Abstract
In this paper, we explore two notions of stationary processes — uniform martingales and random Markov processes. We show that every stationary process on a countable alphabet that is a uniform martingale and is dominated by a finite measure on that alphabet is also a random Markov process, and that the random look-back times and associated coupling can be chosen so that the distribution on the present given both the n-past and a look-back time of n is ‘deterministic’: all probabilities are in {0, 1}. In the case of finite alphabets, those random Markov processes for which the look-back time can be chosen with finite expected value are characterized. For stationary processes on an uncountable alphabet, a stronger condition is also considered which is sufficient to imply that a process is a random Markov processes. In addition, a number of examples are given throughout to show the sharpness of the results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
K. Alexander and S. Kalikow, Random stationary processes, Ann. Probab. 20 (1992), 1174–1198.
H. Berbee, Chains with infinite connections: uniqueness and Markov representation, Probab. Theory Related Fields 76 (1987), 243–253.
N. Berger, C. Hoffman and V. Sidoravicius, Nonuniqueness for specifications in 2+e, ArXiv e-prints (2008).
M. Bramson and S. Kalikow, Nonuniqueness in g-functions, Israel J. Math. 84 (1993), 153–160.
P. Bühlmann and A. J. Wyner, Variable length Markov chains, Ann. Statist. 27 (1999), 480–513.
W. Doeblin and R. Fortet, Sur des châines à liaisons complètes, Bull. Soc. Math. France 65 (1937), 132–148.
F. Ferrari and A. Wyner, Estimation of general stationary processes by variable length Markov chains, Scand. J. Statist. 30 (2003), 459–480.
A. Galves and F. Leonardi, Exponential inequalities for empirical unbounded context trees, in In and Out of Equilibrium. 2, Progr. Probab., Vol. 60, Birkhäuser, Basel, 2008, pp. 257–269.
P. Hulse, An example of non-unique g-measures, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 26 (2006), 439–445.
A. Johansson, A. Öberg and M. Pollicott, Countable state shifts and uniqueness of gmeasures, Amer. J. Math. 129 (2007), 1501–1511.
S. Kalikow, Random Markov processes and uniform martingales, Israel J. Math. 71 (1990), 33–54.
S. Kalikow, Infinite partitions and Rokhlin towers, Ergodic Theory and Dynamical Systems 32 (2012), 707–738.
S. Kalikow, Y. Katznelson and B. Weiss, Finitarily deterministic generators for zero entropy systems, Israel J. Math. 79 (1992), 33–45.
S. Kalikow and R. McCutcheon, An Outline of Ergodic Theory, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics, Vol. 122, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2010.
M. Keane, Strongly mixing g-measures, Invent. Math. 16 (1972), 309–324.
G. Maillard, Introduction to Chains with Complete Connections, Lecture notes, 2007 <https://www.i2m.univ-amu.fr/maillard/Greg/Publications files/main.pdf>.
R. D. Mauldin and M. Urbański, Gibbs states on the symbolic space over an infinite alphabet, Israel J. Math. 125 (2001), 93–130.
O. Onicescu and G. Mihoc, Sur les châines statistiques, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris 200 (1935), 511–512.
W. Parry, Generators and strong generators in ergodic theory, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 72 (1966), 294–296.
W. Parry, Entropy and Generators in Ergodic Theory, W. A. Benjamin, Inc., New York–Amsterdam, 1969.
M. Rahe, On a class of generalized baker’s transformations, Canad. J. Math. 45 (1993), 638–649.
M. Rahe, On finite coding factors of a class of random Markov chains, Canad. Math. Bull. 37 (1994), 399–407.
V. A. Rohlin, Generators in ergodic theory. II, Vestnik Leningrad. Univ. 20 (1965), 68–72.
O. M. Sarig, Thermodynamic formalism for countable Markov shifts, Ergodic Theory Dynam. Systems 19 (1999), 1565–1593.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The second author was supported in part by the Heilbronn Institute for Mathematical Research.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bushaw, N., Gunderson, K. & Kalikow, S. Random Markov processes for countable and uncountable alphabets. Isr. J. Math. 216, 181–214 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-016-1407-5
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11856-016-1407-5