Skip to main content
Log in

Isomorphic limit ultrapowers for infinitary logic

  • Published:
Israel Journal of Mathematics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The logic \({\mathbb{L}}_\theta ^1\) was introduced in [She12]; it is the maximal logic below \({{\mathbb{L}}_{\theta, \theta}}\) in which a well ordering is not definable. We investigate it for θ a compact cardinal. We prove that it satisfies several parallels of classical theorems on first order logic, strengthening the thesis that it is a natural logic. In particular, two models are \({\mathbb{L}}_\theta ^1\)-equivalent iff for some ω-sequence of θ-complete ultrafilters, the iterated ultrapowers by it of those two models are isomorphic.

Also for strong limit λ>θ of cofinality \({\aleph _0}\), every complete \({\mathbb{L}}_\theta ^1\)-theory has a so-called special model of cardinality λ, a parallel of saturated. For first order theory T and singular strong limit cardinal λ, T has a so-called special model of cardinality λ. Using “special” in our context is justified by: it is unique (fixing T and λ), all reducts of a special model are special too, so we have another proof of interpolation in this case.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. C. C. Chang and H. J. Keisler, Model Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundation of Mathematics, Vol. 73, North–Holland, Amsterdam, 1973.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Ehrenfeucht and A. Mostowski, Models of axiomatic theories admitting automorphisms, Fundamenta Mathematicae 43 (1956), 50–68.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. H. Gaifman, Elementary embeddings of models of set-theory and certain subtheories, in Axiomatic Set Theory, Part II, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 13, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1974, pp. 33–101.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. W. Hodges and S. Shelah, Infinite games and reduced products, Annals of Mathematical Logic 20 (1981), 77–108.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. H. J. Keisler, Ultraproducts and elementary classes, Indagationes Mathematicae 64 (1961), 477–495.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. H. J. Keisler, Limit ultrapowers, Transactions of the American Mathematical Society 107 (1963), 382–408.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Kochen, Ultraproducts in the theory of models, Annals of Mathematics 74 (1961), 221–61.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. J. A. Makowsky, Compactness, embeddings and definability, in Model-Theoretic Logics, Perspectives in Mathematical Logic, Springer, New York, 1985, pp. 645–716.

    Google Scholar 

  9. S. Shelah, Model theory for a compact cardinal, https://arxiv.org/abs/1303.5247.

  10. S. Shelah, Every two elementarily equivalent models have isomorphic ultrapowers, Israel Journal of Mathematics 10 (1971), 224–233.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. S. Shelah, Nice infinitary logics, Journal of the American Mathematical Society 25 (2012), 395–427.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Shelah, A.E.C. with not too many models, in Logic Without Borders, Ontos Mathematical Logic, Vol. 5, de Gruyter, Berlin–Boston, MA, 2015, pp. 367–402.

    Google Scholar 

  13. R. M. Solovay, Strongly compact cardinals and the gch, in Proceedings of the Tarski Symposium, Berkeley 1971, Proceedings of Symposia in Pure Mathematics, Vol. 25, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1974, pp. 365–372.

    Google Scholar 

  14. J. Väänänen, Models and Games, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 132, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author thanks Alice Leonhardt for the beautiful typing. We thank the referee for many helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saharon Shelah.

Additional information

The author would like to thank the Israel Science Foundation for partial support of this research (Grant No. 1053/11). References like [She12, 2.11=La18] means we cite from [She12], Claim 2.11 which has label La18; this helps if [She12] will be revised.

This paper was separated from [She] which was first typed May 10, 2012; so was IJM 7367. This is the author’s paper no. 1101.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shelah, S. Isomorphic limit ultrapowers for infinitary logic. Isr. J. Math. 246, 21–46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-021-2226-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-021-2226-x

Navigation