Abstract
Continuous casting of high-strength steels is challenging owing to peritectic phase transformation during solidification. This transformation is reported to be either diffusion controlled or “massive” like. The experimental evidence suggests that constant thermal gradients lead to diffusion-controlled phenomena, whereas the concentric solidification technique induces massive transformation. Diffusion-controlled peritectic solidification is more desirable during continuous casting to ensure a suitable cast quality compared with massive transformation. Accordingly, the authors demonstrate a general one-dimensional numerical modeling of the solidification process in steel by incorporating a diffusion-controlled peritectic phase transformation. The model is dynamically linked with the FactSage thermodynamic database through ChemAppV 7.1.4 library for input of accurate thermodynamic data. The modeling details are presented for a binary Fe-C system, and the results are compared with the experimental data available in the literature. The growth and dissolution of phases are accurately predicted as a function of composition and cooling rate.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
C.G. Lee, S. Kim, B. Song, and S. Lee, Met. Mater. Int. 8, 435 (2002).
O. Matsumura, Y. Sakuma, and H. Takechi, ISIJ Int. 32, 1014 (1992).
Z. Li and D. Wu, ISIJ Int. 46, 121 (2006).
T. Saeki, S. Ooguchi, S. Mizoguchi, T. Yamamoto, H. Misumi, and A. Tsuneoka, Tetsu-to-Hagané 68, 1773 (1982).
S. Moon, The peritectic phase transition and continuous casting practice (Doctor of Philosophy thesis, Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, 2015). https://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/4350.
Y. Ueshima, S. Mizoguchi, T. Matsumiya, and H. Kajioka, Metall. Trans. B 17, 845 (1986).
T. Matsumiya, H. Kajioka, S. Mizoguchi, Y. Ueshima, and H. Esaka, Trans. Iron Steel Inst. Jpn. 24, 873 (1984).
Y.J. Choi, Non-Equilibrium Solidification of δ-TRIP Steel (Pohang: Pohang University of Science and Technology, 2011).
H.M. Lee, J.S. Bae, J.R. Soh, S.K. Kim, and Y.D. Lee, Mater. Trans. JIM 39, 633 (1998).
K.S. Chuang and D. Reinisch, Met. Trans. A 6, 235 (1975).
H. Shibata, Y. Arai, M. Suzuki, and T. Emi, Metall. Mater. Trans. B 31, 981 (2000).
H. Yasuda, T. Nagira, M. Yoshiya, A. Sugiyama, N. Nakatsuka, M. Kiire, M. Uesugi, K. Uesugi, K. Umetani, and K. Kajiwara, IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 33, 012036 (2012).
S. Griesser, C. Bernhard, and R. Dippenaar, Acta Mater. 81, 111 (2014).
Y.M. Won and B.G. Thomas, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 32, 1755 (2001).
H. Fredriksson and J. Stjerndahl, Met. Sci. 6, 575 (1982).
L. Thuinet and H. Combeau, Comput. Mater. Sci. 45, 294 (2009).
L. Thuinet and H. Combeau, Comput. Mater. Sci. 45, 285 (2009).
C.W. Bale, E. Bélisle, P. Chartrand, S.A. Decterov, G. Eriksson, K. Hack, I.H. Jung, Y.B. Kang, J. Melançon, A.D. Pelton, C. Robelin, and S. Petersen, Calphad 33, 295 (2009).
M. Paliwal and I.H. Jung, J. Cryst. Growth 394, 28 (2014).
M. Paliwal, D.H. Kang, E. Essadiqi, and I.H. Jung, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 45, 3596 (2014).
M. Paliwal and I.H. Jung, Acta Mater. 61, 4848 (2013).
M. Paliwal, D.H. Kang, E. Essadiqi, and I.H. Jung, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 45, 3308 (2014).
D.M. Stefanescu, ISIJ Int. 46, 786 (2006).
S. Arrhenius, Zeitschrift Für Phys. Chemie 4, 226 (1889).
H.G. Landau, Q. Appl. Math. 8, 81 (1950).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Das, I.M.M., Kumar, N. & Paliwal, M. Numerical Modeling of Diffusion-Based Peritectic Solidification in Iron Carbon System and Experimental Validation. JOM 71, 2780–2790 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03442-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-019-03442-7