinary study. Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández, M., Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Rojas-Drummond, S. M. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “scaffolding” and the zone proximal development in the context of symmetrical collaborative learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction, 36, 40–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzallen, N., & Watson, J. (2010). Developing statistical reasoning facilitated by TinkerPlots. In C. Reading (Ed.), Proceedings of the eight international conference for teaching statistics. Lbjubjana: International Statistical Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Francisco, J. M., & Maher, C. A. (2005). Conditions for promoting reasoning in problem solving: insights from a longitudinal study. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24, 361–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guzdial, M. (1994). Software-realized scaffolding to facilitate programming for science learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horvath, J., & Lehrer, R. (1998). A model-based perspective on the development of children’s understanding of chance and uncertainty. In S. P. LaJoie (Ed.), Reflections on statistics: agendas for learning, teaching, and assessment in K-12 (pp. 121–148). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazak, S., Wegerif, R., & Fujita, T. (2013). ‘I get it now!’ Stimulating insights about probability through talk and technology. Mathematics Teaching, 235, 29–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kazak, S., Wegerif, R., & Fujita, T. (2015). The importance of dialogic processes to conceptual development in mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics,. doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9618-y.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. (1989). Informal conceptions of probability. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 59–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C., Harradine, A., & Kazak, S. (2007). Understanding distributions by modeling them. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 12, 217–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konold, C. & Kazak, S. (2008). Reconnecting data and chance. Technology innovations in statistics education, vol. 2. http://repositories.cdlib.org/uclastat/cts/tise/vol2/iss1/art1. Accessed 10 December 2008.

  • Konold, C. & Miller, C. D. (2011). TinkerPlots2.0: dynamic data exploration. Emeryville: Key Curriculum.

  • Konold, C., Pollatsek, A., Well, A., Lohmeier, J., & Lipson, A. (1993). Inconsistencies in probabilistic reasoning of novices. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24, 392–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., Angotti, R. L., & Tarr, J. (2010). Making comparisons between observed data and expected outcomes: students’ informal hypothesis testing with probability simulation tools. Statistics Education Research Journal, 9(1), 68–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Makar, K., Bakker, A., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2011). The reasoning behind informal statistical inference. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 13, 152–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: how we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 137–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Polaki, M. V. (2002). Using instruction to identify key features of Basotho elementary students’ growth in probabilistic thinking. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 4, 285–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D. (2000). Making sense of the total of two dice. Journal of Research in Mathematics Education, 31, 602–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, D., Johnston-Wilder, P., Ainley, J., & Mason, J. (2008). Local and global thinking in statistical inference. Statistics Education Research Journal, 7(2), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quintana, C., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Krajcik, J., Fretz, E., Duncan, R. G., et al. (2004). A scaffolding design framework for software to support science inquiry. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 337–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiser, B. J. (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 13, 273–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rojas-Drummond, S. M., & Mercer, N. (2003). Scaffolding the development of effective collaboration and learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 39, 99–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit, J. & Van Eerde, H. A. A. (2011). A teacher’s learning process in dual design research: learning to scaffold language in a multilingual mathematics classroom, ZDM—The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 43, 889–900.

  • Smit, J., Van Eerde, H. A. A., & Bakker, A. (2013). A conceptualisation of whole-class scaffolding. British Educational Research Journal, 39, 817–834.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: the development of higher mental processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (trans: Kozulin, A.). Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Watson, J. M., & Moritz, J. B. (2003). A longitudinal study of students’ beliefs and strategies for making judgments. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 34, 270–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2007). Dialogic, education and technology: expanding the space of learning. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2011). From dialectic to dialogic: a response to Wertsch and Kazak. In T. Koschmann (Ed.), Theorizing practice: theories of learning and research into instruction practice (pp. 201–222). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wegerif, R. (2013). Dialogic: education for the internet age. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D., Bruner, J., & Ross, G. (1976). The role of tutoring in problem solving. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 17, 89–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a Marie Curie Intra European Fellowship within the 7th European Community Framework Programme to S. Kazak and R. Wegerif. We would also like to acknowledge the generous support of the schools, teachers and students who worked with us on this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Education, Pamukkale University, 20070, Denizli, Turkey

    Sibel Kazak

  2. Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK

    Rupert Wegerif & Taro Fujita

Authors
  1. Sibel Kazak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rupert Wegerif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Taro Fujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sibel Kazak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kazak, S., Wegerif, R. & Fujita, T. Combining scaffolding for content and scaffolding for dialogue to support conceptual breakthroughs in understanding probability. ZDM Mathematics Education 47, 1269–1283 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0720-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-015-0720-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation